958 resultados para hydrometeorology, Penman-Monteith-FAO, kriging
Resumo:
A estimativa da evapotranspiração de referência (ETo), usada no balanço hídrico, possibilita quantificar o armazenamento de água no solo, auxiliando no manejo da irrigação. O objetivo do trabalho foi comparar métodos mais simples de estimativa da evapotranspiração de referência com o método Penman-Monteith (FAO), nas escalas diária e de 5, 10, 15 e 30 dias, e mensal, para os municípios de Frederico Westphalen e Palmeira das Missões, no RS. Os métodos avaliados tenderam a melhorar a eficiência com o aumento da escala temporal de estudo, mantendo o mesmo desempenho para ambas as localidades. Os maiores e menores valores de ETo ocorreram nos meses de dezembro e junho, respectivamente. A maioria dos métodos subestimou os valores de ETo. Em qualquer escala temporal, os métodos de Makking e da Radiação FAO24 podem substituir o modelo de Penman-Monteith.
Resumo:
La Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Agricultura y la Alimentación FAO propone el uso de la ecuación de Penman-Monteith (PM) como el estándar para la estimación de la evapotranspiración de referencia y para la calibración de otras ecuaciones. El principal inconveniente del uso de esta ecuación es que requiere datos que no se tienen en la mayoría de las estaciones. El uso de métodos de cálculos alternativos es usual en la bibliografía. El método de Hargreaves (HG), recomendado por la FAO, es el más usado en la bibliografía cuando sólo se dispone de los datos de temperaturas. El principal objetivo de este trabajo es analizar la posibilidad de calibración y ajuste del método HG en la estación de Coronel Dorrego. Se han comparado los métodos PM y HG, encontrándose una buena correlación entre ambos. Se concluye que el modelo HG es una metodología adecuada, para la zona de Coronel Dorrego y se sugiere la fórmula siguiente: ETo HG = 0,00206⋅Ra⋅(Tmáx-- T mín) 0,49⋅(tm+17,8) mm/día
Resumo:
All crop models, whether site-specific or global-gridded and regardless of crop, simulate daily crop transpiration and soil evaporation during the crop life cycle, resulting in seasonal crop water use. Modelers use several methods for predicting daily potential evapotranspiration (ET), including FAO-56, Penman-Monteith, Priestley-Taylor, Hargreaves, full energy balance, and transpiration water efficiency. They use extinction equations to partition energy to soil evaporation or transpiration, depending on leaf area index. Most models simulate soil water balance and soil-root water supply for transpiration, and limit transpiration if water uptake is insufficient, and thereafter reduce dry matter production. Comparisons among multiple crop and global gridded models in the Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP) show surprisingly large differences in simulated ET and crop water use for the same climatic conditions. Model intercomparisons alone are not enough to know which approaches are correct. There is an urgent need to test these models against field-observed data on ET and crop water use. It is important to test various ET modules/equations in a model platform where other aspects such as soil water balance and rooting are held constant, to avoid compensation caused by other parts of models. The CSM-CROPGRO model in DSSAT already has ET equations for Priestley-Taylor, Penman-FAO-24, Penman-Monteith-FAO-56, and an hourly energy balance approach. In this work, we added transpiration-efficiency modules to DSSAT and AgMaize models and tested the various ET equations against available data on ET, soil water balance, and season-long crop water use of soybean, fababean, maize, and other crops where runoff and deep percolation were known or zero. The different ET modules created considerable differences in predicted ET, growth, and yield.
Resumo:
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - CNPq
Resumo:
Dissertação (mestrado)—Universidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Agronomia e Medicina Veterinária, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agronomia, 2016.
Resumo:
Este trabalho teve como objetivo comparar métodos empíricos de estimativa de evapotranspiração de referência (ETo) diária em relação ao método Penman-Monteith/FAO para o município de Cristino Castro-Piauí, utilizando série de dados coletados em estação agrometeorológica convencional para o período 01 de janeiro de 2010 a 31 dezembro de 2012.
Resumo:
农业高效用水包括节水灌溉和旱作农业 ,其核心是提高自然降水和灌溉水的利用效率和效益 .农田蒸散的测定方法各有利弊 .FAO先后建议用Penman修正式和Penman Monteith公式计算参考作物蒸散量 .Jensen乘法模型和Blank加法模型在作物水分生产函数研究中得到广泛应用 .土壤适宜含水量和土壤干旱下限指标的最新研究成果 ,为低定额的农业供水提供了土壤物理学的重要依据 .水分亏缺对与产量形成相关的各个生理过程影响的先后顺序为细胞扩张 >气孔运动 >蒸腾运动 >光合作用 >物质运输 .不很严重的干旱反而对物质运输有促进作用 .农田灌溉研究已由传统的充分灌溉 ,转向非充分灌溉、调亏灌溉和控制性分根交替灌溉 .未来农业高效用水理论将在界面、土壤水动力学、生物节水、缺水逆境等方面深入开展研究 .
Resumo:
采用FAO推荐的标准化、统一化后的Penman-Monteith公式计算植物生长季节祁连山北坡5种主要类型草地的潜在蒸散量,通过揭示植物生长季蒸散量季节变化特征,分析不同类型草地的蒸散特征以及蒸散量与土壤水分之间的关系.
Resumo:
p.99-104
Resumo:
A study was devised to evaluate influences of irrigation and fertigation practices on Vitis vinifera and Vitis labruscana grapes in the Niagara Peninsula. A modified FAO Penman- Monteith evapotranspiration formula was used to calculate water budgets and schedule irrigations. Five deficit irrigation treatments (non-irrigated control; deficits imposed postbloom, lag phase, and veraison; fiiU season irrigation) were employed in a Chardonnay vineyard. Transpiration rate (4-7 /xg H20/cmVs) and soil moisture data demonstrated that the control and early deficit treatments were under water stress throughout the season. The fiiU season irrigation treatment showed an 18% (2001) and 19% (2002) increase in yield over control due to increased berry weight. Soluble solids and wine quality were not compromised, and the fiiU season treatment showed similar or higher °Brix than all other treatments. Berry titratable acidity andpH also fell within acceptable levels for all five treatments. Irrigation/fertigation timing trials were conducted on Concord and Niagara vines in 2001- 02. The six Concord treatments consisted of a non-irrigated control, irrigation fi^om Eichhom and Lorenz (EL) stage 12 to harvest, and four fertigation treatments which applied 70 kg/ha urea. The nine Niagara treatments included a non-irrigated control, two irrigated treatments (ceasing at veraison and harvest, respectively) and six fertigation treatments of various durations. Slight yield increases (ca. 10% in Concord; 29% in Niagara) were accompanied by small decreases in soluble solids (1.5°Brix), and methyl anthranilate concentrations. Transpiration rate and soil moisture (1 1.9-16.3%) data suggested that severe water stress was present in these Toledo clay based vineyards.
Resumo:
With the need to deploy management and monitoring systems of natural resources in areas susceptible to environmental degradation, as is the case of semiarid regions, several works have been developed in order to find effective models and technically and economically viable. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate the daily actual evapotranspiration (ETr) through the application of the Surface Energy Balance Algorithm for Land (SEBAL), from remote sensing products, in a semiarid region, Seridó of the Rio Grande do Norte, and do the validation of these estimates using ETr values obtained by the Penman-Monteith (standard method of the Food and Agriculture Organization-FAO). The SEBAL is based on energy balance method, which allows obtaining the vertical latent heat flux (LE) with orbital images and, consequently, of the evapotranspiration through the difference of flows, also vertical, of heat in the soil (G), sensitive heat (H) and radiation balance (Rn). The study area includes the surrounding areas of the Dourado reservoir, located in the Currais Novos/RN city. For the implementation of the algorithm were used five images TM/Landsat-5. The work was divided in three chapters in order to facilitate a better discussion of each part of the SEBAL processing, distributed as follows: first chapter addressing the spatio-temporal variability of the biophysical variables; second chapter dealing with spatio-temporal distribution of instant and daily radiation balance; and the third chapter discussing the heart of the work, the daily actual evapotranspiration estimation and the validation than to the study area
Resumo:
The aim of this investigation was to evaluate four reference methods to estimate evapotranspiration (Makkink, Hargreaves, Class A pan and Radiation), compared tb Penman-Monteith method, that is considered standard by the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Errors due to variable measurements in the reference evapotranspiration estimate were taken into consideration. The research was developed in an experimental area of the Department of Rural Engieering of the School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Campus of Jaboticabal, São Paulo State University. An automated weather station was used and it was equipped with sensors to measure global and net radiation, temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed. The aftermath showed a better adjustment to Hargreaves. Makkink, Class A pan and Radiation methods are different from Penman-Monteith, therefore, they cannot be compared. To evaluate methods to estimate evapotranspiration and avoid possible evaluation errors, ETo estimate errors must be considered.
Resumo:
The aim of this work was to determine crop coefficients (Kc) of drip irrigated watermelon in the climatic and growing conditions of the Gurgueia Vale, State of Piaui, Brazil, located at 8 ° 26' S, 43 ° 47' W and altitude of 251 m. The reference evapotranspiration (ET0) was determined by the sum of hourly values of ET0 obtained by the Penman-Monteith method parameterized by FAO with climatic data obtained from an automatic weather station. The daily crop evapotranspiration (ETc) was measured by three weighing lysimeters of load cells. Aiming high fruit yield in this region, we recommend that the following local values of Kc and Kcb be used for planning and management of irrigation, respectively: initial stage (crop establishment) - 0.34 and 0.24; intermediate stage (growth and fruit maturation) - 1.16 and 1.10; end stage (harvest) - 0.93 and 0.86. These Kc values of initial and intermediate phases are statistically higher than the values of Kc and Kcb already adjusted according to the methodology presented in the FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. The values of Kc and Kcb at the end phase are not statistically different from the FAO values.
Resumo:
Pós-graduação em Agronomia (Ciência do Solo) - FCAV
Resumo:
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)