824 resultados para PANDEMIC INFLUENZA A (H1N1)
Resumo:
A recente pandemia de gripe de 2009/2010 causada pelo vírus A (H1N1) pandêmico mostrou um perfil de gravidade diferente da gripe sazonal, pois um percentual considerável de casos graves e fatais ocorreu em indivíduos adultos jovens, sem comorbidade. A virulência dos vírus Influenza A (H1N1) pandêmico resulta de interações protéicas complexas e depende essencialmente de alguns genes virais. O objetivo deste estudo foi caracterizar os genes codificadores da hemaglutinina (H1) e polimerase básica 2 (PB2) do vírus Influenza A (H1N1) pandêmico mediante a obtenção de cepas provenientes de pacientes com gripe procedente da mesorregião metropolitana de Belém-PA. O tamanho amostral foi constituído de 87 amostras aleatórias de ambos os sexos de 0 a 96 anos, com síndrome respiratória aguda grave (SRAG) sem nenhuma comorbidade relatada, no período de maio de 2009 a agosto de 2010. As amostras foram isoladas em cultura de célula MDCK e analisadas por técnicas de biologia molecular que compreenderam três etapas principais: a) extração do RNA viral (RNAv) a partir do sobrenadante celular; b) amplificação do RNAv pela técnica de Reação em Cadeia mediada pela Polimerase precedida de Transcrição Reversa (RT-PCR); c) sequenciamento completo dos genes codificadores da H1 e PB2. Das 87 cepas amplificadas pelo RT-PCR, em 82 tornou-se possível a obtenção e análise de sequências para o gene HA, enquanto que de 81 amostras virais obteve-se sequências para o gene PB2. A análise comparativa das sequências obtidas com a sequência da cepa vacinal (A/California/07/2009(H1N1)) revelou substituições aminoacídicas na HA (P83S; D97N; S203T; D222G; Q293H e I321V) e na PB2 (K340N; K526R e M631L), no entanto sem associação a hospitalização. Ao nível de substituição na HA, a D97N isolada ou associada com a S203T, foi detectada com mais frequência na primeira onda. Já ao nível da PB2 a substituição K526R foi mais encontrada em cepas que circularam na primeira onda, enquanto que, a M631L foi mais evidenciada na segunda. A substituição D222G na HA só foi encontrada em casos de óbitos. Por fim, observou-se uma tendência de alterações nos sítios antigênicos da HA. Sendo assim, a contínua vigilância genética e antigênica do vírus Influenza A (H1N1) pdm em circulação, bem como o compartilhamento de informações é de extrema importância para a melhor recomendação possível para os vírus que entram na composição vacinal evitando assim maior risco de epidemias severas no futuro.
Resumo:
O vírus Influenza é o responsável pela gripe, uma doença que ocasiona milhões de mortes e hospitalizações todos os anos. Nas infecções severas, especialmente em pessoas com risco para complicações, os antivirais tornam-se os principais meios para o manejo clínico, merecendo especial destaque os inibidores da neuraminidase (INAs). De fato, na pandemia de 2009 a Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS) recomendou o uso do oseltamivir para o tratamento dos doentes. Porém, devido à evolução genética viral, surgiram cepas com mutações no gene codificador da neuraminidase (NA) responsáveis por substituições aminoacídicas que levam à resistência aos fármacos INAs. Assim, a OMS passou a recomendar a vigilância de resistência genotípica para os vírus Influenza. Este trabalho teve como objetivos verificar a ocorrência de mutações no gene codificador da NA dos vírus Influenza A (H1N1) pandêmico que possam estar relacionadas à resistência aos INAs em cepas circulantes na mesorregião metropolitana de Belém no período de maio de 2009 a maio de 2012 e analisar, através da modelagem de proteínas, as substituições aminoacídicas da NA que possam estar influenciando na conformação protéica. Durante o período de estudo, foram recebidas no Laboratório de Vírus Respiratórios 2619 amostras clínicas de pacientes que apresentavam sinais e sintomas de infecção respiratória aguda com até cinco dias de evolução. Para a detecção do genoma viral foi feita a extração do RNA viral, seguida de RT-PCR em tempo real utilizando marcadores específicos para Influenza A H1N1pdm, resultando em 744 (28,4%) positivas. Parte das amostras positivas foram então inoculadas em células MDCK. Para as amostras isoladas em cultura de células, foi feita uma nova extração do RNA viral seguida de uma RT-PCR e semi-nested (PCR) utilizando iniciadores específicos para o gene NA, e posterior análise em sequenciador automático ABI Prism 3130xl (Applied Biosystems). A modelagem molecular da NA foi realizada através dos softwares SWISS-MODEL, MODELLER 9.10, PROCHECK, VERIFY3D e PYMOL. A análise parcial das sequências da neuraminidase nas amostras sequenciadas mostrou que não houve a circulação de cepas de vírus H1N1pdm com a mutação H275Y, a principal envolvida na resistência ao oseltamivir. Porém, em duas amostras foi identificada a substituição D199N que já foi relatada em vários estudos mostrando uma possível associação com o aumento da resistência ao oseltamivir. As amostras de 2012 apresentaram duas substituições (V241I e N369K) que estão relacionadas com um possível papel na compensação dos efeitos negativos causados pela mutação H275Y. A modelagem molecular mostrou que na mutação D199N houve uma alteração na estrutura da proteína NA próxima ao sítio de ligação ao antiviral. A análise filogenética revelou que as amostras de 2012 formaram um cluster isolado, demonstrando uma variação muito mais temporal do que geográfica. Este representa o primeiro estudo de resistência dos vírus Influenza H1N1pdm na mesorregião metropolitana de Belém, representando um importante instrumento para que os profissionais de saúde adotem estratégias mais eficazes no manejo da doença e no desenvolvimento de novos fármacos anti-influenza.
Resumo:
Introduction Vaccination is an effective tool against several infectious agents including influenza. In 2010, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended influenza A H1N1/2009 immunization for high risk groups, including juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients and more recently the EULAR task force reinforced the importance of vaccination in immunosuppressed pediatric rheumatologic patients. We have recently shown that Influenza A H1N1/2009 vaccination generated protective antibody production with short-term safety profile among 93 JIA patients, but the possible impact of the vaccine in autoimmune response in JIA have not been studied. Therefore, we aimed to assess the production of some autoantibodies generated following influenza H1N1 vaccination in JIA patients. Objectives To assess the autoimmune response and H1N1 serology following influenza H1N1 vaccination in patients with JIA. Methods Cepa A/California/7/2009 (NYMC X-179A) anti-H1N1 was used to vaccinate JIA patients: 1 dose of immunization was given to all participants and those <9yrs of age received a second booster 3 weeks apart. Sera were analyzed before and 3 weeks following complete vaccination. Serology against H1N1 virus was performed by hemagglutination inhibition antibody assay, rheumatoid factor (RF) by latex fixation test, antinuclear antibodies (ANA) by IIF, IgM and IgG anticardiolipin (aCL) by ELISA.Results Among 98 JIA patients that were vaccinated, 58 sera were available for this study. Mean age of 58 JIA patients was 23.9 ± 9.5 yrs, 38 were females and 20 males with mean disease duration of 14.7 ± 10.1 yrs. JIA subtypes were: 33 (57%) poliarticular, 10 (17%) oligoarticular, 6 (10%) systemic and 9 (16%) other. Sixteen patients were off drugs while 42 (72%) were under different pharmacotherapy: 32 (55%) were on 1 DMARD/IS, 10 (17%) on 2 DMARDs/IS, 19 (33%) antimalarials, 29 (50%) MTX, 8(14%) sulfasalazine, 6 (10%) anti-TNFs, 4 (7%) abatacept; no patient was using prednisone >0.5 mg/kg/d. Seroprotection rates against H1N1 influenza increased from 23 to 83% and seroconversion rates were achieved in 78% JIA. Prior to vaccination, 31(53.4%) JIA patients were ANA+, 6(10.3%) RF+, and 4 (7%) IgM + IgG aCL+. After complete H1N1 vaccination, positivity for ANA remained the same whereas 1 patient became negative for IgG aCL, and another for RF, IgM and IgG aCL. One (1.7%) patient turned low titer IgG aCL+. Conclusion Vaccination of JIA patients against pandemic influenza A (H1N1) generated successful protective antibody production without the induction of autoantibody production, except for 1 patient that became positive for low titer IgG aCL, supporting its safety.
Resumo:
Background Immunosuppressed individuals present serious morbidity and mortality from influenza, therefore it is important to understand the safety and immunogenicity of influenza vaccination among them. Methods This multicenter cohort study evaluated the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of an inactivated, monovalent, non-adjuvanted pandemic (H1N1) 2009 vaccine among the elderly, HIV-infected, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), cancer, kidney transplant, and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients. Participants were included during routine clinical visits, and vaccinated according to conventional influenza vaccination schedules. Antibody response was measured by the hemagglutination-inhibition assay, before and 21 days after vaccination. Results 319 patients with cancer, 260 with RA, 256 HIV-infected, 149 elderly individuals, 85 kidney transplant recipients, and 83 with JIA were included. The proportions of seroprotection, seroconversion, and the geometric mean titer ratios postvaccination were, respectively: 37.6%, 31.8%, and 3.2 among kidney transplant recipients, 61.5%, 53.1%, and 7.5 among RA patients, 63.1%, 55.7%, and 5.7 among the elderly, 59.0%, 54.7%, and 5.9 among HIV-infected patients, 52.4%, 49.2%, and 5.3 among cancer patients, 85.5%, 78.3%, and 16.5 among JIA patients. The vaccine was well tolerated, with no reported severe adverse events. Conclusions The vaccine was safe among all groups, with an acceptable immunogenicity among the elderly and JIA patients, however new vaccination strategies should be explored to improve the immune response of immunocompromised adult patients. (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01218685)
Resumo:
BACKGROUND: While viral myocarditis and heart failure are recognized and feared complications of seasonal influenza A infection, only limited information is available for 2009 influenza A(H1N1)-induced heart failure. METHODS AND MAIN FINDINGS: This case series summarizes the disease course of four patients with 2009 influenza A(H1N1) infection who were treated at our institution from November 2009 until September 2010. All patients presented with severe cardiac dysfunction (acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation) as the leading symptom of influenza A(H1N1) infection. Two patients most likely had pre-existent cardiac pathologies, and three required catecholamine therapy to maintain hemodynamic function. Except for one patient who died before influenza A(H1N1) infection had been diagnosed, all patients received antiviral therapy with oseltamivir and supportive critical care. Acute respiratory distress syndrome due to influenza A(H1N1) infection developed in one patient. Heart function normalized in two of the three surviving patients but remained impaired in the other one at hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Influenza A(H1N1) infection may be associated with severe cardiac dysfunction which can even be the leading clinical symptom at presentation. During an influenza pandemic, a thorough history may reveal flu-like symptoms and should indicate testing for H1N1 infection also in critically ill patients with acute heart failure.
Resumo:
The aim of this study was to determine if severity assessment tools (general severity of illness and community-acquired pneumonia specific scores) can be used to guide decisions for patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) due to pandemic influenza A pneumonia. A prospective, observational, multicentre study included 265 patients with a mean age of 42 (±16.1) years and an ICU mortality of 31.7%. On admission to the ICU, the mean pneumonia severity index (PSI) score was 103.2 ± 43.2 points, the CURB-65 score was 1.7 ± 1.1 points and the PIRO-CAP score was 3.2 ± 1.5 points. None of the scores had a good predictive ability: area under the ROC for PSI, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.65-0.78); CURB-65, 0.67 (95% CI, 0.59-0.74); and PIRO-CAP, 0.64 (95% CI, 0.56-0.71). The PSI score (OR, 1.022 (1.009-1.034), p 0.001) was independently associated with ICU mortality; however, none of the three scores, when used at ICU admission, were able to reliably detect a low-risk group of patients. Low risk for mortality was identified in 27.5% of patients using PIRO-CAP, but above 40% when using PSI (I-III) or CURB65 (<2). Observed mortality was 13.7%, 13.5% and 19.4%, respectively. Pneumonia-specific scores undervalued severity and should not be used as instruments to guide decisions in the ICU.
Resumo:
The influenza A virus pandemic of 1918–1919 resulted in an estimated 20–40 million deaths worldwide. The hemagglutinin and neuraminidase sequences of the 1918 virus were previously determined. We here report the sequence of the A/Brevig Mission/1/18 (H1N1) virus nonstructural (NS) segment encoding two proteins, NS1 and nuclear export protein. Phylogenetically, these genes appear to be close to the common ancestor of subsequent human and classical swine strain NS genes. Recently, the influenza A virus NS1 protein was shown to be a type I IFN antagonist that plays an important role in viral pathogenesis. By using the recently developed technique of generating influenza A viruses entirely from cloned cDNAs, the hypothesis that the 1918 virus NS1 gene played a role in virulence was tested in a mouse model. In a BSL3+ laboratory, viruses were generated that possessed either the 1918 NS1 gene alone or the entire 1918 NS segment in a background of influenza A/WSN/33 (H1N1), a mouse-adapted virus derived from a human influenza strain first isolated in 1933. These 1918 NS viruses replicated well in tissue culture but were attenuated in mice as compared with the isogenic control viruses. This attenuation in mice may be related to the human origin of the 1918 NS1 gene. These results suggest that interaction of the NS1 protein with host-cell factors plays a significant role in viral pathogenesis.
Resumo:
Recent studies suggest an association between the Interferon Inducible Transmembrane 3 (IFITM3) rs12252 variant and the course of influenza infection. However, it is not clear whether the reported association relates to influenza infection severity. The aim of this study was to estimate the hospitalization risk associated with this variant in Influenza Like Illness (ILI) patients during the H1N1 pandemic influenza. A case-control genetic association study was performed, using nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs collected during the H1N1 pandemic influenza. Laboratory diagnosis of influenza infection was performed by RT-PCR, the IFITM3 rs12252 was genotyped by RFLP and tested for association with hospitalization. Conditional logistic regression was performed to calculate the confounder-adjusted odds ratio of hospitalization associated with IFITM3 rs12252. We selected 312 ILI cases and 624 matched non-hospitalized controls. Within ILI Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 positive patients, no statistical significant association was found between the variant and the hospitalization risk (Adjusted OR: 0.73 (95%CI: 0.33–1.50)). Regarding ILI Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 negative patients, CT/CC genotype carriers had a higher risk of being hospitalized than patients with TT genotype (Adjusted OR: 2.54 (95%CI: 1.54–4.19)). The IFITM3 rs12252 variant was associated with respiratory infection hospitalization but not specifically in patients infected with Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09.
Resumo:
E-health can facilitate communication and interactions among stakeholders involved in pandemic responses. Its implementation, nevertheless, represents a disruptive change in the healthcare workplace. Organisational preparedness assessment is an essential requirement prior to e-health implementation; including this step in the planning process can increase the chances of programme success. The objective of this study is to develop an e-health preparedness assessment model for pandemic influenza (EHPM4P). Following the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), 20 contextual interviews were conducted with domain experts from May to September 2010. We examined the importance of all preparedness components within a fivedimensional hierarchical framework that was recently published. We also calculated the relative weight for each component at all levels of the hierarchy. This paper presents the hierarchical model (EHPM4P) that can be used to precisely assess healthcare organisational and providers' preparedness for e-health implementation and potentially maximise e-health benefits in the context of an influenza pandemic. Copyright © 2013 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
Resumo:
Tesis (Maestría en Ciencias con Acentuación en Inmunobiología) UANL, 2012.
Resumo:
Rationnel : La pandémie de grippe A(H1N1)pdm09 a induit un grand nombre d’hospitalisation d’enfants en soins intensifs pédiatriques (SIP). L’objectif de cette étude a été de comparer l’incidence et la mortalité des enfants admis en SIP durant l’automne 2009 entre le Canada et la France, deux pays qui diffèrent essentiellement par l’immunisation de la population contre ce virus (première vague en été et taux de couverture vaccinale supérieur à 50% au Canada ; pas de vague estivale et couverture vaccinale de 18% en France). Méthodes : Nous avons comparé deux cohortes nationales qui ont inclue tous les patients avec une infection A(H1N1)pdm09 documentée, admis en SIP au Canada et en France entre le 1er Octobre 2009 et le 31 janvier 2010. Résultats : Au Canada, 160 enfants (incidence=2,63/100000 enfants) en 6 semaines ont été hospitalisés en SIP comparé aux 125 enfants (incidence=1,15/100000 enfants) en 11 semaines en France (p<0,001). Le taux de vaccination avant l’admission était inférieur à 25% parmi les enfants en situation critique dans les deux pays. La gravité à l’admission en SIP et le taux de mortalité ont été similaires au Canada et en France (4,4% en France vs 6,5% au Canada, p=0,45, respectivement). Au Canada, la vaccination contre le virus H1N1pdm09 a été associée avec une diminution du recours à la ventilation invasive (Odd Ratio 0.30, intervalle de confiance à 95% [0,11-0,83], p=0,02). Au Canada comparé à la France, les durées médianes de séjour en SIP et de ventilation invasive ont été plus courtes (2,9 vs 3 jours, p=0,03 et 4 vs 6 jours, p=0,02, respectivement). Conclusion : Les enfants canadiens et français critiquement malades ont été beaucoup moins nombreux à recevoir le vaccin contre le virus influenza A (H1N1)pdm09 en comparaison avec l’ensemble des enfants dans ces deux populations. Au Canada, où la couverture vaccinale a été élevée, le risque d’avoir une détresse respiratoire sévère était moins important parmi les enfants en situation critique ayant été vaccinés avant l’admission.
Resumo:
Patients and methods: Clinical data from all patients admitted with acute respiratory failure due to novel viral H1N1 infection were reviewed. Lung tissue was submitted for viral and bacteriological analyses by real-time RT-PCR, and autopsy was conducted on all patients who died. Results: Eight patients were admitted, with ages ranging from 55 to 65 years old. There were five patients with solid organ tumors (62.5%) and three with hematological malignancies (37.5%). Five patients required mechanical ventilation and all died. Four patients had bacterial bronchopneumonia. All deaths occurred due to multiple organ failure. A milder form of lung disease was present in the three cases who survived. Lung tissue analysis was performed in all patients and showed diffuse alveolar damage in most patients. Other lung findings were necrotizing bronchiolitis or extensive hemorrhage. Conclusions: H1N1 viral infection in patients with cancer can cause severe illness, resulting in acute respiratory distress syndrome and death. More data are needed to identify predictors of unfavorable evolution in these patients.
Resumo:
Objectives The aim of the present paper is to assess the influence of demographic, muscle enzymes, JDM scores and treatment on non-adjuvanted influenza A H1N1/2009 vaccine immunogenicity in juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) patients. Methods Thirty JDM patients and 81 healthy age-matched controls were vaccinated. All participants were evaluated pre- and 21 days post-vaccination and serology for anti-HI NI was performed by haemagglutination inhibition assay. Muscle enzymes, JDM scores and treatment were evaluated before and after vaccination. Adverse events were reported. Results After immunisation seroconversion rates were significantly lower in JDM patients compared to age-matched controls (86.7 vs. 97.5%, p=0.044), whereas seropmtection (p=0.121), geometric mean titres (GMT) (p=0.992) and factor increase (FI) in GMT (p=0.827) were similar in both groups. Clinical and labomtorial evaluations revealed that JDM scores and muscle enzymes remained stable throughout the study (p>0.05). A higher frequency of chronic course was observed in non-seroconverted compared to seroconverted (100% vs. 27%, p=0.012). Regarding treatment, a lower rate of seroconversion was observed in patients under prednisone>20mg/day (50% vs. 4%, p=0.039), and in those treated with a combination of prednisone, methotrexate and cyclosporine (50% vs. 4%, p=0.039). Local and systemic vaccine adverse events were mild and similar in patients and controls (p>0.05). Conclusion This study identified that chronic course and immunosuppressive therapy are the major factors hampering seroconversion was JDM, suggesting that a specific protocol may be required for this subgroup of patients. In spite of that, a single dose of non-adjuvanted influenza A/H1N1 2009 vaccine was generally seroprotective in this disease with no evident deleterious effect in disease itself (ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT01151644).
Resumo:
Methods We conducted a phase I, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-arm (10) parallel study involving healthy adults to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of influenza A (H1N1) 2009 non-adjuvanted and adjuvanted candidate vaccines. Subjects received two intramuscular injections of one of the candidate vaccines administered 21 days apart. Antibody responses were measured by means of hemagglutination-inhibition assay before and 21 days after each vaccination. The three co-primary immunogenicity end points were the proportion of seroprotection >70%, seroconversion >40%, and the factor increase in the geometric mean titer >2.5. Results A total of 266 participants were enrolled into the study. No deaths or serious adverse events were reported. The most commonly solicited local and systemic adverse events were injection-site pain and headache, respectively. Only three subjects (1.1%) reported severe injection-site pain. Four 2009 influenza A (H1N1) inactivated monovalent candidate vaccines that met the three requirements to evaluate influenza protection, after a single dose, were identified: 15 μg of hemagglutinin antigen without adjuvant; 7.5 μg of hemagglutinin antigen with aluminum hydroxide, MPL and squalene; 3.75 μg of hemagglutinin antigen with aluminum hydroxide and MPL; and 3.75 μg of hemagglutinin antigen with aluminum hydroxide and squalene. Conclusions Adjuvant systems can be safely used in influenza vaccines, including the adjuvant monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL) derived from Bordetella pertussis with squalene and aluminum hydroxide, MPL with aluminum hydroxide, and squalene and aluminum hydroxide.