980 resultados para Dental radiography
Resumo:
Aim: To assess the bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images, comparing whether different parameters of digitization and storage change these values. Methods: Twenty radiographs were taken from five partially dentulous dry mandibles with an aluminum 7-mm stepwedge placed on the superior edge of the film. After processing, the films were digitized with a resolution of 600 and 2,400 d.p.i. and saved as TIFF and JPEG files. On every conventional and digitized image, circular regions of interest were selected for densitometry and radiographic contrast analysis. Results: Pearson's correlation coefficient showed a significant and strong mean gray values association between digitized and conventional images, differing from radiographic contrast that did not show a significant association. ANOVA did not reveal a statistically significant difference in bone density and radiographic contrast among the four digitized image groups, but the conventional image contrast was significantly lower. Conclusions: Bone mineral density did not differ in both conventional and digitized images. The parameters of image compression and resolution, tested in this study, did not change the results of densitometry and digitization process increased the radiographic contrast.
Resumo:
Pós-graduação em Odontologia - FOAR
Resumo:
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
Resumo:
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
Resumo:
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
Resumo:
Pós-graduação em Biopatologia Bucal - ICT
Resumo:
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
Resumo:
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
Resumo:
Aims: This study compared fractal dimension (FD) values on mandibular trabecular bone in digital and digitized images at different spatial and contrast resolutions. Materials and Methods: 12 radiographs of dried human mandibles were obtained using custom-fabricated hybrid image receptors composed of a periapical radiographic film and a photostimulable phosphor plate (PSP). The film/ PSP sets were disassembled, and the PSPs produced images with 600 dots per inch (dpi) and 16 bits. These images were exported as tagged image file format (TIFF), 16 and 8 bits, and 600, 300 and 150 dpi. The films were processed and digitized 3 times on a flatbed scanner, producing TIFF images with 600, 300 and 150 dpi, and 8 bits. On each image, a circular region of interest was selected on the trabecular alveolar bone, away from root apices and FD was calculated by tile counting method. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test were conducted to compare the mean values of FD, according to image type and spatial resolution (α = 5%). Results: Spatial resolution was directly and inversely proportional to FD mean values and standard deviation, respectively. Spatial resolution of 150 dpi yielded significant lower mean values of FD than the resolutions of 600 and 300 dpi ( P < 0.05). A nonsignificant variability was observed for the image types ( P > 0.05). The interaction between type of image and level of spatial resolution was not signi fi cant (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Under the tested, conditions, FD values of the mandibular trabecular bone assessed either by digital or digitized images did not change. Furthermore, these values were in fluenced by lower spatial resolution but not by contrast resolution.
Resumo:
The aim of this clinical study was to evaluate and compare the performance of visual exam with use of the Nyvad criteria (visual examination - (VE)), interproximal radiography (BW), laser fluorescence device (DIAGNOdent Pen-DDPen), and their association in the diagnosis of proximal lesions in primary teeth. For this purpose, 45 children (n = 59 surfaces) of both sexes, aged between 5 and 9 years were selected, who presented healthy primary molars or primary molars with signs suggestive of the presence of caries lesions. The surfaces were clinically evaluated and coded according to the Nyvad criteria and immediately afterwards with the DDPen. Radiographic exam was performed only on the surfaces coded with Nyvad scores 2, 3, 5, or 6. Active caries lesions and/or those with discontinuous surfaces were restored, considering the depth of lesion as reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under ROC curve were calculated for each technique and its associations. Visual exam with Nyvad criteria presented the highest specificity, accuracy, and area under ROC curve values. The DDPen presented the highest sensitivity values. Association with one or more methods resulted in an increase in specificity. The performance of visual, radiographic, and DDpen exams and their associations were good; however, the clinical examination with the Nyvad criteria was sufficient for the diagnosis of interproximal lesions in primary teeth.
Resumo:
Objectives: A wide variety of manifestations is presented in patients with Gaucher's disease (GD), including bone, haematology and visceral disturbances. This study was conducted to ascertain the main maxillofacial abnormalities by means of clinical survey, panoramic and cone beam CT (CBCT); to compare the patient's group with an age-sex matched control group; and to correlate clinical and radiological data. Methods: Ten patients previously diagnosed with GD were submitted to clinical and radiological surveys (CBCT and panoramic radiographs). The examination consisted of anamnesis, extra- and intraoral examinations and analyses of each patient's records. Imaging data were collected from the point of view of 3 observers, and the results compared with a healthy group (20 individuals) by means of statistical analysis (Fisher's exact test). Results: Gaucher patients had significantly more manifestations than otherwise healthy carriers. The most prevalent findings were enlarged marrow spaces, generalized osteopenia and effacement of jaw structures (mandibular canal, lamina dura and mental foramen). Here we describe a case in which thickening of the maxillary sinus mucosa was observed on CBCT rather than opacification of the sinus as seen on panoramic radiographs. Pathological fractures, root resorption and delay on tooth eruption were not observed. Conclusions: A poor relationship could be observed between clinical and radiological data. Patients showed important bone manifestations, which require careful diagnostic and surgical planning whenever necessary. Although panoramic radiographs have shown significant differences, CBCT is more effective in pointing out differences between patients and a control group, thus showing it as an important tool for evaluation of Gaucher patients. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2012) 41, 541-547. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/143023353
Resumo:
PURPOSE: To compare the direct and indirect radiographic methods for assessing the gray levels of biomaterials employing the Digora for Windows and the Adobe Photoshop CS2 systems. METHODS: Specimens of biomaterials were made following manusfacturer's instructions and placed on phosphor storage plates (PSP) and on radiographic film for subsequent gray level assessment using the direct and indirect radiographic method, respectively. The radiographic density of each biomaterial was analyzed using Adobe Photoshop CS2 and Digora for Windows software. RESULTS: The distribution of gray levels found using the direct and indirect methods suggests that higher exposure times are correlated to lower reproducibility rates between groups. CONCLUSION: The indirect method is a feasible alternative to the direct method in assessing the radiographic gray levels of biomaterials, insofar as significant reproducibility was observed between groups for the exposure times of 0.2 to 0.5 seconds.
Resumo:
A imagem digital no formato DICOM requer grande espaço para armazenamento, dificultando o arquivamento e transmissão da imagem via internet, sendo necessária, muitas vezes, a compressão das imagens por meio de formatos de arquivo como o JPEG. O objetivo neste estudo foi avaliar a influência dos formatos DICOM e JPEG, nos Fatores de Qualidade 100, 80 e 60, na reprodutibilidade intra e interexaminador na marcação de pontos cefalométricos em Telerradiografias digitais em Norma Frontal. A amostra consistiu de 120 imagens digitais de Telerradiografias em Norma Frontal, obtidas de 30 indivíduos. As 30 imagens originais, em formato DICOM, posteriormente, foram convertidas para o formato JPEG, nos Fatores de Qualidade 100, 80 e 60. Após cegar e randomizar a amostra, três ortodontistas calibrados marcaram os 18 pontos cefalométricos em cada imagem utilizando um programa de cefalometria computadorizada, que registra as medidas dos pontos cefalométricos em um sistema de coordenadas cartesianas X e Y. Nos resultados, os testes estatísticos de correlações intraclasses e análise de variância (ANOVA) apresentaram concordância de reprodutibilidade dos pontos cefalométricos em Telerradiografias digitais em Norma Frontal, tanto intra como interexaminador, com exceção dos pontos ZL, ZR, AZ, JR, NC, CN na coordenada Y e A6 na coordenada X, independentemente dos formatos de arquivo. Em conclusão, os formatos de arquivo DICOM e JPEG, nos Fatores de Qualidade 100, 80 e 60, não afetaram a reprodutibilidade intra e interexaminador na marcação dos pontos cefalométricos.(AU)
Resumo:
A imagem digital no formato DICOM requer grande espaço para armazenamento, dificultando o arquivamento e transmissão da imagem via internet, sendo necessária, muitas vezes, a compressão das imagens por meio de formatos de arquivo como o JPEG. O objetivo neste estudo foi avaliar a influência dos formatos DICOM e JPEG, nos Fatores de Qualidade 100, 80 e 60, na reprodutibilidade intra e interexaminador na marcação de pontos cefalométricos em Telerradiografias digitais em Norma Frontal. A amostra consistiu de 120 imagens digitais de Telerradiografias em Norma Frontal, obtidas de 30 indivíduos. As 30 imagens originais, em formato DICOM, posteriormente, foram convertidas para o formato JPEG, nos Fatores de Qualidade 100, 80 e 60. Após cegar e randomizar a amostra, três ortodontistas calibrados marcaram os 18 pontos cefalométricos em cada imagem utilizando um programa de cefalometria computadorizada, que registra as medidas dos pontos cefalométricos em um sistema de coordenadas cartesianas X e Y. Nos resultados, os testes estatísticos de correlações intraclasses e análise de variância (ANOVA) apresentaram concordância de reprodutibilidade dos pontos cefalométricos em Telerradiografias digitais em Norma Frontal, tanto intra como interexaminador, com exceção dos pontos ZL, ZR, AZ, JR, NC, CN na coordenada Y e A6 na coordenada X, independentemente dos formatos de arquivo. Em conclusão, os formatos de arquivo DICOM e JPEG, nos Fatores de Qualidade 100, 80 e 60, não afetaram a reprodutibilidade intra e interexaminador na marcação dos pontos cefalométricos.(AU)
Resumo:
A imagem digital no formato DICOM requer grande espaço para armazenamento, dificultando o arquivamento e transmissão da imagem via internet, sendo necessária, muitas vezes, a compressão das imagens por meio de formatos de arquivo como o JPEG. O objetivo neste estudo foi avaliar a influência dos formatos DICOM e JPEG, nos Fatores de Qualidade 100, 80 e 60, na reprodutibilidade intra e interexaminador na marcação de pontos cefalométricos em Telerradiografias digitais em Norma Frontal. A amostra consistiu de 120 imagens digitais de Telerradiografias em Norma Frontal, obtidas de 30 indivíduos. As 30 imagens originais, em formato DICOM, posteriormente, foram convertidas para o formato JPEG, nos Fatores de Qualidade 100, 80 e 60. Após cegar e randomizar a amostra, três ortodontistas calibrados marcaram os 18 pontos cefalométricos em cada imagem utilizando um programa de cefalometria computadorizada, que registra as medidas dos pontos cefalométricos em um sistema de coordenadas cartesianas X e Y. Nos resultados, os testes estatísticos de correlações intraclasses e análise de variância (ANOVA) apresentaram concordância de reprodutibilidade dos pontos cefalométricos em Telerradiografias digitais em Norma Frontal, tanto intra como interexaminador, com exceção dos pontos ZL, ZR, AZ, JR, NC, CN na coordenada Y e A6 na coordenada X, independentemente dos formatos de arquivo. Em conclusão, os formatos de arquivo DICOM e JPEG, nos Fatores de Qualidade 100, 80 e 60, não afetaram a reprodutibilidade intra e interexaminador na marcação dos pontos cefalométricos.(AU)