Combining RTSJ with Fork/Join: a priority-based model

This paper discusses the increased need to support dynamic task-level parallelism in embedded real-time systems and proposes a Java framework that combines the Real-Time Specification for Java (RTSJ) with the Fork/Join (FJ) model, following a fixed priority-based scheduling scheme. Our work intends to support parallel runtimes that will coexist with a wide range of other complex independently developed applications, without any previous knowledge about their real execution requirements, number of parallel sub-tasks, and when those sub-tasks will be generated.

Enhanced Race-to-halt: a leakage-aware energy management approach for dynamic priority systems

With progressing CMOS technology miniaturization, the leakage power consumption starts to dominate the dynamic power consumption. The recent technology trends have equipped the modern embedded processors with the several sleep states and reduced their overhead (energy/time) of the sleep transition. The dynamic voltage frequency scaling (DVFS) potential to save energy is diminishing due to efficient (low overhead) sleep states and increased static (leakage) power consumption. The state-of-the-art research on static power reduction at system level is based on assumptions that cannot easily be integrated into practical systems. We propose a novel enhanced race-to-halt approach (ERTH) to reduce the overall system energy consumption. The exhaustive simulations demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach showing an improvement of up to 8 % over an existing work.

Resource sharing in global fixed-priority preemptive multiprocessor scheduling

In this paper we consider global fixed-priority preemptive multiprocessor scheduling of constrained-deadline sporadic tasks that share resources in a non-nested manner. We develop a novel resource-sharing protocol and a corresponding schedulability test for this system. We also develop the first schedulability analysis of priority inheritance protocol for the aforementioned system. Finally, we show that these protocols are efficient (based on the developed schedulability tests) for a class of priority-assignments called reasonable priority-assignments.

Conjecture about global fixed-priority preemptive multiprocessor scheduling of implicit-deadline sporadic tasks: the utilization bound of SM-US(sqrt(2)-1) is sqrt(2)-1

Consider global fixed-priority preemptive multiprocessor scheduling of implicit-deadline sporadic tasks. I conjecture that the utilization bound of SM-US(√2−1) is √2-1.

Static-priority scheduling over wireless networks with multiple broadcast domains

We propose a wireless medium access control (MAC) protocol that provides static-priority scheduling of messages in a guaranteed collision-free manner. Our protocol supports multiple broadcast domains, resolves the wireless hidden terminal problem and allows for parallel transmissions across a mesh network. Arbitration of messages is achieved without the notion of a master coordinating node, global clock synchronization or out-of-band signaling. The protocol relies on bit-dominance similar to what is used in the CAN bus except that in order to operate on a wireless physical layer, nodes are not required to receive incoming bits while transmitting. The use of bit-dominance efficiently allows for a much larger number of priorities than would be possible using existing wireless solutions. A MAC protocol with these properties enables schedulability analysis of sporadic message streams in wireless multihop networks.

Competitive analysis of static-priority partitioned scheduling on uniform multiprocessors

Consider the problem of scheduling a set of sporadically arriving tasks on a uniform multiprocessor with the goal of meeting deadlines. A processor p has the speed Sp. Tasks can be preempted but they cannot migrate between processors. On each processor, tasks are scheduled according to rate-monotonic. We propose an algorithm that can schedule all task sets that any other possible algorithm can schedule assuming that our algorithm is given processors that are √2 / √2−1 ≈ 3.41 times faster. No such guarantees are previously known for partitioned static-priority scheduling on uniform multiprocessors.

Global static-priority preemptive multiprocessor scheduling with utilization bound 38%

Consider the problem of scheduling real-time tasks on a multiprocessor with the goal of meeting deadlines. Tasks arrive sporadically and have implicit deadlines, that is, the deadline of a task is equal to its minimum inter-arrival time. Consider this problem to be solved with global static-priority scheduling. We present a priority-assignment scheme with the property that if at most 38% of the processing capacity is requested then all deadlines are met.

The utilization bound of static-priority preemptive partitioned multiprocessor scheduling is 50%

This paper studies static-priority preemptive scheduling on a multiprocessor using partitioned scheduling. We propose a new scheduling algorithm and prove that if the proposed algorithm is used and if less than 50% of the capacity is requested then all deadlines are met. It is known that for every static-priority multiprocessor scheduling algorithm, there is a task set that misses a deadline although the requested capacity is arbitrary close to 50%.

A framework for the response time analysis of fixed-priority tasks with stochastic inter-arrival times

Real-time scheduling usually considers worst-case values for the parameters of task (or message stream) sets, in order to provide safe schedulability tests for hard real-time systems. However, worst-case conditions introduce a level of pessimism that is often inadequate for a certain class of (soft) real-time systems. In this paper we provide an approach for computing the stochastic response time of tasks where tasks have inter-arrival times described by discrete probabilistic distribution functions, instead of minimum inter-arrival (MIT) values.

Profile and follow-up of patients with tuberculosis in a priority city in Brazil

OBJECTIVE To analyze the cases of tuberculosis and the impact of direct follow-up on the assessment of treatment outcomes.METHODS This open prospective cohort study evaluated 504 cases of tuberculosis reported in the Sistema de Informação de Agravos de Notificação (SINAN – Notifiable Diseases Information System) in Juiz de Fora, MG, Southeastern Brazil, between 2008 and 2009. The incidence of treatment outcomes was compared between a group of patients diagnosed with tuberculosis and directly followed up by monthly consultations during return visits (287) and a patient group for which the information was indirectly collected (217) through the city’s surveillance system. The Chi-square test was used to compare the percentages, with a significance level of 0.05. The relative risk (RR) was used to evaluate the differences in the incidence rate of each type of treatment outcome between the two groups.RESULTS Of the outcomes directly and indirectly evaluated, 18.5% and 3.2% corresponded to treatment default and 3.8% and 0.5% corresponded to treatment failure, respectively. The incidence of treatment default and failure was higher in the group with direct follow-up (p < 0.05) (RR = 5.72, 95%CI 2.65;12.34, and RR = 8.31, 95%CI 1.08;63.92, respectively).CONCLUSIONS A higher incidence of treatment default and failure was observed in the directly followed up group, and most of these cases were neglected by the disease reporting system. Therefore, effective measures are needed to improve the control of tuberculosis and data quality.

Global and Partitioned Multiprocessor Fixed Priority Scheduling with Deferred Pre-emption

This article introduces schedulability analysis for global fixed priority scheduling with deferred preemption (gFPDS) for homogeneous multiprocessor systems. gFPDS is a superset of global fixed priority pre-emptive scheduling (gFPPS) and global fixed priority non-pre-emptive scheduling (gFPNS). We show how schedulability can be improved using gFPDS via appropriate choice of priority assignment and final non-pre-emptive region lengths, and provide algorithms which optimize schedulability in this way. Via an experimental evaluation we compare the performance of multiprocessor scheduling using global approaches: gFPDS, gFPPS, and gFPNS, and also partitioned approaches employing FPDS, FPPS, and FPNS on each processor.

Timing Analysis of Fixed Priority SelfSuspending Sporadic Tasks

27th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems (ECRTS 2015), Lund, Sweden.

Response Time Analysis for Fixed-Priority Tasks with Multiple Probabilistic Parameters

Demo presented in 12th Workshop on Models and Algorithms for Planning and Scheduling Problems (MAPSP 2015). 8 to 12, Jun, 2015. La Roche-en-Ardenne, Belgium. Extended abstract.

Task partitioning and priority assignment for distributed hard real-time systems

In this paper, we propose the Distributed using Optimal Priority Assignment (DOPA) heuristic that finds a feasible partitioning and priority assignment for distributed applications based on the linear transactional model. DOPA partitions the tasks and messages in the distributed system, and makes use of the Optimal Priority Assignment (OPA) algorithm known as Audsley’s algorithm, to find the priorities for that partition. The experimental results show how the use of the OPA algorithm increases in average the number of schedulable tasks and messages in a distributed system when compared to the use of Deadline Monotonic (DM) usually favoured in other works. Afterwards, we extend these results to the assignment of Parallel/Distributed applications and present a second heuristic named Parallel-DOPA (P-DOPA). In that case, we show how the partitioning process can be simplified by using the Distributed Stretch Transformation (DST), a parallel transaction transformation algorithm introduced in [1].

Real-time Task-Splitting scheduling algorithms framework

Nos dias de hoje, os sistemas de tempo real crescem em importância e complexidade. Mediante a passagem do ambiente uniprocessador para multiprocessador, o trabalho realizado no primeiro não é completamente aplicável no segundo, dado que o nível de complexidade difere, principalmente devido à existência de múltiplos processadores no sistema. Cedo percebeu-se, que a complexidade do problema não cresce linearmente com a adição destes. Na verdade, esta complexidade apresenta-se como uma barreira ao avanço científico nesta área que, para já, se mantém desconhecida, e isto testemunha-se, essencialmente no caso de escalonamento de tarefas. A passagem para este novo ambiente, quer se trate de sistemas de tempo real ou não, promete gerar a oportunidade de realizar trabalho que no primeiro caso nunca seria possível, criando assim, novas garantias de desempenho, menos gastos monetários e menores consumos de energia. Este último fator, apresentou-se desde cedo, como, talvez, a maior barreira de desenvolvimento de novos processadores na área uniprocessador, dado que, à medida que novos eram lançados para o mercado, ao mesmo tempo que ofereciam maior performance, foram levando ao conhecimento de um limite de geração de calor que obrigou ao surgimento da área multiprocessador. No futuro, espera-se que o número de processadores num determinado chip venha a aumentar, e como é óbvio, novas técnicas de exploração das suas inerentes vantagens têm de ser desenvolvidas, e a área relacionada com os algoritmos de escalonamento não é exceção. Ao longo dos anos, diferentes categorias de algoritmos multiprocessador para dar resposta a este problema têm vindo a ser desenvolvidos, destacando-se principalmente estes: globais, particionados e semi-particionados. A perspectiva global, supõe a existência de uma fila global que é acessível por todos os processadores disponíveis. Este fato torna disponível a migração de tarefas, isto é, é possível parar a execução de uma tarefa e resumir a sua execução num processador distinto. Num dado instante, num grupo de tarefas, m, as tarefas de maior prioridade são selecionadas para execução. Este tipo promete limites de utilização altos, a custo elevado de preempções/migrações de tarefas. Em contraste, os algoritmos particionados, colocam as tarefas em partições, e estas, são atribuídas a um dos processadores disponíveis, isto é, para cada processador, é atribuída uma partição. Por essa razão, a migração de tarefas não é possível, acabando por fazer com que o limite de utilização não seja tão alto quando comparado com o caso anterior, mas o número de preempções de tarefas decresce significativamente. O esquema semi-particionado, é uma resposta de caráter hibrido entre os casos anteriores, pois existem tarefas que são particionadas, para serem executadas exclusivamente por um grupo de processadores, e outras que são atribuídas a apenas um processador. Com isto, resulta uma solução que é capaz de distribuir o trabalho a ser realizado de uma forma mais eficiente e balanceada. Infelizmente, para todos estes casos, existe uma discrepância entre a teoria e a prática, pois acaba-se por se assumir conceitos que não são aplicáveis na vida real. Para dar resposta a este problema, é necessário implementar estes algoritmos de escalonamento em sistemas operativos reais e averiguar a sua aplicabilidade, para caso isso não aconteça, as alterações necessárias sejam feitas, quer a nível teórico quer a nível prá