Plant pathogens as suppressors of host defense

This chapter reviews our current knowledge about mechanisms of suppression developed by pathogens to avoid host defense responses. In general, plants perceive pathogens by diverse pathogen- or microbe- or even damage-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs, MAMPs, DAMPs) and induce a variety of defense mechanisms referred to as horizontal or basal resistance, nowadays designated PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI). In addition, plants can also recognize specific pathogen-derived effectors and have derived a highly specific defense response termed effector-triggered immunity (ETI), classically called R gene-mediated, specific or vertical resistance. Both PTI and ETI are responses to potential dangers and have common components. Fungal, oomycete, and bacterial pathogens have evolved various effector-based mechanisms of suppression that interfere with such components. Plants strongly depend on RNA gene silencing to interfere with viral pathogens. Plant viruses counteract this response by encoding suppressor proteins of RNA silencing.

Studies on Estradiol, growth hormone, and suppressors of cytokine signalling-2, and the influence in liver metabolism

Programa de doctorado: Clínica Veterinaria e Investigación Terapéutica

Tumour suppressors in liver carcinogenesis

The circuitous cell signalling pathways of hepatocytes comprise several factors that operate to downgrade or even interrupt the transmission of a given signal. These down-regulating influences are essential to keep cell proliferation and cell survival in check and if impaired, can alter a delicate balance in favour of cell proliferation. Each signalling pathway that has been implicated in carcinogenesis is influenced by both oncogenic factors that promote tumour growth when activated as well as tumour suppressor proteins that have to be impaired to favour tumour growth. This summary of the Tumour Suppressors in Liver Carcinogenesis Symposium held at the 2007 EASL Annual Meeting discusses four pathways with pre-eminent tumour suppressor activity, each involved in hepatocarcinogenesis: p53, mTOR, beta-catenin and hedgehog.

PU.1 binding to the p53 family of tumor suppressors impairs their transcriptional activity

The transcription factor PU.1 is essential for terminal myeloid differentiation, B- and T-cell development, erythropoiesis and hematopoietic stem cell maintenance. PU.1 functions as oncogene in Friend virus-induced erythroleukemia and as tumor suppressor in acute myeloid leukemias. Moreover, Friend virus-induced erythroleukemia requires maintenance of PU.1 expression and the disruption of p53 function greatly accelerates disease progression. It has been hypothesized that p53-mediated expression of the p21(Cip1) cell cycle inhibitor during differentiation of pre-erythroleukemia cells promotes selection against p53 function. In addition to the blockage of erythroblast differentiation provided by increased levels of PU.1, we propose that PU.1 alters p53 function. We demonstrate that PU.1 reduces the transcriptional activity of the p53 tumor suppressor family and thus inhibits activation of genes important for cell cycle regulation and apoptosis. Inhibition is mediated through binding of PU.1 to the DNA-binding and/or oligomerization domains of p53/p73 proteins. Lastly, knocking down endogenous PU.1 in p53 wild-type REH B-cell precursor leukemia cells leads to increased expression of the p53 target p21(Cip1).

NEW TARGET GENES FOR TUMOR SUPPRESSORS p53 AND p73 IN REGENERATING LIVER

The p53-family of proteins regulates expression of target genes during tissue development and differentiation. Within the p53-family, p53 and p73 have hepatic-specific functions in development and tumor suppression. Despite a growing list of p53/p73 target genes, very few of these have been studied in vivo, and the knowledge regarding functions of p53 and p73 in normal tissues remains limited. p53+/-p73+/- mice develop hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), whereas overexpression of p53 in human HCC leads to tumor regression. However, the mechanism of p53/p73 function in liver remains poorly characterized. Here, the model of mouse liver regeneration is used to identify new target genes for p53/p73 in normal quiescent vs. proliferating cells. In response to surgical removal of ~2/3 of liver mass (partial hepatectomy, PH), the remaining hepatocytes exit G0 of cell cycle and undergo proliferation to reestablish liver mass. The hypothesis tested in this work is that p53/p73 functions in cell cycle arrest, apoptosis and senescence are repressed during liver regeneration, and reactivated at the end of the regenerative response. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), with a p73-antibody, was used to probe arrayed genomic sequences (ChIP-chip) and uncover 158 potential targets of p73-regulation in normal liver. Global microarray analysis of mRNA levels, at T=0-48h following PH, revealed sets of genes that change expression during regeneration. Eighteen p73-bound genes changed expression after PH. Four of these genes, Foxo3, Jak1, Pea15, and Tuba1 have p53 response elements (p53REs), identified in silico within the upstream regulatory region. Forkhead transcription factor Foxo3 is the most responsive gene among transcription factors with altered expression during regenerative, cellular proliferation. p53 and p73 bind a Foxo3 p53RE and maintain active expression in quiescent liver. During liver regeneration, binding of p53 and p73, recruitment of acetyltransferase p300, and an active chromatin structure of Foxo3 are disrupted, alongside loss of Foxo3 expression. These parameters of Foxo3 regulation are reestablished at completion of liver growth and regeneration, supporting a temporary suspension of p53 and p73 regulatory functions in normal cells during tissue regeneration.

NHERF1 recruits the tumor suppressors PTEN and PHLPP to synergistically inhibit the PI-3K pathway

Glioblastoma multiforme is the most common form of brain cancer that presents patients with a poor prognosis that has remained unchanged over the past few decades. The tumor suppressor phosphatase PTEN antagonizes one of the major oncogenic pathways involved in the progression of glioblastoma, and is frequently deleted in this cancer type. Contrary to our expectations, we found that most glioblastoma cells expressing endogenous PTEN also harbor basal PI-3K/AKT activation mainly attributable to impaired PTEN membrane localization. This alteration correlated with a shift of the adaptor protein NHERF1, which contributes to PTEN membrane recruitment in normal cells, from the membrane to the cytoplasm. In cells expressing membrane-localized NHERF1, only simultaneous PTEN and NHERF1 depletion achieved AKT activation, suggesting the involvement of additional PI-3K/AKT suppressor regulated by NHERF1. We identified these novel interactors of NHERF1 as the PHLPP1 and PHLPP2 phosphatases. ^ NHERF1 directly interacted and recruited both PHLPP proteins to the membrane and, through both NHERF1 PDZ domains, assembled ternary complexes consisting of PTEN-NHERF1-PHLPP. Only simultaneous depletion of PTEN and PHLPP1 significantly activated AKT and increased proliferation in cells with membrane-localized NHERF1. Analysis of glioblastoma human tumors revealed frequent loss of membrane-localized NHERF1. On the other hand, targeting of NHERF1 to the membrane achieved suppression of AKT and cell proliferation. Our findings reveal a novel mechanism for PI-3K/AKT regulation by the synergistic cooperation between two important tumor suppressors, PTEN and PHLPP, via the scaffold protein NHERF1. ^

Regulation of {\it neu\/} gene expression by the simian virus 40 large T antigen and tumor suppressors Rb and p53

The neu gene (also c-erbB-2 or HER2) encodes a 185 kilodalton protein that is frequently overexpressed in breast, ovarian and non-small cell lung cancers. Study of the regulation of neu indicates that neu gene expression can be modulated by c-myc or by the adenovirus 5 E1a gene product. This study demonstrates that the transforming protein, large T antigen, of the simian virus 40 represses neu promoter activity. Repression of neu by large T antigen is mediated through the region $-$172 to $-$79 (relative to first ATG) of the neu promoter--unlike through $-$312 to $-$172 for c-myc or E1a. This suggests a different pathway for repression of neu by large T antigen. The 10 amino acid region of large T required for binding the tumor suppressor, retinoblastoma gene product, Rb, is not necessary for repression of neu. Moreover, the tumor suppressors, Rb and p53 can independently inhibit neu promoter activity. Rb inhibits neu through a 10 base pair G-rich enhancer (GTG element) ($-$243 to $-$234) and also through regions close to transcription initiation sites ($-$172 to $-$79). Mutant Rb unable to complex large T is able to repress the region close to transcription initiation but not the GTG enhancer. Thus, Rb inhibits the two regulatory domains of the neu gene by different mechanisms. Both Rb and p53 can repress the transforming activity of activated neu in focus forming assays. These data provide evidence that tumor suppressors regulate expression of growth stimulatory genes such as neu. Therefore, one reason for the overexpression of neu that is frequently seen in breast cancer cells may be due to functional inactivation of Rb and p53 which is also a common occurrence in breast cancer cells. ^

Caracterización funcional de los genes sgb (suppressors of agb1-2 susceptibility to pathogens): Nuevos reguladores de la respuesta de inmunidad innata de Arabidopsis thaliana

Un porcentaje importante de las pérdidas de la producción agrícola se deben a las enfermedades que causan en los cultivos los hongos necrótrofos y vasculares. Para mejorar la productividad agrícola es necesario tener un conocimiento detallado de las bases genéticas y moleculares que regulan la resistencia de las plantas a este tipo de patógenos. En Arabidopsis thaliana la resistencia frente a patógenos necrótrofos, como el hongo Plectosphaerella cucumerina BMM (PcBMM), es genéticamente compleja y depende de la activación coordinada de distintas rutas de señalización, como las reguladas por las hormonas ácido salicílico (SA), ácido jasmónico (JA), etileno (ET) y ácido abscísico (ABA), así como de la síntesis de compuestos antimicrobianos derivados del Triptófano y de la integridad de la pared celular (Llorente et al., 2005, Hernández-Blanco et al., 2007; Delgado-Cerezo et al., 2012). Uno de los componentes claves en la regulación de la resistencia de las plantas a patógenos (incluidos hongos necrótrofos y biótrofos) es la proteína G heterotrimérica, un complejo proteico formado por tres subunidades (Gα, Gβ y Gγ), que también regula distintos procesos del desarrollo vegetal. En Arabidopsis hay un gen que codifica para la subunidad α (GPA1), otro para la β (AGB1), y tres genes para la subunidad γ (AGG1, AGG2 y AGG3). El complejo GPA1-AGB1-AGG (1-3) se activa y disocia tras la percepción de una señal específica, actuando el dímero AGB1-AGG1/2 como un monómero funcional que regula las respuestas de defensa (Delgado-Cerezo et al., 2012). Estudios transcriptómicos y análisis bioquímicos de la pared celular en los que se comparaban los mutantes agb1-2 y agg1 agg2, y plantas silvestres (Col-0) revelaron que la resistencia mediada por Gβ-Gγ1/2 no es dependiente de rutas de defensa previamente caracterizadas, y sugieren que la proteína G podría modular la composición/estructura (integridad) de la pared celular (Delgado-Cerezo et al., 2012). Recientemente, se ha demostrado que AGB1 es un componente fundamental de la respuesta inmune mediada por Pathogen- Associated Molecular Patterns (PTI), ya que los mutantes agb1-2 son incapaces de activar tras el tratamiento con PAMPs respuestas de inmunidad, como la producción de especies reactivas de oxígeno (ROS; Liu et al., 2013). Dada la importancia de la proteína G heterotrimérica en la regulación de la respuestas de defensa (incluida la PTI) realizamos un escrutinio de mutantes supresores de la susceptibilidad de agb1-2 al hongo necrótrofo, PcBMM, para identificar componentes adicionales de las rutas de señalización reguladas por AGB1. En este escrutinio se aislaron cuatro mutantes sgb (suppressors of agb1-2 susceptibility to pathogens), dos de los cuales, sgb10 y sgb11, se han caracterizado en la presente Tesis Doctoral. El mutante sgb10 es un segundo alelo nulo del gen MKP1 (At3g55270) que codifica la MAP quinasa-fosfatasa 1 (Bartels et al., 2009). Este mutante presenta lesiones espontáneas en plantas adultas y una activación constitutiva de las principales rutas de defensa (SA, JA y ET, y de metabolitos secundarios, como la camalexina), que explicaría su elevada resistencia a PcBMM y Pseudomonas syringae. Estudios epistáticos sugieren que la resistencia mediada por SGB10 no es dependiente, si no complementaria a la regulada por AGB1. El mutante sgb10 es capaz de restablecer en agb1-2 la producción de ROS y otras respuestas PTI (fosforilación de las MAPK6/3/4/11) tras el tratamiento con PAMPs tan diversos como flg22, elf18 y quitina, lo que demuestra el papel relevante de SGB10/MKP1 y de AGB1 en PTI. El mutante sgb11 se caracteriza por presentar un fenotipo similar a los mutantes irregular xylem (e.g. irx1) afectado en pared celular secundaria: irregularidades en las células xilemáticas, reducción en el tamaño de la roseta y altura de planta, y hojas con un mayor contenido de clorofila. La resistencia de sgb11 a PcBMM es independiente de agb1-2, ya que la susceptibilidad del doble mutante sgb11 agb1-2 es intermedia entre la de agb1-2 y sgb11. El mutante sgb11 no revierte la deficiente PTI de agb1-2 tras el tratamiento con flg22, lo que indica que está alterado en una ruta distinta de la regulada por SGB10. sgb11 presenta una sobreactivación de la ruta del ácido abscísico (ABA), lo que podría explicar su resistencia a PcBMM. La mutación sgb11 ha sido cartografiada en el cromosoma III de Arabidopsis entre los marcadores AthFUS6 (81,64cM) y nga6 (86,41cM) en un intervalo de aproximadamente 200 kb, que comprende genes, entre los que no se encuentra ninguno previamente descrito como IRX. El aislamiento y caracterización de SGB11 apoya la relevancia de la proteína G heterotrimérica en la regulación de la interconexión entre integridad de la pared celular e inmunidad. ABSTRACT A significant percentage of agricultural losses are due to diseases caused by necrotrophic and vascular fungi. To enhance crop yields is necessary to have a detailed knowledge of the genetic and molecular bases regulating plant resistance to these pathogens. Arabidopsis thaliana resistance to necrotrophic pathogens, such as Plectosphaerella cucumerina BMM (PcBMM) fungus, is genetically complex and depends on the coordinated activation of various signaling pathways. These include those regulated by salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA), ethylene (ET) and abscisic acid (ABA) hormones and the synthesis of tryptophan-derived antimicrobial compounds and cell wall integrity (Llorente et al., 2005, Hernández-Blanco et al., 2007; Delgado-Cerezo et al., 2012). One key component in the regulation of plant resistance to pathogens (including biotrophic and necrotrophic fungi) is the heterotrimeric G-protein. This protein complex is formed by three subunits (Gα, Gβ and Gγ), which also regulates various plant developmental processes. In Arabidopsis only one gene encodes for subunits α (GPA1) and β (AGB1), and three genes for subunit γ (AGG1, AGG2 y AGG3). The complex GPA1- AGB1-AGG(1-3) is activated and dissociates after perception of an specific signal, AGB1- AGG1/2 acts as a functional monomer regulating defense responses (Delgado-Cerezo et al., 2012). Comparative transcriptomic studies and biochemical analyses of the cell wall of agb1-2 and agg1agg2 mutant and wild plants (Col-0), showed that Gβ-Gγ1/2-mediated resistance is not dependent on previously characterized defense pathways. In addition, it suggests that G protein may modulate the composition/structure (integrity) of the plant cell wall (Delgado-Cerezo et al., 2012). Recently, it has been shown that AGB1 is a critical component of the immune response mediated by Pathogen-Associated Molecular Patterns (PTI), as agb1-2 mutants are unable to activate immune responses such as oxygen reactive species (ROS) production after PAMPs treatment (Liu et al., 2013). Considering the importance of the heterotrimeric G protein in regulation of defense responses (including PTI), we performed a screening for suppressors of agb1-2 susceptibility to the necrotrophic fungus PcBMM. This would allow the identification of additional components of the signaling pathways regulated by AGB1. In this search four sgb mutants (suppressors of agb1-2 susceptibility to pathogens) were isolated, two of which, sgb10 and sgb11, have been characterized in this PhD thesis. sgb10 mutant is a second null allele of MKP1 gene (At3g55270), which encodes the MAP kinase-phosphatase 1 (Bartels et al., 2009). This mutant exhibits spontaneous lesions in adult plants and a constitutive activation of the main defense pathways (SA, JA and ET, and secondary metabolites, such as camalexin), which explains its high resistance to Pseudomonas syringae and PcBMM. Epistatic studies suggest that SGB10- mediated resistance is not dependent, but complementary to the regulated by AGB1. The sgb10 mutant is able to restore agb1-2 ROS production and other PTI responses (MAPK6/3/4/11 phosphorylation) upon treatment with PAMPs as diverse as, flg22, elf18 and chitin, demonstrating the relevant role of SGB10/MKP1 and AGB1 in PTI. sgb11 mutant is characterized by showing a similar phenotype to irregular xylem mutants (e.g. irx1), affected in secondary cell wall: irregular xylems cells, rosette size reduction and plant height, and higher chlorophyll content on leaves. The resistance of sgb11 to PcBMM is independent of agb1-2, as susceptibility of the double mutant agb1-2sgb11 is intermediate between agb1-2 and sgb11. The sgb11 mutant does not revert the deficient PTI response in agb1-2 after flg22 treatment, indicating that is altered in a pathway different to the one regulated by SGB10. sgb11 presents an over-activation of the abscisic acid pathway (ABA), which could explain its resistance to PcBMM. The sgb11 mutation has been mapped on chromosome III of Arabidopsis, between AthFUS6 (81.64 cM) and nga6 (86.41 cM) markers, in 200 kb interval, which does not include previously known IRX genes. The isolation and characterization of SGB11 supports the importance of heterotrimeric G protein in the regulation of the interconnection between the cell wall integrity and immunity.

Developmental signal transduction pathways uncovered by genetic suppressors

We have found conditions for saturation mutagenesis by restriction enzyme mediated integration that result in plasmid tagging of disrupted genes. Using this method we selected for mutations in genes that act at checkpoints downstream of the intercellular signaling system that controls encapsulation in Dictyostelium discoideum. One of these genes, mkcA, is a member of the mitogen-activating protein kinase cascade family while the other, regA, is a novel bipartite gene homologous to response regulators in one part and to cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases in the other part. Disruption of either of these genes results in partial suppression of the block to spore formation resulting from the loss of the prestalk genes, tagB and tagC. The products of the tag genes have conserved domains of serine proteases attached to ATP-driven transporters, suggesting that they process and export peptide signals. Together, these genes outline an intercellular communication system that coordinates organismal shape with cellular differentiation during development.

The conserved SOCS box motif in suppressors of cytokine signaling binds to elongins B and C and may couple bound proteins to proteasomal degradation

The suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS) family of proteins act as intracellular inhibitors of several cytokine signal transduction pathways. Their expression is induced by cytokine activation of the Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) pathway and they act as a negative feedback loop by subsequently inhibiting the JAK/STAT pathway either by direct interaction with activated JAKs or with the receptors. These interactions are mediated at least in part by the SH2 domain of SOCS proteins but these proteins also contain a highly conserved C-terminal homology domain termed the SOCS box. Here we show that the SOCS box mediates interactions with elongins B and C, which in turn may couple SOCS proteins and their substrates to the proteasomal protein degradation pathway. Analogous to the family of F-box-containing proteins, it appears that the SOCS proteins may act as adaptor molecules that target activated cell signaling proteins to the protein degradation pathway.

Sense- and antisense-mediated gene silencing in tobacco is inhibited by the same viral suppressors and is associated with accumulation of small RNAs

Antisense-mediated gene silencing (ASGS) and posttranscriptional gene silencing (PTGS) with sense transgenes markedly reduce the steady-state mRNA levels of endogenous genes similar in transcribed sequence. RNase protection assays established that silencing in tobacco plants transformed with plant-defense-related class I sense and antisense chitinase (CHN) transgenes is at the posttranscriptional level. Infection of tobacco plants with cucumber mosaic virus strain FN and a necrotizing strain of potato virus Y, but not with potato virus X, effectively suppressed PTGS and ASGS of both the transgenes and homologous endogenes. This suggests that ASGS and PTGS share components associated with initiation and maintenance of the silent state. Small, ca. 25-nt RNAs (smRNA) of both polarities were associated with PTGS and ASGS in CHN transformants as reported for PTGS in other transgenic plants and for RNA interference in Drosophila. Similar results were obtained with an antisense class I β-1,3-glucanase transformant showing that viral suppression and smRNAs are a more general feature of ASGS. Several current models hold that diverse signals lead to production of double-stranded RNAs, which are processed to smRNAs that then trigger PTGS. Our results provide direct evidence for mechanistic links between ASGS and PTGS and suggest that ASGS could join a common PTGS pathway at the double-stranded RNA step.

prlA suppressors in Escherichia coli relieve the proton electrochemical gradient dependency of translocation of wild-type precursors.

The SecY protein of Escherichia coli is an integral membrane component of the protein export apparatus. Suppressor mutations in the secY gene (prlA alleles) have been isolated that restore the secretion of precursor proteins with defective signal sequences. These mutations have never been shown to affect the translocation of wild-type precursor proteins. Here, we report that prlA suppressor mutations relieve the proton-motive force (pmf) dependency of the translocation of wild-type precursors, both in vivo and in vitro. Furthermore, the proton-motive force dependency of the translocation of a precursor with a stably folded domain in the mature region was suppressed by prlA mutations in vitro. These data show that prlA mutations cause a general relaxation of the export apparatus rather than a specific change that results in bypassing of the recognition of the signal sequence. In addition, these results are indicative for a mechanism in which the proton-motive force stimulates translocation by altering the conformation of the translocon.

Biochemical and functional characterization of the tumor suppressors BRCA1 and BAP1

L’ubiquitination est une modification post-traductionnelle qui joue un rôle majeur dans la régulation d’une multitude de processus cellulaires. Dans cette thèse, je discuterai de la caractérisation de deux protéines, BRCA1 et BAP1, soit deux suppresseurs de tumeurs fonctionnellement reliés. BRCA1, une ubiquitine ligase qui catalyse la liaison de l’ubiquitine à une protéine cible, est mutée dans les cancers du sein et de l'ovaire. Il est bien établi que cette protéine aide à maintenir la stabilité génomique suite à un bris double brin de l’ADN (BDB), et ce, à l’aide d’un mécanisme de réparation bien caractérisé appelé recombinaison homologue. Cependant, les mécanismes de régulation de BRCA1 suite à des stresses génotoxiques n’impliquant pas directement un BDB ne sont pas pleinement élucidés. Nous avons démontré que BRCA1 est régulée par dégradation protéasomale suite à une exposition des cellules à deux agents génotoxiques reconnus pour ne pas directement générer des BDBs, soit les rayons UV, qui provoquent la distorsion de l’hélice d’ADN, et le méthyle méthanesulfonate (MMS), qui entraîne l’alkylation de l’ADN. La dégradation de BRCA1 est réversible et indépendante des kinases associées à la voie des PI3 kinase, soit ATM, ATR et DNA-PK, protéines qui sont rapidement activées par les dommages à l’ADN. Nous proposons que la dégradation de BRCA1 prévienne son recrutement intempestif, ainsi que celui des facteurs qui lui sont associés, à des sites de dommages d’ADN qui ne sont pas des BDBs, et que cette régulation coordonne la réparation de l’ADN. L’enzyme de déubiquitination BAP1 a initialement été identifiée comme une protéine capable d’interagir avec BRCA1 et de réguler sa fonction. Elle est également connue pour sa capacité à se lier avec les protéines du groupe Polycomb, ASXL1 et ASXL2. Cependant, l’importance de ces interactions n’a toujours pas été établie. Nous avons démontré que BAP1 forme deux complexes protéiques mutuellement exclusifs avec ASXL1 et ASXL2. Ces interactions sont critiques pour la liaison de BAP1 à l’ubiquitine ainsi que pour la stimulation de son activité enzymatique envers l’histone H2A. Nous avons également identifié des mutations de BAP1 dérivées de cancers qui empêchent à la fois son interaction avec ASXL1 et AXSL2, et son activité de déubiquitinase, ce qui fournit un lien mécanistique direct entre la déubiquitination de H2A et la tumorigenèse. Élucider les mécanismes de régulation de BRCA1 et BAP1 menera à une meilleure compréhension de leurs rôles de suppresseurs de tumeurs, permettant ainsi d’établir de nouvelles stratégies de diagnostic et traitement du cancer.