987 resultados para manuscripts
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Vol. 6:3 and v. 7: Nendeln, Liechtenstein: Kraus reprint, 1970.
Manuscripts von Werken der Autoren des Augustiner-Eremitenordens in mitteleuropäischen Bibliotheken.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Cover title.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
This ed. was originally printed for the Roxburghe Club in 1857.
Resumo:
"The manuscript of this work is in the library of the American philosophical society. It is a copy made by Mr. Duponceau, and forms no. xxvii of a collection made by him and recorded in a folio account book, of which it occupies pp. 114-119."--Pilling, Bibl. of the Algonquin languages, p. 227.
Resumo:
The plates are numbered 170-216 with reference to the series of "Choice examples selected from illuminated manuscripts, unpublished drawings, and illustrated books of early date," of which the Facsimiles forms pt. 6.
Resumo:
The paper informs about the history of manuscript digitization in the National Library of the Czech Republic as well as about other issues concerning processing of manuscripts. The main consequence of the massive digitization and record and/or full text processing is a paradigm shift leading to the digital history.
Resumo:
This article presents the principal results of the doctoral thesis “Recognition of neume notation in historical documents” by Lasko Laskov (Institute of Mathematics and Informatics at Bulgarian Academy of Sciences), successfully defended before the Specialized Academic Council for Informatics and Mathematical Modelling on 07 June 2010.
Resumo:
Background: The publication of articles in peer-reviewed scientific journals is a fairly complex and stepwise process that involves responding to referees’ comments. Little guidance is available in the biomedical literature on how to deal with such comments. Objective: The objective of this article is to provide guidance to novice writers on dealing with peer review comments in a way that maximizes the chance of subsequent acceptance. Methods: This will be a literature review and review of the author’s experience as a writer and referee. Results: Where possible, the author should consider revising and resubmitting rather than sending an article elsewhere. A structured layout for responding to referees’ comments is suggested that includes the 3 golden rules: (1) respond completely; (2) respond politely; and (3) respond with evidence. Conclusion: Responding to referees’ comments requires the writer to overcome any feelings of personal attack, and to instead concentrate on addressing referees’ concerns in a courteous, objective, and evidencebased way. (J Am Acad Dermatol 2004;51:79-83.)