La cooperazione amministrativa tra stati membri in materia fiscale: verso una amministrazione finanziaria "europea"

L’armonizzazione fiscale è una importante sfida che l’Unione Europea si trova ad affrontare per la completa realizzazione del mercato interno. Le istituzioni comunitarie, tuttavia, non dispongono delle competenze legislative per intervenire direttamente negli ordinamenti tributari degli Stati membri. Svolgendo una analisi del contesto legislativo vigente, ed esaminando le prospettive de iure condendo della materia fiscale dell’Unione, il presente lavoro cerca di comprendere le prospettive di evoluzione del sistema, sia dal punto di vista della normativa fiscale sostanziale, che procedimentale. Mediante la disciplina elaborata a livello comunitario che regola la cooperazione amministrativa in materia fiscale, con particolare riferimento alle direttive relative allo scambio di informazioni e all’assistenza alla riscossione (dir. 2011/16/UE e dir. 2010/24/UE) si permette alle Amministrazioni degli Stati membri di avere accesso ai reciproci ordinamenti giuridici, e conoscerne i meccanismi. L’attuazione di tali norme fa sì che ciascun ordinamento abbia l’opportunità di importare le best practices implementate dagli altri Stati. L’obiettivo sarà quello di migliorare il proprio procedimento amministrativo tributario, da un lato, e di rendere più immediati gli scambi di informazione e la cooperazione alla riscossione, dall’altro. L’armonizzazione fiscale all’interno dell’Unione verrebbe perseguita, anziché mediante un intervento a livello europeo, attraverso un coordinamento “dal basso” degli ordinamenti fiscali, realizzato attraverso l’attività di cooperazione delle amministrazioni che opereranno su un substrato di regole condivise. La maggiore apertura delle amministrazioni fiscali dei Paesi membri e la maggiore spontaneità degli scambi di informazioni, ha una efficacia deterrente di fenomeni di evasione e di sottrazione di imposta posti in essere al fine di avvantaggiarsi delle differenze dei sistemi impositivi dei vari paesi. Nel lungo periodo ciò porterà verosimilmente, gli Stati membri a livellare i sistemi impositivi, dal momento che i medesimi non avranno più interesse ad utilizzare la leva fiscale per generare una concorrenza tra gli ordinamenti.

Il diritto alla detrazione e le frodi Iva

Il presente lavoro parte dalla constatazione che l’Imposta sul valore aggiunto è stata introdotta con lo scopo specifico di tassare il consumo in modo uniforme a livello europeo. La globalizzazione dell’economia con l’abolizione delle frontiere ha tuttavia favorito la nascita non solo di un mercato unico europeo, ma anche di “un mercato unico delle frodi”. L’esistenza di abusi e frodi in ambito Iva risulta doppiamente dannosa per l’Unione europea: tali condotte incidono quantitativamente sull'ammontare delle risorse proprie dell’Unione e sulle entrate fiscali dei singoli Stati membri nonché violano il principio di concorrenza e producono distorsioni nel mercato unico. È in questo contesto che intervengono i giudici nazionali e la Corte di Giustizia, al fine di porre un freno a tali fenomeni patologici. Quest’ultima, chiamata a far rispettare il diritto comunitario, ha sviluppato una misura antifrode e antiabuso consistente nel diniego del diritto alla detrazione qualora lo stesso venga invocato dal soggetto passivo abusivamente o fraudolentemente. Vedremo però che il problema non può essere facilmente ridotto a formule operative: al di là dello schema, fin troppo scontato, dell’operatore apertamente disonesto e degli operatori con esso dichiaratamente correi, rimane il territorio grigio dei soggetti coinvolti, qualche volta inconsapevolmente qualche volta consapevolmente, ma senza concreta partecipazione nella frode da altri orchestrata. Permane a questo punto la domanda se sia coerente - in un sistema impositivo che privilegia i profili oggettivi, prescindendo, salvo gli aspetti sanzionatori, da quelli soggettivi- negare il diritto alla detrazione Iva per asserita consapevolezza di comportamenti fraudolenti altrui o se non vi siano regole più adatte al fine di porre un freno alle frodi e dunque più conformi al principio di proporzionalità.

Planeamento Fiscal nas operações relativas a instrumentos financeiros derivados e a sua tributação

Mestrado em Fiscalidade

Branqueamento de Capitais, Fraude Fiscal e Corrupção Internacional

Resumo: a fraude fiscal é um dos crimes que pode dar origem a um outro crime, o crime de branqueamento de capitais e/ou lavagem de dinheiro, como é mais conhecido por exemplo no Brasil. O branqueamento de capitais é apenas um dos exemplos do branqueamento de vantagens. Toda esta actividade pode ser incluída, em sentido amplo, na chamada corrupção internacional. Quanto mais internacionais forem estas actividades – fraude fiscal e branqueamento de capitais -, mais eficazes serão os seus proveitos. A fraude fiscal é um crime que pode atingir montantes mais elevados no caso de poder ser praticado em cenários internacionais. O branqueamento de capitais é também um crime que pode atingir montantes mais elevados no caso de poder ser praticado em cenários internacionais. Assim, a corrupção internacional em sentido amplo pode ser apelidada como mercado ideal para a criminalidade. Estamos também a falar de multinacionais do crime. § Abstract: tax fraud is a crime that can lead to another crime, the crime of money laundering. Money laundering is just one example of the whitening benefits. All this activity can be included in a broad sense, the international corruption. The more international are these activities - tax evasion and money laundering - the more effective will be the income. Tax fraud is a crime that can achieve higher amounts if it can be practiced in international scenarios. Money laundering is also a crime that can achieve higher amounts if it can be practiced in international scenarios. Thus, the international corruption in the broad sense can be dubbed as ideal market for the crime. We are talking also about transnational crime.

Fraude Fiscal: parte III

O que é a Fraude Fiscal? Perguntámos nas duas semanas anteriores. Fomos respondendo assim que as ciências jurídicas e a Constituição o permitem. Pois hoje vamos continuar. Na passada 6ª Feira tivemos uma aula magnífica ao vivo do Sr. Prof. Catedrático Doutor Costa Andrade que nos falou sobre “Crimes Tributários na Lei Vigente e Jurisprudência”. Sobre a mesma falaremos nos próximos episódios. É que o Mestre superou as expectativas mais optimistas e que já eram elevadas ao mais alto nível técnico. Cada palavra dava uma tese de mestrado e fartou-se de dar bofetadas científicas naqueles que julgam que as contraordenações são um fenómeno de somenos que pode ser tratado como se as mesmas pudessem ser desnecessárias, desadequadas, desproporcionais e de intervenção máxima, violando direitos fundamentais dos cidadãos. § What is Tax Fraud? We asked in the previous two weeks. We have responded as soon as the legal sciences and the Constitution permit. For today we will continue. Last Friday we had a magnificent live lesson from Mr. Prof. Professor Costa Andrade, who told us about "Tax Crimes in the Current Law and Jurisprudence". About the same we will speak in the next episodes. It is that the Master surpassed the most optimistic expectations and that they were already elevated to the highest technical level. Each word gave a master's thesis and was satisfied to give scientific slaps to those who think that the misconduct is a phenomenon of the same that can be treated as if they could be unnecessary, inadequate, disproportionate and of maximum intervention, violating fundamental rights of the Citizens.

Sales tax enforcement: An empirical analysis of compliance enforcement methodologies and pathologies

Most research on tax evasion has focused on the income tax. Sales tax evasion has been largely ignored and dismissed as immaterial. This paper explored the differences between income tax and sales tax evasion and demonstrated that sales tax enforcement is deserving of and requires the use of different tools to achieve compliance. Specifically, the major enforcement problem with sales tax is not evasion: it is theft perpetrated by companies that act as collection agents for the state. Companies engage in a principal-agent relationship with the state and many retain funds collected as an agent of the state for private use. As such, the act of sales tax theft bears more resemblance to embezzlement than to income tax evasion. It has long been assumed that the sales tax is nearly evasion free, and state revenue departments report voluntary compliance in a manner that perpetuates this myth. Current sales tax compliance enforcement methodologies are similar in form to income tax compliance enforcement methodologies and are based largely on trust. The primary focus is on delinquent filers with a very small percentage of businesses subject to audit. As a result, there is a very large group of noncompliant businesses who file on time and fly below the radar while stealing millions of taxpayer dollars. ^ The author utilized a variety of statistical methods with actual field data derived from operations of the Southern Region Criminal Investigations Unit of the Florida Department of Revenue to evaluate current and proposed sales tax compliance enforcement methodologies in a quasi-experimental, time series research design and to set forth a typology of sales tax evaders. This study showed that current estimates of voluntary compliance in sales tax systems are seriously and significantly overstated and that current enforcement methodologies are inadequate to identify the majority of violators and enforce compliance. Sales tax evasion is modeled using the theory of planned behavior and Cressey’s fraud triangle and it is demonstrated that proactive enforcement activities, characterized by substantial contact with non-delinquent taxpayers, results in superior ability to identify noncompliance and provides a structure through which noncompliant businesses can be rehabilitated.^

HTLV-1 Tax Specific CD8+ T Cells Express Low Levels of Tim-3 in HTLV-1 Infection: Implications for Progression to Neurological Complications

The T cell immunoglobulin mucin 3 (Tim-3) receptor is highly expressed on HIV-1-specific T cells, rendering them partially ""exhausted'' and unable to contribute to the effective immune mediated control of viral replication. To elucidate novel mechanisms contributing to the HTLV-1 neurological complex and its classic neurological presentation called HAM/TSP (HTLV-1 associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis), we investigated the expression of the Tim-3 receptor on CD8(+) T cells from a cohort of HTLV-1 seropositive asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Patients diagnosed with HAM/TSP down-regulated Tim-3 expression on both CD8(+) and CD4(+) T cells compared to asymptomatic patients and HTLV-1 seronegative controls. HTLV-1 Tax-specific, HLA-A*02 restricted CD8(+) T cells among HAM/TSP individuals expressed markedly lower levels of Tim-3. We observed Tax expressing cells in both Tim-3(+) and Tim-3(-) fractions. Taken together, these data indicate that there is a systematic downregulation of Tim-3 levels on T cells in HTLV-1 infection, sustaining a profoundly highly active population of potentially pathogenic T cells that may allow for the development of HTLV-1 complications.

Tax Cost of Investment Projects: the case of ICMS credits

This article discusses the impact on the profitability of firms under Complementary Law 102/2000 (which abrogated the Law 89/96 - Kandir Law) allowing the appropriation of ICMS credits, due to investment in fixed assets goods, at a ratio of 1/48 per month. The paper seeks to demonstrate how this new system - which resulted in the transformation of the ICMS as a value added tax (VAT) consumption-type to an income-type - leads to a loss of approximately 30% of the value of credits to be recovered and the effect it generates on the cost of investment and the profits for small, medium and large firms. From the methodological point of view, it is a descriptive and quantitative research, which proceeded in three stages. Initially, we have obtained estimated value of net sales and volume of investments, based on report Painel de Competitividade prepared by the Federacao das Indtustrias do Estado de Sao Paulo (Fiesp/Serasa). Based on this information, it was possible to obtain estimates of the factors of generation of debits and credits for ICMS, using the model Credit Control of Fixed Assets (CIAP). Finally, we have calculated three indicators: (i) present value of debt recovery/value of credits, (ii) present value of debt recovery / investment value, (iii) present value of debt recovery / sales profitability. We have conclude that the system introduced by Complementary Law 102/2000 implicates great opportunity cost for firms and that legislation should be reviewed from this perspective, aiming to ensure lower costs associated with investment projects.

Financial strategies for minimizing corporate income taxes under Brazil's new global tax system

In 1996, Brazil adopted a worldwide income tax system for corporations. This system represents a fundamental change in how the Brazílian government treats multinational transactions and the tax minimizing strategies relevant to businesses. In this article, we describe the conceptual basis for worldwide tax systems and the problem of double taxation that they create. Responses to double taxation by both the governments and the priva te sector are considered. Namely, the imperfect mechanisms developed by Brazil and other countries for mitigating double taxation are analyzed. We ultimately focus on the strategies that companies utilize in order not only to avoid double texetion, but also to take advantage of tax havens.