Tasosartan, enoltasosartan, and angiotensin II receptor blockade: the confounding role of protein binding.

Tasosartan is a long-acting angiotensin II (AngII) receptor blocker. Its long duration of action has been attributed to its active metabolite enoltasosartan. In this study we evaluated the relative contribution of tasosartan and enoltasosartan to the overall pharmacological effect of tasosartan. AngII receptor blockade effect of single doses of tasosartan (100 mg p.o. and 50 mg i.v) and enoltasosartan (2.5 mg i.v.) were compared in 12 healthy subjects in a randomized, double blind, three-period crossover study using two approaches: the in vivo blood pressure response to exogenous AngII and an ex vivo AngII radioreceptor assay. Tasosartan induced a rapid and sustained blockade of AngII subtype-1 (AT1) receptors. In vivo, tasosartan (p.o. or i.v.) blocked by 80% AT1 receptors 1 to 2 h after drug administration and still had a 40% effect at 32 h. In vitro, the blockade was estimated to be 90% at 2 h and 20% at 32 h. In contrast, the blockade induced by enoltasosartan was markedly delayed and hardly reached 60 to 70% despite the i.v. administration and high plasma levels. In vitro, the AT1 antagonistic effect of enoltasosartan was markedly influenced by the presence of plasma proteins, leading to a decrease in its affinity for the receptor and a slower receptor association rate. The early effect of tasosartan is due mainly to tasosartan itself with little if any contribution of enoltasosartan. The antagonistic effect of enoltasosartan appears later. The delayed in vivo blockade effect observed for enoltasosartan appears to be due to a high and tight protein binding and a slow dissociation process from the carrier.

Assessment of angiotensin II receptor blockade in humans using a standardized angiotensin II receptor-binding assay.

An in vitro angiotensin II (AngII) receptor-binding assay was developed to monitor the degree of receptor blockade in standardized conditions. This in vitro method was validated by comparing its results with those obtained in vivo with the injection of exogenous AngII and the measurement of the AngII-induced changes in systolic blood pressure. For this purpose, 12 normotensive subjects were enrolled in a double-blind, four-way cross-over study comparing the AngII receptor blockade induced by a single oral dose of losartan (50 mg), valsartan (80 mg), irbesartan (150 mg), and placebo. A significant linear relationship between the two methods was found (r = 0.723, n = 191, P<.001). However, there exists a wide scatter of the in vivo data in the absence of active AngII receptor blockade. Thus, the relationship between the two methods is markedly improved (r = 0.87, n = 47, P<.001) when only measurements done 4 h after administration of the drugs are considered (maximal antagonist activity observed in vivo) suggesting that the two methods are equally effective in assessing the degree of AT-1 receptor blockade, but with a greatly reduced variability in the in vitro assay. In addition, the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis performed with the three antagonists suggest that the AT-1 receptor-binding assay works as a bioassay that integrates the antagonistic property of all active drug components of the plasma. This standardized in vitro-binding assay represents a simple, reproducible, and precise tool to characterize the pharmacodynamic profile of AngII receptor antagonists in humans.

Characterization of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist TCV-116 in healthy volunteers.

The purpose of this study was to assess the inhibitory effect of TCV-116, an orally active angiotensin II (Ang II) antagonist, on the pressor action of exogenous Ang II and to determine the compensatory rise in plasma renin activity and Ang II levels. Twenty-three male volunteers were treated for 8 days in a double-blind fashion with either placebo or TCV-116 (1, 2, or 4 mg PO daily) and challenged on the first, fourth, and eighth days with repeated bolus injections of Ang II. An additional 4 subjects received 8 mg PO daily in a single-blind fashion. The inhibitory effect on the systolic blood pressure response to Ang II was long lasting and clearly dose related. Six hours after 4 mg TCV-116, the systolic blood pressure response to a given dose of Ang II was reduced to 40 +/- 4% and 35 +/- 8% of baseline value on days 1 and 8, respectively. TCV-116 induced a dose-related increase in plasma renin activity and Ang II levels that was more pronounced on the eighth than on the first day of drug administration. Despite this compensatory mechanism, the relation between the time-integrated systolic blood pressure response to Ang II and the time-integrated CV-11974 levels, the active metabolite of TCV-116, was not different between days 1 and 8. In conclusion, TCV-116 appears to be a well-tolerated, orally active, potent, and long-lasting antagonist of Ang II in men.

Angiotensin II receptor blockade in normotensive subjects: A direct comparison of three AT1 receptor antagonists.

Use of angiotensin (Ang) II AT1 receptor antagonists for treatment of hypertension is rapidly increasing, yet direct comparisons of the relative efficacy of antagonists to block the renin-angiotensin system in humans are lacking. In this study, the Ang II receptor blockade induced by the recommended starting dose of 3 antagonists was evaluated in normotensive subjects in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, 4-way crossover study. At 1-week intervals, 12 subjects received a single dose of losartan (50 mg), valsartan (80 mg), irbesartan (150 mg), or placebo. Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system was assessed before and 4, 24, and 30 hours after drug intake by 3 independent methods: inhibition of the blood pressure response to exogenous Ang II, in vitro Ang II receptor assay, and reactive changes in plasma Ang II levels. At 4 hours, losartan blocked 43% of the Ang II-induced systolic blood pressure increase; valsartan, 51%; and irbesartan, 88% (P<0.01 between drugs). The effect of each drug declined with time. At 24 hours, a residual effect was found with all 3 drugs, but at 30 hours, only irbesartan induced a marked, significant blockade versus placebo. Similar results were obtained when Ang II receptor blockade was assessed with an in vitro receptor assay and by the reactive rise in plasma Ang II levels. This study thus demonstrates that the first administration of the recommended starting dose of irbesartan induces a greater and longer lasting Ang II receptor blockade than that of valsartan and losartan in normotensive subjects.

Short-term and sustained renal effects of angiotensin II receptor blockade in healthy subjects.

We investigated the short-term and sustained hormonal and renal effects of angiotensin II (Ang II) receptor blockade in normotensive healthy volunteers. Twenty-four subjects maintained on a fixed sodium diet were randomized to receive for 8 days a placebo or 10 or 50 mg doses of the Ang II antagonist irbesartan (SR 47436, BMS 186295) according to a double-blind, parallel group design. Plasma renin activity, plasma immunoreactive Ang II and aldosterone levels, blood pressure, renal hemodynamics, and urinary electrolyte excretion were measured for 8 hours after the first and eighth administration of each dose of irbesartan or placebo. Ang II receptor blockade with irbesartan induced a dose-dependent compensatory increase in plasma renin activity and plasma angiotensin levels and a significant decrease in plasma aldosterone levels. The compensatory rise in plasma renin activity and Ang II levels was more pronounced on day 8, reflecting a long duration of the blocking effect of irbesartan. Irbesartan induced small changes in blood pressure and did not significantly modify renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate. However, a significant decrease in filtration fraction was observed during receptor blockade on days 1 and 8. The tubular effects of irbesartan were characterized by a dose-dependent increase in sodium and chloride excretions. Interestingly, the cumulative natriuretic response to Ang II receptor blockade was similar on days 1 and 8, suggesting that in these subjects, renal Ang II receptors are not blocked over 24 hours during repeated administration even though this antagonist has a long duration of action (t1/2 of 15 to 17 hours).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparative vascular and renal tabular effects of angiotensin II receptor blockers combined with a thiazide diurectic in humans

Rapport de synthese :Comparaison des effets vasculaires et tubulaires rénaux de plusieurs antagonistes des récepteurs de |'angiotensine II en combinaison avec un diurétique thiazidique chez l'humainObjectif : Le but de ce travail était d'investiguer si les antagonistes des récepteurs AT1 de l'angiotensine II (ARA2) entraînent un blocage équivalent des récepteurs au niveau vasculaire et au niveau rénal, en particulier lorsque le système rénine- angiotensine est stimulé par l'administration d'un diurétique thiazidique. Méthode : trente volontaires masculins en bonne santé ont participé à cette étude randomisée, contrôlée, en simple insu. Nous avons mesuré les variations de pression artérielle, d'hémodynamique rénale ainsi que la réponse tubulaire rénale à une perfusion d'angiotensine II 3ng/kg/min administrée sur 1 heure. Ceci avant traitement puis après sept jours d'administration, 24 heures après la dernière dose de médicament. Nous avons comparé l'irbésartan 300 mg seul ou en association avec 12.5 ou 25 mg d'hydrochlorothiazide. (irbésartan 300/12.5 ; irbésartan 300/25). Nous avons également comparé les effets de l'irbésartan 300/25 au losartan 100 mg, au valsartan 160 mg ainsi qu'à l'olmésartan 20 mg, tous administrés avec 25 mg d'hydrochlorothiazide. Chaque participant a été randomisé pour recevoir 2 traitements de 7 jours espacés d'une période d'une semaine sans traitement. Résultats: La réponse de la pression artérielle à |'angiotensine II exogène était bloquée >90% avec l'irbésartan 300 mg seul ou en association avec le diurétique. Il en était de même avec l'olmésartan 20/25. Par contre le blocage n'était que de 60% environ dans les groupes valsartan 160/25 et losartan 100/25. Au niveau rénal, |'angiotensine II exogène réduisait le flux plasmatique rénal de 36% en pré- traitement. Dans les groupes recevant l'irbésartan 300 mg et l'olmésartan 20 mg associés à l'hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg, la vasoconstriction rénale était bloquée presque entièrement alors qu'el|e ne |'était que partiellement avec le valsartan 160/25 et le losartan 100/25 (34 et 45%, respectivement). En pré-traitement, au niveau tubulaire, l'angiotensine II exogène réduisait le volume urinaire de 84% et l'excrétion urinaire de sodium de 65 %. Les effets tubulaires n'étaient que partiellement bloqués par l'administration d'ARA2. Conclusion: Ces résultats démontrent que les ARA; aux doses maximales recommandées ne bloquent pas aussi efficacement les récepteurs ATI au niveau tubulaire qu'au niveau vasculaire. Cette observation pourrait constituer une justification à l'hypothèse selon laquelle des doses plus importantes d'ARA2 seraient nécessaires afin d'obtenir une meilleure protection d'organe. De plus, nos résultats confirment qu'i| y a d'importantes différences entre les ARA2, relatives à leur capacité d'induire un blocage prolongé sur 24 heures des récepteurs AT1 au niveau vasculaire et tubulaire.

Combining blockers of the renin-angiotensin system or increasing the dose of an angiotensin II receptor antagonist in proteinuric patients: a randomized triple-crossover study.

Objective The goal of this study was to investigate whether increasing the dose of an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) provides as much benefits as combining the ARB with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) in terms of blood pressure (BP) control and urinary albumin excretion (UAE) in hypertensive patients with a proteinuria.Methods We enrolled 20 hypertensive patients with proteinuric nephropathies and a reduced renal function in a randomized, 12-month, triple-crossover, prospective, open-label study to compare the effects of a regular dose of losartan (Los 100mg q.d., LOS100) vs. a high dose of losartan (Los 100mg b.i.d., LOS200) vs. losartan 100mg q.d. associated with lisinopril 20 mg q.d. (LOS100 + LIS20). Each treatment was given for 8 weeks with a 4-week initial run-in period and 2 weeks of washout between each treatment phases. 24 h UAE and ambulatory BP were measured during the running phase and at the end of each treatment period.Results Compared to pretreatment, 24 h SBP and DBP were reduced by 10/5 +/- 7/4 mmHg with LOS100 (P=0.023 vs. baseline) and, respectively, 13/6 +/- 12/5 mmHg with LOS200 (P=0.011) and 19/9 +/- 15/8 mmHg with LOS100+LIS20 (P < 0.01). UAE decreased significantly with LOS100 and to an even greater degree with LOS200 and LOS100+LIS20 (P < 0.01 vs. baseline for both and P=0.032, LOS100+LIS20 vs. LOS200). The combination had a greater impact in patients with a high baseline proteinuria as suggested by a nonparallel leftward shift of the relationship between the changes in UAE induced by the combination and those induced by LOS200. The high dose of losartan was better tolerated than the combination.Conclusion Increasing the dose of losartan from 100mg once daily to 100mg twice a day enables to obtain a greater decrease in BP and proteinuria and is better tolerated than combining the ARB with lisinopril, though the high dose appears to be slightly less effective than the combination in patients with a marked proteinuria. J Hypertens 29: 1228-1235 (C) 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Pharmacology of valsartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist.

Valsartan is the second orally-active, non-peptide angiotensin II receptor blocker to reach the market in Europe and the USA for the treatment of hypertension. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that this blocker is specific for the AT(1) receptor and has no affinity for the angiotensin II AT(2) receptor. Experimentally, valsartan dose-dependently inhibits the vasoconstriction induced by angiotensin II and lowers blood pressure in renin-dependent models of hypertension. Pharmacologically, oral valsartan is characterised by a low bioavailability but a rapid absorption and distribution with a half-life in keeping with once-daily administration. Thus, after oral administration, the maximal plasma concentration is reached 2 h after dosing and the elimination half-life is about 6 h. Clinically, several dose-finding and comparative studies have demonstrated that valsartan is an effective and well-tolerated antihypertensive drug in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Valsartan has also been shown to be effective in severe hypertension. Valsartan is at least as effective as ACE inhibitors, diuretics, beta-blockers and calcium antagonists. However, none of the side-effects observed with these latter agents, including cough and lower limb oedema, has been observed with the administration of valsartan. Three large clinical trials are now underway to demonstrate whether valsartan can reduce morbidity and mortality: one in hypertensives with a high cardiovascular risk profile (VALUE), one in patients with heart failure previously treated with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (VAL-HeFT) and one in post-myocardial infarct patients (VALIANT). These studies will further define the place of valsartan beyond the treatment of hypertension.

Telmisartan: a different angiotensin II receptor blocker protecting a different population?

The ONgoing Telmisartan Alone and in combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial (ONTARGET()) showed that the angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) telmisartan was as protective as the reference-standard ramipril in a broad cross-section of patients at increased cardiovascular risk, but was better tolerated. Telmisartan has a unique profile among ARBs, with a high affinity for the angiotensin II type 1 receptor, a long duration of receptor binding, a high lipophilicity and a long plasma half life. This leads to sustained and powerful blood pressure lowering when compared with the first marketed ARBs, such as losartan and valsartan. Some pharmacological properties of telmisartan clearly distinguish it from other members of the ARB class and may contribute to the clinical effects seen with telmisartan. A class effect for ARBs cannot be assumed. To date, telmisartan is the only ARB that has been shown to reduce cardiovascular risk in at-risk cardiovascular patients.

Role of Nuclear Angiotensin-II Receptor Mediated Signalling in Cardiovascular Remodelling

Le remodelage cardiaque est le processus par lequel la structure ou la fonction cardiaque change en réponse à un déséquilibre pathophysiologique tel qu'une maladie cardiaque, un contexte d'arythmie prolongée ou une modification de l'équilibre hormonal. Le système rénine-angiotensine (SRA) est un système hormonal largement étudié et il est impliqué dans de nombreuses activités associées au remodelage cardiovasculaire. L’existence d'un système circulatoire couplé à un système de tissus locaux est une représentation classique, cependant de nouvelles données suggèrent un SRA indépendant et fonctionnellement actif à l'échelle cellulaire. La compréhension de l'activité intracellulaire du SRA pourrait mener à de nouvelles pistes thérapeutiques qui pourraient prévenir un remodelage cardiovasculaire défavorable. L'objectif de cette thèse était d'élucider le rôle du SRA intracellulaire dans les cellules cardiaques. Récemment, les récepteurs couplés aux protéines G (RCPG), les protéines G et leurs effecteurs ont été détectés sur des membranes intracellulaires, y compris sur la membrane nucléaire, et les concepts de RCPG intracellulaires fonctionnels sont en voie d'être acceptés comme une réalité. Nous avons dès lors fait l'hypothèse que la signalisation du SRA délimitant le noyau était impliquée dans le contrôle de l'expression des gènes cardiaques. Nous avons démontré la présence de récepteurs d'angiotensine de type-1 (AT1R) et de type-2 (AT2R) nucléaires dans les cardiomyocytes ventriculaires adultes et dans une fraction nucléaire purifiée de tissu cardiaque. Des quantités d'Ang II ont été détectées dans du lysat de cardiomyocytes et des microinjections d'Ang-II-FITC ont donné lieu à des liaisons préférentielles aux sites nucléaires. L'analyse transcriptionnelle prouve que la synthèse d'ARN de novo dans des noyaux isolés stimulés à l'Ang-II, et l'expression des ARNm de NF-κB étaient beaucoup plus importants lorsque les noyaux étaient exposés à de l'Ang II par rapport aux cardiomyocytes intacts. La stimulation des AT1R nucléaires a engendré une mobilisation de Ca2+ via les récepteurs de l'inositol trisphosphate (IP3R), et le blocage des IP3R a diminué la réponse transcriptionnelle. Les méthodes disponibles actuellement pour l'étude de la signalisation intracrine sont limitées aux méthodes indirectes. L'un des objectifs de cette thèse était de synthétiser et caractériser des analogues d'Ang-II cellule-perméants afin d’étudier spécifiquement dans les cellules intactes l'activité intracellulaire du SRA. Nous avons synthétisé et caractérisé pharmacologiquement des analogues photosensibles Ang-II encapsulée en incorporant un groupement 4,5-diméthoxy-2-nitrobenzyl (DMNB) photoclivable sur les sites actifs identifiés du peptide. Chacun des trois analogues d'Ang II encapsulée synthétisés et purifiés: [Tyr(DMNB)4]Ang-II, Ang-II-ODMNB et [Tyr(DMNB)4]Ang-II-ODMNB a montré une réduction par un facteur deux ou trois de l'affinité de liaison envers AT1R et AT2R dans les dosages par liaison compétitive et une activité réduite dans la contraction de l'aorte thoracique. La photostimulation de [Tyr(DMNB)4]Ang-II dans des cellules HEK a augmenté la phosphorylation d'ERK1/2 (via AT1R) et la production de cGMP (via AT2R) alors que dans les cardiomyocytes isolés elle générait une augmentation de Ca2+ nucléoplasmique et initiait la synthèse d'ARNr 18S et d'ARNm du NF-κB. Les fibroblastes sont les principaux générateurs de remodelage cardiaque structurel, et les fibroblastes auriculaires sont plus réactifs aux stimuli profibrotiques que les fibroblastes ventriculaires. Nous avons émis l'hypothèse que l’Ang-II intracellulaire et l'activation des AT1R et AT2R nucléaires associés contrôlaient les profils d'expression des gènes des fibroblastes via des systèmes de signalisation distincts et de ce fait jouaient un rôle majeur dans le développement de la fibrose cardiaque. Nous avons remarqué que les fibroblastes auriculaires expriment l’AT1R et l’AT2R nucléaire et l'Ang-II au niveau intracellulaire. L’expression d'AT1R nucléaire a été régulés positivement dans les cas d’insuffisance cardiaque (IC), tandis que l'AT2R nucléaire a été glycosylé post-traductionnellement. La machinerie protéique des protéines G, y compris Gαq/11, Gαi/3, et Gβ, a été observée dans des noyaux isolés de fibroblastes. AT1R et AT2R régulent l'initiation de la transcription du fibroblaste via les voies de transduction de signal d'IP3R et du NO. La photostimulation de [Tyr(DMNB)4]Ang-II dans une culture de fibroblastes auriculaire déclenche la libération de Ca2+ nucléoplasmique, la prolifération, et la synthèse et sécrétion de collagène qui ne sont pas inhibées par les bloqueurs d'AT1R et/ou AT2R extracellulaires.

Influence of angiotensin II receptor subtypes of the paraventricular nucleus on the physiological responses induced by angiotensin II injection into the medial septal area

Objective - We determined the effects of losartan and PD 123319 (antagonists of the AT1 and AT2 angiotensin receptors, respectively), and [Sar1, Ala8] ANG II (a relatively peptide antagonist of angiotensin receptors) injected into the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) on water and 3% NaCl intake, and the diuretic, natriuretic, and pressor effects induced by administration of angiotensin II (ANG II) into the medial septal area (MSA) of conscious rats. Methods - Holtzman rats were used. Animals were anesthetized with tribromoethanol (20 mg) per 100 grams of body weight, ip. A stainless steel guide cannula was implanted into the MSA and PVN. All drugs were injected in 0.5-μl volumes for 10-15 seconds. Seven days after brain surgery, water and 3% NaCl intake, urine and sodium excretion, and arterial blood pressure were measured. Results - Losartan (40 nmol) and [Sar1, Ala8] ANG II (40 nmol) completely eliminated whereas PD 123319 (40 nmol) partially blocked the increase in water and sodium intake and the increase in arterial blood pressure induced by ANG II (10 nmol) injected into the MSA. The PVN administration of PD 123319 and [Sar1, Ala8] ANG II blocked whereas losartan attenuated the diuresis and natriuresis induced by MSA administration of ANG II. Conclusion - MSA involvement with PVN on water and sodium homeostasis and arterial pressure modulation utilizing ANGII receptors is suggested.

MiRNA-208a and miRNA-208b are triggered in thyroid hormone-induced cardiac hypertrophy - role of type 1 Angiotensin II receptor (AT1R) on miRNA-208a/α-MHC modulation

Hyperthyroidism promotes cardiac hypertrophy and the Angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT1R) has been demonstrated to mediate part of this response. Recent studies have uncovered a potentially important role for the microRNAs (miRNAs) in the control of diverse aspects of cardiac function. Then, the objective of the present study was to investigate the action promoted by hyperthyroidism on β-MHC/miR-208b expression and on α-MHC/miR-208a expression, as well as the possible contribution of the AT1R in this event. The findings of this study confirmed that AT1R is a key mediator of the cardiac hypertrophy induced by hyperthyroidism. Additionally, we demonstrated that like β-MHC, miR-208b was down-regulated in the hyperthyroid group. Similarly, like the expression of its host gene, α-MHC, miR-208a expression was up-regulated in response to hyperthyroidism. Finally, our data suggest for the first time that AT1R mediates the hyperthyroidism-induced increase on cardiac miRNA-208a/α-MHC levels, while does not influence on the reduction of miRNA-208b/β-MHC levels.

Conditioned fear is modulated by D(2) receptor pathway connecting the ventral tegmental area and basolateral amygdala

Excitation of the mesocorticolimbic pathway, originating from dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA), may be important for the development of exaggerated fear responding. Among the forebrain regions innervated by this pathway, the amygdala is an essential component of the neural circuitry of conditioned fear. The functional role of the dopaminergic pathway connecting the VIA to the basolateral amygdala (BLA) in fear and anxiety has received little attention. In vivo microdialysis was performed to measure dopamine levels in the BLA of Wistar rats that received the dopamine D(2) agonist quinpirole (1 mu g/0.2 mu l) into the VTA and were subjected to a fear conditioning test using a light as the conditioned stimulus (CS). The effects of intra-BLA injections of the D(1) antagonist SCH 23390 (1 and 2 mu g/0.2 mu l) and D(2) antagonist sulpiride (1 and 2 mu g/0.2 mu l) on fear-potentiated startle (FPS) to a light-CS were also assessed. Locomotor performance was evaluated by use of open-field and rotarod tests. Freezing and increased dopamine levels in the BLA in response to the CS were both inhibited by intra-VTA quinpirole. Whereas intra-BLA SCH 23390 did not affect FPS, intra-BLA sulpiride (2 mu g) inhibited FPS. Sulpiride`s ability to decrease FPS cannot be attributed to nonspecific effects because this drug did not affect motor performance. These findings indicate that the dopamine D(2) receptor pathway connecting the ventral tegmental area and the basolateral amygdala modulates fear and anxiety and may be a novel pharmacological target for the treatment of anxiety. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.