Pharmacométrie de la ropivacaïne suivant l’anesthésie locorégionale chez les patients orthopédiques : caractérisation de l’intensité et de la durée du bloc sensitif

Introduction & Objectifs : Pour assurer l’analgésie postopératoire, l’anesthésiste dispose, en plus des différentes classes de médicaments administrés par voie orale ou intraveineuse, de diverses techniques pour bloquer l’influx nerveux douloureux en administrant les anesthésiques locaux (AL) de manière centrale ou périphérique. La ropivacaïne (ROP), un AL à longue durée d’action, est un médicament de première intention partout dans le monde, en raison de sa grande efficacité et de son faible risque de toxicité. Contrairement à certains pays, la ROP n'est toujours pas indiquée au Canada pour la rachianesthésie (bloc central) en raison d'un manque de données probantes. Jusqu'à présent, les efforts de recherche ont essentiellement porté sur la sécurité ainsi que sur la durée d’action du médicament lorsqu’administré par voie spinale. De plus, les doses optimales de ROP pour l’anesthésie régionale périphérique ne sont pas encore précisément connues. La posologie devrait être adaptée au site d’administration ainsi qu’à l’intensité et la durée du stimulus produit par la chirurgie. Ultimement, cela permettrait aux cliniciens d’identifier le régime optimal en fonction des facteurs démographiques qui pourraient affecter la pharmacocinétique (PK) et la pharmacodynamie (PD) de l’AL (objectif global de ces travaux). Validation de la Méthode Analytique Manuscrit 1 : Une méthode analytique spécifique et sensible permettant de déterminer les concentrations plasmatiques de ROP a d’abord été optimisée et validée. Validation du Biomarqueur Manuscrit 2 : Nous avons ensuite mis au point et évalué la fiabilité d’une méthode quantitative basée sur la mesure du seuil de perception sensorielle (CPT) chez le volontaire sain. Ce test nécessite l’application d’un courant électrique transcutané qui augmente graduellement et qui, selon la fréquence choisie, est capable de stimuler spécifiquement les fibres nerveuses impliquées dans le cheminement de l’influx nerveux douloureux. Les résultats obtenus chez les volontaires sains indiquent que la mesure CPT est fiable, reproductible et permet de suivre l’évolution temporelle du bloc sensitif. Études cliniques Manuscrit 3 : Nous avons ensuite caractérisé, pendant plus de 72 h, l’absorption systémique de la ROP lorsqu’administrée pour un bloc du nerf fémoral chez 19 patients subissant une chirurgie du genou. Le modèle PK populationnel utilisé pour analyser nos résultats comporte une absorption biphasique durant laquelle une fraction de la dose administrée pénètre rapidement (temps d’absorption moyen : 27 min, IC % 19 – 38 min) dans le flux sanguin systémique pendant que l’autre partie, en provenance du site de dépôt, est redistribuée beaucoup plus lentement (demi-vie (T1/2) : 2.6 h, IC % 1.6 – 4.3 h) vers la circulation systémique. Une relation statistiquement significative entre l’âge de nos patients et la redistribution de l’AL suggère que la perméabilité tissulaire est augmentée avec l’âge. Manuscrit 4 : Une analyse PK-PD du comportement sensitif du bloc fémoral (CPT) a été effectuée. Le modèle développé a estimé à 20.2 ± 10.1 mg la quantité de ROP nécessaire au site d’action pour produire 90 % de l’effet maximal (AE90). À 2 X la AE90, le modèle prédit un début d’action de 23.4 ± 12.5 min et une durée de 22.9 ± 5.3 h. Il s’agit de la première étude ayant caractérisé le comportement sensitif d’un bloc nerveux périphérique. Manuscrit 5 : La troisième et dernière étude clinique a été conduite chez les patients qui devaient subir une chirurgie du genou sous rachianesthésie. Tout comme pour le bloc du nerf fémoral, le modèle PK le plus approprié pour nos données suggère que l’absorption systémique de la ROP à partir du liquide céphalo-rachidien est biphasique; c.à.d. une phase initiale (T1/2 : 49 min, IC %: 24 – 77 min) suivie (délai: 18 ± 2 min) d'une phase légèrement plus lente (T1/2 : 66 min, IC %: 36 – 97 min). L’effet maximal a été observé beaucoup plus rapidement, soit aux environs de 12.6 ± 4.9 min, avant de revenir aux valeurs de base 210 ± 55 min suivant l’administration de l’agent. Ces données ont permis d’estimer une AE50 de 7.3 ± 2.3 mg pour l'administration spinale. Conclusion : En somme, ces modèles peuvent être utilisés pour prédire l’évolution temporelle du bloc sensitif de l’anesthésie rachidienne et périphérique (fémorale), et par conséquent, optimiser l’utilisation clinique de la ROP en fonction des besoins des cliniciens, notamment en ce qui a trait à l’âge du patient.

Sex-related macrostructural organization of the deer's brachial plexus

We describe the morphological organization of the deer brachial plexus in order to supply data to veterinary neuroclinics and anaesthesiology. The deer (Mazama gouazoubira) brachial plexus is composed of four roots: three cervical (C6, C7 and C8) and one thoracic (T1). Within each sex group, no variations are observed between the left and the right brachial plexus, though sex-related differences are seen especially in its origin. The origin of axillary and radial nerves was: C6, C7, C8 and T1 in males and C8-T1 (radial nerve) and C7, C8 and T1 (axillary nerve) in females; musculocutaneous nerve was: C6-C7 (males) and C8-T1 (females); median and ulnar nerves was: C8-T1 (males) and T1 (females); long thoracic nerve was: C7 (males) and T1 (females); lateral thoracic nerve was: C6, C7, C8 and T1 (males) and T1 (females); thoracodorsal nerve was: C6, C7, C8 and T1 (males) and C8-T1 (females); suprascapular nerve was: C6-C7 (males) and C6 (females) and subscapular nerve was: C6-C7 (males) and C7 (females). This study suggests that in male deer the origin of the brachial plexus is more cranial than in females and the origin of the brachial plexus is slightly more complex in males, i.e. there is an additional number of roots (from one to three). This sexual dimorphism may be related to specific biomechanical functions of the thoracic limb and electrophysiological studies may be needed to shed light on this morphological feature.

Assessment of brachial plexus blockade in chickens by an axillary approach

Objective To assess the brachial plexus block in chickens by an axillary approach and using a peripheral nerve stimulator.Study design Prospective, randomized, double-blinded study.Animals Six, 84-week old, female chickens.Methods Midazolam (1 mg kg(-1)) and butorphanol (1 mg kg(-1)) were administered into the pectoralis muscle. Fifteen minutes later, the birds were positioned in lateral recumbency and following palpation of the anatomic landmarks, a catheter was inserted using an axillary approach to the brachial plexus. Lidocaine or bupivacaine (1 mL kg(-1)) was injected after plexus localization by the nerve stimulator. Sensory function was tested before and after blockade (carpus, radius/ulna, humerus and pectoralis muscle) in the blocked and unblocked wings. The latency to onset of motor and sensory block and the duration of sensory block were recorded. A Friedman nonparametric one-way repeated-measures ANOVA was used to compare scores from baseline values over time and to compare the differences between wings at each time point.Results A total of 18 blocks were performed with a success rate of 66.6% (12/18). The latency for motor block was 2.8 +/- 1.1 and 3.2 +/- 0.4 minutes for lidocaine and bupivacaine, respectively. The latencies for and durations of the sensory block were 6.0 +/- 2.5 and 64.0 +/- 18.0 and 7.8 +/- 5.8 and 91.6 +/- 61.7 minutes for lidocaine and bupivacaine, respectively. There was no statistical difference between these times for lidocaine or bupivacaine. Sensory function was not abolished in nonblocked wings.Conclusions and clinical relevance The brachial plexus block was an easy technique to perform but had a high failure rate. It might be useful for providing anesthesia or postoperative analgesia of the wing in chickens and exotic avian species that have similar wing anatomy.

RESULTS OF ULNAR NERVE NEUROTIZATION TO BICEPS BRACHII MUSCLE IN BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURY

Objective: To evaluate the factors influencing the results of ulnar nerve neurotization at the motor branch of the brachii biceps muscle, aiming at the restoration of elbow flexion in patients with brachial plexus injury. Methods: 19 patients, with 18 men and 1 woman, mean age 28.7 years. Eight patients had injury to roots C5-C6 and 11, to roots C5-C6-C7. The average time interval between injury and surgery was 7.5 months. Four patients had cervical fractures associated with brachial plexus injury. The postoperative follow-up was 15.7 months. Results: Eight patients recovered elbow flexion strength MRC grade 4; two, MRC grade 3 and nine, MRC <3. There was no impairment of the previous ulnar nerve function. Conclusion: The surgical results of ulnar nerve neurotization at the motor branch of brachii biceps muscle are dependent on the interval between brachial plexus injury and surgical treatment, the presence of associated fractures of the cervical spine and occipital condyle, residual function of the C8-T1 roots after the injury and the involvement of the C7 root. Signs of reinnervation manifested up to 3 months after surgery showed better results in the long term. Level of Evidence: IV, Case Series.

Upper Brachial Plexus Injuries: Grafts vs Ulnar Fascicle Transfer to Restore Biceps Muscle Function

BACKGROUND: Nerve transfers or graft repairs in upper brachial plexus palsies are 2 available options for elbow flexion recovery. OBJECTIVE: To assess outcomes of biceps muscle strength when treated either by grafts or nerve transfer. METHODS: A standard supraclavicular approach was performed in all patients. When roots were available, grafts were used directed to proximal targets. Otherwise, a distal ulnar nerve fascicle was transferred to the biceps branch. Elbow flexion strength was measured with a dynamometer, and an index comparing the healthy arm and the operated-on side was developed. Statistical analysis to compare both techniques was performed. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (34 men) were included in this series. Mean age was 28.7 years (standard deviation, 8.7). Twenty-two patients (62.8%) presented with a C5-C6 injury, whereas 13 patients (37.2%) had a C5-C6-C7 lesion. Seventeen patients received reconstruction with grafts, and 18 patients were treated with a nerve transfer from the ulnar nerve to the biceps. The trauma to surgery interval (mean, 7.6 months in both groups), strength in the healthy arm, and follow-up duration were not statistically different. On the British Medical Research Council muscle strength scale, 8 of 17 (47%) patients with a graft achieved >= M3 biceps flexion postoperatively, vs 16 of 18 (88%) post nerve transfers (P = .024). This difference persisted when a muscle strength index assessing improvement relative to the healthy limb was used (P = .031). CONCLUSION: The results obtained from ulnar nerve fascicle transfer to the biceps branch were superior to those achieved through reconstruction with grafts.

Different Learning Curves for Axillary Brachial Plexus Block: Ultrasound Guidance versus Nerve Stimulation

Little is known about the learning of the skills needed to perform ultrasound- or nerve stimulator-guided peripheral nerve blocks. The aim of this study was to compare the learning curves of residents trained in ultrasound guidance versus residents trained in nerve stimulation for axillary brachial plexus block. Ten residents with no previous experience with using ultrasound received ultrasound training and another ten residents with no previous experience with using nerve stimulation received nerve stimulation training. The novices' learning curves were generated by retrospective data analysis out of our electronic anaesthesia database. Individual success rates were pooled, and the institutional learning curve was calculated using a bootstrapping technique in combination with a Monte Carlo simulation procedure. The skills required to perform successful ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block can be learnt faster and lead to a higher final success rate compared to nerve stimulator-guided axillary brachial plexus block.

Ultrasonography for depiction of brachial plexus injury

Recent development of ultrasonographic equipment has allowed improved spatial resolution for visualizing normal and pathologic conditions of peripheral nerves. Regarding the brachial plexus, only ultrasonographic studies that have described the normal appearance have been reported. To the best of our knowledge, no case report regarding the ultrasonographic description of a brachial plexus lesion has been published. We report the ultrasonographic findings of a brachial plexus injury after extirpation of a suspected enlarged supraclavicular lymph node.

Transition from nerve stimulator to sonographically guided axillary brachial plexus anesthesia in hand surgery: block quality and patient satisfaction during the transition period

OBJECTIVES Sonographic guidance for peripheral nerve anesthesia has proven increasingly successful in clinical practice; however, fears that a change to sonographically guided regional anesthesia may impair the block quality and operating room work flow persist in certain units. In this retrospective cohort study, block quality and patient satisfaction during the transition period from nerve stimulator to sonographic guidance for axillary brachial plexus anesthesia in a tertiary referral center were investigated. METHODS Anesthesia records of all patients who had elective surgery of the wrist or hand during the transition time (September 1, 2006-August 25, 2007) were reviewed for block success, placement time, anesthesiologist training level, local anesthetic volume, and requirement of additional analgesics. Postoperative records were reviewed, and patient satisfaction was assessed by telephone interviews in matched subgroups. RESULTS Of 415 blocks, 341 were sonographically guided, and 74 were nerve stimulator guided. Sonographically guided blocks were mostly performed by novices, whereas nerve stimulator-guided blocks were performed by advanced users (72.3% versus 14%; P < .001). Block performance times and success rates were similar in both groups. In sonographically guided blocks, significantly less local anesthetics were applied compared to nerve stimulator-guided blocks (mean ± SD, 36.1 ± 7.1 versus 43.9 ± 6.1 mL; P< .001), and less opioids were required (fentanyl, 66.1 ± 30 versus 90 ± 62 μg; P< .001). Interviewed patients reported significantly less procedure-related discomfort, pain, and prolonged procedure time when block placement was sonographically guided (2% versus 20%; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS Transition from nerve stimulator to sonographic guidance for axillary brachial plexus blocks did not change block performance times or success rates. Patient satisfaction was improved even during the early institutional transition period.

CT myelography for diagnosis of brachial plexus avulsion in small animals

Avulsion of nerve roots of the brachial plexus can be diagnosed clinically, neurologically, radiographically and by electromyography. But like the myelography these techniques are inprecise for determination of the severity (partial or complete disruption) and the localization of the lesion. In human medicine the combination of computerized tomography with myelography shows high accuracy. Veterinary reports of experience in this field are not yet known. The aim of the present study was to demonstrate nerve root avulsions using myelography and computerized tomography. Three dogs and one cat with traumatic lesions of the brachial plexus were examined. The lesion could be seen in all patients. Thus CT-myelography results in an improved prognostic assessment of brachial plexus paralysis. Moreover, this technique could become one of the most important diagnostic methods for brachial plexus lesions involving nerve root reinsertion--neurotizations in veterinary medicine.

Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome due to subclavius posticus muscle with dynamic brachial plexus compression: a case report.

BACKGROUND Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome is an underestimated cause of brachial weakness and pain. The subclavius posticus muscle (SPM) is an aberrant muscle originating from the medial aspect of the first rib reaching to superior border of the scapula, which may cause, depending on its activation, dynamic compression of the brachial plexus. CASE PRESENTATION In the present study, we report about a 32-year-old male caucasian patient with weakness in radial deviation of his left hand. An isolated macrodactyly of his left middle finger had been operated twice. Electroneurography showed a carpal-tunnel-syndrome (CTS) on the left side. MRI of the brachial plexus revealed an additional muscle in the costoclavicular space, identified as SPM. To our knowledge, this is the second case report of a neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome due to SPM, and the first case described with isolated macrodactyly and CTS in the same patient. CONCLUSION If complaints about hand weakness are only reported in cases of distinct hand positions, a dynamic compression of the brachial plexus by SPM may be the cause. A neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome may facilitate the development of CTS.

Ultrasound Mapping of Stimulated Finger Flexion During Infra-Clavicular Brachial Plexus Nerve Blockade for Elbow Arthroplasty and Its Correlation To Postoperative Analgesia

Background: Infraclavicular brachial plexus nerve blockade (ICNB) is a very common anesthetic procedure performed for upper extremity surgery at the elbow and distally, however the rate of adequate analgesia is variable among patients. Ultrasound guidance (US) has not been demonstrated to increase the success rate of ICNB when compared to nerve stimulator (NS) guidance. Combined US and NS guided ICNB have not been reported, although there is a call for more trials comparing the two techniques. This study was performed to observe if a specific anatomic region near the axillary artery of the brachial plexus identified by finger flexion with nerve stimulation results in improved postoperative analgesia. Method: Patients undergoing elective elbow arthroplasty received a postoperative ICNB. The angle of the nerve stimulator needle tip and the radial distance from the center of the arterial lumen at which an optimal finger flexion twitch response was observed were measured with ultrasound imaging. Pain scores and postoperative opioid dosages on discharge from the post anesthesia care unit and at 24 hours after surgery were recorded. Results: 11 patients enrolled in this study. Adequate finger flexion response to nerve stimulation that resulted in complete analgesia was more frequently observed when the needle was located in the postero-superior quadrant in relation to the axillary artery. Identifying a specific point near the brachial plexus in relation to the artery that consistently provides superior analgesia is desirable and would lead to improved analgesia and faster onset time of nerve blockade and would reduce the need for other approaches for brachial plexus blockade with their associated disadvantages.