1000 resultados para Public transports


Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Collection : Les études de la Documentation française

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The use of private funding and management is enjoying an increasing trend in airports. The literature has not paid enough attention to the mixed management models in this industry, although many European airports take the form of mixed public-private companies, where ownership is shared between public and private sectors. We examine the determinants of the degree of private participation in the European airport sector. Drawing on a sample of the 100 largest European airports, we estimate a multivariate equation in order to determine the role of airport characteristics, fiscal variables, and political factors on the extent of private involvement. Our results confirm the alignment between public and private interests in partially privatized airports. Fiscal constraints and market attractiveness promote private participation. Integrated governance models and the share of network carriers prevent the presence of private ownership, while the degree of private participation appears to be pragmatic rather than ideological.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The use of private funding and management enjoys an increasing trend in airports. The literature has not paid enough attention to the mixed management models in this industry, although many European airports take the form of mixed firms or Institutional PPP, where ownership is shared between public and private sectors. We examine the determinants of the degree of private participation in the European airport sector. Drawing on a sample of the 100 largest European airports we estimate a multivariate equation in order to determine the role of airport characteristics, fiscal variables and political factors on the extent of private involvement. Our results confirm the alignment between public and private interests in PPPs. Fiscal constraints and market attractiveness promote private participation. Integrated governance models and the share of network carriers prevent the presence of private ownership, while the degree of private participation appears to be pragmatic rather than ideological.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

PURPOSE: Needs assessment is recognized to be a key element of mental health care. Patients tend to present heterogeneous profiles of needs. However, there is no consensus in previous research about how patients' needs are organized. This study investigates both general and specific dimensions of patients' needs for care. METHODS: Patients' needs were assessed with ELADEB, an 18-domain self-report scale. The use of a self-assessment scale represents a unique way of obtaining patients' perceptions. A patient-centered psychiatric practice facilitates empowerment as it is based on the patients' personal motivations, needs, and wants. Four seventy-one patients' profiles were analyzed through exploratory factor analysis. RESULTS: A four-factor bifactor model, including one general factor and three specific factors of needs, was most adequate. Specific factors were (a) "finances" and "administrative tasks"; (b) "transports," "public places," "self-care," "housework," and "food"; and (c) "family," "children," "intimate relationships," and "friendship." CONCLUSION: As revealed by the general factor, patients expressing urgent needs in some domains are also more susceptible to report urgent needs in several other domains. This general factor relates to high versus low utilizers of public mental healthcare. Patients also present specific needs in life domains, which are organized in three dimensions: management, functional disabilities, and familial and interpersonal relationships. These dimensions relate to the different types of existing social support described in the literature.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

1915/10/30 (A38,N15).

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

1908/12/12 (A31,N50).

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

1904/12/03 (A27,N49).

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

1905/07/15 (A28,N28).

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

1882/04/08 (A5,SER2,N123).

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

1886/07/17 (A9,SER3,N29).

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

1910/10/29 (A33,N44).

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

1907/05/18 (A30,N20).