Fish physiology, fish toxicology, and fisheries management : proceedings of an international symposium, Guangzhou, PRC, September 14-16, 1988 /

Mode of access: Internet.

Georgia fish pond management.

Stamped on cover and at end of Preface: Fred J. Dickson.

Early limnological and fish population conditions of Canton Reservoir, Oklahoma, and fishery management recommendation, report to the Oklahoma Fish and Game Council.

Mode of access: Internet.

Recycling ground water in Waushara County, Wisconsin : resource management for cold-water fish hatcheries /

Mode of access: Internet.

Banner Marsh State Fish and Wildlife Area : Rice Lake State Fish and Wildlife Area : natural resource management plan.

Includes executive summary.

Management of wildlife and fish habitats in forests of western Oregon and Washington /

"June 1985."

Action plan : anadromous fish habitat management on national forests in Idaho.

Prepared in cooperation with Intermountain Region, and Idaho Dept. of Fish and Game.

Draft Bill of the Indian Fish and Wildlife Resource Management Act of 1993 : hearing before the Committee on Indian Affairs, United States Senate, One Hundred Third Congress, first session.

"June 16, 1993, Washington, DC"--Pt. 2.

Report to the California Fish and Game Commission, November 5, 1948; preliminary report on the problems of deer management in California,

Mimeographed.

Fish restoration and management projects : Hearings before the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries, House of Representatives, Seventy-seventh Congress, first session, on H. R. 3361, a bill to provide that the United States shall aid the states in fish-restoration and management projects, and for other purposes. May 14 and July 15, 1941.

Schuyler Otis Bland, chairman.

Binghamton wastewater management study : report of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on plans developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for short- and long-range wastewater management to insure high quality water for future generations in Broome and Tioga Counties.

Caption title.

Cleaner fish use tactile dancing behavior as a preconflict management strategy

The most commonly asked question about cooperative interactions is how they are maintained when cheating is theoretically more profitable [1]. In cleaning interactions, where cleaners remove parasites from apparently cooperating clients, the classical question asked is why cleaner fish can clean piscivorous client fish without being eaten, a problem Trivers [2] used to explain reciprocal altruism. Trivers [2] suggested that predators refrain from eating cleaners only when the repeated removal of parasites by a particular cleaner results in a greater benefit than eating the cleaner. Although several theoretical models have examined cheating behavior in clients [3,4], no empirical tests have been done (but see Darcy [5]). It has been observed that cleaners are susceptible to predation [6, 7]. Thus, cleaners should have evolved strategies to avoid conflict or being eaten. In primates, conflicts are often resolved with conflict or preconflict management behavior [8]. Here, I show that cleaner fish tactically stimulate clients while swimming in an oscillating dancing manner (tactile dancing) more when exposed to hungry piscivorous clients than satiated ones, regardless of the client's parasite load. Tactile dancing thus may function as a preconflict management strategy that enables cleaner fish to avoid conflict with potentially dangerous clients.

Recent Fish Introductions Into Everglades National Park: An Unforeseen Consequence of Water Management?

Non-native fishes present a management challenge to maintaining Everglades National Park (ENP) in a natural state. We summarized data from long-term fish monitoring studies in ENP and reviewed the timing of introductions relative to water-management changes. Beginning in the early 1950s, management actions have added canals, altered wetland habitats by flooding and drainage, and changed inflows into ENP, particularly in the Taylor Slough/C-111 basin and Rocky Glades. The first non-native fishes likely entered ENP by the late 1960s, but species numbers increased sharply in the early 1980s when new water-management actions were implemented. After 1999, eight non-native species and three native species, all previously recorded outside of Park boundaries, were found for the first time in ENP. Several of these incursions occurred following structural and operational changes that redirected water deliveries to wetlands open to the eastern boundary canals. Once established, control non-native fishes in Everglades wetlands is difficult; therefore, preventing introductions is key to their management. Integrating actions that minimize the spread of non-native species into protected natural areas into the adaptive management process for planning, development, and operation of water-management features may help to achieve the full suite of objectives for Everglades restoration.