Comparison of CBS-QB3, CBS-APNO, G2, and G3 thermochemical predictions with experiment for formation of ionic clusters of hydronium and hydroxide ions complexed with water

The GAUSSIAN 2, GAUSSIAN 3, complete basis set-QB3, and complete basis set-APNO methods have been used to calculate ΔH∘ and ΔG∘ values for ionic clusters of hydronium and hydroxide ions complexed with water. Results for the clusters H3O+(H2O)n andOH−(H2O)n, where n=1–4 are reported in this paper, and compared against experimental values contained in the National Institutes of Standards and Technology (NIST) database. Agreement with experiment is excellent for the three ab initio methods for formation of these clusters. The high accuracy of these methods makes them reliable for calculating energetics for the formation of ionic clusters containing water. In addition this allows them to serve as a valuable check on the accuracy of experimental data reported in the NIST database, and makes them useful tools for addressing unresolved issues in atmospheric chemistry.

Program manual : NOR network transduction based on connectable and disconnectable conditions (reference manual of NOR network transduction programs NETTRA-G1 and NETTRA-G2) /

"UIUCDCS-R-75-698"

Network transduction based on permissible functions : general principles of NOR network transduction NETTRA programs /

Includes bibliographical references.

NOR network transduction based on error-compensation : principles of NOR network transduction programs NETTRA-E1, NETTRA-E2, and NETTRA-E3 /

Bibliography: p. 101-102.

NOR network transduction system : principles of the NETTRA system /

Bibliography: p. 209-212.

Program manual for the NETTRA system /

"UILU-ENG 77 1743."

Program manual: NOR network pruning procedures using permissible functions : (reference manual of NOR network transduction programs NETTRA-PG1, NETTRA-P1, and NETTRA-P2) /

Includes bibliographical references (page 78).

Pruning procedures for NOR networks using permissible functions : principles of NOR network transduction programs NETTRA-PGI, NETTRA-P1, and NETTRA-P2 /

Bibliography: p. 49.

Program manual : NOR network transduction based on error-compensation : (Reference manual of NOR network transduction programs NETTRA-EL, NETTRA-E2, and NETTRA-E3) /

"Work supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant no. GJ-40221."

NOR network transduction procedures based on connectable and disconnectable conditions : principles of NOR network transduction programs NETTRA-G1 and NETTRA-G2 /

Bibliography: p. 63.

Operator, organizational, direct support, and general support maintenance : wattmeter AN/URM-120A, (Sierra 164B-G3), (NSN 6625-01-039-1488).

"12 May 1980."

Petrov type I electric silent universes must possess symmetries: G1, G2 or G3

We prove that all Petrov type I, silent universe solutions of Einstein's field equations with a zero cosmological constant must possess symmetries: G1, G2 or G3.

Physical and linkage maps for Drosophila serrata, a model species for studies of clinal adaptation and sexual selection

Drosophila serrata is a member of the montium group, which contains more than 98 species and until recently was considered a subgroup within the melanogaster group. This Drosophila species is an emerging model system for evolutionary quantitative genetics and has been used in studies of species borders, clinal variation and sexual selection. Despite the importance of D. serrata as a model for evolutionary research, our poor understanding of its genome remains a significant limitation. Here, we provide a first-generation gene-based linkage map and a physical map for this species. Consistent with previous studies of other drosophilids we observed strong conservation of genes within chromosome arms homologous with D. melanogaster but major differences in within-arm synteny. These resources will be a useful complement to ongoing genome sequencing efforts and QTL mapping studies in this species

Ten truths about Australia's rush to mine and the mining workforce

The sky is falling because the much-vaunted mining ‘boom’ is heading for ‘bust’. The fear-mongering by politicians, the industry and the media has begun in earnest. On ABC TV's 7:30 program on 22 August 2012, Federal Opposition Leader Tony Abbott blamed the Minerals Resource Rent Tax and the Carbon Tax for making ‘a bad investment environment much, much worse’ for the mining industry. The following day, Australia's Resources and Energy Minister Martin Ferguson told us on ABC radio that ‘the resources boom is over’. This must be true because, remember, we were warned to ‘Get ready for the end of the boom’ (David Uren, Economics Editor for The Australian 19 May 2012) due to the ‘Australian resource boom losing steam’ (David Winning & Robb M. Stewart, Wall Street Journal 21 August 2012). Besides, there is ‘unarguable evidence’ that Australia's production costs are ‘too expensive’ and ‘too uncompetitive’: mining magnate Gina Rinehart said so in a YouTube video placed on the Sydney Mining Club's website on 5 September 2012. Can this really be so? What is happening to the mining boom and to the people who depend upon it?