Responsabilidade tributária de empresas que compõem o mesmo grupo econômico

O presente estudo tem por objetivo avaliar se o sistema jurídico brasileiro permite a atribuição de responsabilidade tributária a empresas integrantes de um mesmo grupo econômico. Para atingir o referido objetivo, foi realizada investigação baseada na análise de precedentes previamente selecionados na esfera administrativa e judicial. Também foram avaliadas a doutrina e a legislação específicas que tratam do assunto. Primeiramente, identificamos o conceito de grupo econômico adotado pelas autoridades fiscais e pela jurisprudência, assim como as bases legais que suportariam a tentativa de responsabilização nesses casos. Depois, analisamos a validade da legislação que poderia suportar a imposição da referida responsabilidade, confrontando-a com a doutrina e a jurisprudência. O resultado deste estudo demonstrou que o pertencimento a um grupo econômico não resulta na imposição de responsabilidade tributária às empresas que o compõem e que, a despeito de existirem, basicamente, três caminhos para responsabilizar empresas que integram um mesmo grupo econômico, apenas dois deles seriam juridicamente válidos. Referimo-nos aos casos em que duas ou mais empresas podem ser consideradas contribuintes solidárias por realizarem em conjunto o fato gerador do tributo e àqueles que decorrem da aplicação da teoria da desconsideração da personalidade jurídica.

Responsabilidade tributária de grupos econômicos

A presente pesquisa tem por objetivo investigar a responsabilidade tributária de grupos econômicos. Para tanto, analisa inicialmente o que é grupo econômico a partir da evolução da organização da empresa, verificando as formas de regulação no direito societário, bem como nos demais ramos do direito, especialmente o tributário. Em seguida, se debruça sobre a limitação da responsabilidade, a desconsideração da personalidade jurídica e a responsabilidade tributária. Verifica, então, em quais hipóteses poderia haver a responsabilidade tributária de grupos econômicos, sendo analisadas as possibilidades com fundamento legal no art. 30, IX, da Lei nº 8.212/91; art. 124 da Lei nº 5.172/66; art. 50 da Lei nº 10.406/2002; art. 990 da Lei nº 10.406/02 combinado com o art. 126, III, da Lei nº 5.172/66; e art. 116, §1º, da Lei nº 5.172/66. Por fim, aborda aspectos processuais da responsabilidade de grupos econômicos, com enfoque no incidente de desconsideração da personalidade jurídica previsto no Código de Processo Civil de 2015.

The IRS Collection Division: Contacts and Settlements

In his study -The IRS Collection Division: Contacts and Settlements - by John M. Tarras, Assistant Professor School of Hotel, Restaurant and Institutional Management, Michigan State University, Tarras initially states: “The collection division of the internal revenue service is often the point of contact for many hospitality businesses. The author describes how the division operates, what the hospitality firm can expect when contacted by it, and what types of strategies firms might find helpful when negotiating a settlement with the IRS.” The author will have you know that even though most chance meetings with the IRS Collection Division are due to unfortunate tax payment circumstances, there are actually more benign reasons for close encounters of the IRS kind. This does not mean, however, that brushes with the IRS Collection Division will end on an ever friendlier note. “…the Tax Reform Act of 1986 with its added complexity will cause some hospitality firms to inadvertently fail to make proper payments on a timely basis,” Tarras affords in illustrating a perhaps less pugnacious side of IRS relations. Should a hospitality business owner represent himself/herself before the IRS? Never, says Tarras. “Too many taxpayers ruin their chances of a fair settlement by making what to them seem innocent remarks, but ones that turn out to be far different,” warns Professor Tarras. Tarras makes the distinction between IRS the Collection Division, and IRS the Audit Division. “While the Audit Division is interested in how the tax liability arose, the Collection Division is generally only interested in collecting the liability,” he informs you. Either sounds firmly in hostile territory. They don’t bluff. Tarras does want you to know that when the IRS threatens to levy on the assets of a hospitality business, they will do so. Those assets may extend to personal and real property as well, he says. The levy action is generally the final resort in an IRS collection effort. Professor Tarras explains the lien process and the due process attached to that IRS collection tactic. “The IRS can also levy a hospitality firm owner's wages. In this case, it is important to realize that you are allowed to exempt from levy $75 per week, along with $25 per week for each of your dependents (unless your spouse works),” Professor Tarras says with the appropriate citation. What are the options available to the hospitality business owner who finds himself on the wrong side of the IRS Collection Division? Negotiate in good faith says Professor Tarras. “In many cases, a visit to the IRS office will greatly reduce the chances that a simple problem will turn into a major one,” Tarras advises. He dedicates the last pages of the discussion to negotiation strategies.

Indemnifying the corporate executive : business, legal, and tax aspects of reimbursement for personal liability /

Includes bibliographical references & index.

Illinois cigarette tax and tobacco settlement.

"LPU Order 34494"--Colophon.

Illinois cigarette tax, tobacco products tax, and tobacco settlement update /

"July 2006."

Beyond Bryan: Builders' liability and pure economic loss

In Bryan v Maloney, the High Court extended a builder’s duty of care to encompass a liability in negligence for the pure economic loss sustained by a subsequent purchaser of a residential dwelling as a result of latent defects in the building’s construction. Recently, in Woolcock Street Investments Pty Ltd v CDG Pty Ltd, the Court refused to extend this liability to defects in commercial premises. The decision therefore provides an opportunity to re-examine the rationale and policy behind current jurisprudence governing builders’ liability for pure economic loss. In doing so, this article considers the principles relevant to the determination of a duty of care generally and whether the differences between purchasers of residential and commercial properties are as great as the case law suggests

Measuring the managerial benefits of tax compliance : a fresh approach

Managerial benefits of tax compliance have been identified by many authors in the tax compliance costs literature; they have however often been ignored when measuring the net effect of tax compliance on business taxpayers because it was believed that the measurement of such benefits was impossible or difficult. This paper first discusses the theoretical issues surrounding the valuation of managerial benefits, including the related tax/ accounting costs overlap problem; it then proposes a fresh approach for measuring managerial benefits. The proposed measurement model incorporates a subjective evaluation of useful accounting information by owner‑managers and objective measurements of accounting costs. Two main components of managerial benefits are identified: the incremental value of managerial accounting information and the savings on reporting costs. A study of small businesses conducted in late 2006, compared accounting practices between tax complying entities (TCEs) and tax compliance free entities (TFEs) and investigated how accounting information was valued by owner-managers in TCEs. The research adopted a mixed methodological design including a major quantitative phase followed by a minor qualitative phase. The results show that while a vast majority of TFEs maintained basic accounting functions, record keeping requirements imposed by tax compliance led to the implementation of more sophisticated accounting systems in TCEs. It was also found that TCE owner-managers assigned a relatively significant value to the managerial accounting information that is generated as a result of record keeping imposed by tax compliance, suggesting that substantial managerial benefits might be derived.