Karisman juuret narsismissa

Kirjallisuusarvostelu

Lähtö ja paluu : inkerinsuomalaisten oloista Inkerissä ja Suomessa 1900-luvulla

Kirjallisuusarvostelu

Äidinkielen opetuksen monenlaiset juuret

Kirjallisuusarvostelu

Luovuus näyttelijäntyössä

This thesis considers creativity in acting and performing. The original question is how to construct roles creatively. The thesis also considers the quality of creativity at a general level. In addition, the question expands to consider directing and, briefly, the ethics of making theatre. The first section discusses acceptation as a tool for opening the blocks that restrain creativity. It also discusses what the use of acceptation causes and what challenges it brings when creativity begins. The second and the third sections deal with two productions that have changed the author's view of creativity and theatre. The first production is "Medeia Goes Karaoke". This section considers the influence of listening and being in contact when making the role of Medeia. The second production is about directing, "My Roots are Water and Blood". This section considers revising performing and directing and especially the influence of the Alexander-technique. The last section concerns the definition of what good acting is. It also discusses the differences between performing and acting and presents the author's opinions concerning the ethics of acting. The aim of this work is to define creativity in acting, performing and theatre-making, through the author' s personal experiences.

Naiskomiikka : huumorista stand upiin, naurusta valtaan

The final project deals with the question of female comedy and the comedy made by women. Comedy has traditionally been made by men and the woman has been the one who laughs. A funny woman has been a rare phenomenon. Although times have changed and gender roles have become more flexible, female comedians still remain in a minority compared to their male colleagues. The essay reviews the social and historical structures that influence the position of women in general and on the field of comedy in particular. The teoretical basis to this is feminist theory. Female comedy and humour have features of their own, that are being examined in the essay. It also makes a difference between feminine comedy and feminist comedy. Largely the project handles stand up comedy. The popularity of stand up comedy has changed the field of professional entertainment and brought a number of widely gifted comedians to a common knowledge. Stand up has an opportunity to be a political tool, which is essential for marginal comedians, which also includes female comedians. One of the fundamental subjects of the project is the political character of comedy. The essay also portrays the historical roots of stand up comedy in the Finnish and in the American tradition. It reflects on the fore mothers of the modern female comedian. The reasons that make a woman become a comedian are under consideration, as well as the strategies that help her to get her voice and message delivered. Since a woman is still held in the marginal, it gives female comedy a feature of its own. This way comedy can become a tool for a feminist battle.

Kuuma keskustelu - ja mitä opimme tästä?

Vastine Jan Rydmanin artikkeliin Kuuma keskustelu - mutta olisiko sitä saanut käydä? // Tieteessä tapahtuu 1/2003