An ecclesiastical history, ancient and modern, from the birth of Christ to the beginning of the present century. In which the rise, progress, and variation of church power, are considered in their connexion with the state of learning and philosophy, and the political history of Europe, during that period.

Mode of access: Internet.

An ecclesiastical history, ancient and modern : in which the rise, progress, and variations of church power, are considered in their connexion with the state of learning and philosophy, and the political history of Europe during that period /

Includes bibliographical references and index.

The ecclesiastical history, ancient and modern; in which the rise, progress, and variations of church power, are considered in their connexion with their state of learning and philosophy, and the political history of Europe during that period,

Bibliographical footnotes.

The history of ancient Greece : its colonies and conquests to the division of the Macedonian empire including the history of literature, philosophy and the fine arts /

Includes bibliographies and index.

The history of ancient Greece, its colonies and conquests; from the earliest accounts till the division of the Macedonian empire in the East. Including the history of literature, philosophy, and the fine arts.

Mode of access: Internet.

The civil war of ideas: Ayn Rand, intellectual freedom, and the regulation of thought in the Soviet Union and United States, 1905-1943

The philosopher and novelist Ayn Rand (1905–1982) is an icon of American culture. That culture misunderstands her, however. It perceives her solely as a pure market conservative. In the first forty years of her life, Rand's individualism was intellectual and served as a defense for the free trade of ideas. It originated in the Russian Revolution. In 1926, when Rand left the Soviet Union, she developed her individualism into an American philosophy. Her ideas of the individual in society belonged to a debate where intellectuals intended to abolish the State and free man and woman from its intellectual snares. To present Rand as a freethinker allows me to examine her anticommunism as a reaction against Leninism and to consider the relation of her ideas to Marxism. This approach stresses that Rand, as Marx, opposed the State and argued for the historical importance of a capitalist revolution. For Rand the latter, however, depended on an entrepreneurial class that rejected Protestantism as ideology – which she contended threatened its interests because Christianity had lost its historical significance. This exposes the nature of Rand's intellectual individualism in American society, where the majority on the entire political spectrum still identified with the teachings of Christ. It also reveals the dynamics of her anticommunism. From 1926 to 1943, Rand remodeled American individualism and as she did so, she determined her opposition first to the New Deal liberals and second business conservatives. To these ends, Marxism and Protestantism served Rand's individualism and made her an American icon of the twentieth century.

Nature in the books of seven metals – Ǧābirian corpus in dialogue with ancient Greek philosophy and Byzantine alchemy –

The Ǧābirian corpus was a receiver of ancient Greek ideas and, at the same time, a source of knowledge for the later Greek-speaking world, in particular for medieval Byzantine alchemy. Both aspects are explored in the dissertation with respect to the notion of nature. After a general introduction to the Corpus and the sciences described in it, particular attention is devoted to a Byzantine anonymous text, The Work of Four Elements, which was probably influenced by the Ǧābirian Books of Seventy. These texts exemplify how, in the theory of the Ǧābirian science, things are constructed from four natures (hot, cold, moist and dry), the balance of which defines what a thing is. By changing the balance of natures, one can transmute any metals into gold that is perfectly proportioned in terms of natures. Ǧābir presents the art of dyeing metals gold in the Books of Seven Metals which, along with chrysopoetic recipes, also include medical recipes and theoretical contents such as the theories of four humours, properties, and talismans. Moreover, Ǧābir postulated a substrate that does not change in itself and continues to exist when natures move in and out of things. Such primary existence is called the fifth nature as an additional principle to the four natures. This key concept for the Ǧābirian theory, which has been underexplored so far, is discussed through the textual and critical analysis of various unedited sources: the Books of Seven Metals and the Book of the Fifth Nature. This study confirms that the fifth nature was probably derived from ancient Greek philosophical concepts such as the Empedoclean particles, the Aristotelian fifth element and the Stoic pneuma. Thus, this research indicates the importance of the Ǧābirian corpus both in the history of alchemy and the history of philosophy.

The Tausk controversy on the foundations of quantum mechanics: Physics, philosophy, and politics

In 1966 the Brazilian physicist Klaus Tausk (b. 1927) circulated a preprint from the International Centre for Theoretical Physics in Trieste, Italy, criticizing Adriana Daneri, Angelo Loinger, and Giovanni Maria Prosperi`s theory of 1962 on the measurement problem in quantum mechanics. A heated controversy ensued between two opposing camps within the orthodox interpretation of quantum theory, represented by Leon Rosenfeld and Eugene P. Wigner. The controversy went well beyond the strictly scientific issues, however, reflecting philosophical and political commitments within the context of the Cold War, the relationship between science in developed and Third World countries, the importance of social skills, and personal idiosyncrasies.

Transfer Of Ideas And Cultural (Taxonomic) Traits Between The Vistula And Dnieper In The Late Neolithic . Archaeological Evidence On Subcarpathian Plateaus

,

Copyright is an Impediment to the Free Flow of Ideas

"Sur un ton humoristique, les auteurs avouent être des voleurs… d’idées. À quoi riment les lois sur le droit d’auteur demandent-ils ? À l’origine, ce ne sont pas les droits des créateurs que le souverain ou l’État voulait protéger, mais bien les privilèges des éditeurs. Et d’où vient qu’on ait ainsi accordé à ces derniers le droit exclusif de publier ? C’est que dès l’invention de l’imprimerie, les hommes de pouvoir ont bien vu la menace que représentait pour eux la dissémination des idées : le calcul qu’ils ont fait a profité aux imprimeurs. Le phénomène n’est pas étranger à l’existence des permis de radiodiffusion / télévision existant de nos jours dans nos États démocratiques ; et l’histoire se répète comme on l’observe aujourd’hui quant à la régulation du réseau Internet. Quand les éditeurs se rendirent compte qu’ils ne pouvaient plus avoir la main haute sur tout ce qui se publiait, ils ont pris prétexte du droit des créateurs pour protéger leurs propres intérêts. Ni l’éthique ni l’esthétique ne motivaient les éditeurs , mais bien leurs seuls intérêts commerciaux, légitimes au demeurant. Deux factions s’opposent aujourd’hui quant à la question du droit des auteurs à l’ère numérique. La vieille garde se bat pour préserver à peu de choses près le statu quo tandis que ses vis-à-vis proclament la mort du droit d’auteur tel qu’il a existé. Et quel modèle nouveau préconisent ces derniers ? En fait, ils ne s’opposent pas à toute forme de protection pour ceux qui traditionnellement en ont bénéficié, mais songent à des mécanismes nouveaux …, de sorte que la vieille garde n’a pas à s’en faire outre mesure. Le fond du problème est ailleurs soutiennent MM. Benyekhlef et Tresvant : même si les avocats plaideront que ce ne sont pas les idées, mais bien la forme particulière qu’un créateur a choisie pour les exprimer qu’on protège par les lois sur le droit d’auteur, cela ne change rien. Dès qu’une idée est exprimée et fixée d’une certaine manière, il devient plus difficile de l’exprimer à nouveau puisqu’une partie du champ virtuel qu’elle pouvait occuper est déjà conquise, à bon droit selon le droit actuel. Il faut en conclure que le droit d’auteur nouveau, comme le droit d’auteur traditionnel, est une entrave à la libre circulation des idées."