Adipose tissue concentrations of persistent organic pollutants and total cancer risk in an adult cohort from Southern Spain: preliminary data from year 9 of the follow-up.

There is an increasing trend in the incidence of cancer worldwide, and it has been accepted that environmental factors account for an important proportion of the global burden. The present paper reports preliminary findings on the influence of the historical exposure to a group of persistent organic pollutants on total cancer risk, at year 9 in the follow-up of a cohort from Southern Spain. A cohort of 368 participants (median age 51 years) was recruited in 2003. Their historical exposure was estimated by analyzing residues of persistent organic pollutants in adipose tissue. Estimation of cancer incidence was based on data from a population-based cancer registry. Statistical analyses were performed using multivariable Cox-regression models. In males, PCB 153 concentrations were positively associated with total cancer risk, with an adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.20 (1.01-1.41) for an increment of 100 ng/g lipid. Our preliminary findings suggest a potential relationship between the historical exposure to persistent organic pollutants and the risk of cancer in men. However, these results should be interpreted with caution and require verification during the future follow-up of this cohort.

Reflux vésico-­‐urétéral et atteinte rénale: rôle de l'albuminurie

Introduction :¦Le reflux vésico-urétéral (RVU) touche environs 1% des nouveau-nés et est retrouvé chez 25 à 30 % des enfants ayant une pyélonéphrite. Le RVU peut être associé à une hypoplasie/dysplasie rénale ou/et à des cicatrices rénales causées par les pyélonéphrites. Ces changements morphologiques sont plus ou moins importants selon le grade du reflux et peuvent conduire à une insuffisance rénale chronique et potentiellement évoluer en une insuffisance rénale terminale.¦La microalbuminurie (MA) reflète une augmentation anormale de la perméabilité capillaire glomérulaire et est un indicateur prédictif de la péjoration de la fonction rénale vers l'insuffisance chronique. La MA est également un facteur de risque cardiovasculaire.¦Objectif :¦Le but de cette recherche transversale est d'évaluer la présence de MA chez des patients atteints de RVU et de voir s'il est possible de corréler la MA avec le degré de reflux, la présence d'une hyperfiltration et le degré de l'insuffisance rénale.¦Patients et méthode :¦Une base de données de 160 dossiers médicaux du service de pédiatrie du CHUV, portant sur les années 2007, 2008, 2009 et 2010, va être investiguée. Ces dossiers regroupent tous les patients atteints de RVU ayant eu une exploration fonctionnelle rénale, dont l'âge varie du nouveau-né au jeune adulte âgé de 21 ans. Les variables suivantes seront considérées et analysées en détail: âge, sexe, taille, type de RVU, taux de filtration glomérulaire (TFG), flux plasmatique rénal (FPR), fraction de filtration (FF), albuminurie, rapport albumine/créatinine.¦- Les RVU sont classés en cinq grades (I, II, III, IV, V) et peuvent être uni- ou bilatéraux¦- Le TFG est calculé avec la clairance à l'inuline, un polymère de glucose filtré, non réabsorbé, ni sécrété, qu'on perfuse au patient. TFG = Uin V/Pin (ml/min)¦- Le FPR est calculé avec la clairance au PAH (acide para-amino-hippurique), une substance entièrement filtrée et sécrétée au premier passage et qu'on injecte au patient. FPR = UPAHV / PPAH (ml/min)¦- La FF est la proportion du FPR qui est filtrée.¦FF= TGF / FPR ou FF = Cl in / Cl PAH¦- La MA a été mesurée par la méthode Immulite (Siemens) jusqu'en fin août 2010 et par la méthode ALBT2 (Roche Diagnostics) à partir d'octobre 2010. Le taux normal d'albuminurie est de moins de 20 mg/l sur un échantillon d'urine.¦- Le rapport albumine urinaire / créatinine urinaire permet d'éviter les problèmes de variation de volume urinaire lors de l'analyse d'échantillon urinaire d'une seule miction. Le rapport normal est de moins de 2,5 g/mol de créatinine.¦Un questionnaire sera envoyé aux patients pour obtenir des précisions sur la fréquence et la sévérité des infections urinaires éventuellement survenues depuis.¦Les dossiers seront revus pour connaître l'évolution du RVU.¦Résultats attendus et discussion: Les résultats nous permettront :¦1) De savoir si les patients avec un RVU ont une MA¦2) De savoir si la MA varie en fonction du grade de leur reflux¦3) De savoir si la MA varie en fonction de l'hyperfiltration mesurée par la FF.¦Interprétation :¦Si la MA varie en fonction de la FF cela indiquera que la MA est la conséquence directe de l'hyperfiltration compensatrice de la perte de la masse néphronique et qu'elle est ainsi le reflet d'une cause principalement mécanique. Si la MA ne varie pas en fonction de la FF cela indiquera qu'elle est liée à l'hypoplasie/dysplasie ou/et aux cicatrices dues aux pyélonéphrites. Elle pourra alors être par exemple la conséquence d'une néphropathie glomérulotubulointerstitielle.¦Du point de vue pratique, cette étude permettra de déterminer si la simple mesure da la MA peut aider à prédire le degré de l'atteinte rénale et/ou le degré de l'hyperfiltration dans ce groupe de patients atteints de RVU.¦Bibliographie¦1. Silbernagl S, Despopoulos A. Atlas de poche de physiologie. Paris : Flammarion médecine-sciences; 2004.¦2. Brenner BM, Rector FC. The Kidney . Philadelphia : WB Saunders Company; 1996.¦3. Brandström P, Esbjörner E, Herthelius M, Holmdahl G, Läckgren G, Nevéus T, et al. The Swedish Reflux Trial in Children: I. Study Design and Study Population Characteristics. The Journal of Urology. 2010;184:274-279.¦4. Holmdahl G, Brandström P, Läckgren G, Sillén U, Stokland E, Jodal U, et al. The Swedish Reflux Trial in Children: II. Vesicoureteral Reflux Outcome. The Journal of Urology. 2010;184:280-285.¦5. Brandström P, Esbjörner E, Herthelius M, Swerkersson S, Jodal U, Hansson S. The Swedish Reflux Trial in Children: III. Urinary Tract Infection Pattern. The Journal of Urology. 2010;184:286-291.¦6. Brandström P, Nevéus T, Sixt R, Stokland E, Jodal U, Hansson S. The Swedish Reflux Trial in Children: IV. Renal Damage. The Journal of Urology. 2010;184:292-297.¦7. Ruggenenti P, Remuzzi G. Time to abandon microalbuminuria? Kidney Int. 2006;70:1214-1222.¦8. Hostetter TH, Olson JL, Rennke HG, Venkatachalam MA, Brenner BM. Hyperfiltration in remnant nephrons: a potentially adverse response to renal ablation. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2001;12:1315-1325.¦9. Basic J, Golubovic E, Miljkovic P, Bjelakovic G, Cvetkovic T, Milosevic V. Microalbuminuria in children with vesicoureteral reflux. Ren Fail. 2008:639-643.¦10. González E, Papazyan JP, Girardin E. Impact of vesicoureteral reflux on the size of renal lesions after an episode of acute pyelonephritis. The Journal of Urology. 2005;173:571-575.

Edge vascular response after polymer-free vs. polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation.

BACKGROUND It is unknown if lack of polymer can provoke a different edge response in drug-eluting stents. The aim of this study was to compare edge vascular response between polymer-free paclitaxel-eluting stent (PF-PES) and polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stents (PB-PES). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 165 eligible patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were prospectively randomized 1:1 to receive either PF-PES or PB-PES. Those patients with paired intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) after procedure and at 9-month follow-up were included in this analysis.Seventy-six patients with 84 lesions, divided into PB-PES (38 patients, 41 lesions) and PF-PES groups (38 patients, 43 lesions) had paired post-procedure and 9-month follow-up IVUS and were therefore included in this substudy. There was a significant lumen decrease at the proximal edge of PF-PES (from 9.02±3.06 mm(2)to 8.47±3.05 mm(2); P=0.040), and a significant plaque increase at the distal edges of PF-PES (from 4.39±2.73 mm(2)to 4.78±2.63 mm(2); P=0.004). At the distal edge there was a significant plaque increase in the PF-PES compared to PB-PES (+8.0% vs. -0.6%, respectively; P=0.015) with subsequent lumen reduction (-5.2% vs. +6.0%, respectively; P=0.024). CONCLUSIONS PF-PES had significant plaque increase and lumen reduction at the distal edge as compared to PB-PES, probably due to difference in polymer-based drug-release kinetics between the 2 platforms.

Appropriate therapy for fistulizing and fibrostenotic Crohn's disease: results of a multidisciplinary international expert panel (EPACT II)

Introduction Many therapeutic decisions in the management of fistulizing and fibrostenotic Crohn's disease (CD) have to be taken without the benefit of strong scientific evidence. For this reason, explicit appropriateness criteria for CD fistula and stenosis treatment were developed by a multidisciplinary European expert panel in 2004 with the aim of making them easily available on the Internet and thus allowing individual case scenario evaluation; these criteria were updated in 2007. Methods Twelve international experts convened in Geneva, Switzerland in December 2007. Explicit clinical scenarios, corresponding to real daily practice, were rated on a 9-point scale based on evidence from the published literature and panelists' own expertise. Median ratings were stratified into three categories: appropriate (7-9), uncertain (4-6) and inappropriate (1-3). Results Overall, panelists rated 60 indications pertaining to fistulas. Antibiotics, azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine and conservative surgery are the mainstay of therapy for simple and complex fistulas. In the event of previous failure of azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine therapy, methotrexate and infliximab were considered appropriate for complex fistulas. The panel also rated 72 indications related to the management of fibrostenotic CD. The experts considered balloon dilation, if the stricture was endoscopically accessible, stricturoplasty and bowel resection to be appropriate for small bowel fibrostenotic Crohn's disease, and balloon dilation and bowel resection appropriate for fibrostenotic colonic disease. In the presence of an ileocolonic or ileorectal anastomotic stricture of <7 cm, endoscopic balloon dilation, and bowel resection were considered appropriate. Conclusion Antibiotics, azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine, and conservative surgery are the mainstay of therapy for fistulizing Crohn's disease. Infliximab is a therapeutic option in patients without prior response to immunosuppressant therapy. In fibrostenotic Crohn's disease, endoscopic balloon dilation, if feasible, or surgical therapy should be considered. These expert recommendations are available online (www.epact.ch). Prospective evaluation is now needed to test the validity of these appropriateness criteria in clinical practice.

Five-Year Denosumab Treatment of Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis: Results from the first two Years of the Freedom Trial Extension

Objectives : The FREEDOM trial1 open-label extension is designed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of denosumab for up to 10 years. We report the results from the first 2 years of the extension, representing up to 5 years of denosumab exposure.Materials/Methods : Postmenopausal women enrolled in the extension previously completed FREEDOM. During the extension, all women receive denosumab (60 mg) every 6 months and calcium and vitamin D daily. For the FREEDOM denosumab group, the data reflect 5 years of denosumab treatment (long-term group). For the FREEDOM placebo group, the data reflect 2 years of denosumab treatment (de novo group). P-values are descriptive.Results : There were 4550 (70.2%) FREEDOM women enrolled in the extension (2343 long-term; 2207 de novo). During the 4th and 5th years of denosumab treatment, the long-term group had further 1.9% and 1.7% increases in lumbar spine BMD and further 0.7% and 0.6% increases in total hip BMD (all P<0.0001 compared with extension baseline). Total BMD increases with 5-year denosumab treatment were 13.7% (lumbar spine) and 7.0% (total hip). In the de novo group, BMD increased during the first 2 years of denosumab treatment by 7.9% (lumbar spine) and 4.1% (total hip) (all P<0.0001 compared with extension baseline). After denosumab administration, serum CTX was rapidly and maximally reduced in both groups with the characteristic attenuation observed at the end of the dosing interval, as previously reported.2 Incidences of new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures were low and below rates observed in the FREEDOM placebo group. Adverse event reports were similar for both groups: in the long-term group, 83.4% reported AEs and 18.9% were serious. In the de novo group, the percentages were 82.8% and 19.4%, respectively. In FREEDOM, the respective percentages were 92.8% and 25.8% in the denosumab group and 93.1% and 25.1% in the placebo group. Two subjects in the de novo group had AEs adjudicated to ONJ which healed without further complications ; one resolved within the 6-month dosing interval and denosumab was continued. There were no atypical femoral fractures.Conclusions : Denosumab treatment for 5 years was well-tolerated and continued to significantly reduce CTX and significantly increase BMD. Reference: 1)Cummings;NEJM;2009;361:756, 2)Eastell;JBMR;2010; doi-10.1002/jbmr.251 Disclosure of Interest: This study was funded by Amgen; S Papapoulos: Consulting fees from Amgen, Merck, Novartis, Procter & Gamble, GSK, and Wyeth; R Chapurlat: Research grants and/or consulting fees from Amgen, Merck, Novartis, sanofi-aventis, Roche, Servier, and Warner Chilcott;ML Brandi: Research grants and/or consulting fees from Amgen, Eli Lily, GSK, MSD, NPS, Nycomed, Roche, Servier, and Stroder; JP Brown: Research grants and/or consulting or speaking fees from Abott, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, Merck, and Warner Chilcott; E Czerwinski: Research grants from Amgen, Astrazeneca, Danone Research, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck Serono, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, SantoSolve AS, and Servier; N Daizadeh, A Grauer, C Libanati: Employed by Amgen and own Amgen stocks or stock options; M-A Krieg, D Mellstrom, H Resch: None; S Radominski: Research grants from Amgen, Pfizer, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, and Aventis; Z Man: Lecture fees and/or consulting fees from Merck, Novartis, Roche, and sanofi-aventis. Novartis steering committee member; JA Roman: Research grants from Roche; J-Y Reginster: Research grants, consulting fees, and/or lecture fees from Amgen, Analis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ebewee Pharma, Genevrier, GSK, IBSA, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dhome, Negma, Novartis, Novo-Nordisk, Nycomed, NPS, Roche, Rottapharm, Servier, Teijin, Teva, Theramex, UCB, Wyeth, and Zodiac; C Roux: Research grants and/or consulting fees from Amgen, MSD, Novartis, Servier, and Roche; SR Cummings: Research grants and/or consulting fees from Amgen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, and Merck; HG Bone: Research grants and/or consulting or speaking fees from Amgen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Nordic Bioscience, Novartis, Takeda, and Zelos