Turnaround across diverse global supply chains using shared metrics and change methodology: The Case of Amer Sports Corporation

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to document the outcome of a global three-year long supply chain improvement initiative at a multi-national producer of branded sporting goods that is transforming from a holding structure to an integrated company. The case company is comprised of seven internationally well-known sport brands, which form a diverse set of independent sub-cases, on which the same supply chain metrics and change project approach was applied to improve supply chain performance. Design/methodology/approach - By using in-depth case study and statistical analysis the paper analyzes across the brands how supply chain complexity (SKU count), supply chain type (make or buy) and seasonality affect completeness and punctuality of deliveries, and inventory as the change project progresses. Findings - Results show that reduction in supply chain complexity improves delivery performance, but has no impact on inventory. Supply chain type has no impact on service level, but brands with in-house production are better in improving inventory than those with outsourced production. Non-seasonal business units improve service faster than seasonal ones, yet there is no impact on inventory. Research limitations/implications - The longitudinal data used for the analysis is biased with the general business trend, yet the rich data from different cases and three-years of data collection enables generalizations to a certain level. Practical implications - The in-depth case study serves as an example for other companies on how to initiate a supply chain improvement project across business units with tangible results. Originality/value - The seven sub-cases with their different characteristics on which the same improvement initiative was applied sets a unique ground for longitudinal analysis to study supply chain complexity, type and seasonality.

Report on Special Investigation of the Parkersburg Economic Development Corporation in Parkersburg Iowa, May 1, 1999 - October 16, 2003

City Audit Report

Report on a special investigation of Three Rivers Independent Living Corporation for the period July 1, 2005 through May 26, 2006

Report on a special investigation of Three Rivers Independent Living Corporation for the period July 1, 2005 through May 26, 2006

Report on Ratna Corporation (Plaza Pantry) for the period January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006

Report on Ratna Corporation (Plaza Pantry) for the period January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006

Review of Iowa Student Loan Liquidity Corporation for the year ended June 30, 2007

Review of Iowa Student Loan Liquidity Corporation for the year ended June 30, 2007

Audit report on the Iowa Innovation Corporation for the period from October 24, 2011 (the date of inception) through June 30, 2012

Audit report on the Iowa Innovation Corporation for the period from October 24, 2011 (the date of inception) through June 30, 2012

Evaluation of an International Barrier Corporation Barrier, HR-532, 1990

In 1986, the Iowa DOT installed 700 feet of International Barrier Corporation (IBC) barrier between the 1-235 eastbound off ramp and the adjacent eastbound loop on ramp at 8th Street in West Des Moines. It is a 3 foot 6 inch high sand-filled galvanized sheet metal barrier. The bid price on this project was $130 per lineal foot. It was evaluated annually for four years. During this time, there have been no severe accidents where vehicles hit the barrier. There are scrapes and dents indicating minor accidents. The barrier has performed very well and required no maintenance. Due to its initial cost, the IBC barrier is not as cost-effective as portland cement concrete barrier rails.

Audit report on the Iowa Innovation Corporation for the years ended June 30, 2014 and 2013

Audit report on the Iowa Innovation Corporation for the years ended June 30, 2014 and 2013

Letter health consultation : Air emissions from American Packaging Corporation, Story City, Iowa (2009)

A health consultation is a verbal or written response from ATSDR or ATSDR’s Cooperative Agreement Partners to a specific request for information about health risks related to a specific site, a chemical release, or the presence of hazardous material. In order to prevent or mitigate exposures, a consultation may lead to specific actions, such as restricting use of or replacing water supplies; intensifying environmental sampling; restricting site access; or removing the contaminated material. In addition, consultations may recommend additional public health actions, such as conducting health surveillance activities to evaluate exposure or trends in adverse health outcomes; conducting biological indicators of exposure studies to assess exposure; and providing health education for health care providers and community members. This concludes the health consultation process for this site, unless additional information is obtained by ATSDR or ATSDR’s Cooperative Agreement Partner which, in the Agency’s opinion, indicates a need to revise or append the conclusions previously issued.