984 resultados para Constitutional reform


Relevância:

70.00% 70.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Submission recommended addition of a new 'self-enacting' preamble and enacting words to the Commownealth Constitution, and replacement of the 'race power' by a series of more specific powers relating to the recognition of native title and laws of the indigenous people.

Relevância:

70.00% 70.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Information and communication technologies (ICTs) offer opportunities for greater civic participation in democratic reform. Government ICT use has, however, predominantly been associated with e-government applications that focus on one-way information provision and service delivery. This article distinguishes between e-government and processes of edemocracy, which facilitate active civic engagement through two-way, ongoing dialogue. It draws from participation initiatives undertaken in two case studies. The first highlights efforts to increase youth political engagement in the local government area of Milton Keynes in the United Kingdom. The second is Iceland’s constitutional crowdsourcing, an initiative intended to increase civic input into constitutional reform. These examples illustrate that, in order to maintain legitimacy in the networked environment, a change in governmental culture is required to enable open and responsive e-democracy practices. When coupled with traditional participation methods, processes of e-democracy facilitate widespread opportunities for civic involvement and indicate that digital practices should not be separated from the everyday operations of government. While online democratic engagement is a slowly evolving process, initial steps are being undertaken by governments that enable e-participation to shape democratic reform.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Resumen: El presente trabajo aspira a explicar la dinámica vivida por el proceso que condujo a la reforma constitucional de 1994 en la Argentina, en especial a la sucesión de acontecimientos que culminaron en la celebración del Pacto de Olivos y la sanción de la ley de necesidad de la reforma en 1993. ¿Por qué la Unión Cívica Radical y el Partido Justicialista optaron por celebrar un pacto en el proceso reformista, que podría considerarse un resultado subóptimo, en lugar de conducir cada uno su estrategia dominante: resistir la reforma o promoverla a toda costa? Observado como un “juego anidado”, el proceso que llevó a la reforma, lejos de ser un resultado subóptimo, fue un juego que se desarrolló simultáneamente en tres arenas. Desde esta posición, el trabajo discute la extendida tesis de que el proceso de reforma fue un clásico “juego del gallina”.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

A presente tese examina a relação entre movimentos negros e estado no Brasil e na Colômbia no período imediatamente anterior à promulgação de suas respectivas cartas constitucionais e ao longo das duas décadas que se seguem à adoção dessas novas legislações. No final dos anos 1980, os discursos oficiais que celebravam a mestiçagem e a democracia racial vão sendo gradativamente vertidos para complexas noções de cidadania multicultural, direitos étnico-territoriais e igualdade racial. Assim, este estudo analisa o papel desempenhado pelos movimentos negros para a mudança nas legislações estatais e suas consequências em termos de incremento na participação institucional e reorientação dos repertórios de ação coletiva dos movimentos. Os resultados encontrados por este trabalho, analisados à luz das teorias do Processo Político, indicam que quanto maior a abertura de oportunidades políticas e discursivas maior o impacto políticoinstitucional do movimento negro. A primeira parte da tese demonstra que mudanças no cenário político internacional, com a ascensão de discursos sobre multiculturalismo, e nos contextos nacionais, com o aumento da instabilidade política e processos de redemocratização política, propiciaram uma importante abertura de oportunidades políticas paras os movimentos negros em ambos os países. A tese argumenta ainda que os debates acadêmicos sobre raça e etnicidade também influenciaram os discursos e estratégias dos movimentos negros em seus respectivos países. De maneira específica, no Brasil, o discurso sobre igualdade racial, forjado nas fronteiras entre academia e ativismo, adquire centralidade política tanto para atores estatais quanto para atores não-estatais. Na Colômbia, em contrapartida, é o discurso étnico-territorial que orienta os debates por inclusão sociopolítica de afrocolombianos. A segunda parte da tese analisa a participação institucional dos movimentos negros em ambos os países. São examinados, especificamente, a criação de legislações, políticas públicas e canais formais de participação para as populações afrodescendentes e seu impacto nas estratégias, estrutura organizacional e redes de solidariedade dos movimentos negros. Investiga-se também a ampliação dos vínculos entre os movimentos e órgãos governamentais, a consolidação dos laços com partidos políticos e as interações cooperativas e/ou conflitivas com o estado. A tese contribui para o campo de estudos afrolatinos, ao descortinar processos emergentes de politização racial na América do Sul, e para a ampliação do debate acerca das relações entre os movimentos sociais e institucionalidade, aludindo à novas possibilidades interpretativas que escapem ao já defasado binômio autonomia versus cooptação que têm marcado a literatura sobre a temática.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

New elements associated withWeb 2.0 relating to interactivity and end-user focus have combined with the availability of newlevels of information to encourage the development of what may be termed a Gov 2.0 approach.This, in combination with recent initiatives in the modernising government programme, has emphasised new levels of public participation and engagement with government as well as a re-engineering of public services tomake them more responsive to their end users. Adopting a governmentality perspective, it is argued that this involves a wider process of governing through constructing and reconstructing ideas of the public, community and individual citizen-consumers who take on a role in their own governance. It is argued that this fundamental re-working of the nature of what is public represents a constitutional change that is perhaps more signi¢cant than the constitutional reform programme directed to formal government which attracts more attention

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

This article provides a discussion of the political thinking of John P. Mackintosh (1929–1978) around the debate over Scottish devolution, and the constitutional reform of the UK, during the 1960s and 1970s. The article explores Mackintosh's ‘Union State’ vision of the UK and connects this to his interest in, and study of, the Northern Ireland experience of devolution from 1921 to 1972. It also considers the significance of Mackintosh's confrontations with Scottish nationalism and suggests that his unionism was representative of a more authentic and rooted tradition than is usually acknowledged. The article offers an evaluation of Mackintosh's legacy and considers the extent to which the questions he posed, and the lines of argument he advanced, have retained their relevance and interest in the new context of partial devolution in the UK, and in the current period of renewed constitutional speculation and debate over the future of the Union and the UK.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

This article explores how stateless nationalist parties in the ‘Celtic periphery’ of Scotland and Northern Ireland have used Europe to advance their territorial projects. Despite vastly different historical, political and social contexts, the Scottish National Party and Northern Ireland's Social Democratic and Labour Party have both advanced a pro-European, social democratic discourse that emphasises the importance of Europe as a framework for constitutional reform and shared sovereignty. However, in recent years the parties have diverged on Europe. While the SDLP has continued its principled commitment to further integration, the SNP has articulated an increased criticism of the supranational project. This divergence in party attitudes reveals the extent to which the pro-European dimension of Celtic nationalism is ideological or opportunistic.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Análisis sobre las implicaciones de la reforma constitucional que aprobó la reelección en Colombia, sobre el equilibrio de poder entre las ramas ejecutiva y judicial.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

El documento muestra la sólida influencia de la corriente doctrinal del profesor francés León Duguit (1859 – 1928), en la reforma constitucional colombiana de 1936, desde tres perspectivas: El sistema jurídico, la función social de la propiedad y los servicios públicos. Para el primer tercio del siglo XX, en Colombia, al igual que sucedía en Norteamérica y los países europeos que encauzaban nuestra tradición jurídica, las tesis individualistas sobre el modelo de Estado y el derecho, habían envejecido, y se planteaban nuevas interpretaciones del sistema jurídico imperante y del papel del Estado en la sociedad, en Colombia, el francés, León Duguit secundaría de manera decisiva, aunque no exclusiva, tal proceso.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

De Gaulle, founder of the Fifth French Republic, cherished the notion that the president of the Republic could somehow stand above party politics. In many ways this belief shaped the early institutional configuration of the new Republic. Party politics, however, rapidly reached the presidency, especially with the move, under the constitutional reform of 1962, to direct election of the president. This article charts the development of France's 'political constitution' and the relationship between president and parties over the first decade of the Fifth Republic. It finds that although the presidency became the prime goal of party political competition, the (often dysfunctional) illusion of a head of state above politics continues to shape the behaviour and perceptions of French presidents.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The economic regional integration is a phenomenon observed in numerous occasions inside the global economic reality. Watchful to that phenomenon, the 1988 s Brazilian constitutional order establish in its 4th article, single paragraph, the commitment to seek for the Latin- American integration, as a Fundamental Principle to the Brazilian Federative Republic. Regarding the mentioned constitutional disposition s realization, the Brazilian State celebrated, specially, the 1980 s Montevideo Treaty, creating the Latin-American Integration Association, and the 1991 s Asuncion Treaty, performing the duty to establish a common market, in sub regional level, with Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay, called Mercado Comum do Sul. However, due to an addiction to a wrong comprehension of State s Sovereignty Principle, the Constitution imposes to the international rules an incorporation process, without providing any privilege to those ones regarding the integration constitutional disposition s realization, whether original or derived. The Brazilian s Supreme Court, as matter of fact, affirmed that it is not possible, facing the actual constitutional order, to grant any character of preference. Also in the controversies solution mechanism, responsible for the law s execution in case of its noncompliance, where found malfunctions, most notably the system s open character and its excessive procedural flexibility, in addiction to restricting the access of individuals. It follows from these findings, then, the lack of legal certainty provided by the Mercosul s legal system, considering its effects both international and within the Brazilian state. Among the possible solutions to reduce or eliminate the problem are using the practice of the so-called executive agreements in the Mercosul s original rules incorporation to the Brazilian state, the creation of a Mercosul s court of law and/or a constitutional reform

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

O presente trabalho tem como tema “a influência do Estado no crescimento da economia do setor mineral: o caso da CVRD de 1942 a 2010”. Para orientar a pesquisa e a construção da tese foi estabelecido o problema: que mudanças ocorreram no plano legal e institucional, no Brasil e no Pará, a partir de 1990, que podem ser interpretadas como componentes de um novo modo de regulação e que transformações se processaram na economia, no Brasil e no Pará, que podem ser interpretadas como parte do processo de constituição de um novo regime de acumulação e de que forma essas alterações estão relacionadas com o processo de privatização e crescimento da mineração, sob a gestão da CVRD ou Vale? Como marco teórico operou-se com as categorias de análise regime de acumulação e modo de regulação, considerando as contribuições de Lipetz (1988) e Harvey (1998) da denominada escola da regulação. O objetivo era compreender as mudanças na economia e na legislação, no Brasil e no Pará, como uma transição do regime de acumulação e modo de regulação fordista-keyneiano para um novo regime denominado de acumulação flexível. Selecionou-se um conjunto de eventos para serem analisados como integrantes da transição no modo de regulação: Plano de estabilização econômica; reforma constitucional de 1995; Lei Complementar n° 87/96 - a Lei Kandir; Medida Provisória nº 2166/67 que criou o conceito de obras de utilidade pública; Resolução do Conama nº 369 sobre mineração em Área de Preservação permanente; Lei de responsabilidade Fiscal; Lei de Modernização dos Portos. Outros eventos foram selecionados e analisados como componentes de um novo regime de acumulação: Investimento público em obras de infra-estrutura de transporte e energia; privatização no Brasil, incluindo a da CVRD e sua expansão posterior, juntamente com o crescimento da economia do setor mineral. Concluiu-se que, com a influência do Estado há a estabilização de um novo regime de acumulação, que no Pará aprofunda o perfil primário-exportador da economia. Em 2010, o setor mineral contribuiu com 86% da pauta de exportação e desse total a indústria extrativa mineral participou com 77% e a indústria da transformação com 23%. No período de 2002 a 2007, a indústria extrativa mineral participava com 60% e a da transformação com 40% da exportação. A CVRD ou Vale, no Pará, a partir de 2010, priorizou a exportação de produtos primários, sobretudo minério de ferro, reduzindo sua participação na indústria de transformação, por meio do repasse à Norsk Hidro, de suas ações, na Albrás, Alunorte e Companhia de Alumina do Pará.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Este artigo pretende examinar como a Câmara dos Deputados, à época do segundo mandato de Fernando Henrique Cardoso, discutiu a Reforma do Judiciário, tendo como ponto de partida o desenho constitucional deste complexo de instituições, que fora delineado pelos constituintes em 1988. Levando em conta que os operadores de Direito compõe um segmento profissional altamente organizado, os termos da reforma foram objeto de grande controvérisa, o que trouxe implicações adicionais às dificuldades previsíveis nas iniciativas políticas de alteração constitucional.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Recently, a rising interest in political and economic integration/disintegration issues has been developed in the political economy field. This growing strand of literature partly draws on traditional issues of fiscal federalism and optimum public good provision and focuses on a trade-off between the benefits of centralization, arising from economies of scale or externalities, and the costs of harmonizing policies as a consequence of the increased heterogeneity of individual preferences in an international union or in a country composed of at least two regions. This thesis stems from this strand of literature and aims to shed some light on two highly relevant aspects of the political economy of European integration. The first concerns the role of public opinion in the integration process; more precisely, how economic benefits and costs of integration shape citizens' support for European Union (EU) membership. The second is the allocation of policy competences among different levels of government: European, national and regional. Chapter 1 introduces the topics developed in this thesis by reviewing the main recent theoretical developments in the political economy analysis of integration processes. It is structured as follows. First, it briefly surveys a few relevant articles on economic theories of integration and disintegration processes (Alesina and Spolaore 1997, Bolton and Roland 1997, Alesina et al. 2000, Casella and Feinstein 2002) and discusses their relevance for the study of the impact of economic benefits and costs on public opinion attitude towards the EU. Subsequently, it explores the links existing between such political economy literature and theories of fiscal federalism, especially with regard to normative considerations concerning the optimal allocation of competences in a union. Chapter 2 firstly proposes a model of citizens’ support for membership of international unions, with explicit reference to the EU; subsequently it tests the model on a panel of EU countries. What are the factors that influence public opinion support for the European Union (EU)? In international relations theory, the idea that citizens' support for the EU depends on material benefits deriving from integration, i.e. whether European integration makes individuals economically better off (utilitarian support), has been common since the 1970s, but has never been the subject of a formal treatment (Hix 2005). A small number of studies in the 1990s have investigated econometrically the link between national economic performance and mass support for European integration (Eichenberg and Dalton 1993; Anderson and Kalthenthaler 1996), but only making informal assumptions. The main aim of Chapter 2 is thus to propose and test our model with a view to providing a more complete and theoretically grounded picture of public support for the EU. Following theories of utilitarian support, we assume that citizens are in favour of membership if they receive economic benefits from it. To develop this idea, we propose a simple political economic model drawing on the recent economic literature on integration and disintegration processes. The basic element is the existence of a trade-off between the benefits of centralisation and the costs of harmonising policies in presence of heterogeneous preferences among countries. The approach we follow is that of the recent literature on the political economy of international unions and the unification or break-up of nations (Bolton and Roland 1997, Alesina and Wacziarg 1999, Alesina et al. 2001, 2005a, to mention only the relevant). The general perspective is that unification provides returns to scale in the provision of public goods, but reduces each member state’s ability to determine its most favoured bundle of public goods. In the simple model presented in Chapter 2, support for membership of the union is increasing in the union’s average income and in the loss of efficiency stemming from being outside the union, and decreasing in a country’s average income, while increasing heterogeneity of preferences among countries points to a reduced scope of the union. Afterwards we empirically test the model with data on the EU; more precisely, we perform an econometric analysis employing a panel of member countries over time. The second part of Chapter 2 thus tries to answer the following question: does public opinion support for the EU really depend on economic factors? The findings are broadly consistent with our theoretical expectations: the conditions of the national economy, differences in income among member states and heterogeneity of preferences shape citizens’ attitude towards their country’s membership of the EU. Consequently, this analysis offers some interesting policy implications for the present debate about ratification of the European Constitution and, more generally, about how the EU could act in order to gain more support from the European public. Citizens in many member states are called to express their opinion in national referenda, which may well end up in rejection of the Constitution, as recently happened in France and the Netherlands, triggering a European-wide political crisis. These events show that nowadays understanding public attitude towards the EU is not only of academic interest, but has a strong relevance for policy-making too. Chapter 3 empirically investigates the link between European integration and regional autonomy in Italy. Over the last few decades, the double tendency towards supranationalism and regional autonomy, which has characterised some European States, has taken a very interesting form in this country, because Italy, besides being one of the founding members of the EU, also implemented a process of decentralisation during the 1970s, further strengthened by a constitutional reform in 2001. Moreover, the issue of the allocation of competences among the EU, the Member States and the regions is now especially topical. The process leading to the drafting of European Constitution (even if then it has not come into force) has attracted much attention from a constitutional political economy perspective both on a normative and positive point of view (Breuss and Eller 2004, Mueller 2005). The Italian parliament has recently passed a new thorough constitutional reform, still to be approved by citizens in a referendum, which includes, among other things, the so called “devolution”, i.e. granting the regions exclusive competence in public health care, education and local police. Following and extending the methodology proposed in a recent influential article by Alesina et al. (2005b), which only concentrated on the EU activity (treaties, legislation, and European Court of Justice’s rulings), we develop a set of quantitative indicators measuring the intensity of the legislative activity of the Italian State, the EU and the Italian regions from 1973 to 2005 in a large number of policy categories. By doing so, we seek to answer the following broad questions. Are European and regional legislations substitutes for state laws? To what extent are the competences attributed by the European treaties or the Italian Constitution actually exerted in the various policy areas? Is their exertion consistent with the normative recommendations from the economic literature about their optimum allocation among different levels of government? The main results show that, first, there seems to be a certain substitutability between EU and national legislations (even if not a very strong one), but not between regional and national ones. Second, the EU concentrates its legislative activity mainly in international trade and agriculture, whilst social policy is where the regions and the State (which is also the main actor in foreign policy) are more active. Third, at least two levels of government (in some cases all of them) are significantly involved in the legislative activity in many sectors, even where the rationale for that is, at best, very questionable, indicating that they actually share a larger number of policy tasks than that suggested by the economic theory. It appears therefore that an excessive number of competences are actually shared among different levels of government. From an economic perspective, it may well be recommended that some competences be shared, but only when the balance between scale or spillover effects and heterogeneity of preferences suggests so. When, on the contrary, too many levels of government are involved in a certain policy area, the distinction between their different responsibilities easily becomes unnecessarily blurred. This may not only leads to a slower and inefficient policy-making process, but also risks to make it too complicate to understand for citizens, who, on the contrary, should be able to know who is really responsible for a certain policy when they vote in national,local or European elections or in referenda on national or European constitutional issues.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The Ph.D. dissertation analyses the reasons for which political actors (governments, legislatures and political parties) decide consciously to give away a source of power by increasing the political significance of the courts. It focuses on a single case of particular significance: the passage of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 in the United Kingdom. This Act has deeply changed the governance and the organization of the English judicial system, has provided a much clearer separation of powers and a stronger independence of the judiciary from the executive and the legislative. What’s more, this strengthening of the judicial independence has been decided in a period in which the political role of the English judges was evidently increasing. I argue that the reform can be interpreted as a «paradigm shift» (Hall 1993), that has changed the way in which the judicial power is considered. The most diffused conceptions in the sub-system of the English judicial policies are shifted, and a new paradigm has become dominant. The new paradigm includes: (i) stronger separation of powers, (ii) collective (as well as individual) conception of the independence of the judiciary, (iii) reduction of the political accountability of the judges, (iv) formalization of the guarantees of judicial independence, (v) principle-driven (instead of pragmatic) approach to the reforms, and (vi) transformation of a non-codified constitution in a codified one. Judicialization through political decisions represent an important, but not fully explored, field of research. The literature, in particular, has focused on factors unable to explain the English case: the competitiveness of the party system (Ramseyer 1994), the political uncertainty at the time of constitutional design (Ginsburg 2003), the cultural divisions within the polity (Hirschl 2004), federal institutions and division of powers (Shapiro 2002). All these contributes link the decision to enhance the political relevance of the judges to some kind of diffusion of political power. In the contemporary England, characterized by a relative high concentration of power in the government, the reasons for such a reform should be located elsewhere. I argue that the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 can be interpreted as a result of three different kinds of reasons: (i) the social and demographical transformations of the English judiciary, which have made inefficient most of the precedent mechanism of governance, (ii) the role played by the judges in the policy process and (iii) the cognitive and normative influences originated from the European context, as a consequence of the membership of the United Kingdom to the European Union and the Council of Europe. My thesis is that only a full analysis of all these three aspects can explain the decision to reform the judicial system and the content of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005. Only the cultural influences come from the European legal complex, above all, can explain the paradigm shift previously described.