Bibliography on the influence of mineral deficiencies on growth and reproduction of farm animals,

Mimeographed.

A study designed to determine the effects of whole body irradiation and ingestion of radiocontaminants on health and metabolism of selected farm animals;

Mode of access: Internet.

Feeds and feeding, abridged; the essentials of the feeding, care, and management of farm animals, including poultry,

Mode of access: Internet.

Common diseases of farm animals.

Mode of access: Internet.

How to treat common ailments of farm animals. Veterinary answers revised and compiled from the columns of Hoard's Dairyman.

Mode of access: Internet.

Farm animals; photographs and descriptions of 100 important farm animals,

Mode of access: Internet.

Manual of cattle feeding. A treatise on the laws of animal nutrition and the chemistry of feeding stuffs in their application to the feeding of farm animals.

Mode of access: Internet.

A graphic summary of farm animals and animal products : (based largely on the census of 1930 and 1935) /

"Issued February 1939."

A Graphic summary of farm animals and animal products : (based largely on the census of 1940) /

Includes index.

The maintenance rations of farm animals /

Includes bibliographical references.

Farm foods: or, The rational feeding of farm animals. From the 6th ed. of 'Landwirtschaftliche Fütterungslehre'.

Mode of access: Internet.

Epigenetics and developmental programming of welfare and production traits in farm animals

Acknowledgements Financial support for composing this article was obtained from the Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (AHDB, Beef and Lamb), UK. Concept of review was also initiated from discussions originating from EU COST Action FA1201, Epiconcept: Epigenetics and Periconception Environment

Prevalence of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococci on a Farm: Staff can Harbour MRS When Animals do Not

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

Assessment of the impact of government animal welfare policy on farm animal welfare in the UK

The paper presents the method and findings of a Delphi expert survey to assess the impact of UK government farm animal welfare policy, form assurance schemes and major food retailer specifications on the welfare of animals on forms. Two case-study livestock production systems are considered, dairy and cage egg production. The method identifies how well the various standards perform in terms of their effects on a number of key farm animal welfare variables, and provides estimates of the impact of the three types of standard on the welfare of animals on forms, taking account of producer compliance. The study highlights that there remains considerable scope for government policy, together with form assurance schemes, to improve the welfare of form animals by introducing standards that address key factors affecting animal welfare and by increasing compliance of livestock producers. There is a need for more comprehensive, regular and random surveys of on-farm welfare to monitor compliance with welfare standards (legislation and welfare codes) and the welfare of farm animals over time, and a need to collect farm data on the costs of compliance with standards.

Molecular typing of Salmonella serotypes prevalent in animals in England: assessment of methodology

Salmonella enterica serotypes Derby, Mbandaka, Montevideo, Livingstone, and Senftenberg were among the 10 most prevalent serotypes isolated from farm animals in England and Wales in 1999. These serotypes are of potential zoonotic relevance; however, there is currently no "gold standard" fingerprinting method for them. A collection of isolates representing the former serotypes and serotype Gold Coast were analyzed using plasmid profiling, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and ribotyping. The success of the molecular methods in identifying DNA polymorphisms was different for each serotype. Plasmid profiling was particularly useful for serotype Derby isolates, and it also provided a good level of discrimination for serotype Senftenberg. For most serotypes, we observed a number of nontypeable plasmid-free strains, which represents a limitation of this technique. Fingerprinting of genomic DNA by ribotyping and PFGE produced a significant variation in results, depending on the serotype of the strain. Both PstI/SphI ribotyping and XbaI-PFGE provided a similar degree of strain differentiation for serotype Derby and serotype Senftenberg, only marginally lower than that achieved by plasmid profiling. Ribotyping was less sensitive than PFGE when applied to serotype Mbandaka or serotype Montevideo. Serotype Gold Coast isolates were found to be nontypeable by XbaI-PFGE, and a significant proportion of them were found to be plasmid free. A similar situation applies to a number of serotype Livingstone isolates which were nontypeable by plasmid profiling and/or PFGE. In summary, the serotype of the isolates has a considerable influence in deciding the best typing strategy; a single method cannot be relied upon for discriminating between strains, and a combination of typing methods allows further discrimination.