L'argument d'autorité : de sa structure à ses effets

L'argument d'autorité, schème argumentatif fréquent et occupant une place de choix dans toutes les typologies de types d'argument, est ici revu à l'aune des définitions qu'on lui donne. Partant d'une définition classique articulant une proposition P, un locuteur expert X et la conclusion Q «P est vrai», notre analyse suggère que la conclusion de l'argument d'autorité est moins une question de vérité que d'indubitabilité postulée. Cette force rhétorique de l'argument présenté, qui agit comme si toute mise en doute était exclue, est d'autant plus prégnante que la structure même de l'argument d'autorité ne permet pas de mettre en discussion le propos autorisé. En effet, l'immense majorité des exemples d'argument d'autorité dans les manuels d'argumentation montre que l'autorité est assurée au niveau d'une prémisse au sein d'une argumentation d'un autre type, ce qui sert la tentative d'imposer P à l'allocutaire comme allant de soi. Sans considérer le schème comme un sophisme, nous observerons s'il reste un schème identifiable en tant qu'argument d'autorité quand on lui retire les constituants classiques de ce type d'argumentation. Que se passe-t-il si l'expert cité n'est pas présenté comme tel ? Si le locuteur ne prend pas en charge le contenu référentiel de P ? Si P est un fait attesté par un expert et non une opinion ? Si, enfin, le locuteur compte sur sa propre autorité ou présuppose son autorité sans recourir à un tiers expert ou témoin ? Nous interrogeons ces différentes perspectives sur la base d'exemples tirés de la presse écrite, en insistant sur les effets rhétoriques de ce schème plutôt atypique dans son fonctionnement et en montrant l'importance de la modalité épistémique dans l'assertion autoritaire dont le schème de l'argument d'autorité serait une sous-catégorie.

From caging to rouse dynamics in polymer melts with intramolecular barriers: a critical test of the mode coupling theory

By means of computer simulations and solution of the equations of the mode coupling theory (MCT),we investigate the role of the intramolecular barriers on several dynamic aspects of nonentangled polymers. The investigated dynamic range extends from the caging regime characteristic of glass-formers to the relaxation of the chain Rouse modes. We review our recent work on this question,provide new results, and critically discuss the limitations of the theory. Solutions of the MCT for the structural relaxation reproduce qualitative trends of simulations for weak and moderate barriers. However, a progressive discrepancy is revealed as the limit of stiff chains is approached. This dis-agreement does not seem related with dynamic heterogeneities, which indeed are not enhanced by increasing barrier strength. It is not connected either with the breakdown of the convolution approximation for three-point static correlations, which retains its validity for stiff chains. These findings suggest the need of an improvement of the MCT equations for polymer melts. Concerning the relaxation of the chain degrees of freedom, MCT provides a microscopic basis for time scales from chain reorientation down to the caging regime. It rationalizes, from first principles, the observed deviations from the Rouse model on increasing the barrier strength. These include anomalous scaling of relaxation times, long-time plateaux, and nonmonotonous wavelength dependence of the mode correlators.

Rhétorique et cognition : perspectives théoriques et stratégies persuasives

D'une certaine manière, la rhétorique est un art cognitif. L'art de discourir en situation concrète dans l'espoir de faire adhérer l'auditoire à une thèse suppose une forte aptitude cognitive: celle de se représenter la façon dont l'auditoire lui-même se représente une situation rhétorique. Or, à partir du moment où agir sur les représentations d'autrui est facilité par des techniques rhétoriques ou sophistiques, la question de la tromperie verbale s'est immiscée dans des affaires de régulation sociale et, avec elle, des enjeux tant de crédibilité que de crédulité. Dans le cadre démocratique rendant encore plus aiguë une forme de dépendance à l'information d'autrui, la nécessité de croire tout comme la possibilité d'être leurré mettent à l'épreuve tant le fonctionnement social de la Cité que l'évaluation des informations et de leurs auteurs. Le but des contributions de cet ouvrage n'est pas de dénoncer les effets de certains schèmes argumentatifs que d'aucuns jugeraient fallacieux ni d'ajouter une couche nouvelle aux critiques des sophismes, mais d'étudier leur fonctionnement et leurs effets cognitifs hic et nunc. Quels sont les mécanismes langagiers et cognitifs qui expliquent la «performance» des arguments réputés fallacieux? Comment fonctionnent les stratégies rhétoriques à l'intersection entre cognition, sciences du langage et société? Cet ouvrage, issu du colloque Communication et Cognition: manipulation, persuasion et biais dans le langage, tenu à Neuchâtel du 26 au 28 janvier 2011, propose plusieurs propositions originales ou hypothèses stimulantes dans l'espoir qu'elles inspireront tant les chercheurs spécialisés en rhétorique et sciences du langage à aller voir du côté de la psychologie cognitive que les spécialistes de ce domaine à mettre en évidence la rhétoricité de leurs recherches. English version: In a way, rhetoric is a cognitive art. The art of speaking in concrete situations in the hope of gaining the audience's consent on a given issue requires the operation of a cognitive ability: that of being able to represent the way an audience represents itself a rhetorical situation. Nonetheless, once we consider that rhetorical or sophistic techniques influence people's representations, verbal deception becomes a matter of social regulation, together with issues of credibility and credulity. In a democratic context fostering a form of dependence towards other people's information, the necessity of believing everything and the possibility of being duped are challenges for both the social management of the City and the evaluation of information and of its sources. The contribution of the chapters of this volume is neither to be found in the condemnation of the fallacious effects of specific argument schemes nor in the addition of yet another layer to fallacy criticism, but in the study of how fallacies work, hic et nunc. What are the linguistic and cognitive mechanisms at play behind the "performance" of fallacious arguments? How do rhetorical strategies work at the interface of cognition, language science and society? This book gathers papers that were presented during the international conference Communication & Cognition: manipulation, persuasion and biases in language, held at the University of Neuchâtel in January 2011. A number of original proposals and stimulating hypotheses emerge from them: we hope that these will inspire researchers in the language sciences who specialise in rhetoric to take on board cognitive scientific insights but also researchers in cognitive science to engage with the rhetoricity of their own research.

Carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel doublet chemotherapy compared with monotherapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: IFCT-0501 randomised, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Platinum-based doublet chemotherapy is recommended to treat advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in fit, non-elderly adults, but monotherapy is recommended for patients older than 70 years. We compared a carboplatin and paclitaxel doublet chemotherapy regimen with monotherapy in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS: In this multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised trial we recruited patients aged 70-89 years with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC and WHO performance status scores of 0-2. Patients received either four cycles (3 weeks on treatment, 1 week off treatment) of carboplatin (on day 1) plus paclitaxel (on days 1, 8, and 15) or five cycles (2 weeks on treatment, 1 week off treatment) of vinorelbine or gemcitabine monotherapy. Randomisation was done centrally with the minimisation method. The primary endpoint was overall survival, and analysis was done by intention to treat. This trial is registered, number NCT00298415. FINDINGS: 451 patients were enrolled. 226 were randomly assigned monotherapy and 225 doublet chemotherapy. Median age was 77 years and median follow-up was 30.3 months (range 8.6-45.2). Median overall survival was 10.3 months for doublet chemotherapy and 6.2 months for monotherapy (hazard ratio 0.64, 95% CI 0.52-0.78; p<0.0001); 1-year survival was 44.5% (95% CI 37.9-50.9) and 25.4% (19.9-31.3), respectively. Toxic effects were more frequent in the doublet chemotherapy group than in the monotherapy group (most frequent, decreased neutrophil count (108 [48.4%] vs 28 [12.4%]; asthenia 23 [10.3%] vs 13 [5.8%]). INTERPRETATION: Despite increased toxic effects, platinum-based doublet chemotherapy was associated with survival benefits compared with vinorelbine or gemcitabine monotherapy in elderly patients with NSCLC. We feel that the current treatment paradigm for these patients should be reconsidered. FUNDING: Intergroupe Francophone de Cancérologie Thoracique, Institut National du Cancer.

Induced-feeding bioassays for detection of Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal activity against Epilachna paenulata (Coleoptera)

The objective of this work was to establish and test the induced-feeding bioassay in order to detect Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal activity against Epilachna paenulata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Larvae were induced to swallow high concentrations of spore-crystal suspensions of seven exotic and 30 Argentine B. thuringiensis strains. The great majority of strains showed no toxicity to E. paenulata larvae, and observed mortality was lower than 30%. Induced-feeding bioassay is feasible, and should be used for prospecting strains that produce right combinations of Cry proteins needed to an efficient pest control.

Transitoriness in cancer patients: a cross-sectional survey of lung and gastrointestinal cancer patients.

Despite earlier diagnosis and advancements in treatment, cancer remains a leading cause of death in the world (13% of all deaths according to the World Health Organization) among men and women. Cancer accounts for approximately 20% of the deaths in the USA every year. Here, we report the findings from a cross-sectional survey of psychosocial factors in lung and gastrointestinal cancer patients. The aim of the study was to explore the associations among transitoriness, uncertainty, and locus of control (LOC) with quality of life. Transitoriness is defined as a person's confrontation with life's finitude due to a cancer diagnosis. A total of 126 patients with lung or gastrointestinal cancer completed eight self-reporting questionnaires addressing demographics, spiritual perspective, symptom burden, transitoriness, uncertainty, LOC, and quality of life. Transitoriness, uncertainty, and LOC were significantly associated with one another (r = 0.3267, p = 0.0002/r = 0.1994, p = 0.0252, respectively). LOC/belief in chance has a significant inverse relationship with patients' quality of life (r = -0.2505, p = 0.0047). Transitoriness, uncertainty, and LOC were found to have a significant inverse relationship with patients' quality of life (transitoriness state: r = -0.5363, p = 0.0000/trait: r = -0.4629, p = 0.0000/uncertainty: r = -0.4929, p = 0.0000/internal LOC: r = 0.1759, p = 0.0489/chance LOC: r = -0.2505, p = 0.0047). Transitoriness, uncertainty, and LOC are important concepts as they adversely influence patients' quality of life. Incorporating this finding into the care of cancer patients may provide them with the support they need to cope with treatment and maintenance of a positive quality of life.

Osavalmistuksen kustannustehokkuuden arviointi

Tämän diplomityön tarkoituksena oli selvittää osavalmistuksen kustannustehokkuutta Ruukki Engineering Seinäjoen palvelukeskuksessa. Osavalmistuksessa osia leikataan, särmätään ja viimeistellään kokoonpanohitsaukseen soveltuviksi komponenteiksi. Kustannustehokkuuden selvittämisessä käytettiin aikaan perustuvia mittausmenetelmiä, joiden pohjalta laskettiin tuotteen toteutuneita kustannuksia. Toteutuneita kustannuksia verrattiin hinnoittelutaulukoihin. Vertailussa havaittiin, että kaikkia työvaiheita ei ollut hinnoiteltu lainkaan. Erot hinnoittelun ja toteutuneiden kustannusten välillä olivat merkittäviä. Työssä tutkittiin myös jalostavan ajan osuutta kokonaisläpäisyajasta. Mitattuja tietoja verrattiin kahteen aikaisemmin tehtyyn tutkimukseen. Osavalmistuksessa aikaa kuluu paljon välivarastoissa ja työvaiheiden läpäisyajat olivat joidenkin työvaiheiden kohdalla pitkiä. Diplomityön tulokset olivat vertailukelpoisia muiden tutkimustenkanssa ja olivat ennalta asetettujen hypoteesien mukaisia.

Pontos críticos de impacto em linhas de beneficiamento utilizadas para citros no Estado de São Paulo

A produção citrícola brasileira é uma das mais importantes para a fruticultura do País, comercializando principalmente para o mercado externo. O impacto mecânico é um fator importante a ser minimizado, visando a reduzir as perdas pós-colheita, diminuindo conseqüentemente os prejuízos decorrentes do manejo inadequado. Neste trabalho, foram avaliados os pontos críticos e o nível de impacto em que os frutos são submetidos em equipamentos nacionais e importados, utilizados para beneficiamento e classificação de citros. Utilizou-se da esfera instrumentada (70 mm) (Techmark, Inc., Lansing, EUA), com registrador de aceleração, para a avaliação da magnitude de impactos (G, m/s²) nos pontos de transferência das linhas de classificação de laranjas e lima-ácida Tahiti. A esfera instrumentada foi colocada, juntamente com os frutos, na etapa de recebimento das linhas que funcionavam em seu volume padrão diário, e seguiu o fluxo dos frutos até a etapa de classificação. Os resultados demonstraram que os maiores impactos foram causados por quedas em pontos de transferência com superfícies rígidas, sendo os maiores valores encontrados na etapa de recebimento e na entrada dos frutos em "containers" utilizados para o armazenamento. Observou-se, também, que a magnitude de impacto foi significativamente reduzida quando se utilizaram superfícies recobertas com acolchoados nos diversos pontos de transferência.

Doenças e características físicas e químicas pós-colheita em maracujá amarelo de cultivo convencional e orgânico no centro oeste paulista

Após a colheita do maracujá-amarelo, ocorre aumento na suscetibilidade do fruto às podridões e significativa perda de massa fresca. Diante disso, objetivou-se identificar e quantificar as doenças pós-colheita e avaliar as características físicas e químicas de frutos de maracujazeiro-amarelo produzidos em sistemas de cultivo convencional e orgânico. Os frutos foram individualizados e submetidos a 24h de câmara úmida, permanecendo por mais 13 dias a 25±2ºC e 70-80% de UR. As doenças e o índice de murchamento foram avaliados visualmente após a coleta do fruto e a cada três dias. Os frutos também foram caracterizados quanto à espessura da casca, rendimento em polpa e teores de acidez titulável e de sólidos solúveis. A ocorrência de podridões foi elevada, tanto no pomar orgânico como no convencional. A antracnose foi a principal doença, com 100% de incidência nos frutos de ambos os pomares, seguida pela podridão de Fusarium, com 25,5% no convencional e 19,0% no orgânico. Já para a podridão de Phomopsis, a incidência foi superior no pomar convencional (11,0%), comparado ao orgânico (2,0%). Com auxílio de uma escala diagramática, estimou-se a severidade da antracnose, de 34,1% nos frutos orgânicos e de 39,8% nos frutos do pomar convencional. Os frutos orgânicos apresentaram-se maiores, com maior espessura da casca, menor rendimento em polpa e maior teor de sólidos solúveis. O índice de murchamento não diferiu entre os maracujás dos dois sistemas de cultivo. Com base nos resultados obtidos, medidas de controle fitossanitárias no campo e na pós-colheita devem ser adotadas, visando a obter frutos de maior qualidade.