[Opinion of the Supreme Court] of the state of New York, in a cause in which James Field was plaintiff and Charles Field defendant.

The lawsuit arose out of a dispute between the "orthodox" and "Hicksite" branches of the Society of Friends over the possession of a school fund.

An introduction to the defence of Abner Kneeland, charged with blasphemy : before the Municipal Court, in Boston, Mass. at the January term in 1834 /

Mode of access: Internet.

Decision of the Court of chancery of the state of New Jersey, in a cause between Thomas L. Shotwell, complainant, and Joseph Hendrickson and Stacy Decow, defendants. Also the opinion of the Supreme court of the state of New York, in a cause in which James Field was plaintiff, and Charles Field, defendant.

Dispute concerning a school fund of the Society of Friends, which was claimed by both Orthodox and Hicksite factions.

Memoir of Elder Abner Jones.

Mode of access: Internet.

A series of letters in defence of divine revelation : in reply to Rev. Abner Kneeland's inquiry into the authenticity of the same ; to which is added a religious correspondence between Hosea Ballou and Joseph Buckminster and Joseph Walton.

Mode of access: Internet.

A funeral sermon, delivered at Loudon, January 24, 1810, at the interment of Mr. Abner Ames D'Wolf, : a member of Williams College, who died at Williamstown, January 20th, in the twenty second year of his age, and the third year of his collegiate life. /

Title vignette.

Abner Daniel : the "David Harum" of the South /

Mode of access: Internet.

Marshall, MI house built in 1860 by Judge Abner Pratt on his return from the Sandwich Islands where he held the position of U.S. Consul

2 scans with same hs# - one as print actually looks, one somewhat color corrected. 2nd has suffix -ALT

Speech of Abner Kneeland delivered before the Supreme Court of the City of Boston, in his own defence, on an indictment for blasphemy. November term, 1834.

Mode of access: Internet.

The Troy & Boston railroad company vs. the Boston, Hoosac tunnel & western railway co. Answer. Prout & Walker, defendant's solicitors and counsel.

At head of title: Circuit court of the United States, district of Vermont. In equity.

In Equity no. 169. In the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California : the Equitable Trust Company of New York, as Trustee, Complainant, against Western Pacific Railway Company, Chester L. Hovey, as Receiver of Boca and Loyalton Railroad Company, and Mercantile Trust Company of San Francisco, as Trustee, Defendants, and Central Trust Company of New York, as Trustee, Intervening Defendant and Cross-complainant.

[V.1.] Proceedings on Master's sale -- [v.2.] Decree of forclosure and sale -- [v.3.] Ancillary decree of foreclosure and sale.

The effects of defendant account on damage award decisions

The purpose of this study was to examine whether the manner in which civil defendants account for their behavior influences compensatory and punitive damage awards. Jurors read three civil trial summaries, in which I manipulated injury severity (high vs. low), defendant reprehensibility (high vs. low), defendant status (individual vs. corporate), and account (concession, excuse, justification or refusal) in a factorial design. I also included four control groups in which the defendant stipulated liability. In all other conditions, participants read that a jury had found the defendant negligent. Only defendant reprehensibility influenced punitive awards. Both plaintiff injury and defendant reprehensibility influenced compensatory awards. When individuals offered justifications and when corporations offered excuses, jurors awarded lower compensatory awards against low reprehensibility defendants than against high reprehensibility defendants. Negligence stipulations led to lower damage awards for individuals than for corporations. Additionally, concessions tended to produce lower awards when combined with a stipulation of negligence as opposed to a jury decision. These findings support the hypothesis that in cases in which the defendant is clearly negligent, circumstances exist in which stipulating negligence and offering an apologetic account will lead to reduced damage awards decisions. Results indicate that individual and corporate defendants offering justifications and refusals should first consider the reprehensibility of their actions. In a broader realm, findings demonstrate that the manner in which a jury perceives the explanation given by the defendant is dependent upon defendant characteristics and case-specific factors. ^

Map of the villages of Astoria (late Hallett's Cove) & Ravenswood, Long Island.

Shows landowners' names, tract/lot lines, street names, and buildings.