Sensitivity of an immunoenzymatic test for detection of ant-L. brasiliensis antibodies compared to other tests used for the diagnosis of American cutaneous leishmaniasis

The diagnosis of American cutaneous leishmaniasis (ACL) is frequently based on clinical and epidemiological data associated with the results of laboratory tests. Some laboratory methods are currently being applied for the diagnosis of ACL, among them the indirect immunofluorescence reaction (IIFR), the Montenegro skin test (MST), histopathological examination, and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The performance of these methods varies in a considerable proportion of patients. After the standardization of an immunoenzymatic test (ELISA) for the detection of IgG in the serum of patients with ACL using a crude Leishmania braziliensis antigen, the results obtained were compared to those of other tests routinely used for the diagnosis. The tests revealed the following sensitivity, when analyzed separately: 85% for ELISA IgG, 81% for PCR, 64.4% for MST, 58.1% for IIFR, and 34% for the presence of parasites in the biopsy. ELISA was positive in 75% of patients with ACL presenting a negative MST, in 84.8% of ACL patients with negative skin or mucous biopsies for the presence of the parasite, and in 100% of cases with a negative PCR. Thus, ELISA presented a higher sensitivity than the other tests and was useful as a complementary method for the diagnosis of ACL.

Self-diagnosis of active head lice infestation by individuals from an impoverished community: high sensitivity and specificity

To compare sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of self-diagnosis for head lice infestation with visual inspection, we conducted a study in an urban slum in Brazil. Individuals were asked about active head lice infestation (self-diagnosis); we performed visual inspection and thereafter wet combing (gold standard). Of the 175 individuals included, 77 (44%) had an active head lice infestation. For self-diagnosis, sensitivity (80.5%), specificity (91.8%), PPV (88.6%) and NPV (85.7%) were high. Sensitivity of visual inspection was 35.1%. Public health professionals can use self-diagnosis as a diagnostic tool, to estimate accurately prevalence of pediculosis in a community, and to monitor ongoing intervention strategies.

Specificity and Sensitivity of Screening for Anti-HLA Antibodies in Kidney Allograft Dysfunction

BACKGROUND: Prospective testing for posttransplant circulating anti-HLA antibodies seems to be a critical noninvasive tool, but confirmatory data are lacking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over the last 3 years, peritubular capillary (PTC) C4d deposition was prospectively sought by an immunofluorescence technique applied to frozen tissue in biopsies obtained for allograft dysfunction. Screening for circulating anti-HLA class I/II alloantibodies (AlloAb) by the flow cytometric test was performed simultaneously. RESULTS: We evaluated 132 sets of biopsies and simultaneous serum samples. PTC C4d deposition was demonstrated in 15.9% (21/132) of biopsies. Circulating anti-HLA I/II AlloAb were detected in 25% (33/132) of serum samples. Employing receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves for all C4d-positive biopsies, screening for AlloAb showed a global specificity of 82% and sensitivity of 61.9%. When this analysis was restricted to biopsies obtained in the first month posttransplantation, the sensitivity increased to 81.8%, but the specificity decreased to 76.9%. After the first month posttransplantation, we observed sensitivity of 40.0% and a specificity of 86.4%. In the first month posttransplantation, all patients with a diagnosis of acute antibody-mediated rejection displayed circulating anti-HLA class I/II, but not always at the same time as the C4d-positive biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: In the first month posttransplantation, prospective monitoring of anti-HLA antibodies may be useful. The high sensitivity allows the identification of patients at risk, affording an earlier diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection. After the first month, the test can be used to evaluate allograft dysfunction episodes, since positivity is highly suggestive of an antibody-mediated process.

C4d Presence in Kidney Allograft Biopsy: Sensitivity and Specifity of Immunoperoxidase vs Immunofluorescence

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the sensitivity/specificity of immunoperoxidase method in comparison with the standard immunofluorescence. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective review of 87 biopsies made for allograft dysfunction. Immunofluorescence (IF) was performed in frozen allograft biopsies using monoclonal antibody anti-C4d from Quidel®. The indirect immunoperoxidase (IP) technique was performed in paraffin-embebbed tissue with polyclonal antiserum from Serotec®. Biopsies were independently evaluated by two nephropathologist according Banff 2007 classification. RESULTS: By IF, peritubular C4d deposition were detected in 60 biopsies and absent in 27 biopsies. The evaluation of biopsy by IP was less precise due to the presence of background and unspecific staining. We find 13.8% (12/87) of false negative and Banff classification concordance in 79.3% (69/87) of cases (table1). The ROC curve study reveal a specificity of 100% and sensitivity of 80.0 % of IP method in relation to the gold standard (area under curve:0.900; 95% Confidence interval :0.817-0.954; p=0.0001). Banff Classification C4d Cases Immunofluorescence Immunoperoxidase n =87 Diffuse Negative 3 (3.4%) Focal Negative 9 (10.3%) Negative Negative 27 (31.0%) Diffuse Diffuse 33 (37.9%) Focal Focal 9 (10.3%) Diffuse Focal 6 (6.9%) CONCLUSION: The IP method presents a good specificity, but lesser sensitivity to C4d detection in allograft dysfunction. The evaluation is more difficult, requiring more experience of the observer than IF method. If frozen tissue is unavailable, the use of IP for C4d detection is acceptable.

Effects of UV radiation exposure on DNA and DNA repair enzymes

Dissertação para obtenção do Grau de Mestre em Biotecnologia

Avaliação de funcionamento de duas estações de tratamento de águas residuais do interior de Vila Nova de Gaia

Esta dissertação descreve o trabalho desenvolvido ao longo de um ano e um mês desde a pesquisa teórica até à prática experimental no âmbito da unidade curricular de Dissertação/estágio do Mestrado em Engenharia Química, no ramo Tecnologias em Proteção Ambiental. O tema desta dissertação consiste na avaliação do funcionamento de duas estações de tratamento de águas residuais (ETAR) do interior do município de Vila Nova de Gaia no que diz respeito ao possível aumento da resistência a antibióticos na ETAR de Febros e na ETAR de Lever. Os testes de sensibilidade a antibióticos (TSA) foram executados para ambas as ETAR, sendo as amostras de água recolhidas na entrada e na saída dos reatores biológicos (tratamento secundário). Além disso, foram realizados testes de avaliação da eficiência de desinfeção por radiação ultravioleta (UV) relativamente à Escherichia coli (E. coli) na ETAR de Lever. Os antibióticos selecionados para a realização deste trabalho foram a Eritromicina, a Azitromicina, a Claritromicina, a Ofloxacina, a Ciprofloxacina, o Sulfametoxazol, o Trimetoprim e o Metronidazol. Esta seleção baseou-se no facto de estes serem alguns dos antibióticos mais consumidos e mais persistentes no meio ambiente. A bactéria E. coli (isolada a partir de amostras das águas residuais estudadas) foi escolhida para a realização deste estudo uma vez que está sempre presente nas águas residuais domésticas e está associada a fenómenos de multirresistência a antibióticos. Os testes de TSA foram realizados seguindo a metodologia de difusão por discos. No período do estudo (Março a Junho de 2015) identificaram-se situações quer de aumento de resistência quer de aumento de sensibilidade aos antibióticos testados. As situações mais graves de aumento de resistência, a que corresponderam a halos nulos, verificaram-se para os antibióticos Claritromicina, Trimetoprim e Metronidazol, ocorrendo com maior frequência para os dois últimos, que aliás são fármacos que são administrados em simultâneo. Os períodos mais problemáticos em termos de aumento das resistências foram ligeiramente diferentes nas duas ETAR. No caso da ETAR de Febros correspondeu ao mês Abril e na ETAR de Lever ocorreu entre o final de Abril e o início de Maio. Considera-se que estes períodos poderão coincidir com um aumento do consumo destes fármacos devido à sua utilização no combate a infeções respiratórias muito comuns nesta altura do ano. Não se observou qualquer sensibilidade da E. coli para o Metronidazol porque é um antibiótico com indicação para algumas bactérias anaeróbias, fungos e giardia, e que à partida não tem capacidade para eliminar a E. coli. A eficiência da desinfeção na ETAR de Lever relativamente à remoção de E. coli foi satisfatória. Sendo de salientar a importância da manutenção, no que se refere à identificação de possíveis avarias nas lâmpadas e correspondente limpeza. Os resultados deste trabalho provam a existência de estirpes da bactéria E. coli resistentes a alguns dos antibióticos estudados, o que reforça a importância da desinfeção no tratamento de águas residuais domésticas.