Dissecting the Interaction between p53 and TRIM24

Dissecting the Interaction of p53 and TRIM24 Aundrietta DeVan Duncan Supervisory Professor, Michelle Barton, Ph.D. p53, the “guardian of the genome”, plays an important role in multiple biological processes including cell cycle, angiogenesis, DNA repair and apoptosis. Because it is mutated in over 50% of cancers, p53 has been widely studied in established cancer cell lines. However, little is known about the function of p53 in a normal cell. We focused on characterizing p53 in normal cells and during differentiation. Our lab recently identified a novel binding partner of p53, Tripartite Motif 24 protein (TRIM24). TRIM24 is a member of the TRIM family of proteins, defined by their conserved RING, B-box, and coiled coil domains. Specifically, TRIM24 is a member of the TIF1 subfamily, which is characterized by PHD and Bromo domains in the C-terminus. Between the Coiled-coil and PHD domain is a linker region, 437 amino acids in length. This linker region houses important functions of TRIM24 including it’s site of interaction with nuclear receptors. TRIM24 is an E3-ubiquitin ligase, recently discovered to negatively regulate p53 by targeting it for degradation. Though it is known that Trim24 and p53 interact, it is not known if the interaction is direct and what effect this interaction has on the function of TRIM24 and p53. My study aims to elucidate the specific interaction domains of p53 and TRIM24. To determine the specific domains of p53 required for interaction with TRIM24, we performed co-immuoprecipitation (Co-IP) with recombinant full-length Flag-tagged TRIM24 protein and various deletion constructs of in vitro translated GST-p53, as well as the reverse. I found that TRIM24 binds both the carboxy terminus and DNA binding domain of p53. Furthermore, my results show that binding is altered when post-translational modifications of p53 are present, suggesting that the interaction between p53 and TRIM24 may be affected by these post-translational modifications. To determine the specific domains of TRIM24 required for p53 interaction, we performed GST pull-downs with in vitro translated, Flag-TRIM24 protein constructs and recombinant GST-p53 protein purified from E. coli. We found that the Linker region is sufficient for interaction of p53 and TRIM24. Taken together, these data indicate that the interaction between p53 and TRIM24 does occur in vitro and that interaction may be influenced by post-translational modifications of the proteins.

Gene expression in sea urchin development: Study of {\it LpS1\/} gene regulation and cloning and characterization of the {\it SpKrox}-{\it 1\/} gene

Cell differentiation are associated with activation of cell lineage-specific genes. The $LpS{\it 1}\beta$ gene of Lytechinus pictus is activated at the late cleavage stage. $LpS{\it 1}\beta$ transcripts accumulate exclusively in aboral ectoderm lineages. Previous studies demonstrated two G-string DNA-elements, proximal and distal G-strings, which bind to an ectoderm-enriched nuclear factor. In order to define the cis-elements which control positive expression of the $LpS{\it 1}\beta$ gene, the regulatory region from $-$108 to +17 bp of the $LpS{\it 1}\beta$ gene promoter was characterized. The ectoderm G-string factor binds to a G/C-rich region larger than the G-string itself and the binding of the G-string factor requires sequences immediately downstream from the G-string. These downstream sequences are essential for full promoter activity. In addition, only 108 bp of $LpS{\it 1}\beta\ 5\sp\prime$ flanking DNA drives $LpS{\it 1}\beta$ gene expression in aboral ectoderm/mesenchyme cells. Therefore, for positive control of $LpS{\it 1}\beta$ gene expression, two regions of 5$\sp\prime$ flanking DNA are required: region I from base pairs $-$762 to $-$511, and region II, which includes the G/C-rich element, from base pairs $-$108 to $-$61. A mesenchyme cell repressor element is located within region I.^ DNA-binding proteins play key roles in determination of cell differentiation. The zinc finger domain is a DNA-binding domain present in many transcription factors. Based on homologies in zinc fingers, a zinc finger-encoding gene, SpKrox-1, was cloned from S. purpuratus. The putative SpKrox-1 protein has all structural characteristics of a transcription factor: four zinc fingers for DNA binding; acidic domain for transactivation; basic domain for nuclear targeting; and leucine zipper for dimerization. SpKrox-1 RNA transcripts showed a transient expression pattern which correlates largely with early embryonic development. The spatial expression of SpKrox-1 mRNA was distributed throughout the gastrula and larva ectodermal wall. However, SpKrox-1 was not expressed in pigment cells. The SpKrox-1 gene is thus a marker of a subset of SMCs or ectoderm cells. The structural features, and the transient temporal and restricted spatial expression patterns suggest that SpKrox-1 plays a role in a specific developmental event. ^

Phosphorylation in the regulation of muscle-specific transcription

The contents of this dissertation include studies on the mechanisms by which FGF and growth factor down-stream kinases inactivate myogenin; characterization of myogenin phosphorylation and its role in regulation of myogenin activity; analysis the C-terminal transcriptional activation domain of myogenin; studies on the nuclear localization of myogenin and characterization of proteins that interact with PKC.^ Activation of muscle transcription by the MyoD family requires their heterodimerization with ubiquitous bHLH proteins such as the E2A gene products E12 and E47. I have shown that dimerization with E2A products potentiates phosphorylation of myogenin at serine 43 in its amino-terminus and serine 170 in the carboxyl-terminal transcription activation domains. Mutations of these sites resulted in enhanced transcriptional activity of myogenin, suggesting that their phosphorylation diminishes myogenin's transcriptional activity. Consistent with the role of phosphorylation at serine 170, analysis of the carboxyl-terminal transcriptional activation domain by deletion has revealed a stretch of residues from 157 to 170 which functions as a negative element for myogenin activity.^ In addition to inducing phosphorylation of myogenin, E12 also localizes myogenin to the nucleus. The DNA binding and dimerization mutants of myogenin show various deficiencies in nuclear localization. Cotransfection of E12 with the DNA binding mutants, but not a dimerization mutant, greatly enhances their nuclear binding. These data suggest that the nuclear localization signal is located in the DNA binding region and myogenin can also be nuclear localized by virtue of dimerizing with a nuclear protein.^ FGF is one of the most potent inhibitors of myogenesis and activates many down-stream pathways to exert its functions. One of these pathway is the MAP kinase pathway. Studies have shown that Raf-1 and Erk-1 kinase inactivate transactivation by myogenin and E proteins independent of DNA binding. The other is the PKC pathway. In transfected cells, FGF induces phosphorylation of thr-87 that maps to the previously identified PKC sites in the DNA binding domain of myogenin. Myogenin mutant T-N87 could resist the inhibition directed to the bHLH domain by FGF, suggesting that FGF inactivates myogenin by inducing phosphorylation of this site. In C2 myotubes, where FGF receptors are lost, the phosphatase inhibitor, okadaic acid, and phorbal ester PdBu, can also induce the phosphorylation of thr-87. This result supports the previous observation and suggests that in myotubes, other mechanisms, such as innervation, may inactivate myogenin through PKC induced phosphorylation.^ Many functions of PKC have been well documented, yet, little is known about the activators or effectors of PKC or proteins that mediate PKC nuclear localizations. Identification of PKC binding proteins will help to understand the molecular mechanism of PKC function. Two proteins that interact with the C kinase (PICKS) have been characterized, PICK-1 and PICK-2. PICK1 interacts with two conserved regions in the catalytic domain of PKC. It is localized to the perinuclear region and is phosphorylated in response to PKC activation. PICK2 is a novel protein with homology to the heat shock protein family. It interacts extensively with the catalytic domain of PKC and is localized in the cytoplasm in a punctate pattern. PICK1 and PICK2 may play important roles in mediating the actions of PKC. ^

Functional characterization of transcription factor USF

USF, Upstream Stimulatory Factor, is a family of ubiquitous transcription factors that contain highly conserved basic helix-loop-helix leucine zipper DNA binding domains and recognize the core DNA sequence CACGTG. In human and mouse, two members of the USF family, USF1 and USF2, encoded by two different genes, contribute to the USF activity. In order to gain insights into the mechanisms by which USFs function as transcriptional activators, different approaches were used to map the domains of USF2 responsible for nuclear localization and transcriptional activation. Two stretches of amino acids, one in the basic region of the DNA binding domain, the other in a highly conserved N-terminal region, were found to direct nuclear localization independently of one another. Two distinct activation domains were also identified. The first one, located in the conserved N-terminal region that overlaps the C-terminal nuclear localization signal, functioned only in the presence of an initiator element in the promoter of the reporter. The second, in a nonconserved region, activated transcription in the absence of an initiator element or when fused to a heterologous DNA binding domain. These results suggest that USF2 functions in different promoter contexts by selectively utilizing different activation domains.^ The deletion analysis of USF2 also identified two dominant negative mutants of USF, one lacking the activation domain, the other lacking the basic domain. The latter proved useful for testing the direct involvement of USFs in the transcriptional activation mediated by the viral protein IE62.^ To investigate the biological function of USFs, foci and colony formation assays were used to study the growth regulation by USFs. It was found that USFs had a strong antagonistic effect on cellular transformation mediated by the bHLH/LZ protein Myc. This effect required the DNA binding activity of either USF 1 or USF2. Moreover, USF2, but not USF1 or other mutants of USFs, was also found to have strong inhibitory effect on the cellular transformation by E1a and on the growth of HeLa cells. These results demonstrate that USFs could potentially regulate growth through two mechanisms, one by antagonizing the function of Myc in cellular transformation, the other by mediating a more general growth inhibitory effect. ^

Transcriptional regulation and functional analysis of the Wilms' tumor gene WT1

The Wilms' tumor gene, WT1, encodes a zinc finger transcription factor which functions as a tumor suppressor. Defects in the WT1 gene can result in the development of nephroblastoma. WT1 is expressed during development, primarily in the metanephric kidney, the mesothelial lining of the abdomen and thorax, and the developing gonads. WT1 expression is tightly regulated and is essential for renal development. The WT1 gene encodes a protein with a proline-rich N-terminus which functions as a transcriptional repressor and C-terminus contains 4 zinc fingers that mediate DNA binding. WT1 represses transcription from a number of growth factors and growth factor receptors. WT1 mRNA undergoes alternative splicing at two sites, resulting in 4 mRNA species and polypeptide products. Exon 5, encoding 17 amino acids is alternatively spliced, and is located between the transcriptional repression domain and the DNA binding domain. The second alternative splice is the terminal 9 nucleotides of zinc finger 3, encoding the tripeptide Lys-Thr-Ser (KTS). The presence or absence of KTS within the zinc fingers of WT1 alters DNA binding.^ I have investigated transcriptional regulation of WT1, characterizing two means of repressing WT1 transcription. I have cloned a transcriptional silencer of the WT1 promoter which is located in the third intron of the WT1 gene. The silencer is 460 bp in length and contains an Alu repeat. The silencer functions in cells of non-renal origin.^ I have found that WT1 protein can autoregulate the WT1 promoter. Using the autoregulation of the WT1 promoter as a functional assay, I have defined differential consensus DNA binding motifs of WT1 isoforms lacking and containing the KTS tripeptide insertion. With these refined consensus DNA binding motifs, I have identified two additional targets of WT1 transcriptional repression, the proto-oncogenes bcl-2 and c-myc.^ I have investigated the ability of the alternatively spliced exon 5 to influence cell growth. In cell proliferation assays, isoforms of WT1 lacking exon 5 repress cell growth. WT1 isoforms containing exon 5 fail to repress cell growth to the same extent, but alter the morphology of the cells. These experiments demonstrate that the alternative splice isoforms of WT1 have differential effects on the function of WT1. These findings suggest a role for the alternative splicing of WT1 in metanephric development. ^

Transcriptional regulation and functional analysis of the human Wilms' tumor 1 gene

The Wilms' tumor 1 gene (WT1) encodes a zinc-finger transcription factor and is expressed in urogenital, hematopoietic and other tissues. It is expressed in a temporal and spatial manner in both embryonic and adult stages. To obtain a better understanding of the biological function of WT1, we studied two aspects of WT1 regulation: one is the identification of tissue-specific cis-regulatory elements that regulate its expression, the other is the downstream genes which are modulated by WT1.^ My studies indicate that in addition to the promoter, other regulatory elements are required for the tissue specific expression of this gene. A 259-bp hematopoietic specific enhancer in intron 3 of the WT1 gene increased the transcriptional activity of the WT1 promoter by 8- to 10-fold in K562 and HL60 cells. Sequence analysis revealed both GATA and c-Myb motifs in the enhancer fragment. Mutation of the GATA motif decreased the enhancer activity by 60% in K562 cells. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays showed that both GATA-1 and GATA-2 proteins in K562 nuclear extracts bind to this motif. Cotransfection of the enhancer containing reporter construct with a GATA-1 or GATA-2 expression vector showed that both GATA-1 and GATA-2 transactivated this enhancer, increasing the CAT reporter activity 10-15 fold and 5-fold respectively. Similar analysis of the c-Myb motif by cotransfection with the enhancer CAT reporter construct and a c-Myb expression vector showed that c-Myb transactivated the enhancer by 5-fold. A DNase I-hypersensitive site has been identified in the 258 bp enhancer region. These data suggest that GATA-1 and c-Myb are responsible for the activity of this enhancer in hematopoietic cells and may bind to the enhancer in vivo. In the process of searching for cis-regulatory elements in transgenic mice, we have identified a 1.0 kb fragment that is 50 kb downstream from the promoter and is required for the central nervous system expression of WT1.^ In the search for downstream target genes of WT1, we noted that the proto-oncogene N-myc is coexpressed with the tumor suppressor gene WT1 in the developing kidney and is overexpressed in many Wilms' tumors. Sequence analysis revealed eleven consensus WT1 binding sites located in the 1 kb mouse N-myc promoter. We further showed that the N-myc promoter was down-regulated by WT1 in transient transfection assays. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays showed that oligonucleotides containing the WT1 motifs could bind WT1 protein. Furthermore, a Denys-Drash syndrome mutant of WT1, R394W, that has a mutation in the DNA binding domain, failed to repress the N-myc promoter. This suggests that the repression of the N-myc promoter is mediated by DNA binding of WT1. This finding helps to elucidate the relationship of WT1 and N-myc in tumorigenesis and renal development. ^

Structure-function analyses of {\it PAX6\/} and the molecular bases of aniridia

PAX6 is a transcription activator that regulates eye development in animals ranging from Drosophila to human. The C-terminal region of PAX6 is proline/serine/threonine-rich (PST) and functions as a potent transactivation domain when attached to a heterologous DNA-binding domain of the yeast transcription factor, GAL4. The PST region comprises 152 amino acids encoded by four exons. The transactivation function of the PST region has not been defined and characterized in detail by in vitro mutagenesis. I dissected the PST domain in two independent systems, a heterologous system using a GAL4 DNA-binding site and the native system of PAX6. In both systems, the results show consistently that all four constituent exons of the PST domain are responsible for the transactivation function. The four exon fragments act cooperatively to stimulate transcription, although none of them can function individually as an independent transactivation domain. Combinations of two or more exon fragments can reconstitute substantial transactivation activity when fused to the DNA-binding domain of GAL4, but they surprisingly do not produce much activity in the context of native PAX6 even though the mutant PAX6 proteins are stable and their DNA-binding function remains unaffected. I conclude that the PAX6 protein contains an unusually large transactivation domain that is evolutionarily conserved to a high degree, and that its full transactivation activity relies on the cooperative action of the four exon fragments.^ Most PAX6 mutations detected in patients with aniridia result in truncations of the protein. Some of the truncation mutations occur in the PST region of PAX6, resulting in mutant proteins that retain their DNA-binding ability but have no significant transactivation activity. It is not clear whether such mutants are true loss-of-function or dominant-negative mutants. I show that these mutants are dominant-negative if they are coexpressed with wild-type PAX6 in cultured cells and that the dominant-negative effects result from enhanced DNA-binding ability of these mutants due to removal of the PST domain. These mutants are able to repress the wild-type PAX6 activity not only at target genes with paired domain binding sites but also at target genes with homeodomain binding sites.^ Mutations in the human PAX6 gene produce various phenotypes, including aniridia, Peters' anomaly, autosomal dominant keratitis, and familial foveal dysplasia. The various phenotypes may arise from different mutations in the same gene. To test this theory, I performed a functional analysis of two missense mutations in the paired domain: the R26G mutation reported in a case of Peters' anomaly, and the I87R mutation identified in a patient with aniridia. While both the R26 and the I87 positions are conserved in the paired boxes of all known PAX genes, X-ray crystallography has shown that only R26 makes contact with DNA. I found that the R26G mutant failed to bind a subset of paired domain binding sites but, surprisingly, bound other sites and successfully transactivated promoters containing those sites. In contrast, the I87R mutant had lost the ability to bind DNA at all tested sites and failed to transactivate promoters. My data support the haploinsufficiency hypothesis of aniridia, and the hypothesis that R26G is a hypomorphic allele. ^

Studies of subcellular localization and complex formation of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens transport ATPase VirB11

The VirB11 ATPase is an essential component of an Agrobacterium tumefaciens type IV bacterial secretion system that transfers oncogenic nucleoprotein complexes to susceptible plant cells. This dissertation investigates the subcellular localization and homo-oligomeric state of the VirB11 ATPase in order to provide insights about the assembly of the protein as a subunit of this membrane-associated transfer system. Subcellular fractionation studies and quantitative immunoblot analysis demonstrated that $\sim$30% of VirB11 partitioned as soluble protein and $\sim$70% was tightly associated with the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane. No differences were detected in VirB11 subcellular localization and membrane association in the presence or absence of other transport system components. Mutations in virB11 affecting protein function were mapped near the amino terminus, just upstream of a region encoding a Walker 'A' nucleotide-binding site, and within the Walker 'A' motif partitioned almost exclusively with the cytoplasmic membrane, suggesting that an activity associated with nucleotide binding could modulate the affinity of VirB11 for the cytoplasmic membrane. Merodiploid analysis of VirB11 mutant and truncation derivatives provided strong evidence that VirB11 functions as a homo- or heteromultimer and that the C-terminal half of VirB11 contains a protein interaction domain. A combination of biochemical and molecular genetic approaches suggested that VirB11 and the green fluorescence protein (GFP) formed a mixed multimer as demonstrated by immunoprecipitation experiments with anti-GFP antibodies. Second, a hybrid protein composed of VirB11 fused to the N-terminal DNA-binding domain of bacteriophage $\lambda$ cI repressor conferred immunity to $\lambda$ superinfection, demonstrating that VirB11 self-association promotes dimerization of the chimeric repressor. A conserved Walker 'A' motif, though required for VirB11 function in T-complex export, was not necessary for VirB11 self-association. Sequences in both the N- and the C-terminal halves of the protein were found to contribute to self-association of the full length protein. Chemical cross-linking experiments with His$\sb6$ tagged VirB11 suggested that VirB11 probably assembles into a higher order homo-oligomeric complex. ^

A Non-Synonymous HMGA2 Variant Decreases Height in Shetland Ponies and Other Small Horses

The identification of quantitative trait loci (QTL) such as height and their underlying causative variants is still challenging and often requires large sample sizes. In humans hundreds of loci with small effects control the heritable portion of height variability. In domestic animals, typically only a few loci with comparatively large effects explain a major fraction of the heritability. We investigated height at withers in Shetland ponies and mapped a QTL to ECA 6 by genome-wide association (GWAS) using a small cohort of only 48 animals and the Illumina equine SNP70 BeadChip. Fine-mapping revealed a shared haplotype block of 793 kb in small Shetland ponies. The HMGA2 gene, known to be associated with height in horses and many other species, was located in the associated haplotype. After closing a gap in the equine reference genome we identified a non-synonymous variant in the first exon of HMGA2 in small Shetland ponies. The variant was predicted to affect the functionally important first AT-hook DNA binding domain of the HMGA2 protein (c.83G>A; p.G28E). We assessed the functional impact and found impaired DNA binding of a peptide with the mutant sequence in an electrophoretic mobility shift assay. This suggests that the HMGA2 variant also affects DNA binding in vivo and thus leads to reduced growth and a smaller stature in Shetland ponies. The identified HMGA2 variant also segregates in several other pony breeds but was not found in regular-sized horse breeds. We therefore conclude that we identified a quantitative trait nucleotide for height in horses.

A study in the molecular and cellular functions of GSK3beta in prostate adenocarcinoma

Kinases are part of a complex network of signaling pathways that enable a cell to respond to changes in environmental conditions in a regulated and coordinated way. For example, Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 beta (GSK3β) modulates conformational changes, protein-protein interaction, protein degradation, and activation of unique domains in proteins that transduce signals from the extracellular milieu to the nucleus. ^ In this project, I investigated the expression and function that GSK3β exhibits in prostate cells. The capacity of GSK3β to regulate two transcription factors (JUN and CREB), which are known to be inversely utilized in prostate tumor cells, was measured. JUN/AP1 is constitutively activated in PC-3 cells; whereas, CREB/CRE activity is ∼20 fold less than the former. GSK3β overexpression obliterates JUN/AP1 activity. With respect to CREB GSK3β increases CREB/CRE activity. Cellular levels of active GSK3β can determine whether JUN or CREB is preferentially active in the PC-3s. Theoretically, in response to a particular cellular context or stimulus, a cell may coordinate JUN and CREB function by regulating GSK3β.^ A comparison of various prostate cell lines showed that active GSK3β is less expressed in normal prostate epithelial cells than in tumor cells. Differentially expressed active (GSK3β) may correlate with progression of prostate carcinoma. If a known marker associated with carcinoma of the prostate could be shown to be regulated by GSK3β then, further study of GSK3β may lead to a better understanding of both possible prevention of the disease and improved therapy for advanced stages. ^ The androgen receptor (AR) is an intriguing phosphoprotein whose regulation is potentially determined by a variety of kinases. One of these is (GSK3β) I found that (GSK3β) is a regulator of the androgen receptor in both the unliganded and liganded states. It can inhibit AR function as measured by reporter assays. Also, GSK3β associates with the AR at the DNA binding domain because deletion constructs expressing either the n-terminus or the c-terminus (both having the DBD in common) immunoprecipitated with GSK3β. Increased understanding of how GSK3β functions in prostate cancer would provide clues into how (1) certain signal pathways are coordinated and (2) the androgen receptor may be regulated. ^

MUTATIONS IN STAT3 ASSOCIATED WITH HUMAN HYPER IgE SYNDROME ENHANCE NFκB AND MAPK-MEDIATED GENE EXPRESSION

Hyper IgE syndrome (HIES) is a multisystem disorder resulting in bone and immune system abnormalities. It is associated with mutations in STAT3, which disrupt protein domains responsible for transcriptional function. Patients with HIES display osteoporosis and enhanced inflammatory cytokine production similar to hematopoietic Stat3-deficient mice. Since osteoclast and inflammatory cytokine genes are NFκB targets, these observations indicate a possible deregulation of NFκB signaling in both mice and humans with STAT3-deficiency. Here, we sought to examine the role of STAT3 in the regulation of NFκB-mediated gene expression through analysis of three HIES STAT3 point mutations in both hematopoietic and non- hematopoietic cells. We found that IL-6-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT3 was partially or completely abrogated by HIES mutations in the transactivation domain (V713L) or SH2 domain (V637M), respectively, in both hematopoietic and non- hematopoietic cells. By contrast, IL-6-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of an HIES mutant in the STAT3 DNA-binding domain (R382W) was intact. The R382W and V713L mutants significantly reduced IL-6-dependent STAT3 transcriptional activity in reporter gene assays. Moreover, the R382W and V637M mutants significantly diminished IL-6-responsive expression of the endogenous STAT3 target gene, Socs3, as assessed by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) in the RAW macrophage cell line. These observations indicate the HIES mutants dominantly suppress the transcriptional activity of wild type STAT3, albeit to varying degrees. All three HIES mutants enhanced LPS-induced expression of the NFκB target genes IL6 (IL-6), Cxcl10 (IP- 10), and Tnf (TNFα) in RAW cells, as indicated by qPCR. Furthermore, overexpression of wild type STAT3 in Stat3-deficient murine embryonic fibroblasts significantlyreduced LPS-stimulated expression of IL6, Cxcl10, and IL12p35. In addition, in aprimary murine osteoclast differentiation assay, a STAT3-specific SH2 domain inhibitor led to significantly increased levels of osteoclast-specific gene expression. These results suggest that STAT3 serves as a negative regulator of NFκB-mediated gene expression, and furthermore imply that STAT3 mutations associated with HIES contribute to the osteopenia and inflammation observed in HIES patients.

Regulation of myogenesis by growth signals -growth factors, oncogenes and protein kinases

Establishment of a myogenic phenotype involves antagonism between cell proliferation and differentiation. The recent identification of the MyoD family of muscle-specific transcription factors provides opportunities to dissect at the molecular level the mechanisms through which defined cell type-specific transcription factors respond to environmental cues and regulate differentiation programs. This project is aimed at elucidation of the molecular mechanism whereby growth factors repress myogenesis. Initial studies demonstrated that nuclear oncogenes such as c-fos, junB and c-jun are immediate early genes that respond to serum and TGF-$\beta$. Using the muscle creatine kinase (MCK) enhancer linked to the reporter gene CAT as a marker for differentiation, we showed that transcriptional function of myogenin can be disrupted in the presence of c-Fos, JunB and cjun. In contrast, JunD, which shares DNA-binding specificity with JunB and c-Jun but is expressed constitutively in muscle cells, failed to show the inhibition. The repression by Fos and Jun is targeted at KE-2 motif, the same sequence that mediates myogenin-dependent activation and muscle-specific transactivation. Deletion analysis indicated that the transactivation domain of c-Jun at the N-terminus is responsible for the repression. Considering that myogenin is a phosphoprotein and cAMP and TPA are able to regulate myogenesis, we examined whether constitutively active protein kinase C (PKC) and protein kinase A (PKA) could substitute for exogenous growth factors and prevent transcription activation by myogenin. Indeed, the basic region of myogenin is phosphorylated by PKC at a threonine that is conserved in all members of the MyoD family. Phosphorylation at this site attenuates DNA binding activity of myogenin. Protein kinase A can also phosphorylate myogenin in a region adjacent to the DNA binding domain. However, phosphorylation at this site is insufficient to abrogate myogenin's DNA binding capacity, suggesting that PKA and PKC may affect myogenin transcriptional activity through different mechanisms. These findings provide insight into the mechanisms through which growth factor signals negatively regulate the muscle differentiation program and contribute to an understanding of signal transducing pathways between the cell membrane and nucleus. ^

Analysis of p53 function and regulation

p53 is a tumor suppressor gene that is the most frequent target inactivated in cancers. Overexpression of wild-type p53 in rat embryo fibroblasts suppresses foci formation by other cooperating oncogenes. Introduction of wild-type p53 into cells that lack p53 arrests them at the G1/S boundary and reverses the transformed phenotype of some cells. The function of p53 in normal cells is illustrated by the ability of p53 to arrest cells at G1 phase of the cell cycle upon exposure to DNA-damaging agents including UV-irradiation and biosynthesis inhibitors.^ Since the amino acid sequence of p53 suggested that it may function as a transcription factor, we used GAL4 fusion assays to test that possibility. We found that wild-type p53 could specifically activate transcription when anchored by the GAL4 DNA binding domain. Mutant p53s, which have lost the ability to suppress foci formation by other oncogenes, were not able to activate transcription in this assay. Thus, we established a direct correlation between the tumor suppression and transactivation functions of p53.^ Having learned that p53 was a transcriptional activator, we next sought targets of p53 activation. Because many transcription factors regulate their own expression, we tested whether p53 had this autoregulatory property. Transient expression of wild-type p53 in cells increased the levels of endogenous p53 mRNA. Cotransfection of p53 together with a reporter bearing the p53 promoter confirmed that wild-type p53 specifically activates its own promoter. Deletion analysis from both the 5$\sp\prime$ and 3$\sp\prime$ ends of the promoter minimized the region responsible for p53 autoregulation to 45 bp. Methylation interference identified nucleotides involved in protein-DNA interaction. Mutations within this protected site specifically eliminated the response of the promoter to p53. In addition, multiple copies of this element confer responsiveness to wild-type p53 expression. Thus, we identified a F53 responsive element within the p53 promoter.^ The presence of a consensus NF-$\kappa$B site in the p53 promoter suggested that NF-KB may regulate p53 expression. Gel-shift experiments showed that both the p50 homodimer and the p50/p65 heterodimer bind to the p53 promoter. In addition, the p65 subunit of NF-$\kappa$B activates the p53 promoter in transient transfection experiments. TNF $\alpha$, a natural NF-$\kappa$B inducer, also activates the p53 promoter. Both p65 activation and TNF $\alpha$ induction require an intact NF-$\kappa$B site in the p53 promoter. Since NF-$\kappa$B activation occurs as a response to stress and p53 arrests cells in G1/S, where DNA repair occurs, activation of p53 by NF-$\kappa$B could be a mechanism by which cells recover from stress.^ In conclusion, we provided the first data that wild-type p53 functions as a transcriptional activator, whereas mutant p53 cannot. The correlation between growth suppression and transcriptional activation by p53 implies a pathway of tumor suppression. We have analyzed upstream components of the pathway by the identification of both p53 and NF-$\kappa$B as regulators of the p53 promoter. ^

Analysis of the mechanism of replication inhibition of the tumor suppressor gene p53

p53 plays a role in cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. p53 has also been shown to be involved in DNA replication. To study the effect of p53 on DNA replication, we utilized a SV40 based shuttle vector system. The pZ402 shuttle vector, was constructed with a mutated T-antigen unable to interact with p53 but able to support replication of the shuttle vector. When a transcriptional activation domain p53 mutant was tested for its ability to inhibit DNA replication no inhibition was observed. Competition assays with the DNA binding domain of p53 was also able to block the inhibition of DNA replication by p53 suggesting that p53 can inhibit DNA replication through the transcriptional activation of a target gene. One likely target gene, p21$\sp{\rm cip/waf}$ was tested to determine whether p53 inhibited DNA replication by transcriptionally activating p21$\sp{\rm cip/waf}$. Two independent approaches utilizing p21$\sp{\rm cip/waf}$ null cells or the expression of an anti-sense p21$\sp{\rm cip/waf}$ expression vector were utilized. p53 was able to inhibit pZ402 replication independently of p21$\sp{\rm cip/waf}$. p53 was also able to inhibit DNA replication independent of the p53 target genes Gadd45 and the replication processivity factor PCNA. The inhibition of DNA replication by p53 was also independent of direct DNA binding to a consensus site on the replicating plasmid. p53 mutants can be classified into two categories: conformational and DNA contact mutants. The two types of p53 mutants were tested for their effects on DNA replication. While all conformational mutants were unable to inhibit DNA replication three out of three DNA contact mutants tested were able to inhibit DNA replication. The work here studies the effect wild-type and mutant p53 has on DNA replication and demonstrated a possible mechanism by which wild-type p53 could inhibit DNA replication through the transcriptional activation of a target gene. ^

Biological effects of PEA3 expression in {\it HER-2\/}/{\it neu\/}-overexpressing human cancer cells and the molecular mechanisms of PEA3-mediated transcriptional repression on {\it HER-2\/}/{\it neu\/}

HER-2/neu is a receptor tyrosine kinase highly homologous with epidermal growth factor receptor. Overexpression and/or amplification of HER-2/neu has been implicated in the genesis of a number of human cancers, especially breast and ovarian cancers. Transcriptional upregulation has been shown to contribute significantly to the overexpression of this gene. Studies on the transcriptional regulation of HER-2/neu gene are important for understanding the mechanism of cell transformation and developing the therapeutic strategies to block HER-2/neu-mediated cancers. PEA3 is a DNA binding transcriptional factor and its consensus sequence exists on the HER-2/neu promoter. To examine the role of PEA3 in HER-2/neu expression and cell transformation, we transfected PEA3 into the human breast and ovarian cancer cells that overexpress HER-2/neu and showed that PEA3 dramatically represses HER-2/neu transcription. PEA3 suppresses the oncogenic neu-mediated transformation in mouse fibroblast NIH 3T3 cells. Expression of PEA3 selectively blocks the growth of human cancer cells that overexpress HER-2/neu and inhibits their colony formation. It does not occur in the cancer cells expressing basal level of HER-2/neu. Further studies in the orthotopic ovarian cancer model demonstrated that expression of PEA3 preferentially inhibits growth and tumor development of human cancer cells that overexpress HER-2/neu, the tumor-bearing mice survived significantly longer if treated by injection of the PEA3-liposome complex intraperitoneally. Immunoblotting and immunohistochemical analysis of the tumor tissues indicated that PEA3 mediates the tumor suppression activity through targeting HER-2/neu-p185. Thus, PEA3 is a negative regulator of HER-2/neu gene expression and functions as a tumor suppressor gene in the HER-2/neu-overexpressing human cancer cells.^ The molecular mechanisms of PEA3 mediated transcriptional repression were investigated. PEA3 binds specifically at the PEA3 site on HER-2/neu promoter and this promoter-binding is required for the PEA3 mediated transcriptional repression. Mutation of the PEA3 binding site on HER-2/neu promoter causes decreased transcriptional activity, indicating that the PEA3 binding site is an enhancer-like element in the HER-2/neu-overexpressing cells. We therefore hypothesized that in the HER-2/neu-overexpressing cells, PEA3 competes with a transactivator for binding to the PEA3 site, preventing the putative factor from activating the transcription of HER-2/neu. This hypothesis was supported by the data which demonstrate that PEA3 competes with another nuclear protein for binding to the HER-2/neu promoter in vitro, and expression of a truncated protein which encodes the DNA binding domain of PEA3 is sufficient to repress HER-2/neu transcription in the HER-2/neu-overexpressing human cancer cells. ^