Criminal justice agencies in region 2: New Jersey, New York.

Prepared for the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, by the Bureau of the Census.

Criminal justice agencies, in region 3: Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia.

Prepared for the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, by the Bureau of the Census.

Criminal justice agencies in region 6 /

"SD-2D-6"

Criminal justice agencies in region 7: Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska.

Prepared for the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, by the Bureau of the Census.

Criminal justice agencies in region 10: Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington /

"SD-2D-10"

State-local relations in the criminal justice system; a Commission report.

Mode of access: Internet.

Casino gambling and crime in Chicago : the impact of the proposed casino complex on Chicago, Cook County, and selected state and federal criminal justice agencies /

"November 1992."

The impact of methamphetamine in Illinois communities : an ethnography : a report to the Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority /

"October 15, 2004."

The unfit defendant in Illinois : the implications of Senate Bill 133 for all mental health professionals and those involved in the criminal justice system.

Mode of access: Internet.

Drugs and violence : the criminal justice system in crisis : hearings before the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate, One Hundred First Congress, first session, June 26, 1989 (Macon, GA) and June 28, 1989 (Atlanta, GA).

"Second session, May 21, 1990 (Portland, ME)"--Pt. 3.

Criminal Justice in Transition: The Northern Ireland Context

This book represents a critical examination of key aspects of crime and criminal justice in Northern Ireland which will have resonance elsewhere. It considers the core aspects of criminal justice policymaking in Northern Ireland which are central to the process of post-conflict transition, including reform of policing, judicial decision-making and correctional services such as probation and prisons. It examines contemporary trends in criminal justice in Northern Ireland as related to various dimensions of crime relating to female offenders, young offenders, sexual and violent offenders, race and criminal justice, community safety and restorative justice. The book also considers the extent to which crime and criminal justice issues in Northern Ireland are being affected by the broader processes of ‘policy transfer’, globalisation and transnationalism and the extent to which criminal justice in Northern Ireland is divergent from the other jurisdictions in the United Kingdom. Written by leading international authorities in the field, the book offers a snapshot of the cutting edge of critical thinking in criminal justice practice and transitional justice contexts.

The End of the Transitional Period for Police and Criminal Justice Measures Adopted before the Lisbon Treaty: Who monitors trust in the European Criminal Justice area? CEPS Liberty and Security in Europe No. 74, December 2014

This study examines the legal and political implications of the forthcoming end of the transitional period for the measures in the fields of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, as set out in Protocol 36 to the EU Treaties. This Protocol limits some of the most far-reaching innovations introduced by the Treaty of Lisbon over EU cooperation on Justice and Home Affairs for a period of five years after the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon (until 1 December 2014), and provides the UK with special ‘opt out/opt-in’ possibilities. The study focuses on the meaning of the transitional period for the wider European Criminal Justice area. The most far-reaching change emerging from the end of this transition will be the expansion of the European Commission and Luxembourg Court of Justice scrutiny powers over Member States’ implementation of EU criminal justice law. The possibility offered by Protocol 36 for the UK to opt out and opt back in to pre-Lisbon Treaty instruments poses serious challenges to a common EU area of justice by further institutionalising ‘over-flexible’ participation in criminal justice instruments. The study argues that in light of Article 82 TFEU the rights of the defence are now inextricably linked to the coherency and effective operation of the principle of mutual recognition of criminal decisions, and calls the European Parliament to request the UK to opt in EU Directives on suspects procedural rights as condition for the UK to ‘opt back in’ measures like the European Arrest Warrant.

A report from the National Hispanic Conference on Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, July 28-30, 1980, Washington, D.C.

Item 968-H-1

Handbook of resources for criminal justice evaluators.

August 1978.

Comprehensive plan for criminal justice /

Ceased publication?