Annual report of the Commissioner of Corporations and Taxation.

Since 1923 to [1948], publisher statement changed as : publication of this document approved by the Commission on Administration and Finance.

Life insurance taxation,

"An address delivered before the North Dakota tax association, Grand Forks, N.D."

Final report to the Congress on life insurance company taxation.

Item 925.

Federal income taxation of farmers, June, 1961 /

Bibliographical footnotes.

Cape May County Board of Taxation, Cape May Court House, New Jersey.

"September 1995"--P. iii.

Municipal income taxation in the United States.

Mode of access: Internet.

The ideologies of taxation.

Mode of access: Internet.

A concise history of U.S. federal taxation /

"June 14, 1990."

The economic effects of capital gains taxation : a Joint Economic Committee study /

"June 1997."

Questionnaire survey of VDT operators at the New York State Departments of Motor Vehicles and Taxation and Finance /

Cover title.

Taxation under the A. A. A. (Agricultural adjustment administration)

Mode of access: Internet.

Taxation of couples: a mirrleesian approach for non-unitary households

Optimal tax theory in the Mirrlees’ (1971) tradition implicitly relies on the assumption that all agents are single or that couples may be treated as individuals, despite accumulating evidence against this view of household behavior. We consider an economy where agents may either be single or married, in which case choices result from Nash bargaining between spouses. In such an environment, tax schedules must play the double role of: i) defining households’ objective functions through their impact on threat points, and; ii) inducing the desired allocations as optimal choices for households given these objectives. We find that the taxation principle, which asserts that there is no loss in relying on tax schedules is not valid here: there are constrained efficient allocations which cannot be implemented via taxes. More sophisticated mechanisms expand the set of implementable allocations by: i) aligning the households’ and planner’s objectives; ii) manipulating taxable income elasticities, and; iii) freeing the design of singles’ tax schedules from its consequences on households’ objectives.

Relationship between franking credits and the market risk premium

In a dividend imputation tax system, equity investors have three potential sources of return: dividends, capital gains and franking (tax) credits. However, the standard procedures for estimating the market risk premium (MRP) for use in the capital asset pricing model, ignore the value of franking credits. Officer (1994) notes that if franking credits do affect the corporate cost of capital, their value must be added to the standard estimates of MRP. In the present paper, we explicitly derive the relationship between the value of franking credits (gamma) and the MRP. We show that the standard parameter estimates that have been adopted in practice (especially by Australian regulators) violate this deterministic mathematical relationship. We also show how information on dividend yields and effective tax rates bounds the values that can be reasonably used for gamma and the MRP. We make recommendations for how estimates of the MRP should be adjusted to reflect the value of franking credits in an internally consistent manner.