Résultats des cupules de grand diamètre dans les reprises d’arthroplastie totale de hanche : suivi minimum de deux ans.

La révision d’arthroplastie de la hanche en cas d’important déficit osseux acétabulaire peut être difficile. Les reconstructions avec cupule de très grand diamètre ou cupule « jumbo » (≥ 62 mm chez la femme et ≥ 66 mm chez l’homme) sont une option thérapeutique. Nous voulions évaluer la préservation et la restauration du centre de rotation de la hanche reconstruite en la comparant au coté controlatéral sain ou selon les critères de Pierchon et al. Nous voulions également évaluer la stabilité du montage à un suivi d’au moins 2 ans. Il s’agissait de 53 cas consécutifs de révision acétabulaire pour descellement non septique avec implantation d’une cupule jumbo sans ciment à l’Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont. Le déficit osseux évalué selon la classification de Paprosky et al. Les cupules implantées avaient un diamètre moyen de 66 mm (62-81) chez les femmes et 68 mm (66-75) chez les hommes. L’allogreffe osseuse morcelée et massive était utilisée dans 34 et dans 14 cas respectivement. La cupule a été positionnée avec un angle d’inclinaison moyen de 41.3° (26.0-53.0). Le centre de rotation de la hanche reconstruite a été jugé satisfaisant dans 78% de cas sur l'axe médiolatéral, 71% sur l'axe craniopodal et amélioré dans 27% dans cet axe. Au recul moyen radiologique de 84.0 mois (24.0-236.4) et clinique de 91.8 mois (24.0 – 241.8): 6 cas étaient décédés, 3 perdus au suivi. On a observé le descellement radiologique dans un 1 cas, la luxation récidivante dans 5 cas et l’infection dans 4 cas. Le retrait de la cupule a été effectué dans 2 cas pour infection. L’ostéointégration des greffons osseux était complète dans tous les cas sauf 3. Les scores cliniques étaient pour le HHS de 82 +/-17, le WOMAC de 86 +/- 14 et le SF-12 physique de 46 +/- 12 et mental 53 +/-13. La cupule jumbo peut être considérée comme un moyen fiable pour gérer le déficit osseux dans les révisions acétabulaires. Elle permet de conserver ou d’améliorer la position du centre de rotation physiologique de la hanche. La fixation sans ciment favorise l’ostéointégration de la cupule et permet une stabilité à moyen terme. Le taux de complications est comparable ou inférieur à d'autres procédures de reconstruction.

Development of in vitro methods to test acetabular prosthetic reconstructions (messa a punto di metodi in vitro per la caratterizzazione biomeccanica di ricostruzioni acetabolari)

The revision hip arthroplasty is a surgical procedure, consisting in the reconstruction of the hip joint through the replacement of the damaged hip prosthesis. Several factors may give raise to the failure of the artificial device: aseptic loosening, infection and dislocation represent the principal causes of failure worldwide. The main effect is the raise of bone defects in the region closest to the prosthesis that weaken the bone structure for the biological fixation of the new artificial hip. For this reason bone reconstruction is necessary before the surgical revision operation. This work is born by the necessity to test the effects of bone reconstruction due to particular bone defects in the acetabulum, after the hip prosthesis revision. In order to perform biomechanical in vitro tests on hip prosthesis implanted in human pelvis or hemipelvis a practical definition of a reference frame for these kind of bone specimens is required. The aim of the current study is to create a repeatable protocol to align hemipelvic samples in the testing machine, that relies on a reference system based on anatomical landmarks on the human pelvis. In chapter 1 a general overview of the human pelvic bone is presented: anatomy, bone structure, loads and the principal devices for hip joint replacement. The purpose of chapters 2 is to identify the most common causes of the revision hip arthroplasty, analysing data from the most reliable orthopaedic registries in the world. Chapter 3 presents an overview of the most used classifications for acetabular bone defects and fractures and the most common techniques for acetabular and bone reconstruction. After a critical review of the scientific literature about reference frames for human pelvis, in chapter 4, the definition of a new reference frame is proposed. Based on this reference frame, the alignment protocol for the human hemipelvis is presented as well as the statistical analysis that confirm the good repeatability of the method.

Re-cementing in revision total hip replacement

Removal of well-fixed cement at revision surgery risks bone loss, cortical perforation and fracture, is time-consuming, technically demanding and carries increased risks for the patient. The cement-in-cement technique avoids these problems and when used appropriately has given favourable results at our centre when used on both the femoral and acetabular sides of the articulation. A modified technique has also been used in selected cases of infection and peri-prosthetic fracture. This chapter highlights the results to date and the operative techniques employed. It is essential to recognise that this technique relies fundamentally on the presence of a well-fixed cement mantle, and it is imperative that the criteria laid out are adhered to in order to achieve success. If there is loosening or lysis on the femoral side extending distal to the lesser trochanter or around more than just the periphery of the acetabular cement mantle, then alternative revision techniques should be employed.

Indications for early hip revision surgery in the UK : A re-analysis of NJR data

This study determined the rate and indication for revision between cemented, uncemented, hybrid and resurfacing groups from NJR (6 th edition) data. Data validity was determined by interrogating for episodes of misclassification. We identified 6,034 (2.7%) misclassified episodes, containing 97 (4.3%) revisions. Kaplan-Meier revision rates at 3 years were 0.9% cemented, 1.9% for uncemented, 1.2% for hybrids and 3.0% for resurfacings (significant difference across all groups, p<0.001, with identical pattern in patients <55 years). Regression analysis indicated both prosthesis group and age significantly influenced failure (p<0.001). Revision for pain, aseptic loosening, and malalignment were highest in uncemented and resurfacing arthroplasty. Revision for dislocation was highest in uncemented hips (significant difference between groups, p<0.001). Feedback to the NJR on data misclassification has been made for future analysis. © 2012 Wichtig Editore.

Revision total hip replacement using the cement-in-cement technique for the acetabular component : technique and results for 60 hips

The technique of femoral cement-in-cement revision is well established, but there are no previous series reporting its use on the acetabular side at the time of revision total hip arthroplasty. We describe the surgical technique and report the outcome of 60 consecutive cement-in-cement revisions of the acetabular component at a mean follow-up of 8.5 years (range 5-12 years). All had a radiologically and clinically well fixed acetabular cement mantle at the time of revision. 29 patients died. No case was lost to follow-up. The 2 most common indications for acetabular revision were recurrent dislocation (77%) and to compliment a femoral revision (20%). There were 2 cases of aseptic cup loosening (3.3%) requiring re-revision. No other hip was clinically or radiologically loose (96.7%) at latest follow-up. One case was re-revised for infection, 4 for recurrent dislocation and 1 for disarticulation of a constrained component. At 5 years, the Kaplan-Meier survival rate was 100% for aseptic loosening and 92.2% (95% CI; 84.8-99.6%) with revision for all causes as the endpoint. These results support the use of the cement-in-cement revision technique in appropriate cases on the acetabular side. Theoretical advantages include preservation of bone stock, reduced operating time, reduced risk of complications and durable fixation.

Correlation of synovial fluid cytokine levels with histological and clinical parameters of primary and revision total hip and total knee replacements

We retrieved synovial tissue and fluid samples from patients undergoing primary total hip replacement (THR) (n 15), revision of aseptically loose THR (n 12), primary total knee replacement (TKR) (n 13) and revision of aseptically loose TKR (n 6). Several histological parameters were assessed on a relative scale of 1-4. Primary TJRs were clinically evaluated for degree of osteoarthrosis. Revision TJRs were assessed for migration of the implant, gross loosening and the degree of radiolucency. Cytokine levels in synovial fluid were determined with ELISA.

Infectiological, functional, and radiographic outcome after revision for prosthetic hip infection according to a strict algorithm

Successful treatment of prosthetic hip joint infection (PI) means elimination of infection and restored hip function. However, functional outcome is rarely studied. We analyzed the outcome of the strict use of a treatment algorithm for PI.

Age at hip or knee joint replacement surgery predicts likelihood of revision surgery

We compared revision and mortality rates of 4668 patients undergoing primary total hip and knee replacement between 1989 and 2007 at a University Hospital in New Zealand. The mean age at the time of surgery was 69 years (16 to 100). A total of 1175 patients (25%) had died at follow-up at a mean of ten years post-operatively. The mean age of those who died within ten years of surgery was 74.4 years (29 to 97) at time of surgery. No change in comorbidity score or age of the patients receiving joint replacement was noted during the study period. No association of revision or death could be proven with higher comorbidity scoring, grade of surgeon, or patient gender. We found that patients younger than 50 years at the time of surgery have a greater chance of requiring a revision than of dying, those around 58 years of age have a 50:50 chance of needing a revision, and in those older than 62 years the prosthesis will normally outlast the patient. Patients over 77 years old have a greater than 90% chance of dying than requiring a revision whereas those around 47 years are on average twice as likely to require a revision than die. This information can be used to rationalise the need for long-term surveillance and during the informed consent process.

Management of pelvic discontinuity in revision total hip arthroplasty: a review of the literature

Pelvic discontinuity is a complex problem in revision total hip arthroplasty. Although rare, the incidence is likely to increase due to the ageing population and the increasing number of total hip arthroplasties being performed. The various surgical options available to solve this problem include plating, massive allografts, reconstruction rings, custom triflanged components and tantalum implants. However, the optimal solution remains controversial. None of the known methods completely solves the major obstacles associated with this problem, such as restoration of massive bone loss, implant failure in the short- and long-term and high complication rates. This review discusses the diagnosis, decision making, and treatment options of pelvic discontinuity in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Aetiology of Hip dislocation

Written by the surgeons of the Exeter Hip Team and their colleagues from around the world, this book describes 40 years of innovation and development with cemented hip replacement. Topics covered include the basic science behind successful cemented hip replacement, modern surgical techniques and recent advances. There is also extensive coverage of the revision techniques developed at Exeter and elsewhere, focussing on femoral and acetabular impaction grafting. Each chapter is a self-contained article with an emphasis, where appropriate, on practical techniques and surgical tips, supported by line drawings and intra-operative photographs.