975 resultados para corporations law


Relevância:

40.00% 40.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Kept up to date by pocket supplements and revised vols.

Relevância:

40.00% 40.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Includes index.

Relevância:

40.00% 40.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Paged continuously.

Relevância:

40.00% 40.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Vol. 7 includes index to v. 1-7.

Relevância:

40.00% 40.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Relevância:

40.00% 40.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Paged continuously with main work.

Relevância:

40.00% 40.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

On spine: Henn on corporarions.

Relevância:

40.00% 40.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Paged continuously.

Relevância:

40.00% 40.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Kept up to date by cumulative pocket supplements and revised vols.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Under the Alien Tort Statute United States of America (“America”) Federal Courts have the jurisdiction to hear claims for civil wrongs, committed against non-American citizens, which were perpetrated outside America’s national borders. The operation of this law has confronted American Federal Courts with difficulties on how to manage conflicts between American executive foreign policy and judicial interpretations of international law. Courts began to pass judgment over conduct which was approved by foreign governments. Then in 2005 the American Supreme Court wound back the scope of the Alien Tort Statute. This article will review the problems with the expansion of the Alien Tort Statute and the reasons for its subsequent narrowing.