Argument structures in Chinese university students’ argumentative writing: a contrastive study

Situated within a Systemic Functional Linguistics genre paradigm, this study adopted a function-based linguistic approach to examine the argument structures in English writing produced by Chinese university students of English as foreign language (EFL). Their English writing was contrasted with three other sets of argumentative essays in order to explore differences and similarities in the use of argument structures. The four sets of essays were produced by three groups of university students: native English- and Chinese-speaking university students and Chinese university EFL students. Participants’ interviews and questionnaire responses were also collected. The study found that most native English-speaking participants used an analytical arguing strategy, while most Chinese-speaking university participants preferred a hortatory argument structure both in their English and Chinese writing. It was also found that Chinese participants’ English writing was influenced by both English and Chinese.

Argumentative systems in robots

Nowadays, the development of intelligent agents intends to be more refined, using improved architectures and reasoning mechanisms. Revise the beliefs of an agent is also an important subject, due to the consistency that agents should have about their knowledge. In this work we propose deliberative and argumentative agents using Lego Mindstorms robots, Argumentative NXT BDI-like Agents. These agents are built using the notions of the BDI model and they are capable to reason using the DeLP formalism. They update their knowledge base with their perceptions and revise it when necessary. Two variations are presented: the Single Argumentative NXT BDI-like Agent and the MAS Argumentative NXT BDI-like Agent.

Discourses, argumentative and devotional, on the subject of the Jewish religion : delivered at the synagogue Mikveh Israel

by Isaac Leeser

Enragé! Monologue comique dit

Mode of access: Internet.

Oh, dese women! : a Dutch monologue /

Mode of access: Internet.

The art of reading : containing a number of useful rules exemplified by a variety of selected and original pieces, narrative, didactic, argumentative, poetical, descriptive, pathetic, humourous, and entertaining, together with dialogues, speeches, orations, addresses, and harangues : calculated to improve the scholar in reading and speaking with propriety and elegance, and to impress the minds of youth with sentiments of virtue and religion : designed for the use of schools and families /

Mode of access: Internet.

Procès de Joseph N. Cardinal et autres : auquel on a joint la requête argumentative en faveur des prisonniers et plusieurs autres documents précieux, &c. &c. &c. /

Vraisemblablement de André-Romuald Cherrier, attribué par Gagnon (I, 687) à Francis Johnson. Cf. Vinet. Pseudonymes québécois.

The national preceptor; or, Selections in prose and poetry; consisting of narrative, descriptive, argumentative, didactic, pathetic, and humorous pieces ...

Mode of access: Internet.

Modifying the Mask: the Transformation of the Dramatic Monologue Across the Works of Robert Browning, Norman Dubie, and Frank Bidart

Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2016-06

Examining argumentative coherence in essays by undergraduate students of English as a foreign language in Mainland China and their English speaking peers in the United States

I conducted this study to provide insights toward deepening understanding of association between culture and writing by building, assessing, and refining a conceptual model of second language writing. To do this, I examined culture and coherence as well as the relationship between them through a mixed methods research design. Coherence has been an important and complex concept in ESL/EFL writing. I intended to study the concept of coherence in the research context of contrastive rhetoric, comparing the coherence quality in argumentative essays written by undergraduates in Mainland China and their U.S. peers. In order to analyze the complex concept of coherence, I synthesized five linguistic theories of coherence: Halliday and Hasan's cohesion theory, Carroll's theory of coherence, Enkvist's theory of coherence, Topical Structure Analysis, and Toulmin's Model. Based upon the synthesis, 16 variables were generated. Across these 16 variables, Hotelling t-test statistical analysis was conducted to predict differences in argumentative coherence between essays written by two groups of participants. In order to complement the statistical analysis, I conducted 30 interviews of the writers in the studies. Participants' responses were analyzed with open and axial coding. By analyzing the empirical data, I refined the conceptual model by adding more categories and establishing associations among them. The study found that U.S. students made use of more pronominal reference. Chinese students adopted more lexical devices of reiteration and extended paralleling progression. The interview data implied that the difference may be associated with the difference in linguistic features and rhetorical conventions in Chinese and English. As far as Toulmin's Model is concerned, Chinese students scored higher on data than their U.S. peers. According to the interview data, this may be due to the fact that Toulmin's Model, modified as three elements of arguments, have been widely and long taught in Chinese writing instruction while U.S. interview participants said that they were not taught to write essays according to Toulmin's Model. Implications were generated from the process of textual data analysis and the formulation of structural model defining coherence. These implications were aimed at informing writing instruction, assessment, peer-review, and self-revision.

Séquence didactique visant l’efficacité argumentative des textes d’opinion

Cette recherche expérimente une séquence didactique consacrée au texte d’opinion. Elle vise à amener des scripteurs adultes non francophones à produire des textes argumentativement efficaces, c’est-à-dire des textes dont les marques linguistiques, énonciatives et rhétoriques permettent d’obtenir l’assentiment de l’auditoire. Aujourd’hui encore, la prise en compte de l’efficacité d’un texte d’opinion ne constitue pas un aspect essentiel de l’enseignement de textes argumentatifs, largement dominé par une approche structurelle et formelle. Notre recherche développe une approche intégratrice et critique des travaux de didactique du français à propos de l’argumentation discursive; aussi nous situons-nous à l’antipode des conceptions logicisantes de l’argumentation écrite. Opérant une synthèse des courants théoriques qui ont étudié l’argumentation, en particulier la Nouvelle rhétorique, l’analyse de discours dans ses versions française et anglo-saxonne, la pragmadialectique et « l’argumentation dans la langue », nous avons construit le concept d’efficacité argumentative, socle de l’élaboration, de l’expérimentation et de l’analyse de notre séquence didactique. Cette dernière a été construite selon la démarche de recherche de l’ingénierie didactique avec son réseau de concepts et les différentes étapes qui la composent. Un prétest a permis d’évaluer les capacités argumentatives des étudiants. L’évaluation de ces données nous a guidés dans le choix des contenus des ateliers qui portent sur l’inscription des paramètres de la situation de communication, l’étayage de la thèse, la réfutation et la concession, la polyphonie et la contreargumentation. Ce travail a été suivi d’un posttest qui visait à valider l’effet de l’enseignement sur les compétences des étudiants et leur capacité à produire des textes d’opinion argumentativement efficaces. Nous espérons avoir montré que l’efficacité argumentative devrait être le paradigme principal de l’enseignement des genres argumentatifs et qu’il existe des outils didactiques valides pour contribuer à la démocratisation de l’accès à la langue, non pas comme simple code, mais comme un outil pour agir dans la société. L’enjeu dépasse le simple cadre scolaire, puisque la maitrise de l’argumentation est essentielle au développement professionnel et social des individus, mais aussi, osons nous ajouter, pour l’avènement de sociétés réellement démocratiques.

Experiments on identification of argumentative sentences

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the best set of features that automatically enables the identification of argumentative sentences from unstructured text. As corpus, we use case laws from the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). Three kinds of experiments are conducted: Basic Experiments, Multi Feature Experiments and Tree Kernel Experiments. These experiments are basically categorized according to the type of features available in the corpus. The features are extracted from the corpus and Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Forest are the used as Machine learning algorithms. We achieved F1 score of 0.705 for identifying the argumentative sentences which is quite promising result and can be used as the basis for a general argument-mining framework.