Triplet repeat expansion in myotonic dystrophy alters the adjacent chromatin structure.

Myotonic dystrophy is caused by an expansion of a CTG triplet repeat sequence in the 3' noncoding region of a protein kinase gene, yet the mechanism by which the triplet repeat expansion causes disease remains unknown. This report demonstrates that a DNase I hypersensitive site is positioned 3' of the triplet repeat in the wild-type allele in both fibroblasts and skeletal muscle cells. In three unrelated individuals with myotonic dystrophy that have large expansions of the triplet repeat, the allele with the triplet repeat expansion exhibited both overall DNase I resistance and inaccessibility of nucleases to the adjacent hypersensitive site. These results indicate that the triplet repeat expansion alters the adjacent chromatin structure, establishing a region of condensed chromatin, and suggests a molecular mechanism for myotonic dystrophy.

Investigating the Effect of Histone H4 Sumoylation on Chromatin Structure and Function

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2016-06

Chromatin dynamics in Arbidopsis development: a live cell imaging approach

Dissertation presented to obtain the Ph.D degree in Biology

Comparative chromatin analysis of Trypanosoma congolense

The chromatin of Trypanosoma congolense was analyzed by electron microscopy. The chromatin is organized as nucleosome filaments but does not form a 30 nm fiber. There are five groups of histones, including a histone H1-like protein, which has a molecular weight within the range of the core histones, and is extremely hydrophilic. Weak histone-histone interaction, a typical feature of trypanosoma chromatin, was found. These results are similar to those for T. cruzi and T. b. brucei, but differ significantly from those for higher eukaryotes. The results confirm the model of trypanosome chromatin, and support the theory of their early separation from the other eukaryotes during the evolution. T. congolensis is an excellent model for chromatin research on trypanosomes, because it is easy to cultivate and its chromatin has, a relatively high stability, compared to that of other trypanosomes.

Analysis of a boundary protein delimiting chromatin domains in yeast

SUMMARY The expression state of a eukaryotic gene depends in part on its location in the chromosome. This position effect results from the organization of eukaryotic genomes into discrete functional domains, defined by local differences in chromatin structure. The expression of genes within each domain appears to be defined and maintained by the concerted action of regulatory elements such as promoters, enhancers, silencers and locus control regions. Individual domains may be bordered by boundary elements that separate regions of permissive and silent chromatin. When located next to chromosomal elements such as telomeres, genes can be subjected to epigenetic silencing. In yeast, this is mediated by the propagation of the SIR proteins from telomeres towards more centromeric regions. Particular transcription factors can protect downstream genes from silencing when tethered between the gene and the telomere, and they may thus act as chromatin domain boundaries. Here we have studied one of these transcription factors, CTF-1, that binds directly histone H3. A deletion mutagenesis localized the barrier activity to CTF-1 histone-binding domain. A saturating point mutagenesis of this domain identified several amino-acid substitutions that similarly inhibited the boundary and histone-binding activities. Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments indicated that the barrier protein efficiently prevents the spreading of SIR proteins, and that it separates domains of hypoacetylated and hyperacetylated histones. Together, these results suggest a mechanism by which proteins such as CTF-1 may interact directly with histone H3 to prevent the propagation of a silent chromatin structure, thereby defining boundaries of permissive and silent chromatin domains. RESUME L'expression des gènes eucaryotes dépend en partie de leur localisation sur les chromosomes. Cet effet de position résulte de l'organisation des génomes eucaryotes en domaines fonctionnels, définis par des changements locaux au niveau de la structure de la chromatine. Dans chacun de ces domaines, l'expression des gènes est définie et maintenue par l'action concertée de différents éléments régulateurs tels que les promoteurs, les amplificateurs, les silenceurs et les locus control régions. Ces domaines peuvent être entourés par des éléments barrière, séparant les régions de chromatine répressive des régions permissive pour l'expression des gènes. Lorsqu'ils se situent à proximité d'éléments chromosomiques comme les telomères, les gènes peuvent être réprimés de manière épigénétique. Chez la levure, cette répression est établie par la propagation des protéines SIR depuis les télomères vers les régions centromériques. Certains facteurs de transcription peuvent empêcher la répression d'un gène, lorsqu'ils sont placés entre ce gène et le télomère. Nous avons étudié un de ces facteurs, CTF-1, qui a la particularité de lier directement l'histone H3. La délétion de certaines parties de CTF-1 a permis de déterminer que la région responsable de l'activité barrière correspond au domaine d'interaction avec H3. Plusieurs mutations points effectuées dans ce domaine inhibent à la fois l'activité barrière et la capacité de lier H3. Des expériences d'immuno-précipitation de la chromatine indiquent que la protéine barrière CTF-1 prévient efficacement la propagation des protéines SIR et sépare des domaines contenant des histones hypo-acétylées de ceux constitués d'histones hyper-acétylées. Ces résultats suggèrent que CTF-1 interagit directement avec l'histone H3 pour empêcher la propagation de la chromatine répressive, délimitant ainsi des domaines de chromatine permissive et des domaines de chromatine silencieuse.

Chromatin domain boundaries delimited by a histone-binding protein in yeast.

When located next to chromosomal elements such as telomeres, genes can be subjected to epigenetic silencing. In yeast, this is mediated by the propagation of the SIR proteins from telomeres toward more centromeric regions. Particular transcription factors can protect downstream genes from silencing when tethered between the gene and the telomere, and they may thus act as chromatin domain boundaries. Here we have studied one such transcription factor, CTF-1, that binds directly histone H3. A deletion mutagenesis localized the barrier activity to the CTF-1 histone-binding domain. A saturating point mutagenesis of this domain identified several amino acid substitutions that similarly inhibited the boundary and histone binding activities. Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments indicated that the barrier protein efficiently prevents the spreading of SIR proteins, and that it separates domains of hypoacetylated and hyperacetylated histones. Together, these results suggest a mechanism by which proteins such as CTF-1 may interact directly with histone H3 to prevent the propagation of a silent chromatin structure, thereby defining boundaries of permissive and silent chromatin domains.

Conserved chromosomal clustering of genes governed by chromatin regulators in Drosophila

BACKGROUND: The trithorax group (trxG) and Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are responsible for the maintenance of stable transcriptional patterns of many developmental regulators. They bind to specific regions of DNA and direct the post-translational modifications of histones, playing a role in the dynamics of chromatin structure. RESULTS: We have performed genome-wide expression studies of trx and ash2 mutants in Drosophila melanogaster. Using computational analysis of our microarray data, we have identified 25 clusters of genes potentially regulated by TRX. Most of these clusters consist of genes that encode structural proteins involved in cuticle formation. This organization appears to be a distinctive feature of the regulatory networks of TRX and other chromatin regulators, since we have observed the same arrangement in clusters after experiments performed with ASH2, as well as in experiments performed by others with NURF, dMyc, and ASH1. We have also found many of these clusters to be significantly conserved in D. simulans, D. yakuba, D. pseudoobscura and partially in Anopheles gambiae. CONCLUSION: The analysis of genes governed by chromatin regulators has led to the identification of clusters of functionally related genes conserved in other insect species, suggesting this chromosomal organization is biologically important. Moreover, our results indicate that TRX and other chromatin regulators may act globally on chromatin domains that contain transcriptionally co-regulated genes.

Transcription factor CTF1 acts as a chromatin domain boundary that shields human telomeric genes from silencing.

Telomeres are associated with chromatin-mediated silencing of genes in their vicinity. However, how epigenetic markers mediate mammalian telomeric silencing and whether specific proteins may counteract this effect are not known. We evaluated the ability of CTF1, a DNA- and histone-binding transcription factor, to prevent transgene silencing at human telomeres. CTF1 was found to protect a gene from silencing when its DNA-binding sites were interposed between the gene and the telomeric extremity, while it did not affect a gene adjacent to the telomere. Protein fusions containing the CTF1 histone-binding domain displayed similar activities, while mutants impaired in their ability to interact with the histone did not. Chromatin immunoprecipitation indicated the propagation of a hypoacetylated histone structure to various extents depending on the telomere. The CTF1 fusion protein was found to recruit the H2A.Z histone variant at the telomeric locus and to restore high histone acetylation levels to the insulated telomeric transgene. Histone lysine trimethylations were also increased on the insulated transgene, indicating that these modifications may mediate expression rather than silencing at human telomeres. Overall, these results indicate that transcription factors can act to delimit chromatin domain boundaries at mammalian telomeres, thereby blocking the propagation of a silent chromatin structure.

Conserved chromosomal clustering of genes governed by chromatin regulators in Drosophila

Background: The trithorax group (trxG) and Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are responsible for the maintenance of stable transcriptional patterns of many developmental regulators. They bind to specific regions of DNA and direct the post-translational modifications of histones, playing a role in the dynamics of chromatin structure.Results: We have performed genome-wide expression studies of trx and ash2 mutants in Drosophila melanogaster. Using computational analysis of our microarray data, we have identified 25 clusters of genes potentially regulated by TRX. Most of these clusters consist of genes that encode structural proteins involved in cuticle formation. This organization appears to be a distinctive feature of the regulatory networks of TRX and other chromatin regulators, since we have observed the same arrangement in clusters after experiments performed with ASH2, as well as in experiments performed by others with NURF, dMyc, and ASH1. We have also found many of these clusters to be significantly conserved in D. simulans, D. yakuba, D. pseudoobscura and partially in Anopheles gambiae.Conclusion: The analysis of genes governed by chromatin regulators has led to the identification of clusters of functionally related genes conserved in other insect species, suggesting this chromosomal organization is biologically important. Moreover, our results indicate that TRX and other chromatin regulators may act globally on chromatin domains that contain transcriptionally co-regulated genes.

Determinants of vitellogenin B1 promoter architecture. HNF3 and estrogen responsive transcription within chromatin.

The liver-specific vitellogenin B1 promoter is efficiently activated by estrogen within a nucleosomal environment after microinjection into Xenopus laevis oocytes, consistent with the hypothesis that significant nucleosome remodeling over this promoter is not a prerequisite for the activation by the estrogen receptor (ERalpha). This observation lead us to investigate determinants other than ERalpha of chromatin structure and transcriptional activation of the vitellogenin B1 promoter in this system and in vitro. We find that the liver-enriched transcription factor HNF3 has an important organizational role for chromatin structure as demonstrated by DNase I-hypersensitive site mapping. Both HNF3 and the estrogen receptor activate transcription synergistically and are able to interact with chromatin reconstituted in vitro with three positioned nucleosomes. We propose that HNF3 is the cellular determinant which establishes a promoter environment favorable to a rapid transcriptional activation by the estrogen receptor.

Hog1 bypasses stress-mediated down-regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II redistribution and chromatin remodeling

Cells are subjected to dramatic changes of gene expression upon environmental changes. Stresscauses a general down-regulation of gene expression together with the induction of a set of stress-responsivegenes. The p38-related stress-activated protein kinase Hog1 is an important regulator of transcription uponosmostress in yeast. Genome-wide localization studies of RNA polymerase II (RNA Pol II) and Hog1 showed that stress induced major changes in RNA Pol II localization, with a shift toward stress-responsive genes relative to housekeeping genes. RNA Pol II relocalization required Hog1, which was also localized to stress-responsive loci. In addition to RNA Pol II-bound genes, Hog1 also localized to RNA polymerase III-bound genes, pointing to a wider role for Hog1 in transcriptional control than initially expected. Interestingly, an increasing association of Hog1 with stressresponsive genes was strongly correlated with chromatin remodeling and increased gene expression. Remarkably, MNase-Seq analysis showed that although chromatin structure was not significantly altered at a genome-wide level in response to stress, there was pronounced chromatin remodeling for those genes that displayed Hog1 association. Hog1 serves to bypass the general down-regulation of gene expression that occurs in response to osmostress, and does so both by targeting RNA Pol II machinery and by inducing chromatin remodeling at stressresponsive loci.

Assessment of chromatin activity in mouse and human tissues

Pancreatic deoxyribonuclease preferentially digests active genes during all phases of the cell cycle including mitosis. Recently, a DNAse I-directed in ~ nick translation technique has been used to demonstrate differences in the DNAse I sensitivity of euchromatic and heterochromatic regions of mitotic chromosomes. This ill ~ technique has been used in this study to ask whether facultative heterochromatin of the inactive X chromosome can be distinguished from the active X chromosome in mouse and human tissues. In addition to this, in ~ nick translation has been used to distinguish constitutive heterochromatin in mouse and human mitotic chromosomes. Based on relative levels of DNAse I sensitivity, the inactive X chromosome could not be distinguished from the active X chromosome in either mouse or human tissues but regions of constitutive heterochromatin could be distinguished by their relative DNAse I insensitivity. The use of !D situ nick translation was also applied to tissue sections of 7.5 day mouse embryos to ask whether differing levels of DNAse I sensitivity could be detected between different tissue types. Differences in DNAse I sensitivities were detected in three tissues examined; embryonic ectoderm, an embryo-derived tissue, and two extraembryonic tissues, extraembryonic ectoderm and ectoplacental cone. Embryonic ectoderm and extraembryonic ectoderm nuclei possessed comparable levels of DNAse I sensitivity while ectoplacental cone was significantly less DNAse I sensitive. This suggests that tissue-specific mechanisms such as chromatin structure may be involved in the regulation of gene activity in certain tissue types. This may also shed some light on possible tissue specific mechanisms regulating X chromosome activity in the developing mouse embryo.

Mass spectrometry as a tool to dissect the role of chromatin assembly factors in regulating nucleosome assembly

L'assemblage des nucléosomes est étroitement couplée à la synthèse des histones ainsi qu’à la réplication et la réparation de l’ADN durant la phase S. Ce processus implique un mécanisme de contrôle qui contribue soigneusement et de manière régulée à l’assemblage de l’ADN en chromatine. L'assemblage des nucléosomes durant la synthèse de l’ADN est crucial et contribue ainsi au maintien de la stabilité génomique. Cette thèse décrit la caractérisation par spectrométrie de masse(SM) des protéines jouant un rôle critique dans l’assemblage et le maintien de la structure chromatinienne. Plus précisément, la phosphorylation de deux facteurs d’assemblage des nucléosome, le facteur CAF-1, une chaperone d’histone qui participe à l'assemblage de la chromatine spécifiquement couplée à la réplication de l'ADN, ainsi que le complexe protéique Hir, jouant de plus un rôle important dans la régulation transcriptionelle des gènes d’histones lors de la progression normale du cycle cellulaire et en réponse aux dommages de l'ADN, a été examiné. La caractérisation des sites de phosphorylation par SM nécéssite la séparation des protéines par éléctrophorèse suivi d’une coloration a l’argent. Dans le chapitre 2, nous demontrons que la coloration à l’argent induit un artéfact de sulfatation. Plus précisément, cet artéfact est causé par un réactif spécifiquement utilisé lors de la coloration. La sulfatation présente de fortes similitudes avec la phosphorylation. Ainsi, l’incrément de masse observé sur les peptides sulfatés et phosphorylés (+80 Da) nécéssite des instruments offrant une haute résolution et haute précision de masse pour différencier ces deux modifications. Dans les chapitres 3 et 4, nous avons d’abord démontré par SM que Cac1, la plus grande sous-unité du facteur CAF-1, est cible de plusieurs sites de phosphorylation. Fait intéréssant, certains de ces sites contiennent des séquences consensus pour les kinases Cdc7-Dbf4 et CDKs. Ainsi, ces résultats fournissent les premières évidences que CAF-1 est potentiellement régulé par ces deux kinases in vivo. La fonction de tous les sites de phosphorylation identifiés a ensuite été évaluée. Nous avons démontré que la phosphorylation de la Ser-503, un site consensus de la DDK, est essentielle à la répréssion transcriptionelle des gènes au niveau des télomères. Cependant, cette phosphorylation ne semble pas être nécéssaire pour d’autres fonctions connues de CAF-1, indiquant que le blocage de la phsophorylation de Cac1 Ser-503 affecte spécifiquement la fonction de CAF-1 aux structures hétérochromatiques des télomères. Ensuite, nous avons identifiés une intéraction physique entre CAF-1 et Cdc7-Dbf4. Des études in vitro ont également demontré que cette kinase phosphoryle spécifiquement Cac1 Ser-503, suggérant un rôle potential pour la kinase Cdc7-Dbf4 dans l’assemblage et la stabilité de la structure hétérochromatique aux télomères. Finalement, les analyses par SM nous ont également permi de montrer que la sous-unité Hpc2 du complexe Hir est phosphorylée sur plusieurs sites consensus des CDKs et de Cdc7-Dbf4. De plus, la quantification par SM d’un site spécifique de phosphorylation de Hpc2, la Ser-330, s’est révélée être fortement induite suite à l’activation du point de contrôle de réplication (le “checkpoint”) suite au dommage a l’ADN. Nous montrons que la Ser-330 de Hpc2 est phopshorylée par les kinases de point de contrôle de manière Mec1/Tel1- et Rad53-dépendante. Nos données préliminaires suggèrent ainsi que la capacité du complex Hir de réguler la répréssion transcriptionelle des gènes d'histones lors de la progression du cycle cellulaire normal et en réponse au dommage de l'ADN est médiée par la phosphorylation de Hpc2 par ces deux kinases. Enfin, ces deux études mettent en évidence l'importance de la spectrométrie de masse dans la caractérisation des sites de phosphorylation des protéines, nous permettant ainsi de comprendre plus précisement les mécanismes de régulation de l'assemblage de la chromatine et de la synthèse des histones.

Chromatin Remodeling by BRG1 and SNF2H : Biochemistry and Function

Chromatin is a highly dynamic, regulatory component in the process of transcription, repair, recombination and replication. The BRG1 and SNF2H proteins are ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling proteins that modulate chromatin structure to regulate DNA accessibility for DNA-binding proteins involved in these processes. The BRG1 protein is a central ATPase of the SWI/SNF complexes involved in chromatin remodeling associated with regulation of transcription. SWI/SNF complexes are biochemically hetero-geneous but little is known about the unique functional characteristics of the various forms. We have shown that SWI/SNF activity in SW13 cells affects actin filament organization dependent on the RhoA signaling pathway. We have further shown that the biochemical composition of SWI/SNF complexes qualitatively affects the remodeling activity and that the composition of biochemically purified SWI/SNF complexes does not reflect the patterns of chromatin binding of individual subunits. Chromatin binding assays (ChIP) reveal variations among subunits believed to be constitutive, suggesting that the plasticity in SWI/SNF complex composition is greater than suspected. We have also discovered an interaction between BRG1 and the splicing factor Prp8, linking SWI/SNF activity to mRNA processing. We propose a model whereby parts of the biochemical heterogeneity is a result of function and that the local chromatin environment to which the complex is recruited affect SWI/SNF composition. We have also isolated the novel B-WICH complex that contains WSTF, SNF2H, the splicing factor SAP155, the RNA helicase II/Guα, the transcription factor Myb-binding protein 1a, the transcription factor/DNA repair protein CSB and the RNA processing factor DEK. The formation of this complex is dependent on active transcription and links chromatin remodeling by SNF2H to RNA processing. By linking chromatin remodeling complexes with RNA processing proteins our work has begun to build a bridge between chromatin and RNA, suggesting that factors in chromatin associated assemblies translocate onto the growing nascent RNA.