995 resultados para Helicobacter pylori diagnosis


Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The expression of human leukocyte antigen G (HLA-G) and human leukocyte antigen E (HLA-E) in physiological and pathological processes remains unknown, it is believed that these molecules play a fundamental role in the establishment and maintenance of immune tolerance by inhibiting the functions of immunocompetent cells. In literature we found no published study involving the bacterium Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) with expression of HLA-G and HLA-E. The objective this study is investigated the expression of this protein in gastric biopsies of patients with the bacterium H. pylori. Sixty-four biopsies of the patients with diagnosis of infection by H. pylori were evaluated to expression of HLA-G and HLA-E. The samples were stratified according to the presence of carcinoma or peptic ulcers. Patients without H. pylori were used to control. To investigate the expression of this protein were used immunohistochemistry technique with monoclonal antibody anti-HLA-G and anti-HLA-E. Other criteria such as analysis of the inflammatory infiltrate (hematoxylin-eosin) and identification of H. pylori (Giemsa) were analyzed. We detected HLA-G and HLA-E molecules in the most samples containing ulcer and gastric carcinoma. In negative control group was not detected the presence of HLA-G and HLA-E. The presence of H. pylori seems modulate the expression of HLA-G and HLA-E, favoring the evolution of infection, giving different degrees of gastric lesion in epithelium of these patients

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

CONTEXT: Epidemiological studies have demonstrated higher frequencies of the O blood group and the non-secretor phenotype of ABH antigens among patients suffering from peptic ulcers. Since Helicobacter pylori has been established as the main etiological factor in this disease, controversies about the associations of the ABO and Lewis blood group phenotypes and secretor and non-secretor phenotypes in relation to susceptibility towards infection by this bacillus have been presented. OBJECTIVE: To verify the frequencies of ABO, Lewis blood group phenotypes, secretor and non-secretor phenotypes in patients infected or uninfected by H. pylori. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Outpatient clinic. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and twenty patients with dyspeptic symptoms who underwent endoscopy. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: ABO and Lewis blood group phenotypes were determined by a standard hemagglutination test and the secretor and non-secretor phenotypes were evaluated by saliva samples using the inhibitor hemagglutination test. RESULTS: The diagnosis of infection, made via breath and urea tests and confirmed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in gastric biopsy fragments, showed the presence of H. pylori in 61.7% of the patients and absence in 38.3%. The differences between the frequencies of the ABO blood group phenotypes among infected (A 27.0%; B 12.2%; AB 4.0% and O 56.8%) and uninfected patients (A 58.7%; B 13.0%; AB 4.3% and O 24.0%) were significant. The Lewis blood type, secretor and non-secretor phenotypes showed homogeneous distribution between the groups of patients analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the infection of H. pylori can be related to ABO blood groups but not to the Lewis blood group nor to secretor and non-secretor phenotypes. Copyright©2002, Associação Paulista de Medicina.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

A infecção pela Helicobacter pylori é uma das mais comuns em humanos, admite-se que é adquirida na infância e que é uma das principais causas de gastrite e úlcera gástrica na vida adulta. Entre os vários métodos de diagnósticos da infecção pela H. pylori, a reação e cadeia da polimerase (PCR) tem mostrado alta sensibilidade para a detecção desta bactéria em amostras gástricas, orais fecais. Com o objetivo de padronizar a técnica de PCR para detectar a presença da H. pylori nas fezes e comparar com o método de diagnóstico sorológico, utilizou-se uma amostra de 79 crianças provenientes de um estudo soroepidemiológico realizado em Belém-Pará, no ano de 2003. O DNA total foi extraído das fezes através de um protocolo padronizado neste estudo baseado na associação dos métodos de fervura em resina quelante e digestão por proteinase, seguido por fenol-clorofórmio. Para a amplificação do DNA utilizou-se iniciadores para o gene 16S rRNA para o gênero Helicobacter e para detecção específica da H. pylori utilizou-se iniciadores para trecho do gene ureA. O fragmento foi visualizado em gel de agarose 2% corado com brometo de etídio. A presença da H. pylori foi verificada em 69,62% (55/79) dos pacientes. A análise comparativa entre o ensaio sorológico e a PCR ureA, revelou que a técnica molecular apresenta um melhor desempenho no diagnóstico de H. pylori em fezes (p = 0,0246). A aplicação da técnica da PCR em amostras fecais de crianças, por ser um procedimento não invasivo e altamente eficiente pode ser utilizada para detecção da infecção pela H. pylori tanto na rotina laboratorial como em pesquisas de interesse epidemiológico.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Background and Objectives — Considering the high prevalence of stomach cancer in the northern region of Brazil and the recognized relationship between chronic gastric inflammation caused by Helicobacter pylori, and its carcinogenic potential, the objective we had with this study was to investigate the presence of the microorganism in macro and microscopic presentations of neoplasm in different regions of the stomach, and in non-malignant lesions concomitant to the adenocarcinoma in patients originating from the metropolitan area of Belém (State of Pará, Brazil). Methods - Examinations were made on 172 patients divided into two groups: group I, formed by 75 patients with gastric carcinoma, and group II, formed by 97 patients with mild enanthematic gastritis, considered control group. The diagnosis was obtained during endoscopic examination and the respective biopsy. Gastric neoplasms were classified macroscopically in accordance with Borrmann's classification, and microscopically in accordance with Laurén's classification. In group I, 54 patients were male and 21 female while in group II, 22 patients were male and 75 female. The average age in group I was 61.2 years (range 27 to 86 years), while in group II it was 37.5 years (range 16 to 69 years). Thin sections were prepared and stained using the hematoxylin-eosin method. In the Helicobacter pylori research, the modified Gram stain was utilized. Statistical analysis was done by utilizing the chi-squared (c 2) test, Mann-Whitney test (U), and Fisher's exact test. Results - The results showed the detection of Helicobacter pylori were significantly greater in patients with mild enanthematic gastritis than in patients with gastric carcinoma. The presence of Helicobacter pylori in patients with gastric carcinoma and mild enanthematic gastritis was significantly greater in the antral region than in other gastric regions. Helicobacter pylori detection in patients with gastric carcinoma did not present a significant difference in relation to the macroscopic aspect of the tumor either intestinal or diffuse histological types. Conclusions - These data suggest the presence of the bacteria is predominant in the antral region and it does not show relation with the macroscopic types or histological intestinal or diffuse types of gastric carcinoma.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

A study was conducted to determine the optimal time for collecting the breath examination urea breath marked with the stable isotope 13C. We selected patients before undergoing the examination of endoscopy at the Endoscopy Section of the University Hospital of Botucatu - SP. A screening was performed to determine which patients wanted and could participate. Before performing endoscopy basal sample was collected from the patient and then the labeled urea ingested. The blows were collected in double every 2.5 minutes until an interval of 30.0 minutes after were collected every 5.0 minutes until the time of 45.0 minutes . The samples were analyzed in a mass spectrometer for isotope ratio, located in the center of Stable Isotopes, Institute of Biosciences, UNESP - Botucatu campus. The data were studied and arranged in the form of graphics to better interpretation of results. Based on the obtained results it was determined that a standby time of 15.0 minutes to collect the wind is sufficient for accurate diagnosis and effective

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Hintergrund: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) zählt trotz abnehmender Inzidenz zu den häufigsten bakteriellen Infektionskrankheiten des Menschen. Die Infektion mit H. pylori ist ein Risikofaktor für Krankheiten wie gastroduodenale Geschwüre, Magenkarzinomen und MALT (Mucosa Associated Lymphoid Tissue)-Lymphomen. Zur Diagnostik von H. pylori stehen verschiedene invasive und nichtinvasive Verfahren zur Verfügung. Der 13C-Harnstoff-Atemtest wird zur Kontrolle einer Eradikationstherapie empfohlen, kommt in der Primärdiagnostik von H. pylori derzeit jedoch nicht standardmäßig in Deutschland zum Einsatz. Fragestellung: Welchen medizinischen und gesundheitsökonomischen Nutzen hat die Untersuchung auf H. pylori-Besiedlung mittels 13C-Harnstoff-Atemtest in der Primärdiagnostik im Vergleich zu invasiven und nichtinvasiven diagnostischen Verfahren? Methodik: Basierend auf einer systematischen Literaturrecherche in Verbindung mit einer Handsuche werden Studien zur Testgüte und Kosten-Effektivität des 13C-Harnstoff-Atemtests im Vergleich zu anderen diagnostischen Verfahren zum primären Nachweis von H. pylori identifiziert. Es werden nur medizinische Studien eingeschlossen, die den 13C-Harnstoff-Atemtest direkt mit anderen H. pylori-Testverfahren vergleichen. Goldstandard ist eines oder eine Kombination der biopsiebasierten Testverfahren. Für die gesundheitsökonomische Beurteilung werden nur vollständige gesundheitsökonomische Evaluationsstudien einbezogen, bei denen die Kosten-Effektivität des 13C Harnstoff-Atemtests direkt mit anderen H. pylori-Testverfahren verglichen wird. Ergebnisse: Es werden 30 medizinische Studien für den vorliegenden Bericht eingeschlossen. Im Vergleich zum Immunglobulin G (IgG)-Test ist die Sensitivität des 13C-Harnstoff-Atemtests zwölfmal höher, sechsmal niedriger und einmal gleich, und die Spezifität 13-mal höher, dreimal niedriger und zweimal gleich. Im Vergleich zum Stuhl-Antigen-Test ist die Sensitivität des 13C-Harnstoff-Atemtests neunmal höher, dreimal niedriger und einmal gleich, und die Spezifität neunmal höher, zweimal niedriger und zweimal gleich. Im Vergleich zum Urease-Schnelltest sind die Sensitivität des 13C-Harnstoff-Atemtests viermal höher, dreimal niedriger und viermal gleich und die Spezifität fünfmal höher, fünfmal niedriger und einmal gleich. Im Vergleich mit der Histologie ist die Sensitivität des 13C-Harnstoff-Atemtests einmal höher und zweimal niedriger und die Spezifität zweimal höher und einmal niedriger. In je einem Vergleich zeigt sich kein Unterschied zwischen 13C-Harnstoff-Atemtest und 14C-Harnstoff-Atemtest, sowie eine niedrigere Sensitivität und höhere Spezifität im Vergleich zur Polymerase-Kettenreaktion (PCR). Inwieweit die beschriebenen Unterschiede statistisch signifikant sind, wird in sechs der 30 Studien angegeben. Es werden neun gesundheitsökonomische Evaluationen in dem vorliegenden Bericht berücksichtigt. Die Test-and-Treat-Strategie mittels 13C-Harnstoff-Atemtest wird in sechs Studien mit einem Test-and-Treat-Verfahren auf Basis der Serologie sowie in drei Studien mit einem Test-and-Treat-Verfahren auf Basis des Stuhl-Antigen-Tests verglichen. Dabei ist das Atemtestverfahren dreimal kosteneffektiv gegenüber der serologischen Methode und wird von der Stuhl-Antigen-Test-Strategie einmal dominiert. Vier Studien beinhalten einen Vergleich der Test-and -Treat-Strategie auf Basis des 13C-Harnstoff-Atemtests mit einer empirischen antisekretorischen Therapie, wobei sich das Atemtesverfahren zweimal als kosteneffektive Prozedur erweist und zwei Studien einen Vergleich mit einer empirischen Eradikationstherapie. In fünf Studien wird das Test-and-Treat-Verfahren mittels 13C-Harnstoff-Atemtest einer endoskopiebasierten Strategie gegenübergestellt. Zweimal dominiert die Atemteststrategie die endoskopische Prozedur und einmal wird sie von dieser Strategie dominiert. Diskussion:Sowohl die medizinischen als auch die ökonomischen Studien weisen mehr oder minder gravierende Mängel auf und liefern heterogene Ergebnisse. So werden in der Mehrzahl der medizinischen Studien keine Angaben zur statistischen Signifikanz der berichteten Unterschiede zwischen den jeweiligen Testverfahren gemacht. Im direkten Vergleich weist der 13C-Harnstoff-Atemtest überwiegend eine höhere Testgüte als der IgG und der Stuhl-Antigen-Test auf. Aus den Vergleichen mit dem Urease-Schnelltest lassen sich keine Tendenzen bezüglich der Sensitivität ableiten, wohingegen die Spezifität des 13C-Harnstoff-Atemtests höher einzuschätzen ist. Für die Vergleiche des 13C-Harnstoff-Atemtest mit der Histologie, dem 14C-Harnstoff-Atemtest und der PCR liegen zu wenige Ergebnisse vor. In der eingeschlossenen ökonomischen Literatur deuten einige Studienergebnisse auf eine Kosten-Effektivität der Test-and-Treat-Strategie mittels 13C-Harnstoff-Atemtest gegenüber dem Test-and-Treat-Verfahren auf Basis der Serologie und der empirischen antiskretorischen Therapie hin. Um Tendenzen bezüglich der Kosten-Effektivität der Atemteststrategie gegenüber der Test-and-Treat-Strategie mittels Stuhl-Antigen-Test sowie der empirischen Eradikationstherapie abzuleiten, mangelt es an validen Ergebnissen bzw. ökonomischer Evidenz. Die Untersuchungsresultate hinsichtlich eines Vergleichs mit endoskopiebasierten Verfahren fallen diesbezüglich zu heterogen aus. Insgesamt kann keines der ökonomischen Modelle der Komplexität des Managements von Patienten mit dyspeptischen Beschwerden gänzlich gerecht werden. Schlussfolgerungen/Empfehlungen: Zusammenfassend ist festzuhalten, dass die Studienlage zur medizinischen und ökonomischen Beurteilung des 13C-Harnstoff-Atemtests im Vergleich zu anderen diagnostischen Methoden nicht ausreichend ist, um den Atemtest als primärdiagnostisches Standardverfahren im Rahmen einer Test-and-Treat-Strategie beim Management von Patienten mit dyspeptischen Beschwerden für die deutsche Versorgungslandschaft insbesondere vor dem Hintergrund der Leitlinien der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS) anstelle einer endoskopiebasierten Methode zu empfehlen.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Background: Initial resistance to antibiotics is the main reason for the failure of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication in children. Objectives: As we commonly face high antibiotic resistance rates in children, we aimed to determine the susceptibility of H. pylori to common antibiotics. Patients and Methods: In this cross-sectional in vitro study, 169 children younger than 14 years with clinical diagnosis of peptic ulcer underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Biopsy specimens from stomach and duodenum were cultured. In isolated colonies, tests of catalase, urease, and oxidase as well as gram staining were performed. After confirming the colonies as H. pylori, the antibiogram was obtained using disk diffusion method. Results: Culture for H. pylori was positive in 12.3% of the specimens, urease test in 21.3%, serological test in 18.9% and stool antigen test was positive in 21.9%. We could show high specificity but moderate sensitivity of both histological and H. pylori stool antigen tests to detect H. pylori. The overall susceptibility to metronidazole was 42.9%, amoxicillin 95.2%, clarithromycin 85.7%, furazolidone 61.9%, azithromycin 81.0%, and tetracycline 76.2% with the highest resistance to metronidazole and the lowest to clarithromycin. Conclusions: In our region, there is high resistance of H. pylori to some antibiotics including metronidazole and furazolidone among affected children. To reduce the prevalence of this antibiotic resistance, more controlled use of antibiotics should be considered in children.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Background: The Brazilian consensus recommends a short-term treatment course with clarithromycin, amoxicillin and proton-pump inhibitor for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori ( H. pylori). This treatment course has good efficacy, but cannot be afforded by a large part of the population. Azithromycin, amoxicillin and omeprazole are subsidized, for several aims, by the Brazilian federal government. Therefore, a short-term treatment course that uses these drugs is a low-cost one, but its efficacy regarding the bacterium eradication is yet to be demonstrated. The study's purpose was to verify the efficacy of H. pylori eradication in infected patients who presented peptic ulcer disease, using the association of azithromycin, amoxicillin and omeprazole. Methods: Sixty patients with peptic ulcer diagnosed by upper digestive endoscopy and H. pylori infection documented by rapid urease test, histological analysis and urea breath test were treated for six days with a combination of azithromycin 500 mg and omeprazole 20 mg, in a single daily dose, associated with amoxicillin 500 mg 3 times a day. The eradication control was carried out 12 weeks after the treatment by means of the same diagnostic tests. The eradication rates were calculated with 95% confidence interval. Results: The eradication rate was 38% per intention to treat and 41% per protocol. Few adverse effects were observed and treatment compliance was high. Conclusion: Despite its low cost and high compliance, the low eradication rate does not allow the recommendation of the triple therapy with azithromycin as an adequate treatment for H. pylori infection.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Background: Increasing resistance to clarithromycin and nitroimidazole is the main cause of failure in the Helicobacter pylori eradication. The ideal retreatment regimen remains unclear, especially in developing countries, where the infection presents high prevalence and resistance to antibiotics. The study aimed at determining the efficacy, compliance and adverse effects of a regimen that included furazolidone, levofloxacin and lansoprazole in patients with persistent Helicobacter pylori infection, who had failed to respond to at least one prior eradication treatment regimen. Methods: This study included 48 patients with peptic ulcer disease. Helicobacter pylori infection was confirmed by a rapid urease test and histological examination of samples obtained from the antrum and corpus during endoscopy. The eradication therapy consisted of a 7-day twice daily oral administration of lansoprazole 30 mg, furazolidone 200 mg and levofloxacin 250 mg. Therapeutic success was confirmed by a negative rapid urease test, histological examination and 14C- urea breath test, performed 12 weeks after treatment completion. The Chi-square method was used for comparisons among eradication rates, previous treatments and previous furazolidone use. Results: Only one of the 48 patients failed to take all medications, which was due to adverse effects (vomiting). Per-protocol and intention-to-treat eradication rates were 89% (95% CI-89%-99%) and 88% (88-92%), respectively. Mild and moderate adverse effects were reported by 41 patients (85%). For patients with one previous treatment failure, the eradication rate was 100%. Compared to furazolidone-nave patients, eradication rates were lower in those who had failed prior furazolidone-containing regimen(s) (74% vs. 100%, p = 0.002). Conclusion: An empiric salvage-regimen including levofloxacin, furazolidone and lansoprazole is very effective in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori, particularly in patients that have failed one prior eradication therapy.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Recent studies suggest Helicobacter pylori is spread by faecal-oral or oral-oral transmission. Gastroenterologists who are exposed to gastric secretions and saliva have a high prevalence of H. pylori infection. Venous blood was obtained from 92 dentists, 40 dental nurses, 33 fifth year and 30 first year dental students. An ELISA assay was used to detect H. pylori IgG antibodies. Results were compared with an age and sex matched normal population. The prevalence of H. pylori infection in dentists, dental nurses, fifth year dental students and first year dental students were 23 per cent, 18 per cent, 18 per cent and 16 per cent, respectively. There were no significant differences when compared with the normal population controls. The prevalence of H. pylori antibody was not significantly increased with years of practice or patient contact time in dentists and dental nurses. Helicobacter pylori infection is uncommon in dental professionals working in the oral cavity.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Objective: To determine beliefs and behaviours of Australian doctors regarding Helicobacter pylori. Design: Anonymous reply-paid postal survey mailed in December 1995 and again in March 1996. Subjects: All members on the mailing lists of the Gastroenterological Society of Australia Endoscopy Section (n = 397) and the Australian Society of Infectious Diseases (n = 264; those without medical qualifications were asked not to reply), and 400 general practitioners (GPs) randomly selected from the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Main outcome measures: Differences between specialist groups in belief in a causative association between H. pylori and peptic disease and in use of eradication therapy and pre- and post-treatment testing for H. pylori. Results: 92.6% of doctors believed H. pylori causes duodenal ulcer, with GPs significantly less likely to believe than gastroenterologists (odds ratio [OR], 0.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.00-0.81). In duodenal ulcer, 93.4% of doctors believed H. pylori eradication therapy should be given, but fewer (83.4%) claimed to give it always or mostly, with GPs less likely to report giving it than gastroenterologists (OR, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.02-0.19). For non-ulcer dyspepsia, gastrointestinal surgeons were more likely than gastroenterologists to believe in a causative link with H. pylori (OR, 5.6; 95% CI, 3.0-10.7) and in a need for eradication therapy (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.7-7.7). Most doctors (79.3%) believed in confirming the presence of H. pylori before eradication therapy in duodenal ulcer. Only 51.6% believed post-eradication testing necessary (45.5%), yet 79.1% reported performing it. Conclusions: Significant differences exist between specialist groups in beliefs and self-reported behaviours regarding H. pylori.