La administración concursal como sujeto del proceso jurisdiccional español. Su posición en la determinación del patrimonio concursal

Desde tiempos inmemoriales, la presencia de sujetos encargados de la administración del patrimonio del concursado ha sido consustancial a la existencia de procesos en los que se declaraba la insolvencia del deudor. Tradicionalmente, estos sujetos ostentaban un papel de singular alcance para el correcto desarrollo del concurso. En la actualidad se erigen en el motor del concurso. El vasto cometido atribuido a la administración concursal nos obliga a restringir nuestra investigación. En particular, centraremos nuestra atención en la posición jurídico procesal de la administración concursal en aquellas actuaciones que desarrolla ésta a la hora de determinar el patrimonio concursal. Para ello, partiendo de las líneas generales que a través de la historia han definido a los órganos de administración concursal, analizaremos el régimen jurídico de la actual administración concursal en España. A continuación, estudiaremos la naturaleza jurídica de la limitación a las facultades patrimoniales que sufre el deudor con la declaración de concurso y el reconocimiento que, como parte procesal, le atribuye la Ley de Enjuiciamiento Civil al patrimonio concursal. Todo ello, nos permitirá pronunciarnos sobre la referida posición de la administración concursal, como parte o como representante. Tras lo descrito, nos ocuparemos de determinar la posición que ocupa la administración concursal en aquellos procesos que ya estuvieran pendientes en el momento de la declaración de concurso y aquellos otros procesos nuevos que inicia aquella por su propia iniciativa. Por último, analizaremos la descrita posición procesal en el ejercicio de acciones de reintegración y demás de impugnación así como en aquellos supuestos en los que se impugna el inventario o la lista de acreedores.

A sistematização dos recursos administrativos na legislação federal

A sistematização dos recursos administrativos na legislação federal consiste em um trabalho de elaboração de um modelo de identificação e organização das diversas normas processuais administrativas disciplinadoras das regras de cabimento, processamento e julgamento dos recursos administrativos no âmbito da administração pública federal. Trata-se de uma pesquisa acadêmica de revisão normativa das principais legislações infraconstitucionais administrativas federais desenvolvida a partir da perspectiva das normas gerais de processo administrativo estabelecidas pela Lei Federal n. 9.784/99 (Lei de processo administrativo federal). Inicialmente, são analisados os aspectos históricos e conceituais do processo administrativo brasileiro considerados mais relevantes para a compreensão do sistema recursal administrativo. Posteriormente à fixação desses pressupostos conceituais na primeira parte do trabalho, o estudo direciona-se ao estabelecimento da tipologia recursal administrativa, por meio do exame dos princípios, regras e demais orientações apresentados pela Lei Federal n. 9.784/99. Tendo sido estipulados as espécies recursais, suas características, bem como as regras de cabimento, processamento e julgamento dos recursos administrativos, empreende-se o diagnóstico das legislações infraconstitucionais federais escolhidas com fundamento nos elementos fixados na segunda parte do trabalho. A sistematização dos recursos administrativos na legislação federal tem como finalidade demonstrar que a previsibilidade dos resultados obtida por meio do conhecimento das regras do jogo em matéria recursal administrativa, é responsável por um incremento das garantias constitucionais do processo administrativo nos entes públicos federais.

The Code reporter.

Vols. 1-2 have subtitle : A journal for the judge, the lawyer, and the legislator, containing reports of practice cases, articles on legal topics, new rules of court...; v. 3, A monthly law journal, containing reports of decisions on the Code, articles on legal topics...

Die Rechtsverfolgung im internationalen Verkehr : darstelling der Justizorganisation des Civilprozessrechts, des Konkursrechts, der Erbschaftsregulierung und der Konsulargerichtsbarkeit in den europäischen und aussereuropäischen Staaten ; unter Mitwirkung von R. Altsmann /

Mode of access: Internet.

Usul-i muhakeme-yi ticaret nizamnamesi.

Özege, M.S. Eski harflerle,

مرآة القوانين ياخود اصول محاكمات مجموعه سى /

Özege, M.S. Eski harflerle,

Newsletter /

Title from caption.

S.A.A.S.C. newsletter /

Title from caption.

Königlich Preussisch allgemeines Processual-Lexicon, oder, Möglichst vollständiges Repertorium aller, in sämtlichen Königlich Preussl. Landen, bis jetzo, gültigen Constitutionen, Edicten, and General-Rescripten, so den Process reguliren : besonders des Codicis Fridericiana marchici, der neuen Tribunal-, Sportul-, Pupillen-, wie auch der vorigen Depositionen-, Lehns-, Hypothequen-, Concurs-, Vormundschafts-, Wechsel- und Criminal-Ordnungen, des Duell- und Stempel-Papier-Edicts, auch an die 100, anderer Königl zum Process gehörigen Verordnungen, worauf sich der neue Codex nur bezogen, und den weitern Inhalt derselben confirmiret hat, oder die son noch usuel sind; zu Jedermans besonderm Nutzen abgefasset /

Incomplete; comprising the letters a-e, only.

The Annual practice.

"A collection of the statutes, orders, and rules relating to the general practice, procedure and jurisdiction of the Supreme Court."

Colloquium on Regulatory Design in Theory and Practice. Washington, D.C., 1984-1985 /

"September, 1985"--P. 3.

The competitive dialogue procedure: Advantages, disadvantages, and its implementation into English and Dutch law

Competitive Dialogue (CD) is a new contract award procedure of the European Community (EC). It is set out in Article 29 of the 'Public Sector Directive' 2004/18/EC. Over the last decades, projects were becoming more and more complex, and the existing EC procedures were no longer suitable to procure those projects. The call for a new procedure resulted in CD. This paper describes how the Directive has been implemented into the laws of two member states: the UK and the Netherlands. In order to implement the Directive, both lawmakers have set up a new and distinct piece of legislation. In each case, large parts of the Directive’s content have been repeated ‘word for word’; only minor parts have been reworded and/or restructured. In the next part of the paper, the CD procedure is examined in different respects. First, an overview is given on the different EC contract award procedures (open, restricted, negotiated, CD) and awarding methods (lowest price and Most Economically Advantageous Tender, MEAT). Second, the applicability of CD is described: Among other limitations, CD can only be applied to public contracts for works, supplies, and services, and this scope of application is further restricted by the exclusion of certain contract types. One such exclusion concerns services concessions. This means that PPP contracts which are set up as services concessions cannot be awarded by CD. The last two parts of the paper pertain to the main features of the CD procedure – from ‘contract notice’ to ‘contract award’ – and the advantages and disadvantages of the procedure. One advantage is that the dialogue allows the complexity of the project to be disentangled and clarified. Other advantages are the stimulation of innovation and creativity. These advantages are set against the procedure’s disadvantages, which include high transaction costs and a perceived hindrance of innovation (due to an ambiguity between transparency and fair competition). It is concluded that all advantages and disadvantages are related to one of three elements: communication, competition, and/or structure of the procedure. Further research is needed to find out how these elements are related.