Assessing psychosocial vulnerability and care needs of pretransplant patients by means of the INTERMED.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether the INTERMED, a generic instrument for assessing biopsychosocial case complexity and direct care, identifies organ transplant patients at risk of unfavourable post-transplant development by comparing it to the Transplant Evaluation Rating Scale (TERS), the established measure for pretransplant psychosocial evaluation. METHOD: One hundred nineteen kidney, liver, and heart transplant candidates were evaluated using the INTERMED, TERS, SF-36, EuroQol, Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and Hospital Anxiety & Depression Scale (HADS). RESULTS: We found significant relationships between the INTERMED and the TERS scores. The INTERMED highly correlated with the HADS,MADRS, and mental and physical health scores of the SF-36 Health Survey. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate the validity and usefulness of the INTERMED instrument for pretransplant evaluation. Furthermore, our findings demonstrate the different qualities of INTERMED and TERS in clinical practice. The advantages of the psychiatric focus of the TERS and the biopsychosocial perspective of the INTERMED are discussed in the context of current literature on integrated care.

Validation et normes du SF-36 dans la population du canton de Vaud

[Table des matières] 1. Patients et méthodes. 1.1. Enquête dans la population générale : population, modalités d'envoi, taux de réponse. 1.2. Questionnaire SF-36 et questionnaire Medical Outcome Study (MOS) : PF physical functioning = activité physique (fonctionnement) ; RP role physical = limitations (du rôle) liées à la santé physique ; BP bodily pain = douleur physique ; GH General Health = santé générale ; VT vitality = vitalité (énergie/fatigue) ; SF social functioning = fonctionnement ou bien-être social ; RE role éemotional = limitations (du rôle) liées à la santé mentale ; MH mental health = santé mentale ; CF cognitive functioning = fonctionnement cognitif (dimension absente du SF-36 classique) ; HT eported health transition = modification perçue de l'état de santé ("dimension" annexe, = item 2 ou Q2). 1.3. Analyse : calcul des scores du SF-36 et du SF-36 + CF, cohérence des réponses, fiabilité de l'instrument, validité. 1.4. Analyse statistique. 2. Résultats commentés de l'enquête dans la population générale. 2.1. Fréquence des non-réponses par item et par question. 2.2. Cohérence des réponses. 2.3. Scores d'état de santé par dimension : description et comparaison avec une population américaine, comparaison des scores vaudois et genevois. 2.4. Existe-t-il une concentration des bons et des mauvais scores chez les mêmes répondants ? 2.5. Fiabilité. 2.6. Validité : validité convergente et discriminante, analyse factorielle, validation en fonction de variables externes. 3. Discussion. 3.1. Evaluation du questionnaire. 3.2. Mesure de la qualité de vie liée à l'état de santé perçu dans la population générale. 3.3. Adjonction de la dimension "fonctionnement cognitif". 3.4. Conclusions et recommandations.

Social security disability : disappointing results from SSA's efforts to improve the disability claims process warrant immediate attention : report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Social Security, Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representative /

"GAO-02-322."

Changes in basis for allowance under the disability insurance benefit program, 1968-76 /

"March 1978."

Occupational characteristics of disabled workers, 1975-1976 : analysis of social security disability benefit allowances to workers during 1975-1976 /

Bibliography: p. 149-150.

Social Security : observations on demonstration interviews with disability claimants : briefing report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Social Security, Committee on Ways and Mean, House of Representatives /

"B-224648"--P. 1.

Counting the disabled : using survey self-reports to estimate medical eligibility for Social Security's disability programs /

"January 2001."

Using predisability earnings as an instrument for disability determination outcomes /

"April 2004."

A structural model of Social Security's disability determination process /

"August 1997."

SSA and VA disability programs : re-examination of disability criteria needed to help ensure program integrity.

"GAO-902-597"

Challenges to improve inter-professional care and service collaboration for people living with psychiatric disabilities in ordinary housing

The aim of this study was to describe health care- and social service professionals' experiences of a quality-improvement program implemented in the south of Sweden. The focus of the program was to develop inter-professional collaboration to improve care and service to people with psychiatric disabilities in ordinary housing. Focus group interviews and a thematic analysis were used. The result was captured as themes along steps in process. (I) Entering the quality-improvement program: Lack of information about the program, The challenge of getting started, and Approaching the resources reluctantly. (II) Doing the practice-based improvement work: Facing unprepared workplaces, and Doing twice the work. (III) Looking backevaluation over 1 year: Balancing theoretical knowledge with practical training, and Considering profound knowledge as an integral part of work. The improvement process in clinical practice was found to be both time and energy consuming, yet worth the effort. The findings also indicate that collaboration across organizational boundaries was broadened, and the care and service delivery were improved.

Using Needs Assessment to Understand Continuing Disability in Patients with Enduring Mental Illness. Implications for Considerations of Service Development

Particular strengths of the MRC Needs for Care Assessment Schedule have been used to investigate the treatment status of patients with persistent psychiatric disability in ways that other needs assessment tools are unable to. One hundred and seventy-nine such patients from three settings; a private sector psychiatric hospital, two public sector day hospitals situated in the same town, and a high security hospital, were found to have a high level of need. Although there were differences between settings, overall these needs were well met in all three. The high level of persistent disability found amongst these patients could not be attributed to failure on the part of those treating them to use the best available methods, or to failures to comply or engage with treatment on the patient's part. In some two thirds of instances persistent disability was best explained by the fact that even the most suitable available treatments have to be considered only partially effective.