Responsabilidade Financeira e Criminal, o livro (Recensão)

“Responsabilidade Financeira e Criminal § Direitos Constitucionais Sociais, Dinheiros Públicos e Recuperação de Activos”, com Prefácio do Sr. Prof. Associado com Agregação, da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Coimbra, Doutor Jónatas E.M. Machado, é o título e tema do nosso último livro jurídico dado à estampa pela chancela da Editora Juruá, Curitiba e Lisboa, 2015. Livro o qual está disponível em Portugal nas livrarias Almedina ou em inúmeras livrarias do Brasil. Ou ainda através da loja virtual daquela que é uma das maiores editoras do mundo em língua portuguesa, a Editora Juruá que tem mais de 46 anos de vida: www.jurua.com.br § "Financial Responsibility and Criminal § Constitutional Social Rights, Public Moneys and Assets Recovery" with Prof. Mr. Preface Associated with aggregation, the Law Faculty of the University of Coimbra, Doctor Jónatas E.M. Machado is the title and theme of our last legal book given to the press by the seal of Editora Jurua, Curitiba and Lisbon, 2015. Book which is available in Portugal Almedina in bookstores or in several bookstores in Brazil. Or through the online store of what is one of the largest publishers in the world in English, Editora Jurua which has more than 46 years: www.jurua.com.br

Reflections about Complicity and its Application in some Socio Economics Crimes

In Colombia, the definitions of crimes are found in the special part of the Criminal Code. They are set out as though the only way of to commit them was by being the author of the punishable conduct there described. Nevertheless, in the general part of the Criminal Code, we find other forms of criminal responsibility for the conduct described in the special part. Complicity is one of those ways. Although complicity is established in the Criminal Code, it does not appear as a criminal definition and, as such it is ignored or, worse, applied incorrectly. For those reasons, this article tries to reflect upon the validity of complicity. Accordingly, this article analyzes: what is complicity, what is the difference between complicity and co-authorship and how would complicity work in some practical cases related to socio-economic crimes, in which it has being overlooked or, has been used incorrectly. The article concludes that complicity is still valid, and that the correct application of complicity materializes the ideal of justice.

Punitive damages in Brazilian law and the boundaries between criminal and civil liabilities

This article demonstrates the existence of civil responsibility with punitive purposes in Brazilian Law, explaining how it was introduced by jurisdictional activity in cases involving moral damages. Next, it points out main problems this situation represents to Brazilian Law from the standpoint of our juridical dogmatics and public policies. Additionally, it proposes the execution of an empirical research for comprehension of the structure and fundamentals of jurisprudence on the punitive character of civil responsibility for moral damages and establishes criteria for use in this research based on theories of punishment. Finally, it positions the problem of punitive function of civil responsibility in the broader ambit of relationships and boundaries between civil and criminal responsibility.

A eficácia, no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro, da responsabilização penal da pessoa jurídica pela prática de crimes ambientais

The environment, which fundamental importance has already been recognized in all the world, is an actual national and international discussion subject, whose interest grows for the society, and consequently to the Law, in order to prevent the natural resources to the present and future generations. The 1988 Brazilian Constitution, recognizing the importance of the environment, treated about it in many of its parts, even dedicating a specific chapter (Chapter V About Environment, inserted in Title VIII About Social Order). The brazilian constitutional text established to everyone the fundamental right of enjoying an equilibrated environment, obligating the State and all society to defend and preserve the environment to the present and future generations. The economic growing process, that predominated and still persist in the big majority of the countries, where is practiced the capitalist system, has in the enterprises (legal persons) one of its main actors. Many times, these enterprises, especially in the actual globalized world in where we live, where the gain of money is priorized, ends, at the moment they act, making damages to the environment. These damages are, many times, considered by the law. crimes against the environment. The 1988 Brazilian Constitution, according to the Modern Criminal Law, realizing that many crimes were being committed by the enterprises, established in article 225, §3rd, the criminal responsibility of the legal persons. Almost ten years after the 1988 Brazilian Constitution, was published the Law number 9.605/98, in which third article established the penal responsibility of the legal persons that practice crimes against the environment, without excluding the individual responsibility

A alteração do tipo penal de adulteração de combustíveis: reflexo da constitucionalização do direito penal no mercado de combustíveis

The neoconstitutionalism led to a process of ethical revaluation of the normative systems and the process of constitutionalization of the many fields of law. This study examines the consequences of this process in criminal law, so important a Law field for the protection of the most valuable assets by the society, including the fundamental guarantees, thus emphasizing the necessity of protection of the collective and individual rights, which are guided by the observance of the defendants individual rights in the course of criminal proceedings and the search for the best efficiency of penal protection, according to the corollaries of defense against the state (prohibition of the excess or Übermassverbot) and the provision of rights by the state (prohibition of insufficient protection or Untermassverbot). The offense of fuel adulteration is taken as an object of study, since it is a vital market to a nation dependent of people and good s movement for their living, driven by fossil and biofuels. Such a crime affects essential legal interests to the development of society, interests such as the environment, consumer relations and economic order, particularly the principle of free competition. This paper seeks to analyze the need of a greater efficiency of this particular criminal protection, once concluded the conduct harm and social fear as a consequence by it as growing, and therefore having its former crime type, engraved in Article 1 of Law No. 8.176/1991, rewritten in compliance with the criminal law s principle of legality. Thus, the reformation proposals and legislative creation involving this crime were observed, with emphasis on the bill No. 2498/2003, which keeps it as blank heterogeneous criminal norm, kind of penal normative whose constitutionality is raised, including the forethought of criminal responsibility in the perpetrating of the offense as culpable and subsequently increasing the applicable minimum penalty, as well as the inclusion of new activities in the typical nucleus

Lições de Direito Económico e Financeiro, 1º Ano

I – O “DIREITO ECONÓMICO”: O ESTADO COMO PRODUTOR DE BENS E SERVIÇOS E O ESTADO COMO REGULADOR DA ECONOMIA: O PLANEAMENTO E AS MEDIDAS DE ESTÍMULO OU FOMENTO; O ACESSO À ACTIVIDADE ECONÓMICA; II – CONCEITO E TIPOLOGIA DAS EMPRESAS; III – ALGUMAS EMPRESAS EM ESPECIAL; IV – DIREITO PENAL ECONÓMICO E DE EMPRESA; V – “CONTENCIOSO DAS EMPRESAS”; VI – DIREITO DO CONSUMO, DIREITO DAS EMPRESAS E DIREITO PENAL ECONÓMICO; VII – DIREITO DA CONCORRÊNCIA E DOS PREÇOS; VIII – DIREITO MONETÁRIO, FINANCEIRO E DOS MERCADOS DE VALORES MOBILIÁRIOS: INSTRUMENTOS E MERCADOS FINANCEIROS; IX - REGULAÇÃO DO AMBIENTE E DA ACTIVIDADE ECONÓMICA; X - REGULAÇÃO DA QUALIDADE; XI – DIREITO FINANCEIRO PÚBLICO. §I - "ECONOMIC LAW": THE STATE AS PRODUCER OF GOODS AND SERVICES AND THE STATE AS A ECONOMY REGULATOR: PLANNING AND MEASURES OF STIMULUS OR PROMOTION; ACCESS TO ECONOMIC ACTIVITY II - CONCEPT AND TYPE OF COMPANIES III - SOME SPECIAL COMPANIES IV - ECONOMIC AND CRIMINAL LAW COMPANY, V – “LITIGATION IN COMPANIES”; VI - LAW CONSUMER, LAW OF COMPANIES AND ECONOMIC CRIMINAL LAW; VII - COMPETITION LAW AND PRICES; VIII - MONETARY LAW, FINANCIAL AND SECURITIES MARKETS: FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND MARKETS; X - REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT AND ECONOMIC ACTIVITY: X - ADJUSTMENT OF QUALITY; XI - PUBLIC FINANCIAL LAW.

“Primeiro-Mnistro defende que a investigação, ciência e inovação é ‘decisiva’ para o crescimento económico”…

Afinal, ficamos a saber que a austeridade, tantas vezes chumbada no Tribunal Constitucional, era uma estratégia para investir na Investigação, Ciência e Inovação europeias! É uma boa altura para aumentar, de modo justo e proporcional, todos os orçamentos de todas as universidades e politécnicos portugueses, os quais têm relações privilegiadas com África, Brasil e parte da Ásia, uma evidente mais-valia para a União Europeia! Abstract: After all, we learn that the austerity so often sinker in the Constitutional Court, was a strategy to invest in Research, Science and European Innovation! It is a good time to increase, fair and proportionate manner, all the budgets of all Portuguese universities and polytechnics, which have a special relationship with Africa, Brazil and parts of Asia, an asset apparent to the European Union!

Personal indebtedness, community characteristics and theft crimes

Becker (1968) and Stigler (1970) provide the germinal works for an economic analysis of crime, and their approach has been utilised to consider the response of crime rates to a range of economic, criminal and socioeconomic factors. Until recently however this did not extend to a consideration of the role of personal indebtedness in explaining the observed pattern of crime. This paper uses the Becker (1968) and Stigler (1970) framework, and extends to a fuller consideration of the relationship between economic hardship and theft crimes in an urban setting. The increase in personal debt in the past decade has been significant, which combined with the recent global recession, has led to a spike in personal insolvencies. In the context of the recent recession it is important to understand how increases in personal indebtedness may spillover into increases in social problems like crime. This paper uses data available at the neighbourhood level for London, UK on county court judgments (CCJ's) granted against residents in that neighbourhood, this is our measure of personal indebtedness, and examines the relationship between a range of community characteristics (economic, socio-economic, etc), including the number of CCJ's granted against residents, and the observed pattern of theft crimes for three successive years using spatial econometric methods. Our results confirm that theft crimes in London follow a spatial process, that personal indebtedness is positively associated with theft crimes in London, and that the covariates we have chosen are important in explaining the spatial variation in theft crimes. We identify a number of interesting results, for instance that there is variation in the impact of covariates across crime types, and that the covariates which are important in explaining the pattern of each crime type are largely stable across the three periods considered in this analysis.

Les neurosciences au Tribunal : de la responsabilité à la dangerosité, enjeux éthiques soulevés par la nouvelle loi française

AIM: In the past few years, spectacular progress in neuroscience has led to the emergence of a new interdisciplinary field, the so-called "neurolaw" whose goal is to explore the effects of neuroscientific discoveries on legal proceedings and legal rules and standards. In the United States, a number of neuroscientific researches are designed specifically to explore legally relevant topics and a case-law has already been developed. In Europe, neuroscientific evidence is increasingly being used in criminal courtrooms, as part of psychiatric testimony, nourishing the debate about the legal implications of brain research in psychiatric-legal settings. Though largely debated, up to now the use of neuroscience in legal contexts had not specifically been regulated by any legislation. In 2011, with the new bioethics law, France has become the first country to admit by law the use of brain imaging in judicial expertise. According to the new law, brain imaging techniques can be used only for medical purposes, or scientific research, or in the context of judicial expertise. This study aims to give an overview of the current state of the neurolaw in the US and Europe, and to investigate the ethical issues raised by this new law and its potential impact on the rights and civil liberties of the offenders. METHOD: An overview of the emergence and development of "neurolaw" in the United States and Europe is given. Then, the new French law is examined in the light of the relevant debates in the French parliament. Consequently, we outline the current tendencies in Neurolaw literature to focus on assessments of responsibility, rather than dangerousness. This tendency is analysed notably in relation to the legal context relevant to criminal policies in France, where recent changes in the legislation and practice of forensic psychiatry show that dangerousness assessments have become paramount in the process of judicial decision. Finally, the potential interpretations of neuroscientific data introduced into psychiatric testimonies by judges are explored. RESULTS: The examination of parliamentary debates showed that the new French law allowing neuroimaging techniques in judicial expertise was introduced in the aim to provide a legal framework that would protect the subject against potential misuses of neuroscience. The underlying fear above all, was that this technology be used as a lie detector, or as a means to predict the subject's behaviour. However, the possibility of such misuse remains open. Contrary to the legislator's wish, the defendant is not fully guaranteed against uses of neuroimaging techniques in criminal courts that would go against their interests and rights. In fact, the examination of the recently adopted legislation in France shows that assessments of dangerousness and of risk of recidivism have become central elements of the criminal policy, which makes it possible, if not likely that neuroimaging techniques be used for the evaluation of the dangerousness of the defendant. This could entail risks for the latter, as judges could perceive neuroscientific data as hard evidence, more scientific and reliable than the soft data of traditional psychiatry. If such neuroscientific data are interpreted as signs of potential dangerousness of a subject rather than as signs of criminal responsibility, defendants may become subjected to longer penalties or measures aiming to ensure public safety in the detriment of their freedom. CONCLUSION: In the current context of accentuated societal need for security, the judge and the expert-psychiatrist are increasingly asked to evaluate the dangerousness of a subject, regardless of their responsibility. Influenced by this policy model, the judge might tend to use neuroscientific data introduced by an expert as signs of dangerousness. Such uses, especially when they subjugate an individual's interest to those of society, might entail serious threats to an individual's freedom and civil liberties.

Les Neurosciences au Tribunal: de la responsabilité à la dangerosité

In recent years, an explosion of interest in neuroscience has led to the development of "Neuro-law," a new multidisciplinary field of knowledge whose aim is to examine the impact and role of neuroscientific findings in legal proceedings. Neuroscientific evidence is increasingly being used in US and European courts in criminal trials, as part of psychiatric testimony, nourishing the debate about the legal implications of brain research in psychiatric-legal settings. During these proceedings, the role of forensic psychiatrists is crucial. In most criminal justice systems, their mission consists in accomplishing two basic tasks: assessing the degree of responsibility of the offender and evaluating their future dangerousness. In the first part of our research, we aim to examine the impact of Neuroscientific evidence in the assessment of criminal responsibility, a key concept of law. An initial jurisprudential research leads to conclude that there are significant difficulties and limitations in using neuroscience for the assessment of criminal responsibility. In the current socio-legal context, responsibility assessments are progressively being weakened, whereas dangerousness assessments gain increasing importance in the field of forensic psychiatry. In the second part of our research we concentrate on the impact of using neuroscience for the assessment of dangerousness. We argue that in the current policy era of zero tolerance, judges, confronted with the pressure to ensure public security, may tend to interpret neuroscientific knowledge and data as an objective and reliable way of evaluating one's dangerousness and risk of reoffending, rather than their responsibility. This tendency could be encouraged by a utilitarian approach to punishment, advanced by some recent neuroscientific research which puts into question the existence of free will and responsibility and argues for a rejection of the retributive theory of punishment. Although this shift away from punishment aimed at retribution in favor of a consequentialist approach to criminal law is advanced by some authors as a more progressive and humane approach, we believe that it could lead to the instrumentalisation of neuroscience in the interest of public safety, which can run against the proper exercise of justice and civil liberties of the offenders. By advancing a criminal law regime animated by the consequentialist aim of avoiding social harms through rehabilitation, neuroscience promotes a return to a therapeutical approach to crime which can have serious impact on the kind and the length of sentences imposed on the offenders; if neuroscientific data are interpreted as evidence of dangerousness, rather than responsibility, it is highly likely that judges impose heavier sentences, or/and security measures (in civil law systems), which can be indeterminate in length. Errors and epistemic traps of past criminological movements trying to explain the manifestation of a violent and deviant behavior on a biological and deterministic basis stress the need for caution concerning the use of modern neuroscientific methods in criminal proceedings.

Tilintarkastajan rikosvastuun toteutuminen

Tutkielmassa pureudutaan tilintarkastajan rikosvastuun toteutumiseen teoriassa ja käytännössä. Vastuuta tarkastellaan tilintarkastuslain pohjalta, teoriakirjallisuuden perusteella sekä käytännön esimerkkien avulla. Tutkimus antaa seikkaperäisen kuvauksen siitä, millaiseen rikosvastuuseen tilintarkastaja voi joutua harjoittaessaan ammattiaan.

Defining the crime of aggression : cutting the Gordian knot ?

"Mémoire présenté à la Faculté des Études supérieures en vue de l'obtention du grade de LL.M. en Maîtrise en droit Option recherche"

Les troubles du contrôle des impulsions en droit pénal canadien

Un kleptomane, pris d’impulsions irrésistibles, peut-il être responsable pénalement de ses actes ? Voilà la question à l’origine de cette recherche. Les troubles du contrôle des impulsions sont des troubles mentaux caractérisés par l’impossibilité de résister à une impulsion. Comment peut-on concilier ceux-ci avec le droit pénal canadien sachant que la responsabilité criminelle repose sur le postulat voulant que seul un acte volontaire justifie une déclaration de culpabilité ? Afin d’avoir une étude exhaustive sur le sujet, nous avons choisi trois troubles du contrôle des impulsions, soit la kleptomanie, la pyromanie et le jeu pathologique. Cette sélection permet d’étudier à la fois l’imputabilité criminelle et l’imposition d’une sentence en droit pénal canadien. Cette étude propose un retour aux principes fondamentaux de la responsabilité criminelle et l’analyse du droit pénal canadien afin de démontrer que certains troubles du contrôle des impulsions (kleptomanie et pyromanie) entraînent chez le sujet atteint une incapacité criminelle, le rendant non criminellement responsable au sens de l’article 16 du Code criminel. Au surplus, cette recherche porte sur les principes entourant l’imposition d’une sentence en droit pénal canadien et étudie l’impact de ces maladies mentales au point de vue de la peine. Cette analyse démontre que les caractéristiques diagnostiques des troubles du contrôle des impulsions sont utilisées afin d’alourdir la peine imposée aux contrevenants. Nous considérons que celles-ci ne devraient pas être employées comme facteurs aggravants (particulièrement en matière de jeu pathologique), mais devraient plutôt être utilisées afin d’imposer une peine plus appropriée pour remédier à la problématique entraînant la commission des délits.

La eximente de responsabilidad penal por trastorno mental en el derecho penal internacional. Su operatividad y relevancia

El Derecho Penal Internacional es una rama bastante reciente del Derecho Internacional Público. En ese orden de ideas, el Derecho Penal Internacional le debe mucho a otras especialidades del Derecho Internacional, como lo son el Derecho de los Derechos Humanos y el Derecho Internacional Humanitario, puesto que si bien estas dos especialidades pueden y deben separarse del Derecho Penal Internacional, ciertos crímenes involucran tanto infracciones a las normas de DIH como a las de Derechos Humanos. En consecuencia, han dotado al Derecho Penal Internacional de parte de su contenido y por tanto podríamos considerarlas –guardadas las proporciones- como ancestros evolutivos de la especialidad, materia de esta monografía.

Análisis de las sanciones del sistema de responsabilidad penal para adolescentes a la luz de la justicia restaurativa

La presente investigación diagnóstica busca analizar el papel de las sanciones implementadas por el Sistema de Responsabilidad Penal para Adolescentes (SRPA) a la luz de la justicia restaurativa. A partir de la revisión bibliográfica sobre justicia restaurativa y su relación con la justicia juvenil, lo establecido en el Código de Infancia y Adolescencia (ley 1098 de 2006) y el CONPES 3629 que plantea las disposiciones de política del Sistema de Responsabilidad Penal para Adolescentes, y finalmente, del trabajo de campo realizado con adolescentes privados de la libertad, más una entrevista realizada a un experto, se describe y explica que tanto las sanciones se acercan al paradigma de la justicia restaurativa, la cual se fija en dicho código como una de las finalidades del sistema alternativo para adolescentes. Finalmente, se hacen algunas recomendaciones para la solución de las fallas encontradas en este aspecto del SRPA.