The role of probiotics in Helicobacter pylori infection

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is a major cause of chronic gastritis and peptic ulcer disease, and it is also designated as a class-I carcinogen for stomach cancer. The role of probiotics in the treatment of gastrointestinal infections is increasingly documented as an alternative or complement to antibiotics, with the potential to decrease the use of antibiotics or reduce their adverse effects. These studies were conducted to investigate the role of probiotics in the treatment of H. pylori infection. Various aspects included: an investigation of the effects of a probiotic combination consisting of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, L. rhamnosus LC705, Propionibacterium freudenreichii ssp. shermanii JS and Bifidobacterium breve Bb99 or B. lactis Bb12 as a supplementation to H. pylori eradication therapy, with special reference to tolerability, effectiveness, and microbiota alterations following the treatment; discovering the role of probiotics in vivo with H. pylori infected and uninfected patients, as well as with an in vitro model of H. pylori infection. The probiotic combination therapy was able to reduce significantly the total symptom score, which takes into account both the frequency and the severity of the adverse effects, during the eradication treatment. The supplementation did not improve the success of the eradication treatment significantly, though some difference was seen in the eradication percentages (91% vs. 79%). The quantities of predominant bacterial groups were altered significantly following the triple treatment. Probiotics slightly counteracted the effects of anti-H. pylori treatment, monitored as significantly less alterations in the total numbers of aerobes and lactobacilli/enterococci group bacteria. After probiotic intervention, L. rhamnosus GG adhered to a minority of the patients upper gastrointestinal mucosa, but all of the probiotics survived well through the gastrointestinal tract transit with and without antimicrobial treatment. Probiotic intervention decreased gastrin-17 levels in H. pylori infected patients and appeared to decrease the 13C-urea breath test values. In in vitro Caco-2 cell line experiments, probiotics inhibited H. pylori adhesion to intestinal epithelial cells. Both L. rhamnosus strains, P. freudenreichii ssp. shermanii JS and the combination inhibited the H. pylori-induced acute cell leakage. Simultaneously, both L.rhamnosus strains and the combination transiently improved the epithelial barrier function. The pro-inflammatory effects prevailed when the probiotics were used in combination. According to this series of studies, probiotic combination could have some potential in reducing adverse effects induced by H. pylori eradication treatment and beneficial effects on H. pylori infected subjects.

Esquema secuencial con moxifloxacina de primera línea en el tratamiento del helicobacter pylori: estudio piloto

INTRODUCCIÓN: El éxito de erradicación del H. pylori con las terapias convencionales ha disminuido a niveles inaceptables. Se buscan óptimos esquemas terapéuticos con excelentes tasas de erradicación. OBJETIVO: Cuantificar los desenlaces clínicos evaluados como efectividad, adherencia y seguridad, de una terapia secuencial de primera línea con Esomeprazol, Moxifloxacina, Amoxicilina y Tinidazol para la erradicación individual del H. pylori. METODOLOGÍA: Estudio prospectivo no controlado, piloto, abierto, único centro. Consecutivamente se incluirán adultos con prueba microbiológica positiva para H. pylori y síntomas dispépticos. Los pacientes recibirán un régimen de tratamiento de 10 días que consistirá los 5 primeros días de (Esomeprazol 40 mg, bd; Amoxicilina 1 g, bd). Del día 6 a 10 (Esomeprazol 40 mg, bd ; Tinidazol 500 mg, bd y Moxifloxacina 500 mg, bd). Se realizará una prueba de antígeno en materia fecal, para evaluar la efectividad terapéutica al menos a las 4 semanas de finalizar el tratamiento. RESULTADOS: 38 de 42 pacientes completaron el estudio. La tasa de erradicación fue de 87% (Intervalo de Confianza (IC) 95% (75,5 – 98,5%) en análisis por protocolo (PP), y 79% (IC) 95% (65 – 93%) en análisis por intención de tratar (ITT). La adherencia al tratamiento fue del 95% (40 pacientes), de los pacientes que ingresaron al estudio 48% presentaron al menos un efecto secundario menor principalmente diarrea y nauseas. CONCLUSIONES: Diez días de terapia secuencial basada en moxifloxacina proporciona tasas de erradicación óptimas, con una buena adherencia y efectos secundarios leves y transitorios.

Expressão gênica e proteica e cinética celular no processo inflamatório induzido pela Helicobacter pylori antese após terapia de erradicação

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

Efeito do tratamento da H. pylori na expressão de citocinas e microRNAs associados ao processo inflamatório

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

Medizinischer und gesundheitsökonomischer Nutzen der Untersuchung auf Helicobacter pylori-Besiedlung mittels 13C-Harnstoff-Atemtest in der Primärdiagnostik im Vergleich zu invasiven und nichtinvasiven diagnostischen Verfahren

Hintergrund: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) zählt trotz abnehmender Inzidenz zu den h��ufigsten bakteriellen Infektionskrankheiten des Menschen. Die Infektion mit H. pylori ist ein Risikofaktor für Krankheiten wie gastroduodenale Geschwüre, Magenkarzinomen und MALT (Mucosa Associated Lymphoid Tissue)-Lymphomen. Zur Diagnostik von H. pylori stehen verschiedene invasive und nichtinvasive Verfahren zur Verfügung. Der 13C-Harnstoff-Atemtest wird zur Kontrolle einer Eradikationstherapie empfohlen, kommt in der Primärdiagnostik von H. pylori derzeit jedoch nicht standardmäßig in Deutschland zum Einsatz. Fragestellung: Welchen medizinischen und gesundheitsökonomischen Nutzen hat die Untersuchung auf H. pylori-Besiedlung mittels 13C-Harnstoff-Atemtest in der Primärdiagnostik im Vergleich zu invasiven und nichtinvasiven diagnostischen Verfahren? Methodik: Basierend auf einer systematischen Literaturrecherche in Verbindung mit einer Handsuche werden Studien zur Testgüte und Kosten-Effektivität des 13C-Harnstoff-Atemtests im Vergleich zu anderen diagnostischen Verfahren zum primären Nachweis von H. pylori identifiziert. Es werden nur medizinische Studien eingeschlossen, die den 13C-Harnstoff-Atemtest direkt mit anderen H. pylori-Testverfahren vergleichen. Goldstandard ist eines oder eine Kombination der biopsiebasierten Testverfahren. Für die gesundheitsökonomische Beurteilung werden nur vollständige gesundheitsökonomische Evaluationsstudien einbezogen, bei denen die Kosten-Effektivität des 13C Harnstoff-Atemtests direkt mit anderen H. pylori-Testverfahren verglichen wird. Ergebnisse: Es werden 30 medizinische Studien für den vorliegenden Bericht eingeschlossen. Im Vergleich zum Immunglobulin G (IgG)-Test ist die Sensitivität des 13C-Harnstoff-Atemtests zwölfmal h��her, sechsmal niedriger und einmal gleich, und die Spezifität 13-mal h��her, dreimal niedriger und zweimal gleich. Im Vergleich zum Stuhl-Antigen-Test ist die Sensitivität des 13C-Harnstoff-Atemtests neunmal h��her, dreimal niedriger und einmal gleich, und die Spezifität neunmal h��her, zweimal niedriger und zweimal gleich. Im Vergleich zum Urease-Schnelltest sind die Sensitivität des 13C-Harnstoff-Atemtests viermal h��her, dreimal niedriger und viermal gleich und die Spezifität fünfmal h��her, fünfmal niedriger und einmal gleich. Im Vergleich mit der Histologie ist die Sensitivität des 13C-Harnstoff-Atemtests einmal h��her und zweimal niedriger und die Spezifität zweimal h��her und einmal niedriger. In je einem Vergleich zeigt sich kein Unterschied zwischen 13C-Harnstoff-Atemtest und 14C-Harnstoff-Atemtest, sowie eine niedrigere Sensitivität und h��here Spezifität im Vergleich zur Polymerase-Kettenreaktion (PCR). Inwieweit die beschriebenen Unterschiede statistisch signifikant sind, wird in sechs der 30 Studien angegeben. Es werden neun gesundheitsökonomische Evaluationen in dem vorliegenden Bericht berücksichtigt. Die Test-and-Treat-Strategie mittels 13C-Harnstoff-Atemtest wird in sechs Studien mit einem Test-and-Treat-Verfahren auf Basis der Serologie sowie in drei Studien mit einem Test-and-Treat-Verfahren auf Basis des Stuhl-Antigen-Tests verglichen. Dabei ist das Atemtestverfahren dreimal kosteneffektiv gegenüber der serologischen Methode und wird von der Stuhl-Antigen-Test-Strategie einmal dominiert. Vier Studien beinhalten einen Vergleich der Test-and -Treat-Strategie auf Basis des 13C-Harnstoff-Atemtests mit einer empirischen antisekretorischen Therapie, wobei sich das Atemtesverfahren zweimal als kosteneffektive Prozedur erweist und zwei Studien einen Vergleich mit einer empirischen Eradikationstherapie. In fünf Studien wird das Test-and-Treat-Verfahren mittels 13C-Harnstoff-Atemtest einer endoskopiebasierten Strategie gegenübergestellt. Zweimal dominiert die Atemteststrategie die endoskopische Prozedur und einmal wird sie von dieser Strategie dominiert. Diskussion:Sowohl die medizinischen als auch die ökonomischen Studien weisen mehr oder minder gravierende Mängel auf und liefern heterogene Ergebnisse. So werden in der Mehrzahl der medizinischen Studien keine Angaben zur statistischen Signifikanz der berichteten Unterschiede zwischen den jeweiligen Testverfahren gemacht. Im direkten Vergleich weist der 13C-Harnstoff-Atemtest überwiegend eine h��here Testgüte als der IgG und der Stuhl-Antigen-Test auf. Aus den Vergleichen mit dem Urease-Schnelltest lassen sich keine Tendenzen bezüglich der Sensitivität ableiten, wohingegen die Spezifität des 13C-Harnstoff-Atemtests h��her einzusch��tzen ist. Für die Vergleiche des 13C-Harnstoff-Atemtest mit der Histologie, dem 14C-Harnstoff-Atemtest und der PCR liegen zu wenige Ergebnisse vor. In der eingeschlossenen ökonomischen Literatur deuten einige Studienergebnisse auf eine Kosten-Effektivität der Test-and-Treat-Strategie mittels 13C-Harnstoff-Atemtest gegenüber dem Test-and-Treat-Verfahren auf Basis der Serologie und der empirischen antiskretorischen Therapie hin. Um Tendenzen bezüglich der Kosten-Effektivität der Atemteststrategie gegenüber der Test-and-Treat-Strategie mittels Stuhl-Antigen-Test sowie der empirischen Eradikationstherapie abzuleiten, mangelt es an validen Ergebnissen bzw. ökonomischer Evidenz. Die Untersuchungsresultate hinsichtlich eines Vergleichs mit endoskopiebasierten Verfahren fallen diesbezüglich zu heterogen aus. Insgesamt kann keines der ökonomischen Modelle der Komplexität des Managements von Patienten mit dyspeptischen Beschwerden gänzlich gerecht werden. Schlussfolgerungen/Empfehlungen: Zusammenfassend ist festzuhalten, dass die Studienlage zur medizinischen und ökonomischen Beurteilung des 13C-Harnstoff-Atemtests im Vergleich zu anderen diagnostischen Methoden nicht ausreichend ist, um den Atemtest als primärdiagnostisches Standardverfahren im Rahmen einer Test-and-Treat-Strategie beim Management von Patienten mit dyspeptischen Beschwerden für die deutsche Versorgungslandschaft insbesondere vor dem Hintergrund der Leitlinien der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS) anstelle einer endoskopiebasierten Methode zu empfehlen.

Primary Antibiotic Resistance to Helicobacter pylori Strains Isolated From Children in Northern Iran: A Single Center Study

Background: Initial resistance to antibiotics is the main reason for the failure of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication in children. Objectives: As we commonly face high antibiotic resistance rates in children, we aimed to determine the susceptibility of H. pylori to common antibiotics. Patients and Methods: In this cross-sectional in vitro study, 169 children younger than 14 years with clinical diagnosis of peptic ulcer underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Biopsy specimens from stomach and duodenum were cultured. In isolated colonies, tests of catalase, urease, and oxidase as well as gram staining were performed. After confirming the colonies as H. pylori, the antibiogram was obtained using disk diffusion method. Results: Culture for H. pylori was positive in 12.3% of the specimens, urease test in 21.3%, serological test in 18.9% and stool antigen test was positive in 21.9%. We could show high specificity but moderate sensitivity of both histological and H. pylori stool antigen tests to detect H. pylori. The overall susceptibility to metronidazole was 42.9%, amoxicillin 95.2%, clarithromycin 85.7%, furazolidone 61.9%, azithromycin 81.0%, and tetracycline 76.2% with the highest resistance to metronidazole and the lowest to clarithromycin. Conclusions: In our region, there is high resistance of H. pylori to some antibiotics including metronidazole and furazolidone among affected children. To reduce the prevalence of this antibiotic resistance, more controlled use of antibiotics should be considered in children.

Diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline

This Guideline is an official statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). It addresses the diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (NVUGIH). Main Recommendations MR1. ESGE recommends immediate assessment of hemodynamic status in patients who present with acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (UGIH), with prompt intravascular volume replacement initially using crystalloid fluids if hemodynamic instability exists (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). MR2. ESGE recommends a restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategy that aims for a target hemoglobin between 7 g/dL and 9 g/dL. A higher target hemoglobin should be considered in patients with significant co-morbidity (e. g., ischemic cardiovascular disease) (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). MR3. ESGE recommends the use of the Glasgow-Blatchford Score (GBS) for pre-endoscopy risk stratification. Outpatients determined to be at very low risk, based upon a GBS score of 0 - 1, do not require early endoscopy nor hospital admission. Discharged patients should be informed of the risk of recurrent bleeding and be advised to maintain contact with the discharging hospital (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). MR4. ESGE recommends initiating high dose intravenous proton pump inhibitors (PPI), intravenous bolus followed by continuous infusion (80 mg then 8 mg/hour), in patients presenting with acute UGIH awaiting upper endoscopy. However, PPI infusion should not delay the performance of early endoscopy (strong recommendation, high quality evidence). MR5. ESGE does not recommend the routine use of nasogastric or orogastric aspiration/lavage in patients presenting with acute UGIH (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). MR6. ESGE recommends intravenous erythromycin (single dose, 250 mg given 30 - 120 minutes prior to upper gastrointestinal [GI] endoscopy) in patients with clinically severe or ongoing active UGIH. In selected patients, pre-endoscopic infusion of erythromycin significantly improves endoscopic visualization, reduces the need for second-look endoscopy, decreases the number of units of blood transfused, and reduces duration of hospital stay (strong recommendation, high quality evidence). MR7. Following hemodynamic resuscitation, ESGE recommends early (≤ 24 hours) upper GI endoscopy. Very early (< 12 hours) upper GI endoscopy may be considered in patients with high risk clinical features, namely: hemodynamic instability (tachycardia, hypotension) that persists despite ongoing attempts at volume resuscitation; in-hospital bloody emesis/nasogastric aspirate; or contraindication to the interruption of anticoagulation (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). MR8. ESGE recommends that peptic ulcers with spurting or oozing bleeding (Forrest classification Ia and Ib, respectively) or with a nonbleeding visible vessel (Forrest classification IIa) receive endoscopic hemostasis because these lesions are at high risk for persistent bleeding or rebleeding (strong recommendation, high quality evidence). MR9. ESGE recommends that peptic ulcers with an adherent clot (Forrest classification IIb) be considered for endoscopic clot removal. Once the clot is removed, any identified underlying active bleeding (Forrest classification Ia or Ib) or nonbleeding visible vessel (Forrest classification IIa) should receive endoscopic hemostasis (weak recommendation, moderate quality evidence). MR10. In patients with peptic ulcers having a flat pigmented spot (Forrest classification IIc) or clean base (Forrest classification III), ESGE does not recommend endoscopic hemostasis as these stigmata present a low risk of recurrent bleeding. In selected clinical settings, these patients may be discharged to home on standard PPI therapy, e. g., oral PPI once-daily (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). MR11. ESGE recommends that epinephrine injection therapy not be used as endoscopic monotherapy. If used, it should be combined with a second endoscopic hemostasis modality (strong recommendation, high quality evidence). MR12. ESGE recommends PPI therapy for patients who receive endoscopic hemostasis and for patients with adherent clot not receiving endoscopic hemostasis. PPI therapy should be high dose and administered as an intravenous bolus followed by continuous infusion (80 mg then 8 mg/hour) for 72 hours post endoscopy (strong recommendation, high quality evidence). MR13. ESGE does not recommend routine second-look endoscopy as part of the management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (NVUGIH). However, in patients with clinical evidence of rebleeding following successful initial endoscopic hemostasis, ESGE recommends repeat upper endoscopy with hemostasis if indicated. In the case of failure of this second attempt at hemostasis, transcatheter angiographic embolization (TAE) or surgery should be considered (strong recommendation, high quality evidence). MR14. In patients with NVUGIH secondary to peptic ulcer, ESGE recommends investigating for the presence of Helicobacter pylori in the acute setting with initiation of appropriate antibiotic therapy when H. pylori is detected. Re-testing for H. pylori should be performed in those patients with a negative test in the acute setting. Documentation of successful H. pylori eradication is recommended (strong recommendation, high quality evidence). MR15. In patients receiving low dose aspirin for secondary cardiovascular prophylaxis who develop peptic ulcer bleeding, ESGE recommends aspirin be resumed immediately following index endoscopy if the risk of rebleeding is low (e. g., FIIc, FIII). In patients with high risk peptic ulcer (FIa, FIb, FIIa, FIIb), early reintroduction of aspirin by day 3 after index endoscopy is recommended, provided that adequate hemostasis has been established (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence).

Randomised controlled trial of effects of Helicobacter pylori infection and its eradication on heartburn and gastro-oesophageal reflux: the bristol helicobacter project

Objectives To investigate the effects of Helicobacter pylori infection and its eradication on heartburn and gastro-oesophageal reflux. Design Cross sectional study, followed by a randomised placebo controlled trial. Setting Seven general practices in Bristol, England. Participants 10 537 people, aged 20-59 years, with and without H pylori infection (determined by the 13C-urea breath test). Main outcome measures Prevalence of heartburn and gastro-oesophageal acid reflux at baseline and two years after treatment to eradicate H pylori infection. Results At baseline, H pylori infection was associated with increased prevalence of heartburn (odds ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.23) but not reflux (1.05, 0.97 to 1.14). In participants with H pylori infection, active treatment had no effect on the overall prevalence of heartburn (0.99, 0.88 to 1.12) or reflux (1.04, 0.91 to 1.19) and did not improve pre-existing symptoms of heartburn or reflux. Conclusions H pylori infection is associated with a slightly increased prevalence of heartburn but not reflux. Treatment to eradicate H pylori has no net benefit in patients with heartburn or gastro-oesophageal reflux

Gastric corpus atrophy following eradication of Helicobacter pylori

Atrophic gastritis can develop in patients with Helicobacter pylori infection leading to a reduction in basal acid output. Whether the atrophy that develops is reversible is controversial.

Stool antigen testing for the diagnosis and confirmation of eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection

No Abstract

New aspects of the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection

Aims: Helicobacter pylori infection, although the prevalence is declining in Western world, is still responsible for several clinically important diseases. None of the diagnostic tests is perfect and in this study, the performance of three stool antigen tests was assessed. In areas of high H. pylori prevalence, the definition of patients with the greatest benefit from eradication therapy may be a problem; the role of duodenal gastric metaplasia in categorizing patients at risk for duodenal ulcer was evaluated in this respect. Whether persistent chronic inflammation and elevated H. pylori antibodies after successful eradication are associated with each other or with atrophic gastritis, a long term sequelae of H. pylori infection, were also studied. Patients and methods: The three stool antigen tests were assessed in pre- and post-eradication settings among 364 subjects in two studies as compared to the rapid urease test (RUT), histology, culture, the 13C-urea breath test (UBT) and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) based H. pylori serology. The association between duodenal gastric metaplasia with duodenal ulcer was evaluated in a retrospective study including 1054 patients gastroscopied due to clinical indications and 154 patients previously operated for duodenal ulcer. The extent of duodenal gastric metaplasia was assessed from histological specimens in different patient groups formed on the basis of gastroscopy findings and H. pylori infection. Chronic gastric inflammation (108 patients) and H. pylori antibodies and serum markers for atrophy (77 patients) were assessed in patients earlier treated for H. pylori. Results: Of the stool antigen tests studied, the monoclonal antibody-based EIA-test showed the highest sensitivity and specificity both in the pre-treatment setting (96.9% and 95.9%) and after therapy (96.9% and 97.8%). The polyclonal stool antigen test and the in-office test had at baseline a sensitivity of 91% and 94%, and a specificity of 96% and 89%, respectively and in a post-treatment setting, a sensitivity of 78% and 91%, and a specificity of 97%, respectively. Duodenal gastric metaplasia was strongly associated with H. pylori positive duodenal ulcer (odds ratio 42). Although common still five years after eradication, persistent chronic gastric inflammation (21%) and elevated H. pylori antibodies (33%) were neither associated with each other nor with atrophic gastritis. Conclusions: Current H. pylori infection can feasibly be diagnosed by a monoclonal antibody-based EIA test with the accuracy comparable to that of reference methods. The performance of the polyclonal test as compared to the monoclonal test was inferior especially in the post-treatment setting. The in-office test had a low specificity for primary diagnosis and hence positive test results should probably be confirmed with another test before eradication therapy is prescribed. The presence of widespread duodenal gastric metaplasia showed promising results in detecting patients who should be treated for H. pylori due to an increased risk of duodenal ulcer. If serology is used later on in patients with earlier successfully treated for H. pylori, it should be taken into account that H. pylori antibodies may persist elevated for years for unknown reason. However, this phenomenon was not found to be associated with persistent chronic inflammation or atrophic changes.