978 resultados para Bear Stearns Rescue
Resumo:
A 48-year-old man with essential thrombocythemia suffered an extensive anterior acute myocardial infarction; this is a rare association. A pharmacological thrombolysis was performed, without success. He subsequently underwent successful rescue coronary angioplasty. To our knowledge, there is no other report in the literature relating the triad of essential thrombocythemia, acute myocardial infarction and rescue coronary angioplasty.
Resumo:
A 38-year-old man with acute myocardial infarction in the lower wall affecting the right ventricle underwent thrombolytic treatment with streptokinase. Approximately 2 hours after the thrombolytic treatment started, he presented with signs of coronary reocclusion. He underwent emergency cineangiocoronariography that revealed that his right coronary artery was completely occluded by a clot. He unsuccessfully underwent angioplasty and stent implantation. After the concomitant use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, coronary TIMI III flow was achieved without additional dilations, and he was discharged from the hospital 5 days later with no further complications.
Resumo:
6
Resumo:
v.10:no.1(1909)
Resumo:
v.37:no.2(1955)
Resumo:
v.39:no.13(1958)
Resumo:
n.s. no.30(1995)
Resumo:
BACKGROUND: Among patients with steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) in whom a first rescue therapy has failed, a second line salvage treatment can be considered to avoid colectomy. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of second or third line rescue therapy over a one-year period. METHODS: Response to single or sequential rescue treatments with infliximab (5mg/kg intravenously (iv) at week 0, 2, 6 and then every 8weeks), ciclosporin (iv 2mg/kg/daily and then oral 5mg/kg/daily) or tacrolimus (0.05mg/kg divided in 2 doses) in steroid-refractory moderate to severe UC patients from 7 Swiss and 1 Serbian tertiary IBD centers was retrospectively studied. The primary endpoint was the one year colectomy rate. RESULTS: 60% of patients responded to the first rescue therapy, 10% went to colectomy and 30% non-responders were switched to a 2(nd) line rescue treatment. 66% of patients responded to the 2(nd) line treatment whereas 34% failed, of which 15% went to colectomy and 19% received a 3(rd) line rescue treatment. Among those, 50% patients went to colectomy. Overall colectomy rate of the whole cohort was 18%. Steroid-free remission rate was 39%. The adverse event rates were 33%, 37.5% and 30% for the first, second and third line treatment respectively. CONCLUSION: Our data show that medical intervention even with 2(nd) and 3(rd) rescue treatments decreased colectomy frequency within one year of follow up. A longer follow-up will be necessary to investigate whether sequential therapy will only postpone colectomy and what percentage of patients will remain in long-term remission.
Resumo:
Introduction: Whereas the use of helicopters as a rapid means toreach victims and to bring them to a secure place is well-recognized,very few data are available about the value of winching physicians toprovide medical care for the victims directly on-site. We sought to studythe medical aspects of alpine helicopter rescue operations involving thewinching of an emergency physician to the victim.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical reports of a singlehelicopter-based emergency medical service. Data from 1 January 2003to 31 December 2008 were analyzed. Cases with emergency callindicating that the victim was deceased were excluded. Data includedthe category (trauma or illnesses), and severity (NACA score) of theinjuries, along with the main medical procedures performed on site.Results: 9879 rescue missions were conducted between 1 January2003 and 31 December 2008. The 921 (9.3%) missions involvingwinching of the emergency physician were analysed. 840 (91%)patients suffered from trauma-related injuries. The cases of the 81 (9%)people presenting with medical emergencies were, when compared tothe trauma victims, significantly more severe according to the NACAindex (p <0.001). Overall, 246 (27%) patients had a severe injury orillness, namely, a potential or overt vital threat (NACA score between4-6, table 1). A total of 478 (52%) patients required administration ofmajor analgesics: fentanyl (443 patients; 48%), ketamine (42 patients;5%) or morphine (7 patients; 1%). The mean dose of fentanyl was 188micrograms (range 25-750, SD 127). Major medical interventions wereperformed 72 times on 39 (4%) patients (table 2).Conclusions: The severity of the patients' injuries or illnesses alongwith the high proportion of medical procedures performed directlyon-site validate emergency physician winching for advanced life supportprocedures and analgesia.
Resumo:
Objective: Aim of post operative treatments after cardiac surgery is to avoid low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS). Levosimendan, a new inotrope agent, has been demonstrated in adult patient to be an effective treatment for this purpose when classical therapy is not effective. It shows a positive effect on cardiac output, with fewer adverse effects and lower mortality than with dopamine. There is very few data on its benefit in the paediatric population. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of levosimendan in cardiac children with LCOS.Methods: Retrospective analysis of 25 children hospitalised in our PICU after cardiac surgery that demonstrated LCOS not responding to classical catecholamine therapy and who received levosimendan as rescue. LCOS parameters like urine output, mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2), arterio-venous differences in CO2 (AVCO2) and plasmatic lactate were compared before therapy and at 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours after the beginning of the levosimendan infusion. We also analyzed the effect on the utilisation of amines (amine score), adverse events and mortality.Results: After the beginning of levosimendan infusion, urine output (3.1 vs 5.3ml/kg/h, p=0.003) and SVO2 (56 vs 64mmHg, p=0.001) increase significantly during first 72 hours and at the same time plasmatic lactate (2.6 vs 1.4 mmole/l, p<0.001), AVCO2 (11 vs 8 mmHg, p=0.002) and amine score (63 vs 39, p=0.007) decrease significantly. No side effects were noted during administration of levosimendan. In this group of patients, mortality was 0%.Conclusion: Levosimendan is an effective treatment in children after congenital heart surgery. Our study, with a greater sample of patient than other studies, confirms the improvement of cardiac output already shown in other paediatric studies.
Resumo:
OBJECTIVE: To assess the theoretical and practical knowledge of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) by trained Air-rescue physicians in Switzerland. METHODS: Prospective anonymous observational study with a specially designed questionnaire. General knowledge of the GCS and its use in a clinical case were assessed. RESULTS: From 130 questionnaires send out, 103 were returned (response rate of 79.2%) and analyzed. Theoretical knowledge of the GCS was consistent for registrars, fellows, consultants and private practitioners active in physician-staffed helicopters. The clinical case was wrongly scored by 38 participants (36.9%). Wrong evaluation of the motor component occurred in 28 questionnaires (27.2%), and 19 errors were made for the verbal score (18.5%). Errors were made most frequently by registrars (47.5%, p = 0.09), followed by fellows (31.6%, p = 0.67) and private practitioners (18.4%, p = 1.00). Consultants made significantly less errors than the rest of the participating physicians (0%, p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were shown between anesthetists, general practitioners, internal medicine trainees or others. CONCLUSION: Although the theoretical knowledge of the GCS by out-of-hospital physicians is correct, significant errors were made in scoring a clinical case. Less experienced physicians had a higher rate of errors. Further emphasis on teaching the GCS is mandatory.
Resumo:
Rapport de synthèse Introduction : Le Glasgow coma score (GCS) est un outil reconnu permettant l'évaluation des patients après avoir subi un traumatisme crânien. Il est réputé pour sa simplicité et sa reproductibilité permettant ainsi aux soignants une évaluation appropriée et continue du status neurologique des patients. Le GCS est composé de trois catégories évaluant la réponse oculaire, verbale et motrice. En Suisse, les soins préhospitaliers aux patients victimes d'un trauma crânien sévère sont effectués par des médecins, essdntiellement à bord des hélicoptères médicalisés. Avant une anesthésie générale nécessaire à ces patients, une évaluation du GCS est essentielle indiquant au personnel hospitalier la gravité des lésions cérébrales. Afin d'évaluer la connaissance du GCS par les médecins à bord des hélicoptères médicalisés en Suisse, nous avons élaboré un questionnaire, contenant dans une première partie des questions sur les connaissances générales du GCS suivi d'un cas clinique. Objectif : Evaluation des connaissances pratiques et théoriques du GCS par les médecins travaillant à bord des hélicoptères médicalisés en Suisse. Méthode : Etude observationnelle prospective et anonymisée à l'aide d'un questionnaire. Evaluation des connaissances générales du GCS et de son utilisation clinique lors de la présentation d'un cas. Résultats : 16 des 18 bases d'hélicoptères médicalisés suisses ont participé à notre étude. 130 questionnaires ont été envoyés et le taux de réponse a été de 79.2%. Les connaissances théoriques du GCS étaient comparables pour tous les médecins indépendamment de leur niveau de formation. Des erreurs dans l'appréciation du cas clinique étaient présentes chez 36.9% des participants. 27.2% ont commis des erreurs dans le score moteur et 18.5% dans le score verbal. Les erreurs ont été répertoriées le plus fréquemment chez les médecins assistants (47.5%, p=0.09), suivi par les chefs de clinique (31.6%, p=0.67) et les médecins installés en cabinet (18.4%, p=1.00). Les médecins cadres ont fait significativement moins d'erreurs que les autres participants (0%, p<0.05). Aucune différence significative n'à été observée entre les différentes spécialités (anesthésie, médecine interne, médecine général et «autres »). Conclusion Même si les connaissances théoriques du GCS sont adéquates parmi les médecins travaillant à bord des hélicoptères médicalisés, des erreurs dans son application clinique sont présentes dans plus d'un tiers des cas. Les médecins avec le moins d'expériences professionnelle font le plus d'erreurs. Au vu de l'importance de l'évaluation correcte du score de Glasgow initial, une amélioration des connaissances est indispensable.
Resumo:
Northern Ireland's Fire and Rescue Service - Consultation