995 resultados para Abel, Niels Henrik, 1802-1829.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
CONTENTS CONTINUED--6. Bd. Der Bund der Jugend. Deutsch von A. Strodtmann. Die Stützen der Gesellschaft. Deutsch von Emma Klingenfeld. Ein Puppenheim. Deutsch von Marie von Borch. [1900]--7. Bd. Gespenster. Ein Volksfeind. Die Wildente. [1901]--8. Bd. Rosmersholm. Die Frau vom Meere. Hedda Gabler. Baumeister Solness. [1902]--9. Bd. Klein Eyolf. John Gabriel Borkman. Wenn wir Toten erwachen. [1899]--10. Bd. Briefe. Hrsg. mit Einleitung und Anmerkungen von Julius Elias und Halvdan Koht. [1904]
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
With: Sermão prégado na sé de angra por occasião do Te Deum que se cantou no dia 4 de abril, anniversario natalicio de S.M.F. a senhora Dona Maria Segunda, Rainha de Portugal, na augusta presença de S.M.I. o senhor Duque de Bragança, Regente do Reino em nome da rainha / por Marcos Pinto Soares Vaz Preto. -- Lisboa : Imprensa Nacional, 1833 -- 22 p. ; 20 cm.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
First edition. BAL, vol. 3, p. 354.
Resumo:
Against the marquis of Palmella and others.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
A method is presented for obtaining useful closed form solution of a system of generalized Abel integral equations by using the ideas of fractional integral operators and their applications. This system appears in solving certain mixed boundary value problems arising in the classical theory of elasticity.
Resumo:
In this study I consider what kind of perspective on the mind body problem is taken and can be taken by a philosophical position called non-reductive physicalism. Many positions fall under this label. The form of non-reductive physicalism which I discuss is in essential respects the position taken by Donald Davidson (1917-2003) and Georg Henrik von Wright (1916-2003). I defend their positions and discuss the unrecognized similarities between their views. Non-reductive physicalism combines two theses: (a) Everything that exists is physical; (b) Mental phenomena cannot be reduced to the states of the brain. This means that according to non-reductive physicalism the mental aspect of humans (be it a soul, mind, or spirit) is an irreducible part of the human condition. Also Davidson and von Wright claim that, in some important sense, the mental aspect of a human being does not reduce to the physical aspect, that there is a gap between these aspects that cannot be closed. I claim that their arguments for this conclusion are convincing. I also argue that whereas von Wright and Davidson give interesting arguments for the irreducibility of the mental, their physicalism is unwarranted. These philosophers do not give good reasons for believing that reality is thoroughly physical. Notwithstanding the materialistic consensus in the contemporary philosophy of mind the ontology of mind is still an uncharted territory where real breakthroughs are not to be expected until a radically new ontological position is developed. The third main claim of this work is that the problem of mental causation cannot be solved from the Davidsonian - von Wrightian perspective. The problem of mental causation is the problem of how mental phenomena like beliefs can cause physical movements of the body. As I see it, the essential point of non-reductive physicalism - the irreducibility of the mental - and the problem of mental causation are closely related. If mental phenomena do not reduce to causally effective states of the brain, then what justifies the belief that mental phenomena have causal powers? If mental causes do not reduce to physical causes, then how to tell when - or whether - the mental causes in terms of which human actions are explained are actually effective? I argue that this - how to decide when mental causes really are effective - is the real problem of mental causation. The motivation to explore and defend a non-reductive position stems from the belief that reductive physicalism leads to serious ethical problems. My claim is that Davidson's and von Wright's ultimate reason to defend a non-reductive view comes back to their belief that a reductive understanding of human nature would be a narrow and possibly harmful perspective. The final conclusion of my thesis is that von Wright's and Davidson's positions provide a starting point from which the current scientistic philosophy of mind can be critically further explored in the future.
Resumo:
Handwritten caption: Wir tragen nur Bemberg-Seidenstruempfe! (We wear only Bemberg silk stockings!)
Resumo:
The classical problem of surface water-wave scattering by two identical thin vertical barriers submerged in deep water and extending infinitely downwards from the same depth below the mean free surface, is reinvestigated here by an approach leading to the problem of solving a system of Abel integral equations. The reflection and transmission coefficients are obtained in terms of computable integrals. Known results for a single barrier are recovered as a limiting case as the separation distance between the two barriers tends to zero. The coefficients are depicted graphically in a number of figures which are identical with the corresponding figures given by Jarvis (J Inst Math Appl 7:207-215, 1971) who employed a completely different approach involving a Schwarz-Christoffel transformation of complex-variable theory to solve the problem.
Resumo:
The structure of the novel product obtained from the oxidation of Abel's ketone (1a) and similar spiroketones (1b–d) with 2, 3-dichloro-5, 6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone has been determined on basis of spectral data (i.r., n.m.r., and mass)
Resumo:
The collection contains items relating to individual members of the family as well as the Seixas family in general. Included are papers of the following persons: Isaac Mendes Seixas (1708/9-1780/1), a copy of A voyage to Hudson's--Bay, by Henry Ellis, inscribed with his name on the title page, along with additional inscriptions on the end papers (1748); and a daily prayer book printed in Amsterdam (title page missing), with an inscription on the first page indicating that the book was owned by Seixas in 1758/9, and subsequently by his grandson, Theodore J. Seixas, in 1816/17.