Population pharmacokinetic modelling and evaluation of different dosage regimens for darunavir and ritonavir in HIV-infected individuals.

OBJECTIVES: Darunavir is a protease inhibitor that is administered with low-dose ritonavir to enhance its bioavailability. It is prescribed at standard dosage regimens of 600/100 mg twice daily in treatment-experienced patients and 800/100 mg once daily in naive patients. A population pharmacokinetic approach was used to characterize the pharmacokinetics of both drugs and their interaction in a cohort of unselected patients and to compare darunavir exposure expected under alternative dosage regimens. METHODS: The study population included 105 HIV-infected individuals who provided darunavir and ritonavir plasma concentrations. Firstly, a population pharmacokinetic analysis for darunavir and ritonavir was conducted, with inclusion of patients' demographic, clinical and genetic characteristics as potential covariates (NONMEM(®)). Then, the interaction between darunavir and ritonavir was studied while incorporating levels of both drugs into different inhibitory models. Finally, model-based simulations were performed to compare trough concentrations (Cmin) between the recommended dosage regimen and alternative combinations of darunavir and ritonavir. RESULTS: A one-compartment model with first-order absorption adequately characterized darunavir and ritonavir pharmacokinetics. The between-subject variability in both compounds was important [coefficient of variation (CV%) 34% and 47% for darunavir and ritonavir clearance, respectively]. Lopinavir and ritonavir exposure (AUC) affected darunavir clearance, while body weight and darunavir AUC influenced ritonavir elimination. None of the tested genetic variants showed any influence on darunavir or ritonavir pharmacokinetics. The simulations predicted darunavir Cmin much higher than the IC50 thresholds for wild-type and protease inhibitor-resistant HIV-1 strains (55 and 550 ng/mL, respectively) under standard dosing in >98% of experienced and naive patients. Alternative regimens of darunavir/ritonavir 1200/100 or 1200/200 mg once daily also had predicted adequate Cmin (>550 ng/mL) in 84% and 93% of patients, respectively. Reduction of darunavir/ritonavir dosage to 600/50 mg twice daily led to a 23% reduction in average Cmin, still with only 3.8% of patients having concentrations below the IC50 for resistant strains. CONCLUSIONS: The important variability in darunavir and ritonavir pharmacokinetics is poorly explained by clinical covariates and genetic influences. In experienced patients, treatment simplification strategies guided by drug level measurements and adherence monitoring could be proposed.

Usage et utilité clinique de la CRP dans le diagnostic, le pronostic et le suivi de patients hospitalisés pour une pneumonie acquise dans la communauté. Enquête auprès des médecins du CHUV

Introduction: L'utilisation de marqueurs de l'inflammation comme la CRP pour le diagnostic, le pronostic et le suivi lors de pneumonie acquise dans la communauté (PAC) est une méthode rapide et bon marché. Cependant son utilité reste controversée etles avis d'expert divergent. Au CHUV, la CRP est dosée systématiquement chez les patients hospitalisés avec une PAC. L'objectif de ce travail est double: 1) effectuer une revue systématique de la littérature; 2) mieux comprendre l'usage et la perception de l'utilité clinique de la CRP en analysant la pratique des médecins du CHUV. Méthode: Nous avons envoyé un questionnaire par email à 2 reprises à tous les médecins assistants et chefs de clinique du service de médecine interne (SMI) et du centre interdisciplinaire des urgences (CIU) du CHUV. Les questions portaient sur la pratique clinique et sur la perception de l'utilité de la CRP dans le diagnostic, le pronostic et le suivi de patients hospitalisés pour une PAC. Résultats: Les résultats de la revue systématique sont présentés et analysés en intégrant les réponses issues du questionnaire. Nous avons reçu 53 réponses sur les 125 questionnaires envoyés. 62% des médecins interrogés demandent un dosage de la CRP dans >90% des cas lors d'une suspicion de PAC basée sur la clinique contre 45% si en plus la radiologie parle en faveur d'une PAC. 75% des médecins répètent ce dosage 1 à 4 fois durant le suivi. La raison principale évoquée est la suspicion d'une évolution défavorable et, plus rarement, la présence de comorbidités. Quand on questionne les médecins sur l'utilité de la CRP,on observe que seulement 30% pensent que la CRP est utile pour le diagnostic de PAC et 28% pour exclure une PAC lors de suspicion clinique. De même, 25% des médecins pensent qu'elle est utile dans le suivi des patients et 9% pour évaluer le pronostic de la PAC. On ne trouve pas d'association entre le niveau de formation et l'usage ou l'appréciation de l'utilité de la CRP. Conclusion: Les médecins assistants et les chefs de clinique du SMI et du CIU du CHUV dosent très souvent la CRP chez les patients hospitalisés pour une PAC. Leur motivation n'est ni liée à l'éventuelle valeur diagnostique de cet examen biologique,ni à son hypothétique valeur pour le pronostic et le suivi.

Infections cutanées causées par des mycobactéries à croissance rapide [Skin infections due to rapid-growing mycobacteria].

Rapid-growing mycobacteria (e.g. M. abscessus and M. chelonae) are emerging pathogens with various clinical manifestations. Among immunocompetent individuals, rapid-growing mycobacteria may be responsible of pulmonary, cutaneous, osteoarticular and postoperative infections, as well as lymphadenitis and catheter-associated infections. Among immunocompromised patients, disseminated infections are also observed. Diagnosis relies on specific microbiological investigations to confirm etiology and guide antibiotic treatment. The treatment requires a multi-disciplinary approach that includes specific long-term antibiotic treatment, surgical debridement and reduction of immunosuppression whenever possible.

Utilité et limites du dosage de l'antigène carcinoembryonnaire (CEA) dans la surveillance postopératoire de malades atteints de carcinomes du côlon et du rectu

An attempt is made to define the usefulness and limitations of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) radioimmunoassay for evaluation of tumor resection and detection of tumor relapse in patients with large-bowel carcinoma. In 45 patients for whom complete tumor resection was reported, all but 5 showed a drop in CEA to normal values after surgery. The 5 patients whose CEA did not fall to below 5 ng/ml showed a subsequent rise in CEA level and later were all found to have a tumor relapse. The results indicate that an incomplete drop in circulating CEA level one month after surgery is a bad prognostic sign. Twenty-two of these patients were followed up by repeated CEA radioimmunoassay for several months after surgery; 8 showed a progressive increase in CEA levels preceding clinical diagnosis of tumor relapse by 2-10 months. The clinical history of these 8 patients is briefly described. The results demonstrate that relapses of colon and rectum carcinoma can be detected by increased CEA levels months before the appearance of any clinical evidence.

Pamidronate intraveineux dans le traitement de l'ostéoporose post-ménopausique : effets de différentes modalités d'administration sur le remodelage et la densité osseuse : une étude pilote

Résumé : Introduction : l'ostéoporose est une maladie caractérisée par une masse osseuse diminuée et une structure osseuse appauvrie amenant à une fragilité osseuse augmentée et par conséquent à une augmentation du risque fracturaire. Elle est associée à une morbidité et mortalité importantes. Il existe de nombreuses substances à disposition pour son traitement. La modalité d'administration est très variable selon la substance prescrite. Les bisphosphonates, puissants antirésorbeurs osseux, sont la classe médicamenteuse de référence. Malheureusement, prescrits per os, iIs ont fréquemment des effets secondaires digestifs limitant leur usage et sont donc mieux tolérés en iv. C'est le pamidronate qui a été le premier prescrit et reste le plus utilisé. Méthode : le meilleur régime d'administration du pamidronate n'étant pas connu, nous avons testé son effet à différentes doses sur les marqueurs du remodelage osseux et la densitométrie osseuse. Trois modalités d'administration pour une dose annuelle constante (30 mg tous les 3 mois, 40 mg tous les 4 mois et 60 mg tous les 6 mois) ont été comparées chez des femmes postménopausées avec une ostéoporose. 39 patientes ont été recrutées sur 2 ans et réparties en 2 groupes appelés EFAP 1 et 2 pour Evaluation de la Fréquence d'Administration du Pamidronate selon la fréquence des contrôles de sang. Résultats : au cours des 6 premiers mois de traitement, on observe une chute rapide des télopeptides sanguins dès le premier mois qui suit l'injection de 30, 40 ou 60 mg de pamidronate avec toutefois, une inhibition de la résorption osseuse plus efficace à long terme pour les traitements fractionnés (30 et 40 mg). Des résultats similaires sont obtenus pour l'ostéocalcine. Il n'existe en revanche pas de modifications significatives des autres paramètres (calcémie, PTH, vitamine D et phosphatase alcaline) dans les 3 groupes. Ces résultats se confirment après 24 mois de traitement avec une efficacité plus marquée pour les traitements 30 et 40 mg. Sur le plan des valeurs de densitométrie osseuse, après 2 ans de traitement, les valeurs sont augmentées de façon significative sur la colonne lombaire avec les trais dosages, de façon non significatives sur le col fémoral et de façon significative pour le trochanter avec le dosage de 40 mg seulement. Conclusions : bien que cette étude démontre des gains de densité osseuse quasi identiques entre les 3 modes d'administration pour une dose annuelle cumulée de 120 mg, l'inhibition du remodelage osseux est beaucoup plus importante avec les doses de 30 ou 40 mg tous les 3 ou 4 mois qu'avec 60 mg tous les 6 mois. Ces deux modes d'administration permettent de mieux expliquer le lien entre l'effet sur les marqueurs et sur la densitométrie osseuse.

Ganciclovir exposure under a 450mg daily dosage of valganciclovir for cytomegalovirus prevention in kidney transplantation: a prospective study.

Manuel O, Pascual M, Perrottet N, Lamoth F, Venetz J-P, Decosterd LA, Buclin T, Meylan PR. Ganciclovir exposure under a 450 mg daily dosage of valganciclovir for cytomegalovirus prevention in kidney transplantation: a prospective study. 
Clin Transplant 2010: 24: 794-800. Abstract:  This prospective study aimed at determining the ganciclovir exposure observed under a daily dosage of 450 mg valganciclovir routinely applied to kidney transplant recipients with a GFR above 25 mL/min at risk for cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease. Ganciclovir levels at trough (C(trough) ) and at peak (C(3 h) ) were measured monthly. Ganciclovir exposure (area under the curve [AUC(0-24) ]) was estimated using Bayesian non-linear mixed-effect modeling (NONMEM). Thirty-six patients received 450 mg of valganciclovir daily for three months. Median ganciclovir C(3 h) was 3.9 mg/L (range: 1.3-7.1), and C(trough) was 0.4 mg/L (range 0.1-2.7). Median AUC(0-24) of ganciclovir was 59.3 mg h/L (39.0-85.3) in patients with GFR(MDRD) 26-39 mL/min, 35.8 mg h/L (24.9-55.8) in patients with GFR(MDRD) 40-59 mL/min, and 29.6 mg h/L (22.0-43.2) in patients with GFR(MDRD)  ≥ 60 mL/min. No major differences in adverse events according to ganciclovir exposure were observed. CMV viremia was not detected during prophylaxis. After discontinuing prophylaxis, CMV viremia was seen in 8/36 patients (22%), and 4/36 patients (11%) developed CMV disease. Ganciclovir exposure after administration of valganciclovir 450 mg daily in recipients with GFR ≥60 mL/min was comparable to those previously reported with oral ganciclovir. A routine daily dose of 450 mg valganciclovir appears to be acceptable for CMV prophylaxis in most kidney transplant recipients.

Bénéfices de l'utilisation d'un test VIH rapide à la permanence PMU-FLON [Benefits of using rapid HIV testing at the PMU-FLON walk-in clinic in Lausanne].

Lab tests are frequently used in primary care to guide patient care. This is particularly the case when a severe disorder, or one that will affect patients' initial care, needs to be excluded rapidly. At the PMU-FLON walk-in clinic the use of HIV testing as recommended by the Swiss Office of Public Health was hampered by the delay in obtaining test results. This led us to introduce rapid HIV testing which provides results within 30 minutes. Following the first 250 tests the authors discuss the results as well as the benefits of rapid HIV testing in an urban walk-in clinic.

Pédiatrie. 3. Le score de McIsaac: une aide à l'indication des tests de diagnostic rapide dans tes angines à streptocoques A [Pediatrics. Using the McIsaac score for the indication of rapid diagnostic testing in children with streptococcal pharyngitis].

The McIsaac scoring system is a tool designed to predict the probability of streptococcal pharyngitis in children aged 3 to 17 years with a sore throat. Although it does not allow the physician to make the diagnosis of streptococcal pharyngitis, it enables to identify those children with a sore throat in whom rapid antigen detection tests have a good predictive value.

Dosage plasmatique des medicaments antidépresseurs [Recommendations for therapeutic monitoring of antidepressants].

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), combined in certain situations with pharmacogenetic tests of metabolism, has proven a valuable tool for psychopharmacotherapy. Uncertain drug adherence, suboptimal tolerability, nonresponse at therapeutic doses, or pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions are typical situations when measurement of medication concentrations is helpful. This article is an adaptation of guidelines recently issued by the AGNP-TDM group (Hiemke et al., www. agnp.de), but its content focuses mainly on the TDM of antidepressants. Finally, the potential benefits of TDM for optimization of pharmacotherapy can only be obtained if the method is adequately integrated into the clinical treatment process.

Computerized advice on drug dosage to improve prescribing practice.

BACKGROUND: Maintaining therapeutic concentrations of drugs with a narrow therapeutic window is a complex task. Several computer systems have been designed to help doctors determine optimum drug dosage. Significant improvements in health care could be achieved if computer advice improved health outcomes and could be implemented in routine practice in a cost effective fashion. This is an updated version of an earlier Cochrane systematic review, by Walton et al, published in 2001. OBJECTIVES: To assess whether computerised advice on drug dosage has beneficial effects on the process or outcome of health care. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group specialized register (June 1996 to December 2006), MEDLINE (1966 to December 2006), EMBASE (1980 to December 2006), hand searched the journal Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (1979 to March 2007) and the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (1996 to March 2007) as well as reference lists from primary articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials, controlled trials, controlled before and after studies and interrupted time series analyses of computerized advice on drug dosage were included. The participants were health professionals responsible for patient care. The outcomes were: any objectively measured change in the behaviour of the health care provider (such as changes in the dose of drug used); any change in the health of patients resulting from computerized advice (such as adverse reactions to drugs). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-six comparisons (23 articles) were included (as compared to fifteen comparisons in the original review) including a wide range of drugs in inpatient and outpatient settings. Interventions usually targeted doctors although some studies attempted to influence prescriptions by pharmacists and nurses. Although all studies used reliable outcome measures, their quality was generally low. Computerized advice for drug dosage gave significant benefits by:1.increasing the initial dose (standardised mean difference 1.12, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.92)2.increasing serum concentrations (standradised mean difference 1.12, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.82)3.reducing the time to therapeutic stabilisation (standardised mean difference -0.55, 95%CI -1.03 to -0.08)4.reducing the risk of toxic drug level (rate ratio 0.45, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.70)5.reducing the length of hospital stay (standardised mean difference -0.35, 95% CI -0.52 to -0.17). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review suggests that computerized advice for drug dosage has some benefits: it increased the initial dose of drug, increased serum drug concentrations and led to a more rapid therapeutic control. It also reduced the risk of toxic drug levels and the length of time spent in the hospital. However, it had no effect on adverse reactions. In addition, there was no evidence to suggest that some decision support technical features (such as its integration into a computer physician order entry system) or aspects of organization of care (such as the setting) could optimise the effect of computerised advice.