Group US Army military portrait including Dr. William Levison (top row, third from left); Schofield Barracks, Hawaii Portraits Groups Men

Digital Image

Dr. William Levison (seated, far left) with other U.S. Army medial doctors and nurses with Christmas Tree in background Portraits Groups

Digital Image

Portrait of Dr. William Levison smoking a corn pipe Portraits Men

Digital Image

William Niclas standing next to the Oder River Portraits Men

Digital Image

William Niclas (far left) next to Herr Richards and an unidentified man and woman; Ratibor, Poland Portraits Men

Handwritten on verso: Mormons, Ratibor

Group portrait at the farewell banquet for Dr. William Antopol from the laboratory staff of Mount Sinai Hospital; Ken's Chop House, New York city Portraits Groups

Digital Image

Portrait of William and Charlotte Engel Levison Portraits Couples

Digital Image

Dr. William Levison working at a desk Portraits Men

Digital Image

Portrait of Dr. William Levison Portraits Men

Digital Image

Portrait of Dr. William Levison in military uniform Portraits Men

Digital Image

Group US Army military portrait including Dr. William Levison (top row, third from left); Schofield Barracks, Hawaii Portraits Groups Men

Digital Image

Portrait of Dr. William Levison smoking a corn pipe Portraits Men

Digital Image

Dr. William Levison celebrating Christmas Eve with U.S. Army buddies; Schofield Barracks, Hawaii Portraits Groups Men

Digital Image

Dr. William Levison with U.S. Army buddies; Schofield Barracks, Hawaii Portraits Groups Men

Digital Image

Thinking critically about rural crime: The influence of William J. Chambliss

William J. Chambliss (Bill) is well-known for his path-breaking theories of lawmaking and for his innovative research on state-organized crime. However, rarely discussed is the fact that his study of the original vagrancy laws marked the birth of rural critical criminology. The main objective of this article is twofold: (1) to show how Bill helped shape contemporary rural critical criminology and (2) to provide suggestions for further critical theoretical and empirical work on rural crime and social control.