911 resultados para ChIP-seq
Resumo:
BACKGROUND: Structural mutations (SMs) play a major role in cancer development. In some cancers, such as breast and ovarian, DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) occur more frequently in transcribed regions, while in other cancer types such as prostate, there is a consistent depletion of breakpoints in transcribed regions. Despite such regularity, little is understood about the mechanisms driving these effects. A few works have suggested that protein binding may be relevant, e.g. in studies of androgen receptor binding and active chromatin in specific cell types. We hypothesized that this behavior might be general, i.e. that correlation between protein-DNA binding (and open chromatin) and breakpoint locations is common across divergent cancers. RESULTS: We investigated this hypothesis by comprehensively analyzing the relationship among 457 ENCODE protein binding ChIP-seq experiments, 125 DnaseI and 24 FAIRE experiments, and 14,600 SMs from 8 diverse cancer datasets covering 147 samples. In most cancers, including breast and ovarian, we found enrichment of protein binding and open chromatin in the vicinity of SM breakpoints at distances up to 200 kb. Furthermore, for all cancer types we observed an enhanced enrichment in regions distant from genes when compared to regions proximal to genes, suggesting that the SM-induction mechanism is independent from the bias of DSBs to occur near transcribed regions. We also observed a stronger effect for sites with more than one protein bound. CONCLUSIONS: Protein binding and open chromatin state are associated with nearby SM breakpoints in many cancer datasets. These observations suggest a consistent mechanism underlying SM locations across different cancers.
Resumo:
Mutations in the coding sequence of SOX9 cause campomelic dysplasia (CD), a disorder of skeletal development associated with 46,XY disorders of sex development (DSDs). Translocations, deletions, and duplications within a ∼2 Mb region upstream of SOX9 can recapitulate the CD-DSD phenotype fully or partially, suggesting the existence of an unusually large cis-regulatory control region. Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) is a craniofacial disorder that is frequently an endophenotype of CD and a locus for isolated PRS at ∼1.2-1.5 Mb upstream of SOX9 has been previously reported. The craniofacial regulatory potential within this locus, and within the greater genomic domain surrounding SOX9, remains poorly defined. We report two novel deletions upstream of SOX9 in families with PRS, allowing refinement of the regions harboring candidate craniofacial regulatory elements. In parallel, ChIP-Seq for p300 binding sites in mouse craniofacial tissue led to the identification of several novel craniofacial enhancers at the SOX9 locus, which were validated in transgenic reporter mice and zebrafish. Notably, some of the functionally validated elements fall within the PRS deletions. These studies suggest that multiple noncoding elements contribute to the craniofacial regulation of SOX9 expression, and that their disruption results in PRS.
Resumo:
Abstract : Transcriptional regulation is the result of a combination of positive and negative effectors, such as transcription factors, cofactors and chromatin modifiers. During my thesis project I studied chromatin association, and transcriptional and cell cycle regulatory functions of dHCF, the Drosophila homologue of the human protein HCF-1 (host cell factor-1). The human and Drosophila HCF proteins are synthesized as large polypeptides that are cleaved into two subunits (HCFN and HCFC), which remain associated with one another by non covalent interactions. Studies in mammalian cells over the past 20 years have been devoted to understanding the cellular functions of HCF-1 and have revealed that it is a key regulator of transcription and cell cycle regulation. In human cells, HCF-1 interacts with the histone methyltransferase Set1/Ash2 and MLL/Ash2 complexes and the histone deacetylase Sin3 complex, which are involved in transcriptional activation and repression, respectively. HCF-1 is also recruited to promoters to regulate G1 -to-S phase progression during the cell cycle by the activator transcription factors E2F1 and E2F3, and by the repressor transcription factor E2F4. HCF-1 protein structure and these interactions between HCP-1 and E2F transcriptional regulator proteins are also conserved in Drosophila. In this doctoral thesis, I use proliferating Drosophila SL2 cells to study both the genomic-binding sites of dHCF, using a combination of chromatin immunoprecipitation and ultra high throughput sequencing (ChIP-seq) analysis, and dHCF regulated genes, employing RNAi and microarray expression analysis. I show that dHCF is bound to over 7500 chromosomal sites in proliferating SL2 cells, and is located at +-200 bp relative to the transcriptional start sites of about 30% of Drosophila genes. There is also a direct relationship between dHCF promoter association and promoter- associated transcriptional activity. Thus, dHCF binding levels at promoters correlated directly with transcriptional activity. In contrast, expression studies showed that dHCF appears to be involved in both transcriptional activation and repression. Analysis of dHCF-binding sites identified nine dHCF-associated motifs, four of them linked dHCF to (i) two insulator proteins, GAGA and BEAF, (ii) the E-box motif, and (iii) a degenerated TATA-box. The dHCF-associated motifs allowed the organization of the dHCF-bound genes into five biological processes: differentiation, cell cycle and gene expression, regulation of endocytosis, and cellular localization. I further show that different mechanisms regulate dHCF association with chromatin. Despite that after dHCF cleavage the dHCFN and dHCFC subunits remain associated, the two subunits showed different affinities for chromatin and differential binding to a set of tested promoters, suggesting that dHCF could target specific promoters through each of the two subunits. Moreover, in addition to the interaction between dHCF and E2F transcription factors, the dHCF binding pattern is correlated with dE2F2 genomic 4 distribution. I show that dE2F factors are necessary for recruitment of dHCF to the promoter of a set of dHCF regulated genes. Therefore dHCF, as in mammals, is involved in regulation of G1 to S phase progression in collaboration with the dE2Fs transcription factors. In addition, gene expression arrays reveal that dHCF could indirectly regulate cell cycle progression by promoting expression of genes involved in gene expression and protein synthesis, and inhibiting expression of genes involved in cell-cell adhesion. Therefore, dHCF is an evolutionary conserved protein, which binds to many specific sites of the Drosophila genome via interaction with DNA of chromatin-binding proteins to regulate the expression of genes involved in many different cellular functions. Résumé : La regulation de la transcription est le résultat des effets positifs et négatifs des facteurs de transcription, cofacteurs et protéines effectrices qui modifient la chromatine. Pendant mon projet de thèse, j'ai étudié l'association a la chromatine, ainsi que la régulation de la transcription et du cycle cellulaire par dHCF, l'homologue chez la drosophile de la protéine humaine HCF-1 (host cell factor-1). Chez 1'humain et la V drosophile, les deux protéines HCF sont synthétisées sous la forme d'un long polypeptide, qui est ensuite coupé en deux sous-unités au centre de la protéine. Les deux sous-unités restent associées ensemble grâce a des interactions non-covalentes. Des études réalisées pendant les 20 dernières années ont permit d'établir que HCF-l et un facteur clé dans la régulation de la transcription et du cycle cellulaire. Dans les cellules humaines, HCF-1 active et réprime la transcription en interagissant avec des complexes de protéines qui activent la transcription en méthylant les histones (HMT), comme par Set1/Ash2 et MLL/Ash2, et d'autres complexes qui répriment la transcription et sont responsables de la déacétylation des histones (HDAC) comme la protéine Sin3. HCF-l est aussi recruté aux promoteurs par les activateurs de la transcription E2F l et E2F3a, et par le répresseur de la transcription E2F4 pour réguler la transition entre les phases G1 et S du cycle cellulaire. La structure de HCF-1 et les interactions entre HCF-l et les régulateurs de la transcription sont conservées chez la drosophile. Pendant ma these j'ai utilisé les cellules de la drosophile, SL2 en culture, pour étudier les endroits de liaisons de HCF-l à la chromatine, grâce a immunoprecipitation de la chromatine et du séquençage de l'ADN massif ainsi que les gènes régulés par dHCF 3 grâce a la technique de RNAi et des microarrays. Mes résultats on montré que dHCF se lie à environ 7565 endroits, et estimé a 1200 paire de bases autour des sites d'initiation de la transcription de 30% des gènes de la drosophile. J 'ai observe une relation entre dHCF et le niveau de la transcription. En effet, le niveau de liaison dHCF au promoteur corrèle avec l'activité de la transcription. Cependant, mes études d'expression ont montré que dHCF est implique dans le processus d'activation et mais aussi de répression de la transcription. L'analyse des séquences d'ADN liées par dHCF a révèle neuf motifs, quatre de ces motifs ont permis d'associer dl-ICF a deux protéines isolatrices GAGA et BEAF, au motif pour les E-boxes et a une TATA-box dégénérée. Les neuf motifs associes à dHCF ont permis d'associer les gènes lies par dHCF au promoteur a cinq processus biologiques: différentiation, cycle cellulaire, expression de gènes, régulation de l'endocytosis et la localisation cellulaire, J 'ai aussi montré qu'il y a plusieurs mécanismes qui régulent l'association de dHCF a la chromatine, malgré qu'après clivage, les deux sous-unites dHCFN and dHCFC, restent associées, elles montrent différentes affinités pour la chromatine et lient différemment un group de promoteurs, les résultats suggèrent que dHCF peut se lier aux promoteurs en utilisant chacune de ses sous-unitées. En plus de l'association de dHCF avec les facteurs de transcription dE2F s, la distribution de dHCF sur le génome corrèle avec celle du facteur de transcription dE2F2. J'ai aussi montré que les dE2Fs sont nécessaires pour le recrutement de dHCF aux promoteurs d'un sous-groupe de gènes régules par dHCF. Mes résultats ont aussi montré que chez la drosophile comme chez les humains, dl-ICF est implique dans la régulation de la progression de la phase G1 a la phase S du cycle cellulaire en collaboration avec dE2Fs. D'ailleurs, les arrays d'expression ont suggéré que dHCF pourrait réguler le cycle cellulaire de façon indirecte en activant l'expression de gènes impliqués dans l'expression génique et la synthèse de protéines, et en inhibant l'expression de gènes impliqués dans l'adhésion cellulaire. En conclusion, dHCF est une protéine, conservée dans l'évolution, qui se lie spécifiquement a beaucoup d'endroits du génome de Drosophile, grâce à l'interaction avec d'autres protéines, pour réguler l'expression des gènes impliqués dans plusieurs fonctions cellulaires.
Resumo:
H3K4me3 is a histone modification that accumulates at the transcription-start site (TSS) of active genes and is known to be important for transcription activation. The way in which H3K4me3 is regulated at TSS and the actual molecular basis of its contribution to transcription remain largely unanswered. To address these questions, we have analyzed the contribution of dKDM5/LID, the main H3K4me3 demethylase in Drosophila, to the regulation of the pattern of H3K4me3. ChIP-seq results show that, at developmental genes, dKDM5/LID localizes at TSS and regulates H3K4me3. dKDM5/LID target genes are highly transcribed and enriched in active RNApol II and H3K36me3, suggesting a positive contribution to transcription. Expression-profiling show that, though weakly, dKDM5/LID target genes are significantly downregulated upon dKDM5/LID depletion. Furthermore, dKDM5/LID depletion results in decreased RNApol II occupancy, particularly by the promoter-proximal Pol lloser5 form. Our results also show that ASH2, an evolutionarily conserved factor that locates at TSS and is required for H3K4me3, binds and positively regulates dKDM5/LID target genes. However, dKDM5/LID and ASH2 do not bind simultaneously and recognize different chromatin states, enriched in H3K4me3 and not, respectively. These results indicate that, at developmental genes, dKDM5/LID and ASH2 coordinately regulate H3K4me3 at TSS and that this dynamic regulation contributes to transcription.
Resumo:
The genomic loci occupied by RNA polymerase (RNAP) III have been characterized in human culture cells by genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitations, followed by deep sequencing (ChIP-seq). These studies have shown that only ∼40% of the annotated 622 human tRNA genes and pseudogenes are occupied by RNAP-III, and that these genes are often in open chromatin regions rich in active RNAP-II transcription units. We have used ChIP-seq to characterize RNAP-III-occupied loci in a differentiated tissue, the mouse liver. Our studies define the mouse liver RNAP-III-occupied loci including a conserved mammalian interspersed repeat (MIR) as a potential regulator of an RNAP-III subunit-encoding gene. They reveal that synteny relationships can be established between a number of human and mouse RNAP-III genes, and that the expression levels of these genes are significantly linked. They establish that variations within the A and B promoter boxes, as well as the strength of the terminator sequence, can strongly affect RNAP-III occupancy of tRNA genes. They reveal correlations with various genomic features that explain the observed variation of 81% of tRNA scores. In mouse liver, loci represented in the NCBI37/mm9 genome assembly that are clearly occupied by RNAP-III comprise 50 Rn5s (5S RNA) genes, 14 known non-tRNA RNAP-III genes, nine Rn4.5s (4.5S RNA) genes, and 29 SINEs. Moreover, out of the 433 annotated tRNA genes, half are occupied by RNAP-III. Transfer RNA gene expression levels reflect both an underlying genomic organization conserved in dividing human culture cells and resting mouse liver cells, and the particular promoter and terminator strengths of individual genes.
Resumo:
H3K4me3 is a histone modification that accumulates at the transcription-start site (TSS) of active genes and is known to be important for transcription activation. The way in which H3K4me3 is regulated at TSS and the actual molecular basis of its contribution to transcription remain largely unanswered. To address these questions, we have analyzed the contribution of dKDM5/LID, the main H3K4me3 demethylase in Drosophila, to the regulation of the pattern of H3K4me3. ChIP-seq results show that, at developmental genes, dKDM5/LID localizes at TSS and regulates H3K4me3. dKDM5/LID target genes are highly transcribed and enriched in active RNApol II and H3K36me3, suggesting a positive contribution to transcription. Expression-profiling show that, though weakly, dKDM5/LID target genes are significantly downregulated upon dKDM5/LID depletion. Furthermore, dKDM5/LID depletion results in decreased RNApol II occupancy, particularly by the promoter-proximal Pol lloser5 form. Our results also show that ASH2, an evolutionarily conserved factor that locates at TSS and is required for H3K4me3, binds and positively regulates dKDM5/LID target genes. However, dKDM5/LID and ASH2 do not bind simultaneously and recognize different chromatin states, enriched in H3K4me3 and not, respectively. These results indicate that, at developmental genes, dKDM5/LID and ASH2 coordinately regulate H3K4me3 at TSS and that this dynamic regulation contributes to transcription.
Resumo:
Activated T helper (Th) cells have ability to differentiate into functionally distinct Th1, Th2 and Th17 subsets through a series of overlapping networks that include signaling and transcriptional control and the epigenetic mechanisms to direct immune responses. However, inappropriate execution in the differentiation process and abnormal function of these Th cells can lead to the development of several immune mediated diseases. Therefore, the thesis aimed at identifying genes and gene regulatory mechanisms responsible for Th17 differentiation and to study epigenetic changes associated with early stage of Th1/Th2 cell differentiation. Genome wide transcriptional profiling during early stages of human Th17 cell differentiation demonstrated differential regulation of several novel and currently known genes associated with Th17 differentiation. Selected candidate genes were further validated at protein level and their specificity for Th17 as compared to other T helper subsets was analyzed. Moreover, combination of RNA interference-mediated downregulation of gene expression, genome-wide transcriptome profiling and chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by massive parallel sequencing (ChIP-seq), combined with computational data integration lead to the identification of direct and indirect target genes of STAT3, which is a pivotal upstream transcription factor for Th17 cell polarization. Results indicated that STAT3 directly regulates the expression of several genes that are known to play a role in activation, differentiation, proliferation, and survival of Th17 cells. These results provide a basis for constructing a network regulating gene expression during early human Th17 differentiation. Th1 and Th2 lineage specific enhancers were identified from genome-wide maps of histone modifications generated from the cells differentiating towards Th1 and Th2 lineages at 72h. Further analysis of lineage-specific enhancers revealed known and novel transcription factors that potentially control lineage-specific gene expression. Finally, we found an overlap of a subset of enhancers with SNPs associated with autoimmune diseases through GWASs suggesting a potential role for enhancer elements in the disease development. In conclusion, the results obtained have extended our knowledge of Th differentiation and provided new mechanistic insights into dysregulation of Th cell differentiation in human immune mediated diseases.
Resumo:
L'axe hypothalamo-hypophyso-surrénalien (HPA) permet de maintenir l'homéostasie de l'organisme face à divers stress. Qu'ils soient de nature psychologique, physique ou inflammatoire/infectieux, les stress provoquent la synthèse et la libération de CRH par l'hypothalamus. Les cellules corticotropes hypophysaires perçoivent ce signal et en réaction, produisent et sécrètent l'ACTH. Ceci induit la synthèse des glucocorticoïdes (Gc) par le cortex surrénalien; ces stéroïdes mettent le système métabolique en état d’alerte pour la réponse au stress et à l’agression. Les Gc ont le rôle essentiel de contrôler les défenses de l'organisme, en plus d'exercer une rétro-inhibition sur l'axe HPA. L'ACTH est une petite hormone peptidique produite par le clivage d'un précurseur: la pro-opiomélanocortine (POMC). À cause de sa position critique dans la normalisation de l'homéostasie, le contrôle transcriptionnel du gène Pomc a fait l'objet d'études approfondies au cours des dernières décennies. Nous savons maintenant que la région promotrice du gène Pomc permet une expression ciblée dans les cellules POMC hypophysaires. L'étude du locus Pomc par des technologies génomiques m'a permis de découvrir un nouvel élément de régulation qui est conservé à travers l'évolution des mammifères. La caractérisation de cet enhancer a démontré qu'il dirige une expression restreinte à l'hypophyse, et plus particulièrement dans les cellules corticotropes. De façon intéressante, l'activité de cet élément dépend d'un nouveau site de liaison recrutant un homodimère du facteur de transcription Tpit, dont l'expression est également limitée aux cellules POMC de l'hypophyse. La découverte de cet enhancer ajoute une toute nouvelle dimension à la régulation de l'expression de POMC. Les cytokines pro-inflammatoires IL6/LIF et les Gc sont connus pour leur antagonisme sur la réaction inflammatoire et sur le promoteur Pomc via l'action des facteurs de transcription Stat3 et GR respectivement. L'analyse génomique des sites liés ii par ces deux facteurs nous a révélé une interrelation complexe et a permis de définir un code transcriptionnel entre ces voies de signalisation. En plus de leur action par interaction directe avec l’ADN au niveau des séquences régulatrices, ces facteurs interagissent directement entre eux avec des résultats transcriptionnels différents. Ainsi, le recrutement de GR par contact protéine:protéine (tethering) sur Stat3 étant lié à l'ADN provoque un antagonisme transcriptionnel. Inversement, le tethering de Stat3 sur GR supporte une action synergique, tout comme leur co-recrutement à l'ADN sur des sites contigus ou composites. Lors d'une activation soutenue, ce synergisme entre les voies IL6/LIF et Gc induit une réponse innée de défense cellulaire. Ainsi lors d'un stress majeur, ce mécanisme de défense est mis en branle dans toutes les cellules et tissus. En somme, les travaux présentés dans cette thèse définissent les mécanismes transcriptionnels engagés dans le combat de l'organisme contre les stress. Plus particulièrement, ces mécanismes ont été décrits au niveau de la réponse globale des corticotropes et du gène Pomc. Il est essentiel pour l'organisme d'induire adéquatement ces mécanismes afin de faire face aux stress et d'éviter des dérèglements comme les maladies inflammatoires et métaboliques.
Resumo:
EIF4E, le facteur d’initiation de la traduction chez les eucaryotes est un oncogène puissant et qui se trouve induit dans plusieurs types de cancers, parmi lesquels les sous-types M4 et M5 de la leucémie aiguë myéloblastique (LAM). EIF4E est régulé à plusieurs niveaux cependant, la régulation transcriptionnelle de ce gène est peu connue. Mes résultats montrent que EIF4E est une cible transcriptionnelle directe du facteur nucléaire « kappa-light- chain- enhancer of activated B cells » (NF-κB).Dans les cellules hématopoïétiques primaires et les lignées cellulaires, les niveaux de EIF4E sont induits par des inducteurs de NF-κB. En effet, l’inactivation pharmaceutique ou génétique de NF-κB réprime l’activation de EIF4E. En effet, suite à l’activation de NF-κB chez l’humain, le promoteur endogène de EIF4E recrute p65 (RelA) et c-Rel aux sites évolutionnaires conservés κB in vitro et in vivo en même temps que p300 ainsi que la forme phosphorylée de Pol II. De plus, p65 est sélectivement associé au promoteur de EIF4E dans les sous-types LAM M4/M5 mais non pas dans les autres sous-types LAM ou dans les cellules hématopoïétiques primaires normales. Ceci indique que ce processus représente un facteur essentiel qui détermine l’expression différentielle de EIF4E dans la LAM. Les analyses de données d’expressions par séquençage de l’ARN provenant du « Cancer Genome Atlas » (TCGA) suggèrent que les niveaux d’ARNm de EIF4E et RELA se trouvent augmentés dans les cas LAM à pronostic intermédiaire ou faible mais non pas dans les groupes cytogénétiquement favorables. De plus, des niveaux élevés d’ARNm de EIF4E et RELA sont significativement associés avec un taux de survie relativement bas chez les patients. En effet, les sites uniques κB se trouvant dans le promoteur de EIF4E recrutent le régulateur de transcription NF-κB p65 dans 47 nouvelles cibles prévues. Finalement, 6 nouveaux facteurs de transcription potentiellement impliqués dans la régulation du gène EIF4E ont été prédits par des analyses de données ChIP-Seq provenant de l’encyclopédie des éléments d’ADN (ENCODE). Collectivement, ces résultats fournissent de nouveaux aperçus sur le control transcriptionnel de EIF4E et offrent une nouvelle base moléculaire pour sa dérégulation dans au moins un sous-groupe de spécimens de LAM. L’étude et la compréhension de ce niveau de régulation dans le contexte de spécimens de patients s’avère important pour le développement de nouvelles stratégies thérapeutiques ciblant l’expression du gène EIF4E moyennant des inhibiteurs de NF-κB en combinaison avec la ribavirine.
Resumo:
La leucémie aiguë lymphoblastique (LAL) est le cancer pédiatrique le plus fréquent. Plusieurs réarrangements chromosomiques ont été associés à cette maladie, dont la translocation t(12;21), qui est observée dans 25% des cas de LAL de type pré-B. Cette translocation engendre l’expression de la protéine de fusion ETV6-AML1. Toutefois, celle-ci n’est pas suffisante pour initier seule une leucémie, ce qui suggère que des mutations additionnelles sont nécessaires à la transformation oncogénique. Or, on observe que l’allèle non-réarrangé d’ETV6 est perdu dans 75% des cas de t(12;21). Cette délétion entraîne l’inactivation complète du facteur de transcription ETV6 et l’abolition de sa fonction biologique. Puisqu’ETV6 semble jouer un rôle de suppresseur de tumeurs, nous croyons que son inactivation favoriserait le développement de la leucémie via la dérégulation de ses gènes cibles. Ce projet visait donc à identifier de nouvelles cibles transcriptionnelles d’ETV6, afin d’élucider son implication dans la leucémie. Une expérience de RNA-Seq a permis d’identifier plus de 200 gènes dont l’expression est corrélée avec celle d’ETV6 dans des cellules souches hématopoïétiques CD34+. Parmi ceux-ci, plusieurs gènes sont impliqués dans la réponse immunitaire et inflammatoire, la migration cellulaire, l’homéostasie ionique et la signalisation intracellulaire. Nous avons également mis en place une approche d’immunoprécipitation de la chromatine afin d’identifier les régions auxquelles le facteur de transcription ETV6 peut se lier. À l’aide de cette méthode, nous avons démontré une interaction entre ETV6 et SLCO2B1, un gène dont l’expression est également co-régulée avec ETV6. Finalement, notre étude suggère qu’ETV6 contribuerait à la leucémogenèse en dérégulant l’expression de certains gènes ayant des propriétés oncogéniques.
Resumo:
We previously established an 80 kb haplotype upstream of TNFSF4 as a susceptibility locus in the autoimmune disease SLE. SLE-associated alleles at this locus are associated with inflammatory disorders, including atherosclerosis and ischaemic stroke. In Europeans, the TNFSF4 causal variants have remained elusive due to strong linkage disequilibrium exhibited by alleles spanning the region. Using a trans-ancestral approach to fine-map the locus, utilising 17,900 SLE and control subjects including Amerindian/Hispanics (1348 cases, 717 controls), African-Americans (AA) (1529, 2048) and better powered cohorts of Europeans and East Asians, we find strong association of risk alleles in all ethnicities; the AA association replicates in African-American Gullah (152,122). The best evidence of association comes from two adjacent markers: rs2205960-T (P = 1.71×10-34, OR = 1.43[1.26-1.60]) and rs1234317-T (P = 1.16×10-28, OR = 1.38[1.24-1.54]). Inference of fine-scale recombination rates for all populations tested finds the 80 kb risk and non-risk haplotypes in all except African-Americans. In this population the decay of recombination equates to an 11 kb risk haplotype, anchored in the 5′ region proximal to TNFSF4 and tagged by rs2205960-T after 1000 Genomes phase 1 (v3) imputation. Conditional regression analyses delineate the 5′ risk signal to rs2205960-T and the independent non-risk signal to rs1234314-C. Our case-only and SLE-control cohorts demonstrate robust association of rs2205960-T with autoantibody production. The rs2205960-T is predicted to form part of a decameric motif which binds NF-κBp65 with increased affinity compared to rs2205960-G. ChIP-seq data also indicate NF-κB interaction with the DNA sequence at this position in LCL cells. Our research suggests association of rs2205960-T with SLE across multiple groups and an independent non-risk signal at rs1234314-C. rs2205960-T is associated with autoantibody production and lymphopenia. Our data confirm a global signal at TNFSF4 and a role for the expressed product at multiple stages of lymphocyte dysregulation during SLE pathogenesis. We confirm the validity of trans-ancestral mapping in a complex trait. © 2013 Manku et al.
Resumo:
Modern sugarcane cultivars are complex hybrids resulting from crosses among several Saccharum species. Traditional breeding methods have been employed extensively in different countries over the past decades to develop varieties with increased sucrose yield and resistance to pests and diseases. Conventional variety improvement, however, may be limited by the narrow pool of suitable genes. Thus, molecular genetics is seen as a promising tool to assist in the process of developing improved varieties. The SUCEST-FUN Project (http://sucest-fun.org) aims to associate function with sugarcane genes using a variety of tools, in particular those that enable the study of the sugarcane transcriptome. An extensive analysis has been conducted to characterise, phenotypically, sugarcane genotypes with regard to their sucrose content, biomass and drought responses. Through the analysis of different cultivars, genes associated with sucrose content, yield, lignin and drought have been identified. Currently, tools are being developed to determine signalling and regulatory networks in grasses, and to sequence the sugarcane genome, as well as to identify sugarcane promoters. This is being implemented through the SUCEST-FUN (http://sucest-fun.org) and GRASSIUS databases (http://grassius.org), the cloning of sugarcane promoters, the identification of cis-regulatory elements (CRE) using Chromatin Immunoprecipitation-sequencing (ChIP-Seq) and the generation of a comprehensive Signal Transduction and Transcription gene catalogue (SUCAST Catalogue).
Resumo:
Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) possess two unique characteristics: infinite self-renewal and the potential to differentiate into almost every cell type (pluripotency). Recently, global expression analyses of metastatic breast and lung cancers revealed an ESC-like expression program or signature, specifically for cancers that are mutant for p53 function. Surprisingly, although p53 is widely recognized as the guardian of the genome, due to its roles in cell cycle checkpoints, programmed cell death or senescence, relatively little is known about p53 functions in normal cells, especially in ESCs. My hypothesis is that p53 has specific transcription regulatory functions in human ESCs (hESCs) that a) oppose pluripotency and b) protect the stem cell genome in response to DNA damage and stress signaling. In mouse ESCs, these roles are believed to coincide, as p53 promotes differentiation in response to DNA damage, but this is unexplored in hESCs. To determine the biological roles of p53, specifically in hESCs, we mapped genome-wide chromatin interactions of p53 by chromatin immunoprecipitation and massively parallel tag sequencing (ChIP-Seq), and did so under three VIdifferent conditions of hESC status: pluripotency, differentiation-initiated and DNA-damage-induced. ChIP-Seq showed that p53 is enriched at distinct, induction-specific gene loci during each of these different conditions. Microarray gene expression analysis and functional annotation of the distinct p53-target genes revealed that p53 regulates specific genes encoding developmental regulators, which are expressed in differentiation-initiated but not DNA- damaged hESCs. We further discovered that, in response to differentiation signaling, p53 binds regions of chromatin that are repressed but also poised for rapid activation by core pluripotency factors OCT4 and NANOG in pluripotent hESCs. In response to DNA damage, genes associated with migration and motility are targeted by p53; whereas, the prime targets of p53 in control of cell death are conserved for p53 regulation in both differentiation and DNA damage. Our genome-wide profiling and bioinformatics analyses show that p53 occupies a special set of developmental regulatory genes during early differentiation of hESCs and functions in an induction-specific manner. In conclusion, our research unveiled previously unknown functions of p53 in ESC biology, which augments our understanding of one of the most deregulated proteins in human cancers.
Resumo:
We thank Karim Gharbi and Urmi Trivedi for their assistance with RNA sequencing, carried out in the GenePool genomics facility (University of Edinburgh). We also thank Susan Fairley and Eduardo De Paiva Alves (Centre for Genome Enabled Biology and Medicine, University of Aberdeen) for help with the initial bioinformatics analysis. We thank Aaron Mitchell for kindly providing the ALS3 mutant, Julian Naglik for the gift of TR146 cells, and Jon Richardson for technical assistance. We thank the Genomics and Bioinformatics core of the Faculty of Health Sciences for Next Generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics support, the Information and Communication Technology Office at the University of Macau for providing access to a High Performance Computer and Jacky Chan and William Pang for their expert support on the High Performance Computer. Finally, we thank Amanda Veri for generating CaLC2928. M.D.L. is supported by a Sir Henry Wellcome Postdoctoral Fellowship (Wellcome Trust 096072), R.A.F. by a Wellcome Trust-Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Postdoctoral Fellowship, L.E.C. by a Canada Research Chair in Microbial Genomics and Infectious Disease and by Canadian Institutes of Health Research Grants MOP-119520 and MOP-86452, A.J. P.B. was supported by the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/F00513X/1) and by the European Research Council (ERC-2009-AdG-249793-STRIFE), KHW is supported by the Science and Technology Development Fund of Macau S.A.R (FDCT) (085/2014/A2) and the Research and Development Administrative Office of the University of Macau (SRG2014-00003-FHS) and R.T.W. by the Burroughs Wellcome fund and NIH R15AO094406. Data availability RNA-sequencing data sets are available at ArrayExpress (www.ebi.ac.uk) under accession code E-MTAB-4075. ChIP-seq data sets are available at the NCBI SRA database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) under accession code SRP071687. The authors declare that all other data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary information files, or from the corresponding author upon request.
Resumo:
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2016-06