The morning message; a selection for daily meditation, from the works of Rev. G. Campbell Morgan, D. D.

Mode of access: Internet.

Roger Bacon essays,

--Roger Bacon in English literature, by Sir John Edwin Sandys.--Roger Bacon's works, with reference to the mss. and printed editions, by A. G. Little (p. [375]-425, [1])

Pottery from the Aleutian Islands / George I. Quimby, Curator of Exhibits, Department of Anthropology.

v.36:no.1(1945)

Rubbing of the gravestone of Harvard librarian Nathaniel Ward made by David S. Ferriero, October 15, 1972

Large rubbing of the gravestone of Nathaniel Ward, librarian of Harvard college for one week in 1768. The rubbing was made by David S. Ferriero, and is signed and dated October 15, 1972 in the lower right corner.

Fratris Rogeri Bacon Compendium studii theologiae

Bibliography: p. 71-112.

Reminiscences and letters of George Arrowsmith of New Jersey, late lieutenant-colonel of the One hundred and fifty-seventh regiment, New York state volunteers,

Mode of access: Internet.

A brother to dragons, and other old-time tales,

The first tale appeared in the Atlantic monthly for March, 1886, the second in Lippincott's magazine for July, 1887, the third in Harper's magazine for September, 1887.

George Robert Patterson (late a representative from Pennsylvania) Memorial addresses. Fifty-ninth Congress, first session, House of representatives, April 22, 1906.

"Proceedings in the Senate": p.37-39.

The ghost garden : a novel /

Date from verso of t.p.

Addresses at the tenth annual commencement,

Mode of access: Internet.

G.H. Mead

G.H. Mead (1863-1931) oriented much of his intellectual efforts around three unavoidable questions for anyone living in a modern society: how are selfhood, knowledge, and politics understood and organized in such a society? Modern individuals continually seek answers to questions although nobody has ever come up with a definitive answer to them. Modernity, in other words, confronts us with inevitable problematics that fundamentally shape the way in which we think about certain topics. For the purposes of my discussion of Mead, I focus upon three of these modern problematics: science, selfhood, and democratic politics. But before I discuss Mead’s treatment of these problem areas, allow me to briefly situate Mead as a pragmatist in relation to Dewey and James within pragmatism.

Norton de Matos, o improvável republicano: Um olhar sobre Portugal e o império entre Afonso Costa e Salazar

Discutir o papel político de José Norton de Matos (1867-1955) na galáxia republicana portuguesa entre 1910 e 1955 é o objectivo principal desta tese. A alteração do prisma de análise mais habitual quando se fala de Norton, do colonial para o político, foi acompanhada pela opção de privilegiar os seus escritos contemporâneos, em detrimento das muitas análises retrospectivas posteriormente publicadas, e de cotejar a sua voz com múltiplas vozes de Portugal e do império, entre muitas outras com que se cruzou. Tentámos compreender como é que um liberal como Norton, monárquico de tradição embora não de filiação, usa as suas credenciais coloniais para entrar na política republicana à boleia da polémica do cacau escravo e da Sociedade Portuguesa Anti-Esclavagista. Com a aproximação a Bernardino Machado, aos Jovens Turcos, à maçonaria e à facção do PRP dominada por Afonso Costa, insere-se na órbita democrática e afonsista e ganha o cargo de governador-geral de Angola. Aos africanos, cuja definição legislativa como uma categoria distinta da de cidadão (o indígena) antecipa em 1913, leva as luzes da educação laica e a liberdade de trabalho mas paradoxalmente convive com as escolas das missões e o trabalho forçado. A fibra de político que revela na gestão das tensões entre as elites coloniais e metropolitanas irá ser apurada como ministro da Guerra. Discutimos, em especial, o seu papel político num ambicioso projecto: transformar dezenas de milhares de portugueses, pobres, analfabetos e vindos de meios rurais com parcas simpatias republicanas, em cidadãos e soldados da República. A improvisação, que possibilitou que o Corpo Expedicionário Português fosse combater em França ao lado dos britânicos, teve o rasgo de asa e os problemas inerentes à megalomania que o caracterizava. No Verão de 1917, o prestígio com que regressa à capital após difíceis negociações com o governo de Lloyd George torna-o um sério concorrente de Afonso Costa embora com ele partilhe também o ónus da crescente impopularidade da guerra. Reencontrar-se-ão, após o exílio sidonista, na Conferência da Paz em Paris mas, ao contrário de Costa, que não regressará à política activa, Norton tornar-se-á o altocomissário mais marcante e polémico da nova República do pós-guerra. Após a queda do regime e dois novos exílios, será Norton de Matos a fazer os compromissos necessários para permanecer no país e, aí, combater a Ditadura Militar e o Estado Novo de Salazar. Quando, em 1931, consegue unir a oposição em torno da Aliança Republicano-Socialista, começa a impor-se como símbolo da I República. É com esse estatuto que integrará as frentes unidas antifascistas dos anos 40 que culminarão na sua candidatura à Presidência da República em 1948/1949. O modo como consegue fazer a ponte entre os vários ciclos e gerações da oposição e, simultaneamente, resistir às pressões para romper a unidade com os comunistas na fase mais crispada da Guerra Fria será uma última manifestação do seu talento político, cuja análise poderá ajudar a enriquecer o debate sobre essa realidade plural e multipolar que foi a galáxia republicana na primeira metade do século XX.

The role of a minor party : a comparative study of the British Liberal Party and the Australian Country Party since 1918

and the Australian Country Party since 1918. 2. The thesis examines the proposition that the role of a minor party is determined, not by its total strength expressed as a percentage of the national vote, but by how its strength is concentrated. Australia and Britain were chosen for the comparison because of the many similarities in political culture and in the extent of class voting. Each country has a party - the Country Party in Australia and the Liberal Party in Britain - which has had a distinct impact on the political scene in their respective countries. In the period from 1918 to the present day neither party, at the national level, has ever held the largest number of seats in parliament let alone a majority of seats, and it is in this sense that they are herein defined as minor parties. In the thesis the constitutional background of and differences between Australia and Britain are reviewed, followed by a brief historical picture of each of the two parties being studied. The sources of supporc of the two parties are analysed and it is here that real differences emerge. The Country Party in Australia is a deliberately sectional party with a narrow rural base, whereas the British Liberal Party is more broadly based than either the Labour or Conservative Parties in Britain. 3. Party leadership and organisation are then discussed. Both parties have had outstanding leaders, Earle Page and McEwen for the Country Party; Asquith, Lloyd George and Grimond for the Liberal Party. Both parties have had relatively fewer leaders than their major party opponents. However, whereas the Country Party has been free of serious splits the Liberal Party was shattered on the leadership struggles of Asquith and Lloyd George. Both parties have been identified with decentralisation of state power, the Country Party through its support, albeit sometimes lukewarm of the New States Movement; the Liberal Party through its espousal of a federal system for Britain with separate Welsh, Scottish and regional assemblies. Unfortunately for the British Liberal Party the beneficiaries of their policies in this area have been relatively new nationalist parties in both Wales arid Scotland. The major part of the thesis is devoted to a study of how the electoral systems in the two countries have, in practice, worked to the advantage or disadvantage of the Country Party and the British Liberal Party. The Country Party has been as consistently over-represented in the House of Representatives as the Liberal Party has been under-represented in the British House of Commons. With the even distribution of its support the introduction of the single transferable vote, in itself, would bring little benefit to the British Liberal Party in terms of seats. Multimember urban constituencies combined with some type of list system are the only way the Liberals are likely to obtain House of Commons seats in proportion to their votes. 4. Finally, the relations of the two minor parties with their respective major parties are considered. In the conclusion the future of the two parties is reviewed. In general terms it appears that the Country Party is faced with a slow decline. Although the British Liberal Party made a major breakthrough, in terms of votes, in the February 1974 election, they were unable to maintain this momentum in the October election, even though they lost very little ground. In the long term they must make an inroad into Labour held seats if they are to progress further.

«The Soviet cannot be trusted» : les relations diplomatiques entre l’URSS et la Grande-Bretagne dans les années 1920.

Ce mémoire tente de présenter l’état des relations diplomatiques entre la Russie soviétique, puis l’Union des républiques socialistes soviétiques (URSS) à partir de 1922, et la Grande-Bretagne entre 1920 et 1927, à travers les documents du Foreign Office britannique. Pour cela, il présente le retour progressif des relations officielles entre les deux pays sous la gouverne du premier ministre britannique Lloyd George, de 1916 à 1922, et la mise en place d’une politique britannique à l’égard du gouvernement soviétique. Il tente ensuite d’établir les politiques des différents gouvernements qui suivent celui de Lloyd George, et de voir si ces politiques marquent une rupture avec la politique du gouvernement de Lloyd George ou si, au contraire, il existe une continuité dans ces politiques, malgré le changement de gouvernement. L’hypothèse principale que nous soutenons est que malgré les changements de gouvernements entre 1920 et 1927, la politique de la Grande-Bretagne restera identique durant toute la période, et ce malgré les différents gouvernements britanniques qui vont se succéder : un gouvernement d’union, deux gouvernements conservateurs et le premier gouvernement travailliste. Nous croyons que la prétendue « propagande soviétique » sera l’une des lignes directrices des relations entre les deux pays pendant la période étudiée, lignes établies par Lloyd George et son gouvernement au début de 1920. Nous soutenons également que cette « propagande » sera le pivot des relations entre les deux pays, et qu’elle sera un frein constant dans l’établissement de relations normalisées avec l’Union soviétique. Nous croyons que cette propagande entraînera une « paranoïa » de la part du gouvernement britannique qui, pendant toute la période que nous étudions, passera tout son temps à se plaindre au gouvernement soviétique de « sa » propagande, entraînant finalement la rupture des relations en 1927.