Interaction between tobacco and alcohol use and the risk of head and neck cancer: pooled analysis in the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology Consortium.

BACKGROUND: The magnitude of risk conferred by the interaction between tobacco and alcohol use on the risk of head and neck cancers is not clear because studies have used various methods to quantify the excess head and neck cancer burden. METHODS: We analyzed individual-level pooled data from 17 European and American case-control studies (11,221 cases and 16,168 controls) participating in the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology consortium. We estimated the multiplicative interaction parameter (psi) and population attributable risks (PAR). RESULTS: A greater than multiplicative joint effect between ever tobacco and alcohol use was observed for head and neck cancer risk (psi = 2.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.53-3.04). The PAR for tobacco or alcohol was 72% (95% confidence interval, 61-79%) for head and neck cancer, of which 4% was due to alcohol alone, 33% was due to tobacco alone, and 35% was due to tobacco and alcohol combined. The total PAR differed by subsite (64% for oral cavity cancer, 72% for pharyngeal cancer, 89% for laryngeal cancer), by sex (74% for men, 57% for women), by age (33% for cases <45 years, 73% for cases >60 years), and by region (84% in Europe, 51% in North America, 83% in Latin America). CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that the joint effect between tobacco and alcohol use is greater than multiplicative on head and neck cancer risk. However, a substantial proportion of head and neck cancers cannot be attributed to tobacco or alcohol use, particularly for oral cavity cancer and for head and neck cancer among women and among young-onset cases.

Le tabagisme chez les écoliers en Valais: 2002-2010

Introduction: Le tabagisme est une cause majeure de maladies et de décès dans la population en Valais. Près d'un valaisan sur trois et une valaisanne sur quatre sont fumeurs. L'initiation au tabagisme a lieu le plus souvent à l'adolescence. Il est dès lors important de connaître les habitudes tabagiques des écoliers valaisans. Méthodes: Tous les quatre ans, le Valais et les autres cantons suisses participent à l'enquête Health Behaviour in School aged Chidren (HBSC), qui est réalisée dans plus de 40 pays sous l'égide de l'Organisation mondiale de la santé. L'objectif est de récolter et d'analyser des données pertinentes sur les comportements de santé des écoliers de 11 à 15 ans, et notamment sur le tabagisme. L'enquête HBSC 2010 a été menée dans 71 classes auprès de 1'198 écoliers en Valais. Les données ont été récoltées par questionnaire. Résultats: De nombreux écoliers valaisans de 11-15 ans ont déjà fumé au moins une fois dans leur vie. Alors que très peu d'écoliers sont des fumeurs quotidiens avant l'âge de 14 ans, près d'un écolier sur six (17% des garçons et des filles) affirme fumer quotidiennement à 15 ans. Entre 2002 et 2010, les proportions d'écoliers ayant fumé au moins une fois ou fumant quotidiennement ont diminué. Les écoliers de 14-15 ans fumant régulièrement (au moins une fois par semaine) rapportent avoir acheté le plus souvent eux mêmes leurs cigarettes ou se les êtres procurées auprès de connaissances. 42% des écoliers et 44% des écolières ont au moins leur mère, leur père ou un de leurs frères et soeurs qui fument. Conclusions et perspectives : Le tabagisme est fréquent dans la population valaisanne, et ce dès l'adolescence. La prévalence du tabagisme a légèrement diminué chez les écoliers entre 2002 et 2010. Toutefois, l'augmentation marquée de l'initiation tabagique entre 11 et 15 ans et la prévalence importante des fumeurs quotidiens parmi les écoliers de 15 ans confirment que la prévention du tabagisme est nécessaire dès le plus jeune âge. L'accessibilité des écoliers au tabac devrait être évaluée et des mesures devraient être renforcées pour la diminuer.

Opinions on smoking policies in Switzerland

Purpose: to assess the opinions regarding smoking ban policies in Switzerland. Methods: cross sectional study on 2,601 women and 2,398 men, aged 35-75 years, living in Lausanne, Switzerland. Nine questions on smoking policies (restrictions, advertising, taxes and prevention) were applied. Results: 95% of responders supported policies that would help smokers to quit, 92% supported no selling of tobacco to subjects aged less than 16 years, 87% a smoking ban in public places and 86% a national campaign against smoking. A further 77% supported a total ban on tobacco advertising, 74% the reimbursement of nicotine replacement therapies and 70% increasing the price of cigarettes. Conversely, a lower support was found for a total ban of tobacco sales (35%) or the promotion of light cigarettes (22%). Multivariate analysis showed that women, lower educational level, older age, being physically active or non-smoker were associated with tougher policies against tobacco, whereas current drinking or smoking and higher educational level were associated with lower levels of support. Conclusion: opinions regarding smoking poli ci es vary considerably according to the policy type considered and also the characteristics of the subjects. Those findings provide interesting data regarding which anti-smoking policies would be more acceptable by the lay public, as well as the subjects who might oppose them.

Cigarette Tax October, 2010

This is a report for the Iowa Department of Revenue and Finance about the receipts on cigarettes and tobacco for each month of the year. This receipt is the tax of each sale of cigarettes and tobacco.

Is cannabis use a significant exposition to nicotine?

Purpose: Young cannabis users are at increased risk for cigarette initiation and later progression to nicotine dependence. The present study assesses to which extent cannabis users are exposed to nicotine through mulling, a widespread process consisting of mixing tobacco to cannabis for its consumption. Methods: Data are issued from an ongoing observational study taking place in Switzerland. A total of 267 eligible participants (mean age 19 years, 46.4% males) completed an anonymous self-administered questionnaire on their tobacco and cannabis intake in the previous 5 days. They also provided a urine sample that was blindly analyzed for cotinine (a key metabolite of nicotine) using liquid-chromatography coupled mass-spectrometry. After the exclusion of cannabis users not having smoked at least one joint/blunt in which tobacco had been mixed (n _ 2), and participants reporting other sources of nicotine exposition than cigarettes or mulling (n _37), four groups were created: cannabis and cigarette abstainers (ABS, n_ 69), cannabis only smokers (CAS; n _ 33), cigarette only smokers (CIS; n _ 62); and cannabis and cigarette smokers (CCS, n _ 64). Cotinine measures of CAS were compared to those of ABS, CIS and CCS. All comparisons were performed using ANCOVA, controlling for age, gender, ethnicity, BMI and environmental exposure to cigarette smoke in the past month (at home, in school/at work, in social settings). The number of mixed joints/blunts smoked in the previous 5 days was additionally taken into account when comparing CAS to CCS. Cotinine values (ng/ml) are reported as means with 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Results: In the previous 5 days, CAS had smoked on average 10 mixed joints/blunts, CIS 30 cigarettes, and CCS 8 mixed joints/ blunts and 41 cigarettes. Cotinine levels of participants considerably differed between groups. The lowest measure was found among ABS (3.2 [0.5-5.9]), followed in growing order by CAS (294.6 [157.1-432.0]), CIS (362.8 [258.4-467.3]), and CCS (649.9 [500.7-799.2]). In the multivariate analysis, cotinine levels of CAS were significantly higher than those of ABS (p _.001), lower than those of CCS (p _ .003), but did not differ from levels of CIS (p _ .384). Conclusions: Our study reveals cannabis users to be significantly exposed to nicotine through mulling, even after controlling for several possible confounders such as environmental exposure to cigarette smoke. Utmost, mixing tobacco to Poster cannabis can result in a substantial nicotine exposition as cotinine levels from cannabis only smokers were as high as those of moderate cigarette smokers. Our findings also suggest that mulling is adding up to the already important nicotine exposition of cigarettes smokers. Because of the addictiveness of nicotine, mulling should be part of a comprehensive assessment of substance use among adolescents and young adults, especially when supporting their cannabis and cigarette quitting attempts. Sources of Support: This study was funded by the Public Health Service of the Canton de Vaud. Dr. BÊlanger's contribution was possible through grants from the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, the CHUQ/CMDP Foundation and the Laval University McLaughlin program, QuÊbec, Canada.

The so-called "Spanish model" - Tobacco industry strategies and its impact in Europe and Latin America

Background To demonstrate the tobacco industry rationale behind the "Spanish model" on non-smokers' protection in hospitality venues and the impact it had on some European and Latin American countries between 2006 and 2011. Methods Tobacco industry documents research triangulated against news and media reports. Results As an alternative to the successful implementation of 100% smoke-free policies, several European and Latin American countries introduced partial smoking bans based on the so-called "Spanish model", a legal framework widely advocated by parts of the hospitality industry with striking similarities to "accommodation programmes" promoted by the tobacco industry in the late 1990s. These developments started with the implementation of the Spanish tobacco control law (Ley 28/2005) in 2006 and have increased since then. Conclusion The Spanish experience demonstrates that partial smoking bans often resemble tobacco industry strategies and are used to spread a failed approach on international level. Researchers, advocates and policy makers should be aware of this ineffective policy.

The Tobacco Quarterly, August 2008.

The Newsletter of the Division of Tobacco Use Prevention and Control.

The Tobacco Leaflet, October 2008.

The Newsletter of the Division of Tobacco Use Prevention and Control.

The Tobacco Leaflet, December 2008.

The Newsletter of the Division of Tobacco Use Prevention and Control.

The Tobacco Leaflet, February 2009.

The Newsletter of the Division of Tobacco Use Prevention and Control.

The Tobacco Leaflet, April 2009.

The Newsletter of the Division of Tobacco Use Prevention and Control.

The Tobacco Leaflet, June 2009.

The Newsletter of the Division of Tobacco Use Prevention and Control.

The Tobacco Leaflet, August 2009.

The Newsletter of the Division of Tobacco Use Prevention and Control.

The Tobacco Leaflet, October 2009.

The Newsletter of the Division of Tobacco Use Prevention and Control.