The challenge of modeling nuclear receptor regulatory networks in mammalian cells.

Nuclear receptors are a major component of signal transduction in animals. They mediate the regulatory activities of many hormones, nutrients and metabolites on the homeostasis and physiology of cells and tissues. It is of high interest to model the corresponding regulatory networks. While molecular and cell biology studies of individual promoters have provided important mechanistic insight, a more complex picture is emerging from genome-wide studies. The regulatory circuitry of nuclear receptor regulated gene expression networks, and their response to cellular signaling, appear highly dynamic, and involve long as well as short range chromatin interactions. We review how progress in understanding the kinetics and regulation of cofactor recruitment, and the development of new genomic methods, provide opportunities but also a major challenge for modeling nuclear receptor mediated regulatory networks.

Analysis of LEDGF/p75 expression regulation

Background To replicate, retroviruses must insert DNA copies of their RNA genomes into the host genome. This integration process is catalyzed by the viral integrase protein. The site of viral integration has been shown to be non-random and retrovirus-specific. LEDGF/p75, a splice variant encoded by PSIP1 gene and described as a general transcription coactivator, was identified as a tethering factor binding both to chromatin and to lentiviral integrases, thereby affecting integration efficiency as well as integration site selection. LEDGF/p75 is still a poorly characterized protein, and its cellular endogenous function has yet to be fully determined. In order to start unveiling the roles of LEDGF/p75 in the cell, we started to investigate the mechanisms involved in the regulation of LEDGF/p75. Materials and methods To identify PSIP1 minimal promoter and associated regulatory elements, we cloned a region starting 5 kb upstream the transcription start site (TSS, +1 reference position) to the ATG start codon (+816), as well as systematic truncations, in a plasmid containing the firefly luciferase reporter gene. These constructs were co-transfected into HEK293 cells with a plasmid encoding the Renilla luciferase under the pTK promoter as an internal control for transfection efficiency. Both luciferase activities were assessed by luminescence as an indicator of promoter activity. Results Luciferase assays identified regions -76 to +1 and +1 to +94 as two independent minimal promoters showing respectively a 3.7x and 2.3x increase in luciferase activity. These two independent minimal promoters worked synergistically increasing luciferase activity up to 16.3x as compared to background. Moreover, we identified five regulatory blocks which modulated luciferase activity depending on the DNA region tested, three enhancers (- 2007 to -1159, -284 to -171 and +94 to +644) and two silencers (-171 to -76 and +796 to +816). However, the silencing effect of the region -171 to -76 is dependent on the presence of the +94 to +644 region, ruling out the enhancer activity of the latter. Computational analysis of PSIP1 promoter revealed the absence of TATA box and initiator (INR) sequences, classifying this promoter as nonconventional. TATA-less and INR-less promoters are characterized by multiple Sp1 binding sites, involved in the recruitment of the RNA pol II complex. Consistent with this, PSIP1 promoter contains multiple putative Sp1 binding sequences in regions -76 to +1 and +1 to +94.

CNOT3 is a modifier of PRPF31 mutations in retinitis pigmentosa with incomplete penetrance.

Heterozygous mutations in the PRPF31 gene cause autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (adRP), a hereditary disorder leading to progressive blindness. In some cases, such mutations display incomplete penetrance, implying that certain carriers develop retinal degeneration while others have no symptoms at all. Asymptomatic carriers are protected from the disease by a higher than average expression of the PRPF31 allele that is not mutated, mainly through the action of an unknown modifier gene mapping to chromosome 19q13.4. We investigated a large family with adRP segregating an 11-bp deletion in PRPF31. The analysis of cell lines derived from asymptomatic and affected individuals revealed that the expression of only one gene among a number of candidates within the 19q13.4 interval significantly correlated with that of PRPF31, both at the mRNA and protein levels, and according to an inverse relationship. This gene was CNOT3, encoding a subunit of the Ccr4-not transcription complex. In cultured cells, siRNA-mediated silencing of CNOT3 provoked an increase in PRPF31 expression, confirming a repressive nature of CNOT3 on PRPF31. Furthermore, chromatin immunoprecipitation revealed that CNOT3 directly binds to a specific PRPF31 promoter sequence, while next-generation sequencing of the CNOT3 genomic region indicated that its variable expression is associated with a common intronic SNP. In conclusion, we identify CNOT3 as the main modifier gene determining penetrance of PRPF31 mutations, via a mechanism of transcriptional repression. In asymptomatic carriers CNOT3 is expressed at low levels, allowing higher amounts of wild-type PRPF31 transcripts to be produced and preventing manifestation of retinal degeneration.

Interactions of Adeno-associated virus Rep78 protein with the host cell

Abstract : Adeno-associated virus (AAV) is a small DNA virus belonging to the familiy of Parvoviridae. Its genome contains two genes : the rep gene encoding four non structural proteins (Rep78, 68, 52 and 40) implicated in transcription, replication and site-specific integration of the viral DNA and the cap gene encoding three capsid proteins. AAV does not cause any disease, but is studied in view of its potential use to treat several diseases. An interesting property of AAV is its antiproliferative effect. Two elements of AAV can inhibit cell growth. Firstly, the single stranded viral DNA is recognized in cells as damaged DNA leading to either a G2 block or cell death depending on p53 status. Secondly, the two larger Rep proteins (Rep78 and 68) also arrest the cell cycle when they are expressed at high levels. Rep78 in particular induces a complete cell cycle arrest in all the phases, including S phase. Such a strong S phase arrest is rarely seen in other conditions. It was thus interesting to determine how Rep78 could induce it. We found that this strong block is the consequence of Rep78's effects on at least two pathways. Rep78 induces a DNA damage response by producing nicks in the cellular chromatin. Furthermore, Rep78 can bind to the cellular phosphatase Cdc25A and prevent its binding to its substrates CDK2 and CDK1, thus inhibiting its activity. A mutational analysis of Rep78 protein determined that its endonuclease activity is responsible for the DNA damage response and its zinc finger domain for Cdc25A inhibition. The combined expression of two mutants each defective for one of these activities, or these two activities obtained independently of Rep78, could restore the complete cell cycle block, indicating that these two effects of Rep78 are likely to explain completely the cell cycle block it induces. Secondly, the lack of pathogenicity of AAV, its broad range of infection and its ability to integrate site-specifically in human chromosome 19 make it an interesting potential vector for gene therapy. However site-specific integration is only possible in the presence of Rep78/68 whose gene is removed in recombinant AAV vectors. In this part of the study, we tried to introduce Rep protein separately from recombinant AAV vectors to promote their site-specific integration. For that purpose, a fusion protein, TAT-Rep, comprising Rep78/68 joined to the human immunodeficiency virus Tat protein was produced. It had the ability to enter cells and remain active there for a short period. Its activity was sufficient to mediate transcription from the p5 promoter, second-strand synthesis of a recombinant AAV and probably site-specific integration. Résumé : Le virus associé à l'adénovirus (AAV) est un petit virus à ADN qui fait partie de la famille des Parvoviridae. Son génome contient deux gènes : le gène rep code pour quatre protéines (Rep78, 68, 52 et 40) qui participent à la transcription, la réplication et l'intégration du virus et le gène cap code pour les trois protéines de capside. AAV ne produit pas de maladie, mais pourrait au contraire être utilisé pour en soigner. Sa bénignité, sa capacité à infecter différents types de cellules et son intégration spécifique en font un vecteur potentiel pour la thérapie génique. Pour qu'il puisse s'intégrer spécifiquement, il a besoin de la protéine Rep78 ou 68, mais ce gène doit être enlevé des vecteurs pour la thérapie génique. Le but de la première partie de cette étude était d'introduire Rep78 ou 68 dans des cellules en même temps qu'un AAV recombinant, mais indépendamment afin de permettre une intégration spécifique. La stratégie utilisée était de produire une protéine de fusion (TAT-Rep) qui peut entrer dans des cellules si elle est présente dans leur milieu. Cette protéine entrait bien dans les cellules et y était active favorisant ainsi l'intégration spécifique. Une deuxième propriété d'AAV, son effet anti-prolifératif, est intéressante dans le cadre de certaines maladies comme le cancer. Deux éléments d'AAV en sont responsables. D'abord, son ADN simple brin active une réponse cellulaire à l'ADN endommagé et arrête les cellules en G2 ou provoque leur mort. De plus, la protéine Rep78 d'AAV peut fortement bloquer le cycle cellulaire à toutes les phases, même en phase S, ce qui est rare. C'est pourquoi nous avons essayé de comprendre cet effet. Nous avons remarqué que Rep78 doit agir sur deux fronts pour obtenir ce fort bloc. D'un côté, Rep78 introduit des coupures simple brin sur l'ADN de la cellule ce qui active une réponse cellulaire à l'ADN endommagé qui passe par ATM. D'un autre côté, Rep78 lie une phosphatase cellulaire, Cdc25A, et l'empêche ainsi de lier ses substrats CDK2 et CDK1 et donc d'être active. Finalement, à l'aide de mutants de Rep78, nous avons déterminé que l'activité endonuclease de Rep78 était nécessaire pour induire une réponse cellulaire via ATM et que le domaine C-terminal appelé «zinc finger » était responsable de la liaison avec Cdc25A. En co-exprimant deux mutants, qui n'ont chacun qu'un des effets de Rep78, ou en obtenant les deux effets de Rep78 indépendamment d'elle, nous avons obtenu un bloc complet du cycle cellulaire similaire à celui obtenu avec Rep78. Il est donc probable que ces deux effets de Rep78 sont suffisants pour expliquer comment elle arrive à arrêter le cycle cellulaire si efficacement.

Assaying the regulatory potential of mammalian conserved non-coding sequences in human cells.

BACKGROUND: Conserved non-coding sequences in the human genome are approximately tenfold more abundant than known genes, and have been hypothesized to mark the locations of cis-regulatory elements. However, the global contribution of conserved non-coding sequences to the transcriptional regulation of human genes is currently unknown. Deeply conserved elements shared between humans and teleost fish predominantly flank genes active during morphogenesis and are enriched for positive transcriptional regulatory elements. However, such deeply conserved elements account for <1% of the conserved non-coding sequences in the human genome, which are predominantly mammalian. RESULTS: We explored the regulatory potential of a large sample of these 'common' conserved non-coding sequences using a variety of classic assays, including chromatin remodeling, and enhancer/repressor and promoter activity. When tested across diverse human model cell types, we find that the fraction of experimentally active conserved non-coding sequences within any given cell type is low (approximately 5%), and that this proportion increases only modestly when considered collectively across cell types. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that classic assays of cis-regulatory potential are unlikely to expose the functional potential of the substantial majority of mammalian conserved non-coding sequences in the human genome.

Phosphorylation regulates FOXC2-mediated transcription in lymphatic endothelial cells.

One of the key mechanisms linking cell signaling and control of gene expression is reversible phosphorylation of transcription factors. FOXC2 is a forkhead transcription factor that is mutated in the human vascular disease lymphedema-distichiasis and plays an essential role in lymphatic vascular development. However, the mechanisms regulating FOXC2 transcriptional activity are not well understood. We report here that FOXC2 is phosphorylated on eight evolutionarily conserved proline-directed serine/threonine residues. Loss of phosphorylation at these sites triggers substantial changes in the FOXC2 transcriptional program. Through genome-wide location analysis in lymphatic endothelial cells, we demonstrate that the changes are due to selective inhibition of FOXC2 recruitment to chromatin. The extent of the inhibition varied between individual binding sites, suggesting a novel rheostat-like mechanism by which expression of specific genes can be differentially regulated by FOXC2 phosphorylation. Furthermore, unlike the wild-type protein, the phosphorylation-deficient mutant of FOXC2 failed to induce vascular remodeling in vivo. Collectively, our results point to the pivotal role of phosphorylation in the regulation of FOXC2-mediated transcription in lymphatic endothelial cells and underscore the importance of FOXC2 phosphorylation in vascular development.

Nonsense Mutations in FAM161A Cause RP28-Associated Recessive Retinitis Pigmentosa.

Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is a degenerative disease of the retina leading to progressive loss of vision and, in many instances, to legal blindness at the end stage. The RP28 locus was assigned in 1999 to the short arm of chromosome 2 by homozygosity mapping in a large Indian family segregating autosomal-recessive RP (arRP). Following a combined approach of chromatin immunoprecipitation and parallel sequencing of genomic DNA, we identified a gene, FAM161A, which was shown to carry a homozygous nonsense mutation (p.Arg229X) in patients from the original RP28 pedigree. Another homozygous FAM161A stop mutation (p.Arg437X) was detected in three subjects from a cohort of 118 apparently unrelated German RP patients. Age at disease onset in these patients was in the second to third decade, with severe visual handicap in the fifth decade and legal blindness in the sixth to seventh decades. FAM161A is a phylogenetically conserved gene, expressed in the retina at relatively high levels and encoding a putative 76 kDa protein of unknown function. In the mouse retina, Fam161a mRNA is developmentally regulated and controlled by the transcription factor Crx, as demonstrated by chromatin immunoprecipitation and organotypic reporter assays on explanted retinas. Fam161a protein localizes to photoreceptor cells during development, and in adult animals it is present in the inner segment as well as the outer plexiform layer of the retina, the synaptic interface between photoreceptors and their efferent neurons. Taken together, our data indicate that null mutations in FAM161A are responsible for the RP28-associated arRP.

Fate of linear and supercoiled multinucleosomic templates during transcription.

Electron microscopy was used to monitor the fate of reconstituted nucleosome cores during in vitro transcription of long linear and supercoiled multinucleosomic templates by the prokaryotic T7 RNA polymerase and the eukaryotic RNA polymerase II. Transcription by T7 RNA polymerase disrupted the nucleosomal configuration in the transcribed region, while nucleosomes were preserved upstream of the transcription initiation site and in front of the polymerase. Nucleosome disruption was independent of the topology of the template, linear or supercoiled, and of the presence or absence of nucleosome positioning sequences in the transcribed region. In contrast, the nucleosomal configuration was preserved during transcription from the vitellogenin B1 promoter with RNA polymerase II in a rat liver total nuclear extract. However, the persistence of nucleosomes on the template was not RNA polymerase II-specific, but was dependent on another activity present in the nuclear extract. This was demonstrated by addition of the extract to the T7 RNA polymerase transcription reaction, which resulted in retention of the nucleosomal configuration. This nuclear activity, also found in HeLa cell nuclei, is heat sensitive and could not be substituted by nucleoplasmin, chromatin assembly factor (CAF-I) or a combination thereof. Altogether, these results identify a novel nuclear activity, called herein transcription-dependent chromatin stabilizing activity I or TCSA-I, which may be involved in a nucleosome transfer mechanism during transcription.

A user's guide to the encyclopedia of DNA elements (ENCODE).

The mission of the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) Project is to enable the scientific and medical communities to interpret the human genome sequence and apply it to understand human biology and improve health. The ENCODE Consortium is integrating multiple technologies and approaches in a collective effort to discover and define the functional elements encoded in the human genome, including genes, transcripts, and transcriptional regulatory regions, together with their attendant chromatin states and DNA methylation patterns. In the process, standards to ensure high-quality data have been implemented, and novel algorithms have been developed to facilitate analysis. Data and derived results are made available through a freely accessible database. Here we provide an overview of the project and the resources it is generating and illustrate the application of ENCODE data to interpret the human genome.

A role for Yin Yang-1 (YY1) in the assembly of snRNA transcription complexes.

The RNA polymerase (pol) II and III human small nuclear RNA (snRNA) genes have very similar promoters and recruit a number of common factors. In particular, both types of promoters utilize the small nuclear RNA activating protein complex (SNAP(c)) and the TATA box binding protein (TBP) for basal transcription, and are activated by Oct-1. We find that SNAP(c) purified from cell lines expressing tagged SNAP(c) subunits is associated with Yin Yang-1 (YY1), a factor implicated in both activation and repression of transcription. Recombinant YY1 accelerates the binding of SNAP(c) to the proximal sequence element, its target within snRNA promoters. Moreover, it enhances the formation of a complex on the pol III U6 snRNA promoter containing all the factors (SNAP(c), TBP, TFIIB-related factor 2 (Brf2), and B double prime 1 (Bdp1)) that are sufficient to direct in vitro U6 transcription when complemented with purified pol III, as well as that of a subcomplex containing TBP, Brf2, and Bdp1. YY1 is found on both the RNA polymerase II U1 and the RNA polymerase III U6 promoters as determined by chromatin immunoprecipitations. Thus, YY1 represents a new factor that participates in transcription complexes formed on both pol II and III promoters.

Functional analysis of human POT1 and RPA : insights into the role of single stranded DNA binding proteins at telomeres

Abstract Telomeres, the natural ends of chromosomes, need to be protected from chromosome end fusions, aberrant homologous recombination and degradation. In humans, chromosome ends are specified through arrays of tandemly repeated 5'-TTAGGG-3' hexamers, ending in a 3' overhang. A complex formed by the six proteins TRF1, TRF2, hRap1, TIN2, TPP1 and POT1 specifically assocìates with and protects telomeres. Telomeres are maintained by semiconservative DNA replication and by a specialized reverse transcriptase, telomerase, that carries an RNA subunit which templates new telomeric repeat synthesis. The telomeric single stranded (ss) DNA binding protein POT1 protects the telomeric 3' overhang and modulates telomerase-mediated telomere elongation. It is possible that POT1 also influences DNA synthesis during semiconservative DNA replication, which is initiated by the DNA polymerase alpha-primase complex. The heterotrimeric ss DNA-binding protein RPA plays essential roles during DNA replication. RPA binds to ss DNA with high affinity in order to stabilize ss DNA and facilitate nascent strand synthesis at the replication fork. Here we investigate how the two proteins RPA and POT1 contribute to telomere maintenance by regulating semi-conservative DNA replication and telomerase. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments, we show that RPA associates with telomeres during S-phase. Analysis of telomere structure in cells shRNA-depleted for RPA and POT1 reveals that loss of RPA and POT1 causes exposure of single-stranded DNA at telomeres, suggestive of incomplete DNA replication. Biochemical experiments using purified recombinant POT1 and RPA show that saturating telomeric oligonucleotides with POT1 or RPA reduces the primase activity of the DNA polymerase alpha-primase complex and the overall activity of telomerase. POT1 and RPA also increase the primer extension by DNA polymerase alpha-primase complex and the processivity of telomerase under certain conditions, although POT1 increases the activities to a greater extent than RPA. We propose that POT1 is required for proper replication of the lagging strand of telomeres and that some phenotypes observed in POT1-depleted cells may stern from incomplete DNA replication rather than de-protection of the single-stranded overhang. Résumé Les télomères, les extrémités normales des chromosomes linéaires, doivent être protégés des fusions chromosomiques, d'événements de recombinaison homologue aberrants et de phénomènes de dégradation. Chez l'Homme, les extrémités des chromosomes sont constitués d'ADN double brin répétitif de séquence 5'-TTAGGG-3', d'une extension simple brin 3' sortante et d'un complexe protéique formé des six facteurs TRF1, TRF2, hRap1, TIN2, TPP1 et POT1 qui, s'associant à cette séquence, protègent l'ADN télomèrique. Les télomères sont maintenus par la télomérase, une transcriptase inverse capable d'allonger l'extension 3' sortante télomérique. POT1 lie l'ADN simple brin télomérique et module l'élongation des télomères par la télomérase. POT1 pourrait en théorie également influencer la réplication semi-conservative de l'ADN. L'ADN-polymérase Pal alpha-primase amorce et initie la synthèse d'ADN. Pendant la réplication, l'ADN simple brin est stabilisé par RPA, un complexe hétérotrimèrique qui lie l'ADN simple brin. RPA facilite la synthèse du brin naissant à la fourche de réplication. Ici nous avons étudié comment ces deux protéines qui lient l'ADN simple brin, RPA et POT1, régulent la réplication des télomères par la télomérase et la machinerie classique de réplication de l'ADN. Par immunoprécipitation de chromatine (ChIP), nous montrons que RPA est localisé aux télomères lors de la phase S du cycle cellulaire. De plus, l'analyse de la structure des télomeres indique que !a perte de RPA ou de POT1 conduit à l'apparition d'ADN simple brin télomérique, suggérant une réplication incomplète de l'ADN télomérique in vivo. Par une approche complémentaire biochimique utilisant les protéines POT1 et RPA recombinantes purifiées, nous montrons également que la liaison de POT1 ou de RPA à des oligonucléotides télomériques bloque l'activité primase du complexe polymérase alpha/primase et réduit l'activité télomérase sur ces substrats. En revanche, leur liaison augmente l'activité ADN-polymérase du complexe polymérase alpha/primase, ainsi que fa processivité de la télomérase dans certaines conditions, POT1 étant le plus efficace des deux facteurs. Nous proposons que POT1 est nécessaire à la réplication du brin retardé au niveau des télomères, ce qui suggère que certains phénotypes des cellules déplétés en POT1 puissent résulter d'une réplication incomplète de l'ADN télémétrique plutôt que d'une déprotection de l'extrémité sortante des télomères.

The p63 target HBP1 is required for skin differentiation and stratification.

Genetic experiments established that p63 is crucial for the development and maintenance of pluristratified epithelia. In the RNA interference (RNAi) screening for targets of p63 in keratinocytes, we identified the transcription factor, High Mobility Group (HMG) box protein 1 (HBP1). HBP1 is an HMG-containing repressor transiently induced during differentiation of several cell lineages. We investigated the relationship between the two factors: using RNAi, overexpression, chromatin immunoprecipitations and transient transfections with reporter constructs, we established that HBP1 is directly repressed by p63. This was further confirmed in vivo by evaluating expression in p63 knockout mice and in transgenics expressing p63 in basal keratinocytes. Consistent with these findings, expression of HBP1 increases upon differentiation of primary keratinocytes and HaCaT cells in culture, and it is higher in the upper layers of human skin. Inactivation of HBP1 by RNAi prevents differentiation of keratinocytes and stratification of organotypic skin cultures. Finally, we analyzed the keratinocyte transcriptomes after HBP1 RNAi; in addition to repression of growth-promoting genes, unexpected activation of differentiation genes was uncovered, coexisting with repression of other genes involved in epithelial cornification. Our data indicate that suppression of HBP1 is part of the growth-promoting strategy of p63 in the lower layers of epidermis and that HBP1 temporally coordinates expression of genes involved in stratification, leading to the formation of the skin barrier.

Association of nuclear matrix proteins with granular and threaded nuclear bodies in cell lines undergoing apoptosis.

The granules which appear in the nucleolar area in apoptotic HL-60 cells after camptothecin administration (Zweyer et al., Exp. Cell Res. 221,27-40, 1995) were detected also in several other cell lines induced to undergo apoptosis by different stimuli, such as MOLT-4 treated with staurosporine, K-562 incubated with actinomycin D, P-815 exposed to temperature causing heat shock, Jurkat cells treated with EGTA, U-937 growing in the presence of cycloheximide and tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and HeLa cells treated with etoposide. Using immunoelectron microscopy techniques, we demonstrate that, besides the already described nuclear matrix proteins p125 and p160, these granules contain other nucleoskeletal polypeptides such as proliferating cell nuclear antigen, a component of ribonucleoprotein particles, a 105-kDa constituent of nuclear spliceosomes, and the 240-kDa nuclear mitotic apparatus-associated protein referred to as NuMA. Moreover, we also found in the granules SAF-A/hn-RNP-U and SATB1 proteins, two polypeptides that have been reported to bind scaffold-associated regions DNA sequences in vitro, thus mediating the formation of looped DNA structures in vivo. Fibrillarin and coilin are not present in these granules or the PML protein. Thus, the granules seen during the apoptotic process apparently are different from coiled bodies or other types of nuclear bodies. Furthermore, these granules do not contain chromatin components such as histones and DNA. Last, Western blotting analysis revealed that nuclear matrix proteins present in the granules are not proteolytically degraded except for the NuMA polypeptide. We propose that these granules might represent aggregates of nuclear matrix proteins forming during the apoptotic process. Moreover, since the granules are present in several cell lines undergoing apoptosis, they could be considered a previously unrecognized morphological hallmark of the apoptotic process.

Glycogen synthase 2 is a novel target gene of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors.

Glycogen synthase 2 (Gys-2) is the ratelimiting enzyme in the storage of glycogen in liver and adipose tissue, yet little is known about regulation of Gys-2 transcription. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are transcription factors involved in the regulation of lipid and glucose metabolism and might be hypothesized to govern glycogen synthesis as well. Here, we show that Gys-2 is a direct target gene of PPARalpha, PPARbeta/delta and PPARgamma. Expression of Gys-2 is significantly reduced in adipose tissue of PPARalpha-/-, PPARbeta/delta-/- and PPARgamma+/- mice. Furthermore, synthetic PPARbeta/delta, and gamma agonists markedly up-regulate Gys-2 mRNA and protein expression in mouse 3T3-L1 adipocytes. In liver, PPARalpha deletion leads to decreased glycogen levels in the refed state, which is paralleled by decreased expression of Gys-2 in fasted and refed state. Two putative PPAR response elements (PPREs) were identified in the mouse Gys-2 gene: one in the upstream promoter (DR-1prom) and one in intron 1 (DR-1int). It is shown that DR-1int is the response element for PPARs, while DR-1prom is the response element for Hepatic Nuclear Factor 4 alpha (HNF4alpha). In adipose tissue, which does not express HNF4alpha, DR-1prom is occupied by PPARbeta/delta and PPARgamma, yet binding does not translate into transcriptional activation of Gys-2. Overall, we conclude that mouse Gys-2 is a novel PPAR target gene and that transactivation by PPARs and HNF4alpha is mediated by two distinct response elements.