In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1946. National Labor Relations Board, petitioner, vs. Donnelly Garment Co., Donnelly Garment Workers' Union and International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union. International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, petitioner, vs. Donnelly Garment Co., Donnelly Garment Workers' Union and National Labor Relations Board on writs of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the eighth circuit. Brief for Donnelly Garment Workers' Union.

"Table of cases cited:" p. ii-vi.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, no. 81-2135, Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization, petitioner v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, respondent, Federal Aviation Administration, intervenor : petition for review of an order of the Federal Labor Relations Authority, argued December 3, 1981, decided June 11, 1982.

Cover title.

In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1948 : American Communications Association, C.I.O., Joseph P. Selly, etc., et al., appelants v. Charles T. Douds, individually and as regional director of the National Labor Relations Board, second region, on appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York : brief for appellee.

"No. 336."

In the Supreme Court of the United States, Oct. term 1946. National Labor Relations Board, petitioner, vs. Donnelly Garment Company, a corporation; Donnelly Garment Workers' Union; and International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, respondents. International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, petitioner vs. Donnelly Garment Company, Donnelly Garment Workers' Union and National Labor Relations Board, respondents. On writs of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Brief for respondent, Donnelly Garment Company.

"Table of cases": p. v-ix.

In the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, January term, 1936 : National Labor Relations Board, petitioner v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation, respondent, on application for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board : brief for the National Labor Relations Board.

Includes index.

In the United States Circuit Court of Appeals in and for the Fifth Circuit, no. 8171 : Agwilines, Inc., petitioner vs. National Labor Relations Board and J. Warren Madden ... and John M. Carmody and Edwin S. Smith, respondents, review of decision of National Labor Relations Board : petition for review.

Cover title.

In the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, March term, 1936 : National Labor Relations Board, petitioner v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc., Greyhound Management Company, corporations, respondents, on application for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board : brief for petitioner.

At head of title: No. 6007.

In the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, October term, 1936, no. 8171 : Agwilines, Inc., a corporation, petitioner v. National Labor Relation Board and J. Warren Madden ... and John M. Carmody and Edwin S. Smith, respondents : brief for the National Labor Relations Board.

Cover title.

Court decisions relating to the National Labor Relations Act.

Mode of access: Internet.

Court decisions relating to the National Labor Relations Act.

Vol. 37, Jan. 1 through Dec. 31, 1985.

Children and teenagers working in artistic labor: Brazilian situation and international examples

This descriptive study about children and adolescents artistic labor verifies the applicable legislation, in Brazil, regarding the participation of children and adolescents in the entertainment industry and in advertising campaigns, as well as the judicial processes about the theme known by the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice up to October, 2010. The results permit to conclude that, due to the lack of specific regulation and general rule of child labor prohibition, the restrictions that tend to protect the health and security of children and adolescents that act in the artistic niche (television, advertising, fashion, movies etc.) have been, in Brazil, at subjective criteria of the judges and, in many cases, in the hands of producers themselves. Brief considerations on how other countries regulate the theme are also presented (the USA, Portugal and Argentina).

Under the Crimson Flag: Fahle Burman's Two Trips to the Michigan Supreme Court

Erick Fahle Burman. a Swedish-born, Finnish-speaking labor and political activist, twice had cases argued on his behalf before the Michigan Supreme Court. In People vs. Burman, Burman, along with nine other defendants, had his conviction affirmed by the court and all ten were forced to pay a fine of $25 each for disturbing the peace. In People vs. Immonen, Burman and his co-defendant, Unto Immonen, had their convictions overturned because of improper evidence being admitted in their lower court trial. Though the conviction was overturned, the two men had already spent several months as prisoners at hard labor in Marquette State Prison located in Michigan's Upper Peninsula. Over twenty-five years separate Burman's two trips to Michigan's high court. On the first occasion, his arrest came less than five years after his arrival as an immigrant to the U. S. On the second occasion, his arrest came less than two years after his return to the state after being away for nearly two decades. On both occasions, Burman was arrested for his involvement with red flags. Though separated by decades, these cases, taken together, are important indicators of the state of Finnish-American radicalism in the years surrounding the red flag incidents and provide interesting insights into the delicacies of political suppression. Examination of these cases within the larger career of Fahle Burman points up his overlooked importance in the history of Finnish-American socialism and communism.

The eight hours day for wage earning women: United States Supreme Court upholds the California law : List of eight hours laws

National Consumers' League.

Il lavoro a termine nella giurisprudenza della Corte di giustizia [Jurisprudence in the Court of Justice]. WP C.S.D.L.E. "Massimo D'Antona" .INT - 93/2012

The paper analyzes the ECJ case law on fixed-term work, with specific regard to non-regression clause, measures to prevent abuses and the principle of non-discrimination. In particular, the Author points out that the principle of non-discrimination is to be regarded as being the core of the fixed-term work regulation; in this respect, especially in more recent judgments, the Court seems to maximize the scope of such principle.

l bilanciamento tra le libertà economiche e i diritti sociali collettivi operato dalla Corte di Giustizia è un contemperamento tra diritti equiordinati?* = The balance between economic freedoms and collective social rights and actions; Court of Justice is a choice between rights equiordinati? Actions by the Court of Justice. WP C.S.D.L.E. “Massimo D’Antona”.INT – 98/2012

In the Viking and Laval judgments and more recently in the Comm. v. Germany ruling, the Court of Justice applied the proportionality test to collective rights, setting a series of restrictions to the exercise of the right to strike and the right to collective bargaining. The way the ECJ balances the economic freedoms and the social rights is indeed very different from that of the Italian Constitutional Court. Unlike the European Union Treaties, the Italian Constitution recognizes an important role to the right to take collective action which has to be connected with article 3, paragraph 2, consequently the right of strike is more protected than the exercise of economic freedoms.