902 resultados para Arab theater


Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The promotion of women’s rights is described as a priority within the external action of the European Union (EU). As a result of the Arab Spring uprisings which have been ongoing since 2011, democracy and human rights have been pushed to the forefront of European policy towards the Euro-Mediterranean region. The EU could capitalise on these transformations to help positively reshape gender relations or it could fail to adapt. Thus, the Arab Spring can be seen to serve as a litmus test for the EU’s women’s rights policy. This paper examines how and to what extent the EU diffuses women’s rights in this region, by using Ian Manners’ ‘Normative Power Europe’ as the conceptual framework. It argues that while the EU tries to behave as a normative force for women’s empowerment by way of ‘informational diffusion’, ‘transference’ ‘procedural diffusion’ and ‘overt diffusion’; its efforts could, and should, be strengthened. There are reservations over the EU’s credibility, choice of engagement and its commitment in the face of security and ideological concerns. Moreover, it seems that the EU focuses more intently on women’s political rights than on their social and economic freedoms.

Proposals for Council Decisions on the conclusion of the Protocol to the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Economic Community and the Principality of Andorra; Protocol to the Cooperation Agreement between the European Economic Community and the People's Democratic Republic of Algeria; Protocol to the Cooperation Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan; Protocol to the Cooperation Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Lebanese Republic; Protocol to the Cooperation Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Syrian Arab Republic; Protocol to the Cooperation Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Arab Republic of Egypt; following the accession of the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden to the European Union (presented by the Commission). Drafts Protocol to the Agreement between the Member States of the European Coal and Steel Community and the People's Democratic Republic of Algeria; Protocol to the Agreement between the Member States of the European Coal and Steel Community and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan; Protocol to the Agreement between the Member States of the European Coal and Steel Community and the Lebanese Republic; Protocol to the Agreement between the Member States of the European Coal and Steel Community and the Syrian Arab Republic; Protocol to the Agreement between the Member States of the European Coal and Steel Community and the Arab Republic of Egypt; following the accession of the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden to the European Union (presented by the Commission). COM (95) 745 final, 12 January 1996

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The European Union (EU) has traditionally taken a rather nuanced view of the activities of Hezbollah. Despite historic links to violent activity, Europe always remained reluctant to place the Lebanese militant group on its list of terrorist organisations. Internal divergences among member states, as well as the strategic-realist goals of the EU in both Lebanon and the Middle East more generally meant that such a listing never materialised. This remained the case even in the initial turmoil following the Arab uprisings, when Hezbollah’s relatively moderating objectives were viewed as a force for stability. However, the EU shifted policy in July 2013 by listing the military wing of Hezbollah as a terrorist entity. This paper will investigate the reasons behind this decision, as well as the likely implications and effectiveness of the new policy. Two principal catalysts were behind the decision. The first was a Hezbollah-linked bombing in Bulgaria which provided the focal point around which a consensus of the EU member states could emerge in the Council. Secondly, the escalation both of the Syrian conflict and Hezbollah’s role in it provided a more political and strategic impetus for the decision. This paper maintains that although a change in policy was somewhat necessary, it is questionable whether the artificial separation of Hezbollah’s political and military wings and the symbolic proscription of the latter is the most propitious choice to achieve European objectives.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The EU has not been perceived as reacting very rapidly or effectively to the so-called Arab Spring. Events do appear to validate the idea underpinning the European Security Strategy (ESS) and the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP): only where governments guarantee to their citizens security, prosperity, freedom and equality, can peace and stability last – otherwise, people will revolt. But in practice, in its southern neighbourhood the EU has acted in precisely the opposite manner, so the Arab Spring is occurring in spite of rather than thanks to EU policy. The ENP stands at a crossroads therefore: Can a new start be made? Which instruments and, in times of austerity, which means can the EU apply to consolidate democratization? And, finally, can the EU continue to wage an ENP without addressing the hard security dimension, especially as the US seem to be withdrawing from crisis management in the region – or shall it continue to leave that to others?

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador: