31 resultados para diphosphonates
Resumo:
RESUME Nous rapportons l'étude d'une famille de 49 membres sur 5 générations. Parmi 35 membres étudiés, 18 sont atteints d'Osteolyse Expansive Familiale (OEF). L'OEF est une dysplasie osseuse génétique rare, autosomique dominante, dont les altérations locales et générales du squelette ont une distribution périphérique prédominante qui devient manifeste à partir de la deuxième décennie de vie. Une résorption ostéoclastique progressive, accompagnée d'une faible activité ostéoblastique, est à l'origine d'une expansion médullaire osseuse. Cette dernière est caractérisée par une raréfaction de la moelle osseuse qui est remplacée par du tissu fibreux et de la graisse. L'amincissement de la moelle osseuse aboutit à des déformations invalidantes, sévères et douloureuses du squelette, avec tendance aux fractures spontanées. La première manifestation clinique de la maladie est une surdité de transmission très précoce résultant d'une lyse de la chaîne ossiculaire. Radiologiquement, il existe toujours une pneumatisation marquée de la mastoïde et du rocher. Les dents montrent des signes importants de résorption osseuse au niveau de la région apicale et/ou du collet, dont l'aspect est caractéristique et unique. La phosphatase alcaline sérique, l'hydroxyproline et la deoxypiridoline urinaire sont élevées à des taux variables. Le taux de calcium et d'hormone parathyroïdienne est normal. Le traitement par les diphosphonates, la calcitonine et la vitamine D est inefficace. Histologiquement, l'OEF présente des similitudes avec la maladie de Paget, mais l'âge de début, la distribution des lésions osseuses, les altérations dentaires et de l'oreille moyenne, ainsi que la progression clinique sont différents. Il en va de même pour la dysplasie fibreuse, l'ostéite fibro-kystique et l'ostéogénèse imparfaite. Le gêne responsable de la maladie se localise dans la région du chromosome 18q21-22. Récemment, des mutations du TNFRSF 11A, gêne qui codifie le RANK, ont été identifiées comme étant la cause de l'OEF. La duplication de la 18ème paire de base au niveau de l'exon 1 suggère qu'il correspond au site de l'anomalie. La technique chirurgicale et les résultats audiométriques à court et long terme de 13 interventions chez 8 patients sont présentés. ABSTRACT Objectives: Familial Expansive Osteolysis (EEO) is a rare autosomal dominant bone dys¬plasia. The disease can show general and focal skeletal alterations, the latter having a pre¬dominantly peripheral distribution. Onset occurs after the second decade of life. Patients and methods: We present the study, of 30 years, of a family consisting of 49 members covering five generations. Results: Among the 35 members studied, 18 have familial expansive osteolysis (FEO). The first clinical sign of the condition is transmission deafness at an early age. The features of the teeth has a unique and characteristic appearance. Thinning of the corti¬cal bone leads to severe, painful, disabling deformities. Serum alkaline phosphatase, and urinary hydroxyproline and deoxipyridinoline are elevated. Calcium and parathyroid hor¬mone are normal. Treatment with diphosphonates, calcitonin and vitamin D has been unsuccessful. We present the surgical technology and the results to short and long term of 13 interventions on 8 patients. Conclusion: Progressive osteoclastic reabsorption accompanied by weak osteoblastic activ¬ity results in medullary expansion characterized by rarefaction of the bone marrow, which is replaced by fibrous tissue and fat. FE0 is histologically similar to Paget disease, but the age of onset, the distribution of the bone lesions, the dental and middle ear alterations, and the clin¬ical progression are different. These features also differentiate FE0 from fibrous dysplasia, fibrocystic osteitis and imperfect osteogenesis. The gene responsible for EEO is located in the 18q21-22 chromosome region. Mutations in TNFRSF11A, the gene encoding receptor activa¬tor of nuclear factor-kappa-B (RANK), has been recently identified as the cause of FEO. A duplication of 18 base pairs in exon 1 of the TNFRSF11A gene suggests that this corresponds to the site of the anomaly and can be considered a "hot spot" for mutations.
Resumo:
We report two cases of beta-thalassemia-induced osteoporosis. A man and a woman presented an osteoporosis at the densitometry and were treated with bisphoshonate iv. All the studies analysed the efficacity of bisphosphonate, in particular zoledronate seems to be effective. Concerning the pathogenesis, the RANK-RANK-Ligand and OPG play a major role in bone-resorption and seem to be the principal implicated mechanism for the development of osteoporosis in BTM. At the moment there is no study evaluating the efficacity of denosumab in the BTM.
Resumo:
Fractures due to osteoporosis are one of the major complications after heart transplantation, occurring mostly during the first 6 months after the graft, with an incidence ranging from 18% to 50% for vertebral fractures. Bone mineral density (BMD) decreases dramatically following the graft, at trabecular sites as well as cortical sites. This is explained by the relatively high doses of glucocorticoids used during the months following the graft, and by a long-term increase of bone turnover which is probably due to cyclosporine. There is some evidence for a beneficial effect on BMD of antiresorptive treatments after heart transplantation. The aim of this study was to assess prospectively the effect on BMD of a 3-year treatment of quarterly infusions of 60 mg of pamidronate, combined with 1 g calcium and 1000 U vitamin D per day, in osteoporotic heart transplant recipients, and that of a treatment with calcium and vitamin D in heart transplant recipients with no osteoporosis. BMD of the lumbar spine and the femoral neck was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in all patients every 6 months for 2 years and after 3 years. Seventeen patients, (1 woman, 16 men) aged 46+/-4 years (mean +/- SEM) received only calcium and vitamin D. A significant decrease in BMD was observed after 6 months following the graft, at the lumbar spine (- 6.6%) as well as at the femoral neck (-7.8%). After 2 years, BMD tended to recover at the lumbar spine, whereas the loss persisted after 3 years at the femoral neck. Eleven patients (1 woman and 10 men) aged 46+/-4 years (mean +/- SEM) started treatment with pamidronate on average 6 months after the graft, because they had osteoporosis of the lumbar spine and/or femoral neck (BMD T-score below -2.5 SD). Over the whole treatment period, a continuous increase in BMD at the lumbar spine was noticed, reaching 18.3% after 3 years (14.3% compared with the BMD at the time of the graft). BMD at the femoral neck was lowered in the first year by -3.4%, but recovered totally after 3 years of treatment. In conclusion, a 3-year study of treatment with pamidronate given every 3 months to patients with existing osteoporosis led to a significant increase in lumbar spine BMD and prevented loss at the femoral neck. However, since some of these patients were treated up to 14 months after the transplant, they may already have passed through the phase of most rapid bone loss. In patients who were not osteoporotic at baseline, treatment with calcium and vitamin D alone was not able to prevent the rapid bone loss that occurs immediately after transplantation.
Resumo:
CONTEXT: In the Health Outcomes and Reduced Incidence with Zoledronic Acid Once Yearly - Pivotal Fracture Trial (HORIZON-PFT), zoledronic acid (ZOL) 5 mg significantly reduced fracture risk. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to identify factors associated with greater efficacy during ZOL 5 mg treatment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: We conducted a subgroup analysis (preplanned and post hoc) of a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 36-month trial in 7765 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Intervention: A single infusion of ZOL 5 mg or placebo was administered at baseline, 12, and 24 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary endpoints were new vertebral fracture and hip fracture. Secondary endpoints were nonvertebral fracture and change in femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD). Baseline risk factor subgroups were age, BMD T-score and vertebral fracture status, total hip BMD, race, weight, geographical region, smoking, height loss, history of falls, physical activity, prior bisphosphonates, creatinine clearance, body mass index, and concomitant osteoporosis medications. RESULTS: Greater ZOL induced effects on vertebral fracture risk were seen with younger age (treatment-by-subgroup interaction, P = 0.05), normal creatinine clearance (P = 0.04), and body mass index >or= 25 kg/m(2) (P = 0.02). There were no significant treatment-factor interactions for hip or nonvertebral fracture or for change in BMD. CONCLUSIONS: ZOL appeared more effective in preventing vertebral fracture in younger women, overweight/obese women, and women with normal renal function. ZOL had similar effects irrespective of fracture risk factors or femoral neck BMD.
Resumo:
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate, analysing the dental literature, whether: * Patients on intravenous (IV) or oral bisphosphonates (BPs) can receive oral implant therapy and what could be the risk of developing bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ)? * Osseointegrated implants could be affected by BP therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A Medline search was conducted and all publications fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria from 1966 until December 2008 were included in the review. Moreover, the Cochrane Data Base of Systematic Reviews, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and EMBASE (from 1980 to December 2008) were searched for English-language articles published between 1966 and 2008. Literature search was completed by a hand research accessing the references cited in all identified publications. RESULTS: The literature search rendered only one prospective and three retrospective studies. The prospective controlled non-randomized clinical study followed patients with and without BP medication up to 36 months after implant therapy. The patients in the experimental group had been on oral BPs before implant therapy for periods ranging between 1 and 4 years. None of the patients developed BRONJ and implant outcome was not affected by the BP medication. The three selected retrospective studies (two case-controls and one case series) yielded very similar results. All have followed patients on oral BPs after implant therapy, with follow-up ranging between 2 and 4 years. BRONJ was never reported and implant survival rates ranged between 95% and 100%. The literature search on BRONJ including guidelines and recommendations found 59 papers, from which six were retrieved. Among the guidelines, there is a consensus on contraindicating implants in cancer patients under IV-BPs and not contraindicating dental implants in patients under oral-BPs for osteoporosis. CONCLUSIONS: From the analysis of the one prospective and the three retrospective series (217 patients), the placement of an implant may be considered a safe procedure in patients taking oral BPs for <5 years with regard to the occurrence of BRONJ since in these studies no BRONJ has been reported. Moreover, the intake of oral-BPs did not influence short-term (1-4 years) implant survival rates.
Resumo:
Osteoporosis is an increasing public health problem. The bisphophonates are the most useful treatment used through the world to prevent osteoporotic fractures. Their large prescription revealed an unpredictable side effect: the atypical fracture. These fractures appear in the subtrochanteric or diaphysal femoral proximal site, spontaneously or after a low trauma, and could be bilateral. X-rays shows a transversal or oblique fracture with a spur in the cortex and with a diffuse thickening of the cortical of the proximal femur. Expert's recommendations are current in progress to well understand and managed this problem. Here we report three cases of atypical femur fractures occurred in our Centre of bone diseases with some management and treatment propositions.
Resumo:
L'HPT primaire est une affection de plus en plus souvent diagnostiquée, grâce au dosage de routine du calcium. Près de la moitié des patients opérés le sont à la suite de la découverte fortuite d'une hypercalcémie. S'il est possible d'abaisser temporairement le taux de alcium par des moyens médicamenteux (diphosphonates par exemple), il n'y a pas qujourd'hui de traitement médical à long terme d'une HPT primaire qui, si on la laisse évoluer, peut aboutir à des lésions rénales et osseuses invalidantes, ainsi qu'à des troubles plus ou moins bien systématisés, essentiellement psychiatriques et digestifs. L'opération est grevée d'une morbidité très faible, avec un taux de succès de plus de 90%. Les seuls problèmes chirurgicaux sont liés à l'existence d'adénomes ectopiques (5-10%) ainsi qu'à la présence d'une hyperplasie primaire pouvant toucher les parathyroïdes asymétriquement.
Resumo:
This study evaluated the use of zoledronic acid, a resorption inhibitor, as a medication for root resorption treatment of late replanted teeth. Twenty-four maxillary right central incisors of rats were avulsed and kept dry for 30 min. Then, the teeth were divided into 2 groups. In group I, root surface was treated with 2% sodium fluoride for 20 min; in group II, 10-6M zoledronic acid solution was used for 20 min. All root canals were filled with calcium hydroxide. Next, teeth were replanted in their respective sockets. After 15 and 60 days post-replantation, the animals were killed and the anatomic pieces were obtained and prepared for microscopic and morphometric analyses. The results showed that zoledronic acid was capable of limiting the occurrence of root resorption and preserving cementum resorption. Further research must be performed to confirm the use of zoledronic acid in root surface treatment of late replanted teeth.
Resumo:
The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of a highly potent bisphosphonate, zoledronic acid (ZOL), on cultured odontoblast-like cells MDPC-23. The cells (1.5 × 104 cells/cm2) were seeded for 48 h in wells of 24-well dished. Then, the plain culture medium (DMEM) was replaced by fresh medium without fetal bovine serum. After 24 h, ZOL (1 or 5 μM) was added to the medium and maintained in contact with the cells for 24 h. After this period, the succinic dehydrogenase (SDH) enzyme production (cell viability-MTT assay), total protein (TP) production, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, and gene expression (qPCR) of collagen type I (Col-I) and ALP were evaluated. Cell morphology was assessed by SEM. Five μM ZOL caused a significant decrease in SDH production. Both ZOL concentrations caused a dose-dependent significant decrease in TP production and ALP activity. ZOL also produced discret morphological alterations in the MDPC-23 cells. Regarding gene expression, 1 μM ZOL caused a significant increase in Col-I expression. Although 5 μM ZOL did not affect Col-I expression, it caused a significant alteration in ALP expression (ANOVA and Tukey's test, p < 0.05). ZOL presented a dose-dependent cytotoxic effect on the odontoblast-like cells, suggesting that under clinical conditions the release of this drug from dentin could cause damage to the pulpo-dentin complex. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.
Resumo:
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
Resumo:
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
Resumo:
Os glicocorticoides (GC) são prescritos por praticamente todas as especialidades médicas, e cerca de 0,5% da população geral do Reino Unido utiliza esses medicamentos. Com o aumento da sobrevida dos pacientes com doenças reumatológicas, a morbidade secundária ao uso dessa medicação representa um aspecto importante que deve ser considerado no manejo de nossos pacientes. As incidências de fraturas vertebrais e não vertebrais são elevadas, variando de 30%-50% em pessoas que usam GC por mais de três meses. Assim, a osteoporose e as fraturas por fragilidade devem ser prevenidas e tratadas em todos os pacientes que iniciarão ou que já estejam em uso desses esteroides. Diversas recomendações elaboradas por várias sociedades internacionais têm sido descritas na literatura, porém não há consenso entre elas. Recentemente, o Americam College of Rheumatology publicou novas recomendações, porém elas são fundamentadas na FRAX (WHO Fracture Risk Assessment Tool) para analisar o risco de cada indivíduo e, dessa maneira, não podem ser completamente utilizadas pela população brasileira. Dessa forma, a Comissão de Osteoporose e Doenças Osteometabólicas da Sociedade Brasileira de Reumatologia, em conjunto com a Associação Médica Brasileira e a Associação Brasileira de Medicina Física e Reabilitação, implementou as diretrizes brasileiras de osteoporose induzida por glicocorticoide (OPIG), baseando-se na melhor evidência científica disponível e/ou experiência de experts. DESCRIÇÃO DO MÉTODO DE COLETA DE EVIDÊNCIA: A revisão bibliográfica de artigos científicos desta diretriz foi realizada na base de dados MEDLINE. A busca de evidência partiu de cenários clínicos reais, e utilizou as seguintes palavras-chave (MeSH terms): Osteoporosis, Osteoporosis/chemically induced*= (Glucocorticoids= Adrenal Cortex Hormones, Steroids), Glucocorticoids, Glucocorticoids/administration and dosage, Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use, Glucocorticoids/adverse effects, Prednisone/adverse effects, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Bone Density/drug effects, Bone Density Conservation Agents/pharmacological action, Osteoporosis/ prevention&control, Calcium, Vitamin D, Vitamin D deficiency, Calcitriol, Receptors, Calcitriol; 1-hydroxycholecalciferol, Hydroxycholecalciferols, 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 1-alpha-hydroxylase OR Steroid Hydroxylases, Prevention and Control, Spinal fractures/prevention & control, Fractures, Spontaneous, Lumbar Vertebrae/injuries, Lifestyle, Alcohol Drinking, Smoking OR tobacco use disorder, Movement, Resistance Training, Exercise Therapy, Bone density OR Bone and Bones, Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry OR Absorptiometry Photon OR DXA, Densitometry, Radiography, (Diphosphonates Alendronate OR Risedronate Pamidronate OR propanolamines OR Ibandronate OR Zoledronic acid, Teriparatide OR PTH 1-34, Men AND premenopause, pregnancy, pregnancy outcome maternal, fetus, lactation, breast-feeding, teratogens, Children (6-12 anos), adolescence (13-18 anos). GRAU DE RECOMENDAÇÃO E FORÇA DE EVIDÊNCIA: A) Estudos experimentais e observacionais de melhor consistência; B) Estudos experimentais e observacionais de menor consistência; C) Relatos de casos (estudos não controlados); D) Opinião desprovida de avaliação crítica, com base em consensos, estudos fisiológicos ou modelos animais. OBJETIVO: Estabelecer as diretrizes para a prevenção e o tratamento da OPIG.
Resumo:
Bisphosphonates have proven effectiveness in preventing skeletal-related events (SREs) in advanced breast cancer, prostate cancer and multiple myeloma. The purpose of this study was to assess efficacy of bisphosphonates in preventing SREs, in controlling pain, and in increasing life expectancy in lung cancer patients with bone metastases.^ We performed an electronic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases up to April 4, 2010. Hand searching and searching in clinicaltrials.gov were also performed. Two independent reviewers selected all clinical trials that included lung cancer patients with bone metastases treated with bisphosphonates. We excluded articles that involved cancers other than lung, patients without bone metastasis and treatment other than bisphosphonates. Outcome questions answered were efficacy measured as overall pain control, overall improvement in survival and reduction in skeletal-related events or SREs (fracture, cord compression, radiation or surgery to the bone, hypercalcemia of malignancy). The quality of each study was evaluated using the Cochrane Back Review group questionnaire to assess risk of bias (0-worst to 11-best). Data extraction and quality assessments were independently performed by two assessors. Meta-analyses were performed where more than one study with similar outcomes were found.^ We identified eight trials that met our inclusion criteria. Three studies evaluated zoledronic acid, three pamidronate, three clodronate and two ibandronate. Two were placebocontrol trials while two had multi-group comparisons (radiotherapy, radionucleotides, and chemotherapy) and two had different bisphosphonate as active controls. Quality scores ranged from 1-4 out of 11 suggesting high risk of bias. Studies failed to report adequate explanation of randomization procedures, concealment of randomization and blinding. Metaanalysis showed that patients treated with zoledronic acid alone had lower rates of developing SREs compared to placebo at 21 months (RR=0.80, 95% CI=0.66-0.97, p=0.02). Meta-analyses also showed increased pain control when a bisphosphonate was added to the existing treatment modality like chemotherapy or radiation (RR=1.17, 95% CI=1.03-1.34, p=0.02). However, pain control was not statistically significantly different among various bisphosphonates when other treatment modalities were not present. Despite improvement in SRE and pain control, bisphosphonates failed to show improvement in overall survival (Difference in means=109.1 days, 95% CI= -51.52 – 269.71, p=0.183).^ Adding biphosphonates to standard care improved pain control and reduced SREs. Biphosphonates did not improve overall survival. Further larger studies with higher quality are required to stengthen the evidence.^ Keywords/MeSH terms Bisphosphonates/diphosphonates: generic, chemical and trade names.^