Fractal sets and their applications in medicine

La geometria euclidea risulta spesso inadeguata a descrivere le forme della natura. I Frattali, oggetti interrotti e irregolari, come indica il nome stesso, sono più adatti a rappresentare la forma frastagliata delle linee costiere o altri elementi naturali. Lo strumento necessario per studiare rigorosamente i frattali sono i teoremi riguardanti la misura di Hausdorff, con i quali possono definirsi gli s-sets, dove s è la dimensione di Hausdorff. Se s non è intero, l'insieme in gioco può riconoscersi come frattale e non presenta tangenti e densità in quasi nessun punto. I frattali più classici, come gli insiemi di Cantor, Koch e Sierpinski, presentano anche la proprietà di auto-similarità e la dimensione di similitudine viene a coincidere con quella di Hausdorff. Una tecnica basata sulla dimensione frattale, detta box-counting, interviene in applicazioni bio-mediche e risulta utile per studiare le placche senili di varie specie di mammiferi tra cui l'uomo o anche per distinguere un melanoma maligno da una diversa lesione della cute.

What sets the odds of winning and losing?

Social experience influences the outcome of conflicts such that winners are more likely to win again and losers will more likely lose again, even against different opponents. Although winner and loser effects prevail throughout the animal kingdom and crucially influence social structures, the ultimate and proximate causes for their existence remain unknown. We propose here that two hypotheses are particularly important among the potential adaptive explanations: the 'social-cue hypothesis', which assumes that victory and defeat leave traces that affect the decisions of subsequent opponents; and the 'self-assessment hypothesis', which assumes that winners and losers gain information about their own relative fighting ability in the population. We discuss potential methodologies for experimental tests of the adaptive nature of winner and loser effects.

Cervical soft tissue imaging using a mobile CBCT scanner with a flat panel detector in comparison with corresponding CT and MRI data sets

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate soft tissue image quality of a mobile cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanner with an integrated flat-panel detector. STUDY DESIGN: Eight fresh human cadavers were used in this study. For evaluation of soft tissue visualization, CBCT data sets and corresponding computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data sets were acquired. Evaluation was performed with the help of 10 defined cervical anatomical structures. RESULTS: The statistical analysis of the scoring results of 3 examiners revealed the CBCT images to be of inferior quality regarding the visualization of most of the predefined structures. Visualization without a significant difference was found regarding the demarcation of the vertebral bodies and the pyramidal cartilages, the arteriosclerosis of the carotids (compared with CT), and the laryngeal skeleton (compared with MRI). Regarding arteriosclerosis of the carotids compared with MRI, CBCT proved to be superior. CONCLUSIONS: The integration of a flat-panel detector improves soft tissue visualization using a mobile CBCT scanner.