Development and calibration of an aerodynamic disturbance test facility. Volume III: construction, calibration and operation. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Test facility inventory for the U.S. Department of Transportation. Final report. Volume III of VI. D-I.

National Highway Safety Bureau, Washington, D.C.

Test facility inventory data processing system - procedure.

National Highway Safety Bureau, Washington, D.C.

Test facility inventory for the U.S. Department of Transportation. Final report. Volume II of VI. A-C.

National Highway Safety Bureau, Washington, D.C.

Test facility inventory for the U.S. Department of Transportation. Final report. Volume IV of VI. J-R.

National Highway Safety Bureau, Washington, D.C.

Test facility inventory for the U.S. Department of Transportation. Final report. Volume V of VI. S-Z.

National Highway Safety Bureau, Washington, D.C.

Test facility inventory for the U.S. Department of Transportation. Final report. Volume VI of VI.

National Highway Safety Bureau, Washington, D.C.

Test facility inventory; U.S. Department of Transportation. Final report. Addendum I.

National Highway Safety Bureau, Washington, D.C.

Operators and organizational maintenance manual : test facility kit AN/GRM-95(V)2, (NSN 6625-01-104-8926).

Includes index.

Operator's, organizational, direct support, and general support maintenance manual : test facility sets TS-2644/ASN and TS-2645/ASN.

"14 December 1973."

Organizational and direct support maintenance manual for electronic equipment test facility TADS/PNVS augmentation equipment, 13082808-39, 13231600, 13231650, and 13231800.

"1 February 1986."

Fort Monroe Test Facility.

Mode of access: Internet.

The design and engineering of a reactor test facility for thermal processing of biomass

This thesis describes the design and engineering of a pressurised biomass gasification test facility. A detailed examination of the major elements within the plant has been undertaken in relation to specification of equipment, evaluation of options and final construction. The retrospective project assessment was developed from consideration of relevant literature and theoretical principles. The literature review includes a discussion on legislation and applicable design codes. From this analysis, each of the necessary equipment units was reviewed and important design decisions and procedures highlighted and explored. Particular emphasis was placed on examination of the stringent demands of the ASME VIII design codes. The inter-relationship of functional units was investigated and areas of deficiency, such as biomass feeders and gas cleaning, have been commented upon. Finally, plant costing was summarized in relation to the plant design and proposed experimental programme. The main conclusion drawn from the study is that pressurised gasification of biomass is far more difficult and expensive to support than atmospheric gasification. A number of recommendations have been made regarding future work in this area.