948 resultados para Great Britain. Royal Commission on Land in Wales and Monmouthshire.


Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The larger part bear dates 1782-1783.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

No record of other volumes published by the society.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Edited by J. Gwenogvryn Evans.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

v. 1. Berwick-upon-Tweed, Burford and Lostwithiel corporations; the counties of Wilts and Worcester; the Bishop of Chichester; and the deans and chapters of Chichester, Canterbury and Salisbury.--v. 2. Sir George Wombwell, the Duke of Norfolk, Lord Edmund Talbot, Miss Buxton, Mrs. Harford and Mrs. Wentworth of Woolley.--v. 3. T.B. Clarke-Thornhill, esq., Sir T. Barrett-Lennard, bart., Pelham R. Papillon, esq., and W. Cleverly Alexander, esq.--v. 4. Bishop of Salisbury; Bishop of Exeter, dean and chapter of Exeter; Earl of Leicester; Sir William Clayton, bart.; Major Money-Kyrle; F.H.T. Jervoise, esq.; Glemham hall; corporations of Salisbury, Orford and Aldeburgh.--v. 5. Col. Mordaunt-Hay, of Duns castle; Sir Archibald Edmonstone, of Duntreath; Sir John James Graham, of Fintry, K.C.M.G.--v. 6. Miss M. Eyre Matcham; Captain H.V. Knox; Cornwallis Wykeham-Martin, esq.; K.B. Tighe, esq.; Lord Oranmore and Brown.--v. 7. The Bishop of London; St. George's chapel, Windsor; diocese of Gloucester; corporations of Beccles, Dunwich, Southwold and Thetford; Duke of Norfolk; Earl of essex; Sir Hervey Bruce, Col. Frewen, H.C. Staunton, esq., and F. Merttens, esq.; S. Philip Unwin, esq.--v. 8. The Hon. Frederick Lindley Wood; M.L.S. Clements, esq.; S. Philip Unwin, esq.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

This paper examines the evolution of public rights of access to private land in England and Wales. Since the Eighteenth Century the administration and protection of these rights has been though a form of public/private partnership in which the judiciary, while maintaining the dominance of private property, have safeguarded de facto public access by refusing consistently to punish simple trespass. While this situation has been modified, principally by post-World War II legislation, to allow for some formalisation of access arrangements and consequent compensation to landowners in areas of high recreational pressure and low legal accessibility, recent policy initiatives suggest that the balance of the partnership has now shifted in favour of landowners. In particular, the new access payment schemes, developed by the UK Government in response to the European Commission's Agri-Environment Regulations, identify the landowner as the beneficiary of the partnership, financed by tax revenue and justified on the spurious basis of improved 'access provision'. As such the State, as the former upholder of citizen rights, now assumes the duplicitous position of underwriting private property ownership through the commodification of access, while proclaiming a significant improvement in citizens' access rights.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

McMillan, chairman