Filosofía de la educación en Aristóteles.

La educación en Aristóteles desde la perspectiva de la Filosofía de la Educación. El investigador se sitúa en el ámbito de la reflexión filosófica sobre el hecho educativo y sus dimensiones : perfectibilidad del hombre, concepción subyacente del mundo y de la vida, valores, etc. Antropología aristotélica. El estudio consta de tres partes: la situación sociopolítica de la época en la que vivió Aristóteles, la Antropología aristotélica (Psicología, el saber humano, el obrar humano, el concepto de arte, la justicia , la amistad, la felicidad). En la última parte se desarrollar la concepción de la Paideia: la concepción del ciudadano y del no ciudadano, el proceso educativo y sus etapas. Interpretación filosófica cuyo centro es la Antropología aristotélica y sus gravitaciones, los valores y la educación. Hacer presente la dimensión pedagógica de la obra aristotélica y su actualidad. La distinción entre Tékcne y Phrónesis que hace Aristóteles clarifica los motivos y actitudes subyacentes que informan las dos corrientes principales de la interpretación contempor nea de la educación: el currículum y la enseñanza. La Phrónesis aristotélica fundamenta la nueva orientación que no ve la educación como algo esencialmente técnico ni eminentemente práctico, sino como algo que guarda una estrecha relación con la disposición para actuar de manera correcta, prudente y ajustada a las circunstancias. Este trabajo contribuye a revitalizar un pensamiento que, en ningún momento, se ha manifestado agotado. Hoy es Aristóteles un autor que obliga a pensar iluminando la problemática educativa actual.

A prudência na Ética Nicomaquéia de Aristóteles

Resumo não disponível.

Virtude e mediedade em Aristóteles

Resumo não disponível

Personagem: Filósofo Aristóteles

Dois arquivos, um no formato PNG e outro em formato SVG. Dimensão de 490x885px.

Da poética das lágrimas a uma poética do riso: de Aristóteles ao One-man show

Since the 1970s, the world observes the fragmentation, hybridity, plurality and miscegenation that are taking over the scenic arts. The contemporary poetry feels free of the classical rules; theater no longer obeys the requirements of the poetic "manuals"; the rigid boundaries between genres disappears; artists cease to represent to the public to talk with him. In the last decades of twentieth century and in the twenty-first century, emerges the laughable phenomenon of One-man Show in the brazilian scene, object of this research, as a result of this evolution of the performing arts. It is a form of theater that emerged in the brazilian context, snatching public attention in alternative spaces, theaters and, as it should be, also on the Internet, often confused with the Stand-up Comedy. It is necessary a research that delimitate and pursue to identify the essential characteristics of the brazilian One- Man Show, not only by the absence of theoretical references concerning this, but also to understand some aspects of the brazilian scene and the situation of laughter and comedy in it. In the first chapter, a discussion about comedy and laughter in classical antiquity is presented, using the writings of Plato and Aristotle as a starting point; in the second, some of the main classical theories of laughter are reviewed, attempting to identify the general characteristics that enable to understand the construction of the comedy; the third chapter generally dicusses about the moment of the brazilian theatrical scene in which emerges the One-man Show; and in the fourth chapter, there is an explanation about this phenomenon and a description of the practical exercise titled Experimento One-person Show: Damas

A retórica em Aristóteles: da orientação das paixões ao aprimoramento da eupraxia

This research brings into focus the relationship between the work Rhetoric, from Aristotle, and the conceptions of ethics and practical wisdom of the philosopher from Stageira. Accordingly, it attempts to show that Aristotle's Rhetoric was produced to guide the construction and orientation of oratory passions of the Greek man, setting it as a reference for practices aimed at social ordering of the polis. In other words, the Aristotelian Rhetoric, designed by the author as the study of what is persuasive in every speech, is not composed with the meaning of persuasion at any cost, in another sense it is conceived by Aristotle as a useful knowledge for the improvement eupraxic (the good act in accordance with the fair and true). This research finds that such work has been prepared by Stagirite a time of strong social transformations and upheavals in ancient Greece: The skepticism expanded, with each person wanting to live their own businesses, and especially in Athens, a city that served as intellectual and political reference, there was a lack of collective spirit. In this tumultuous social environment, Aristotle, with a culture of Greeks eager Trusted reviews and socially shareable in the field of verisimilitude, sought with his Rhetoric, contributing to the development of ethics and political science; referrals for legal and organization of inter-social relations in varied environments, including seeking to provide knowledge about human passions and emotional status of active citizens in deliberative meetings

O princípio metafísico da poética de Aristóteles

Aristotle's definition of tragedy indicates a metaphysical project insinuated by a notion of kátharsis. The reconstruction of Aristotle's method of definition is inspired in the concepts of enérgeia and dýnamis taken from Physics, understanding cause as substance. The Doctrine of the Four Causes is the theoretical basis of the definition of tragedy, placing tragedy in the genre of imitation and distinguishing its species: language (material cause), noble and complete action (formal cause), actors (efficient cause) and kátharsis (temporarily identified with the final cause). Nevertheless, there is no final cause in the definition of tragedy. The kátharsis of passions is experienced by the spectator when he witnesses tragedy, which is the imitation of a noble action, executed by actors and not narrated. Aristotle justifies hid proposition in favor of mimesis by assuming that imitation is natural to man since infancy and the view of objects allows whoever contemplates them to identify and learn the originals. As a metaphysical principle, kátharsis is projected to beyond definition of tragedy, where it is manifested cathartically, in the spectator. Research about the spectator brings one back to the definition of tragedy, where the imitation is an imperfect copy which evokes in the spectator the presence of the originals of the imitated sentiments, thus realizing the kátharsis of these emotions. In this way kátharsis reveals itself as selfknowledge and approach of divine truth and perfections.

Conflito político-religioso e embate discursivo entre Eunômio de Cízico e Basílio de cesaréia: utilização do manual de Aristóteles

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

¿Aristóteles era maltusiano?

Incluye Bibliografía

Platão e Aristóteles na filosofia da matemática

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

Diagoguê e suas implicações na educação do cidadão em Aristóteles

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

A teoria lingüística em Aristóteles

Como expressão de tudo o que é, a linguagem merece grande alcnção de Aristóteles. Ele define a natureza do lógos (Política) e examina a sua função em vista de uma concepção ontológica (Categorias) e lógica (Da interpretação). Dintingue, também, uma função prática da linguagem, e, assim, abre um campo específico para o exame da léxis, a elocução retórica (Retórica) e poética (Poética). A atenção à léxis põe em evidência o significante, mas fica sempre em primeiro plano a eficiência da comunicação, garantida pelo conveniente uso dos recursos de elocução.