Prophylactic use of bevacizumab to avoid anterior segment neovascularization following proton therapy for uveal melanoma.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether the prophylactic use of bevacizumab reduces the rate of rubeosis after proton therapy for uveal melanoma and improves the possibility to treat ischemic, reapplicated retina with laser photocoagulation. DESIGN: Comparative retrospective case series. METHODS: Uveal melanoma patients with ischemic retinal detachment and treated with proton therapy were included in this institutional study. Twenty-four eyes received prophylactic intravitreal bevacizumab injections and were compared with a control group of 44 eyes without bevacizumab treatment. Bevacizumab injections were performed at the time of tantalum clip insertion and were repeated every 2 months during 6 months, and every 3 months thereafter. Ultra-widefield angiography allowed determination of the extent of retinal ischemia, which was treated with laser photocoagulation after retinal reapplication. Main outcome measures were the time to rubeosis, the time to retinal reattachment, and the time to laser photocoagulation of ischemic retina. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were balanced between the groups, except for thicker tumors and larger retinal detachments in the bevacizumab group, potentially to the disadvantage of the study group. Nevertheless, bevacizumab prophylaxis significantly reduced the rate of iris rubeosis from 36% to 4% (log-rank test P = .02) and tended to shorten the time to retinal reapplication until laser photocoagulation of the nonperfusion areas could be performed. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic intravitreal bevacizumab in patients treated with proton therapy for uveal melanoma with ischemic retinal detachment prevented anterior segment neovascularization, until laser photocoagulation to the reapplied retina could be performed.

Expression of Chemokine Receptors in Uveal Melanoma

Purpose:Chemokine receptors are transmembrane G coupled proteins that might be involved in the directional metastatic migration of tumor cells to specific organs. CXCR4 and CCR7 have been implicated in the selective metastasis of cutaneous melanoma cells to lung and lymph node, respectively. CCR6 is expressed in metastases from colon, ovarian and thyroid carcinomas to the liver where its ligand, CCL20, is constitutively expressed. As uveal melanomas frequently metastasize to the liver, we hypothesized that specific chemokine receptors and their respective ligands might be involved in metastasis of uveal melanoma to the liver. Methods:Tissue microarrays were constructed using 100 non irradiated primary uveal melanomas and 84 liver metastases, as well as 12 non liver metastases, collected from the files of Jules Gonin Eye Hospital and Pathology Institute, University of Lausanne. Immunohistochemistry was performed using anti-human CXCR4, SDF1, CCR7, CCL21 and CCR6 antibodies. Results:CXCR4 expression was detected in 36% of primary uveal melanomas and in 63% of liver metastases but no expression was found in metastases to other organs, except for one pancreatic metastasis. SDF1 expression was detected in 3% of primary uveal melanomas and in 26% of liver metastases, as well as in pancreas, lymph node and breast metastases. CCR6 expression was observed in the majority of primary uveal melanomas and liver metastases (73 and 88%, respectively). In addition, CCR6 was also detected in 9 metastases to other organs (pancreas, thyroid, lymph node, skin and breast). CCR7 and CCL21 were neither detected in primary uveal melanoma, nor in the metastases. Conclusions:Chemokine receptors CCR6 and CXCR4 are expressed in a large number of primary uveal melanomas and in uveal melanoma metastases to the liver. CCR6 is also expressed in a small number of metastases to other organs. These findings form the basis for further studies on the potential involvement of CXCR4 and CCR6 in the selective metastasis of uveal melanoma to the liver.

Scleritis after proton therapy in uveal melanoma [Skleritis nach Protonentherapie bei Aderhautmelanom]

BACKGROUND: Sclera is a very radioresistant tissue and scleritis after proton therapy has not been described so far. HISTORY AND SIGNS: Four female patients, aged between 31 and 74 years, were treated with proton therapy for uveal melanoma (height range: 2.2 - 3.5 mm), located in the macula, the superior equator and 2 in the ciliary body. All patients had a history of a previous or active inflammatory disease and developed scleritis after radiotherapy. THERAPY AND OUTCOME: Two patients had infectious scleritis and were treated with adequate antibiotic therapy. After systemic corticotherapy, 3 patients recovered completely; the remaining patient was managed with additional immunosuppressive treatment as well as a conjunctival and scleral graft, but has not become pain free yet. CONCLUSION: Scleritis is a possible complication after proton therapy, probably on an ischemic basis, where there is a predisposing factor such as inflammatory systemic disease.

Proton Therapy for Uveal Melanoma in 43 Juvenile Patients: Long-Term Results.

PURPOSE: To examine the metastatic and survival rates, eye retention probability, and the visual outcomes of juvenile patients after proton beam radiotherapy (PBRT) for uveal melanoma (UM). DESIGN: Retrospective case-factor matched control study. PARTICIPANTS AND CONTROLS: Forty-three patients younger than 21 years treated with PBRT for UM were compared with 129 matched adult control patients. METHODS: Information on patient demographics and clinical characteristics were recorded before and after treatment from patients' files. The control group was composed of adult patients (>21 years) matched for tumor size (largest tumor diameter, ±2 mm; height, ±2 mm) and anterior margin location (iris, ciliary body, pre-equatorial or postequatorial choroid). For each juvenile patient, 3 adults were selected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparing outcomes of juvenile and adult patients in terms of metastatic and eye retention rates using the log-rank statistic, relative survival using the Hakulinen method, as well as their visual outcomes. RESULTS: Forty-three juvenile and 129 control cases were reviewed. The metastatic rate at 10 years was significantly lower in juvenile UM patients than in adult controls (11% vs. 34%; P <0.01), with an associated relative survival rate of 93% versus 65% (P = 0.02). Six juvenile patients (14%) demonstrated metastases. One patient underwent enucleation because of a presumed local tumor recurrence and 4 additional patients underwent enucleation because of complications (9.3%). In the adult control group, 27% (n = 35) of matched patients demonstrated metastases, there were 2 cases of local recurrence, and 16% (n = 21) underwent enucleation because of complications. A visual acuity of more than 0.10 was maintained in most cases, without any significant differences before or after treatment observed between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: After PBRT, metastatic and survival rates are significantly better for juvenile than for adult patients with UM. Clinically, juvenile and adult eyes react similarly to PBRT, with patients having a comparable eye retention probability and maintaining a useful level of vision in most cases. This is the largest case-control study of proton therapy in juvenile eyes to date and further validates PBRT as an appropriate conservative treatment for UM in patients younger than 21 years.

Methylation of CpG island promoters in uveal melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Inactivation of tumour-related genes by promoter hypermethylation is a common epigenetic event in the development of a variety of tumours. AIM: To investigate in primary uveal melanoma the status of promoter methylation of genes thought to be involved in tumour development: p16, TIMP3, RASSF1, RARB, FHIT, hTERT and APC. METHODS: Gene promoter methylation was studied by methylation-sensitive single-strand conformation analysis and dot-blot assay in a series of 23 primary uveal melanomas. All DNA samples were obtained from paraffin-embedded formalin-fixed tissue blocks. RESULTS: hTERT promoter methylation was found with a relatively high frequency (52%). Promoter methylation of p16, TIMP3, RASSF1, RARB, FHIT and APC was a rare event. For none of these genes did promoter methylation exceed 15% of tumour samples, and, for some genes (FHIT and APC), no methylation was found at all. Furthermore, promoter methylation was absent in 39% (9/23) of cases. In only 22% (5/23) of cases was hypermethylation of at least two promoters observed. CONCLUSIONS: Promoter methylation of hTERT is a regular event in uveal melanoma. Hypermethylation of the other genes studied does not seem to be an essential element in the development of this tumour. As promoter methylation of APC, RASSF1 and RARB is often observed in cutaneous melanoma, these results suggest that different epigenetic events occur in the development of cutaneous and uveal melanoma.

FDG PET and MR imaging in patients with liver metastases from uveal melanoma : results from a pilot study

Le présent travail a eu comme but la comparaison de la performance de deux méthodes d'imagerie diagnostique pour la détection de métastases hépatiques du mélanome uvéal : la tomographie d'émission par positons au F-18-fluorodésoxyglucose (TEP FDG) couplée à la tomodensitométrie (TDM) et l'imagerie par résonance magnétique (IRM). Dans cette étude rétrospective, nous avons analysé les données radiologiques de patients inclus dans une étude multicentrique randomisée de phase III de l'Uveal Melanoma Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). L'IRM s'est révélée nettement plus sensible que le FDG-PET/CT pour mettre en évidence les métastases hépatiques notamment de taille infra-centimétrique. Néanmoins, l'analyse des changements de l'accumulation du traceur métabolique par les métastases hépatiques au cours du traitement suggère la possibilité d'évaluer, de manière précoce, la réponse des métastases hépatiques à la chimiothérapie. Le nombre de cas étudiés est trop faible pour déterminer la précision et la valeur clinique d'une telle évaluation mais les résultats obtenus dans cette étude pilote justifient une étude plus étendue.

Prophylactic use of bevacizumab to avoid anterior segment neovascularization following proton therapy for uveal melanoma.

PURPOSE To investigate whether the prophylactic use of bevacizumab reduces the rate of rubeosis after proton therapy for uveal melanoma and improves the possibility to treat ischemic, reapplicated retina with laser photocoagulation. DESIGN Comparative retrospective case series. METHODS Uveal melanoma patients with ischemic retinal detachment and treated with proton therapy were included in this institutional study. Twenty-four eyes received prophylactic intravitreal bevacizumab injections and were compared with a control group of 44 eyes without bevacizumab treatment. Bevacizumab injections were performed at the time of tantalum clip insertion and were repeated every 2 months during 6 months, and every 3 months thereafter. Ultra-widefield angiography allowed determination of the extent of retinal ischemia, which was treated with laser photocoagulation after retinal reapplication. Main outcome measures were the time to rubeosis, the time to retinal reattachment, and the time to laser photocoagulation of ischemic retina. RESULTS Baseline characteristics were balanced between the groups, except for thicker tumors and larger retinal detachments in the bevacizumab group, potentially to the disadvantage of the study group. Nevertheless, bevacizumab prophylaxis significantly reduced the rate of iris rubeosis from 36% to 4% (log-rank test P = .02) and tended to shorten the time to retinal reapplication until laser photocoagulation of the nonperfusion areas could be performed. CONCLUSIONS Prophylactic intravitreal bevacizumab in patients treated with proton therapy for uveal melanoma with ischemic retinal detachment prevented anterior segment neovascularization, until laser photocoagulation to the reapplied retina could be performed.

Ocular melanoma is not associated with CDKN2A or MC1R variants - a population-based study

Germline variants in the melanocortin 1 receptor gene (MC1R) and the p16 gene (CDKN2A) are associated with an increased risk of cutaneous melanoma. The frequency of these germline variants was examined in a population-based, incident series of 62 ocular melanoma cases and ethnicity-matched population controls. In both cases and controls, 59% of individuals carried at least one MC1R variant and there were no significant differences in the frequency of any of the five most common variants of MC1R. We also found no significant differences between cases and controls in the frequency of any of the four most common variants of CDKN2A, and no melanoma case carried a deleterious germline CDKN2A mutation. Our findings argue against an important predisposing effect of the MC1R and CDKN2A genes for ocular melanoma.

Ocular melanoma: what's new?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review was to summarize available data on uveal melanoma biology and treatment in order to provide the medical community with a basic reference that would help to make further progress in this rare disease, which remains difficult to treat.¦RECENT FINDINGS: The most relevant recent findings driving current clinical developments are in the elucidation of uveal melanoma genetics and genomics. The key driving mutations - that differ completely from cutaneous melanoma - have been identified. Based on the novel insights into key signaling pathways, the first clinical trials with targeted treatments have been implemented. However, systemic and regional chemotherapy approaches as well as other regional treatment modalities for liver metastases are also a major part of the current treatment armamentarium and are prospectively being evaluated.¦SUMMARY: In summary, the recent biological findings and the creation of a series of clinical trials underscore how the international community is able to perform relevant advances in an extremely rare disease.

Infrequent expression of the MAGE gene family in uveal melanomas.

It has previously been reported that MAGE-1, -2, -3 and -4 genes are expressed in human cancers including cutaneous melanoma. MAGE-1 and MAGE-3 represent targets for specific immunotherapy because they encode peptide antigens which are recognised by cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) when presented by HLA class I molecules, and pilot clinical trials with these peptides are currently in progress. It is likely that other members of the MAGE gene family may also encode antigens recognised by CTL. Uveal melanomas, like cutaneous melanomas, arise from melanocytes that are derived from the neural crest. To determine if uveal melanoma patients would be suitable for MAGE-peptide immunotherapy, the expression of MAGE-1, -2, -3 and -4 genes was assessed by reverse transcription followed by polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) amplification and ethidium bromide staining. Expression of MAGE genes was not detected in any of 27 primary tumours. Either MAGE-1 or MAGE-4 was expressed in only 2 of 26 metastatic samples, but expression of MAGE-2 or -3 was not detected. Our data suggest that, unlike cutaneous melanomas, uveal melanomas may not be suitable candidates for MAGE-peptide immunotherapy.

EDD, the human orthologue of the hyperplastic discs tumour suppressor gene, is amplified and overexpressed in cancer

EDD (E3 isolated by differential display), located at chromosome 8q22.3, is the human orthologue of the Drosophila melanogaster tumour suppressor gene 'hyperplastic discs' and encodes a HECT domain E3 ubiquitin protein-ligase. To investigate the possible involvement of EDD in human cancer, several cancers from diverse tissue sites were analysed for allelic gain or loss (allelic imbalance, AI) at the EDD locus using an EDD-specific microsatellite, CEDD, and other polymorphic microsatellites mapped in the vicinity of the 8q22.3 locus. Of 143 cancers studied, 38 had AI at CEDD (42% of 90 informative cases). In 14 of these cases, discrete regions of imbalance encompassing 8q22.3 were present, while the remainder had more extensive 8q aberrations. AI of CEDD was most frequent in ovarian cancer (22/47 informative cases, 47%), particularly in the serous subtype (16/22, 73%), but was rare in benign and borderline ovarian tumours. AI was also common in breast cancer (31%), hepatocellular carcinoma (46%), squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue (50%) and metastatic melanoma (18%). AI is likely to represent amplification of the EDD gene locus rather than loss of heterozygosity, as quantitative RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry showed that EDD mRNA and protein are frequently overexpressed in breast and ovarian cancers, while among breast cancer cell lines EDD overexpression and increased gene copy number were correlated. These results demonstrate that AI at the EDD locus is common in a diversity of carcinomas and that the EDD gene is frequently overexpressed in breast and ovarian cancer, implying a potential role in cancer progression.

Melastatin Expression in Ocular Melanocytic Proliferations

Purpose: Melastatin (MLSN-1) belongs to the transient receptor potential (TRP) superfamilly of calcium-permeable channels, and has been reported to be a melanocyte-specific gene. In human cutaneous melanoma, MLSN-1 mRNA expression displays a pattern of inverse correlation to disease free survival. We describe the patterns of MLSN-1 mRNA expression in conjunctival nevi, conjunctival melanoma, and uveal melanoma. Methods: In situ hybridization using two S35-labelled riboprobes for MLSN-1 was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. A control probe for H4 histone was used to confirm mRNA integrity in these archival tissues. The 21 ocular melanocytic lesions studied included 5 conjunctival nevi, 6 conjunctival melanomas, and 10 enucleated eyes with uveal melanoma. The minimal requirement for interpretation of MLSN-1 mRNA loss was the presence of only background signal in a focus of at least 5 adjacent melanocytic cells. Results: Ubiquitous expression of MLSN-1 mRNA was found in conjunctival melanocytes in the non-lesional epithelium adjacent to the conjunctival melanocytic proliferations and in all 5 conjunctival nevi studied. Four different patterns of MLSN-1 mRNA expression were observed in conjunctival melanomas: one case showed complete preservation of MLSN-1 mRNA, two cases showed diffuse scattered loss of MLSN-1 mRNA, two cases showed focal clonal loss of MLSN-1 mRNA expression, and one case had no detected MLSN-1 mRNA. In uveal melanomas, MLSN-1 mRNA expression was partially preserved in two cases, lost by a clearly delimited subset of tumor cells (focal clonal loss) in four cases, and was not detectable in the entire tumor in four cases. MLSN-1 mRNA expression was also found in the normal iris, ciliary and choroidal melanocytes as well as in the retinal pigmented epithelium and in the inner nuclear layer of the retina. Conclusions: The patterns of MLSN-1 mRNA expression in the ocular melanocytic proliferations are similar to those reported in cutaneous melanocytic proliferations. In the conjunctiva, MLSN-1 mRNA expression appeared to correlate with tumor progression; all the benign conjunctival nevi had preserved expression of MLSN-1 mRNA and most of the conjunctival melanomas partial or complete loss of expression. In uveal melanoma, patterns of melastatin expression ranging from partial preservation to complete loss were found. Additional studies of a large number of ocular melanocytic proliferations may show a correlation with tumor progression and prognosis similar to that observed in cutaneous melanoma.